Fiber to the x
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this article if you can. (August 2009) |
Fiber to the x (FTTx) is a generic term for