Digital humanities

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The digital humanities is an area of research, teaching, and creation concerned with the intersection of computing and the disciplines of the humanities. Developing from the field of humanities computing, digital humanities embraces a variety of topics ranging from curating online collections to data mining large cultural data sets. Digital Humanities currently incorporates both digitized and born-digital materials and combines the methodologies from the traditional humanities disciplines (such as history, philosophy, linguistics, literature, art, archaeology, music, and cultural studies), as well as social sciences [1] , with tools provided by computing (such as data visualisation, information retrieval, data mining, statistics, text mining) and digital publishing.

Contents

Objectives [edit]

Digital humanities scholars use computational methods either to answer existing research questions or to challenge existing theoretical paradigms, generating new questions and pioneering new approaches. One goal is to systematically integrate computer technology into the activities of humanities scholars,[2] as is done in contemporary empirical social sciences. Such technology-based activities might include incorporation into the traditional arts and humanities disciplines use of text-analytic techniques; GIS; commons-based peer collaboration; and interactive games and multimedia.

Another goal is to create scholarship that is more than texts and papers. This includes the integration of multimedia, metadata and dynamic environments. An example of this is The Valley of the Shadow project at the University of Virginia or the Vectors Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular at University of Southern California.

The definition of digital humanities is volatile and is highly contested.[3] Practitioners have also defined digital humanities in terms of pedagogy,[4] although this is a lesser-used definition of the term.

A growing number of researchers in digital humanities are using computational methods for the analysis of large cultural data sets. Examples of such projects were highlighted by the Humanities High Performance Computing competition sponsored by the Office of Digital Humanities in 2008,[5] and also by the Digging Into Data challenge organized in 2009[6] and 2011[7] by NEH in collaboration with NSF,[8] and in partnership with JISC in the UK, and SSHRC in Canada.[9]

At present, formal academic recognition of digital work in the humanities remains somewhat problematic, although there are signs that this might be changing.[citation needed] Some universities do offer programs related to the field.[10]

Environments and tools [edit]

Digital humanities is also involved in the creation of software, providing "environments and tools for producing, curating, and interacting with knowledge that is 'born digital' and lives in various digital contexts."[11] In this context, the field is sometimes known as computational humanities. Many such projects share a "commitment to open standards and open source."[12]

History [edit]

Digital humanities descends from the field of humanities computing, of computationally enabled "formal representations of the human record,"[13] whose origins reach back to the late 1940s in the pioneering work of Roberto Busa.[14][15]

The Text Encoding Initiative, born from the desire to create a standard encoding scheme for humanities electronic texts, is the outstanding achievement of early humanities computing. The project was launched in 1987 and published the first full version of the TEI Guidelines in May 1994.[15]

In the nineties, major digital text and image archives emerged at centers of humanities computing in the U.S. (e.g. the Women Writers Project,[16] the Rossetti Archive,[17] and The William Blake Archive[18]), which demonstrated the sophistication and robustness of text-encoding for literature.[19]

The terminological change from "humanities computing" to "digital humanities" has been attributed to John Unsworth and Ray Siemens who, as editors of the monograph A Companion to Digital Humanities (2004), tried to prevent the field from being viewed as "mere digitization."[20] Consequently, the hybrid term has created an overlap between fields like rhetoric and composition, which use "the methods of contemporary humanities in studying digital objects,"[20] and digital humanities, which uses "digital technology in studying traditional humanities objects".[20] The use of computational systems and the study of computational media within the arts and humanities more generally has been termed the 'computational turn'.[21]

In 2006 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), the federal granting agency for scholarships in the humanities, launched the Digital Humanities Initiative (renamed Office of Digital Humanities in 2008), which made widespread adoption of the term "digital humanities" all but irreversible in the United States.[22]

Digital humanities emerged from its former niche status and became "big news"[22] at the 2009 MLA convention in Philadelphia, where digital humanists made "some of the liveliest and most visible contributions"[23] and had their field hailed as "the first 'next big thing' in a long time."[24]

Organizations and Institutions [edit]

The field of digital humanities is served by several organisations: The Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing (ALLC), the Association for Computers and the Humanities (ACH), and the Society for Digital Humanities/Société pour l'étude des médias interactifs (SDH/SEMI), which are joined under the umbrella organisation of the Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO). The alliance funds a number of projects such as the Digital Humanities Quarterly, supports the Text Encoding Initiative, the organisation and sponsoring of workshops and conferences, as well as the funding of small projects, awards and bursaries.[25]

ADHO also oversees a joint annual conference, which began as the ACH/ALLC (or ALLC/ACH) conference, and is now known as the Digital Humanities conference.

CenterNet is an international network of about 100 digital humanities centers in 19 countries, working together to benefit digital humanities and related fields.[26][27]

Criticism [edit]

Many conventional humanities scholars dismiss digital humanities as "whimsical."[8] The literary theorist Stanley Fish claims that the digital humanities pursue a revolutionary agenda and thereby undermine the conventional standards of "pre-eminence, authority and disciplinary power."[28]

See also [edit]

Centers [edit]

Journals [edit]

Meetings [edit]

Miscellaneous [edit]

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Digital Humanities Network". University of Cambridge. Retrieved 27 December 2012. 
  2. ^ "Grant Opportunities". National Endowment for the Humanities, Office of Digital Humanities Grant Opportunities. Retrieved 25 January 2012. 
  3. ^ Gold, Matthew. Debates in the Digital Humanities. 
  4. ^ See Stephen Brier's essay in Debates in the Digital Humanities http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/8
  5. ^ Bobley, Brett (December 1, 2008). "Grant Announcement for Humanities High Performance Computing Program". National Endowment for the Humanities. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  6. ^ "Awardees of 2009 Digging into Data Challenge". Digging into Data. 2009. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  7. ^ "NEH Announces Winners of 2011 Digging Into Data Challenge". National Endowment for the Humanities. January 3, 2012. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  8. ^ a b Cohen, Patricia (2010-11-16). "Humanities Scholars Embrace Digital Technology". The New York Times (New York). ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2012-06-07. 
  9. ^ Williford, Christa; Henry, Charles (June 2012). "Computationally Intensive Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Report on the Experiences of First Respondents to the Digging Into Data Challenge". Council on Library and Information Resources. ISBN 978-1-932326-40-6. 
  10. ^ Borovsky, Zoe. "Programs -- Digital Humanities". UCLA Library. Retrieved 26 February 2013. 
  11. ^ Presner, Todd (2010). "Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge". Connexions. Retrieved 2012-06-09. 
  12. ^ Bradley, John (2012). "No job for techies: Technical contributions to research in digital humanities". In Marilyn Deegan and Willard McCarty (eds.). Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate. pp. 11–26 [14]. ISBN 9781409410683. 
  13. ^ Unsworth, John (2002-11-08). "What is Humanities Computing and What is not?". Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie 4. Retrieved 2012-05-31. 
  14. ^ Svensson, Patrik (2009). "Humanities Computing as Digital Humanities". Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (3). ISSN 1938-4122. Retrieved 2012-05-30. 
  15. ^ a b Hockney, Susan (2004). "The History of Humanities Computing". In Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, John Unsworth (eds.). Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 1405103213. 
  16. ^ Women Writers Project, Brown University, retrieved 2012-06-16 
  17. ^ Rossetti Archive, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia, retrieved 2012-06-16 
  18. ^ The William Blake Archive, retrieved 2012-06-16 
  19. ^ Liu, Alan (2004). "Transcendental Data: Toward a Cultural History and Aesthetics of the New Encoded Discourse". Critical Inquiry 31 (1): 49–84. ISSN 0093-1896. Retrieved 2012-06-16. 
  20. ^ a b c Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (2011-05-08). "The humanities, done digitally". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2011-07-10. 
  21. ^ Berry, David (2011-06-01). "The Computational Turn: Thinking About the Digital Humanities". Culture Machine. Retrieved 2012-01-31. 
  22. ^ a b Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. (2010). "What is Digital Humanities and What's it Doing in English Departments?". ADE Bulletin (150). 
  23. ^ Howard, Jennifer (2009-12-31). "The MLA Convention in Translation". The Chronicle of Higher Education. ISSN 0009-5982. Retrieved 2012-05-31. 
  24. ^ Pannapacker, William (2009-12-28). "The MLA and the Digital Humanities" (The Chronicle of Higher Education). Brainstorm. Retrieved 2012-05-30. 
  25. ^ Vanhoutte, Edward (2011-04-01). "Editorial". Literary and Linguistic Computing 26 (1): 3–4. doi:10.1093/llc/fqr002. Retrieved 2011-07-11. 
  26. ^ "About". CenterNet. Retrieved June 16, 2012. 
  27. ^ Caraco, Benjamin (1 January 2012). "Les digital humanities et les bibliothèques". Le Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France 57 (2). Retrieved 12 April 2012. 
  28. ^ Fish, Stanley (2012-01-09). "The Digital Humanities and the Transcending of Mortality". The New York Times (New York). Retrieved 2012-05-30. 

Bibliography [edit]

  1. Berry, D. M., ed. (2012) Understanding Digital Humanities, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Busa, Roberto. (1980). ‘The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus’, in Computers and the Humanities vol. 14, pp. 83–90.
  3. Computers and the Humanities (1966-2004)
  4. Celentano A., Cortesi A., Mastandrea P. (2004), Informatica Umanistica: una disciplina di confine, Mondo Digitale, vol. 4, pp. 44–55.
  5. Condron Frances, Michael Fraser, and Stuart Sutherland, eds. (2001), Oxford University Computing Services Guide to Digital Resources for the Humanities, West Virginia University Press.
  6. Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (2011). Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York; NYU Press.
  7. Gold, Matthew K., ed. (2012), Debates In the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  8. Hancock, B. & Giarlo, M.J. (2001). Moving to XML: Latin texts XML conversion project at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities. Library Hi Tech, 19(3), 257-264.
  9. Hockey, Susan. (2001), Electronic Text in the Humanities: Principles and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Honing, Henkjan (2008). The role of ICT in music research: A bridge too far? International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 1 (1), 67-75.
  11. Inman James, Cheryl reed, & Peter Sands, eds. (2003), Electronic Collaboration in the Humanities: Issues and Options, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  12. Kenna, Stephanie and Seamus Ross, eds. (1995), Networking in the humanities: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Scholarship and Technology in the Humanities held at Elvetham Hall, Hampshire, UK 13–16 April 1994. London: Bowker-Saur.
  13. Kirschenbaum, Matthew (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  14. McCarty, Willard (2005), Humanities Computing, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Moretti, Franco (2007), Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. New York: Verso.
  16. Mullings, Christine, Stephanie Kenna, Marilyn Deegan, and Seamus Ross, eds. (1996), New Technologies for the Humanities London: Bowker-Saur.
  17. Newell, William H., ed. (1998), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  18. Nowviskie, Bethany, ed. (2011). Alt-Academy: Alternative Academic Careers for Humanities Scholars. New York: MediaCommons.
  19. Ramsay, Steve. (2011). Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  20. Schreibman Susan, Siemens Ray, and Unsworth John eds. (2004). A Companion To Digital Humanities Blackwell Publishers.
  21. Selfridge-Field, Eleanor (ed). (1997) Beyond MIDI: The Handbook of Musical Codes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  22. Unsworth, John, (2005). Scholarly Primitives: What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this?
  23. Warwick C., Terras M. & Nyhan J., eds. (2012) Digital Humanities in Practice, Facet

External links [edit]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digital_humanities&oldid=548889920"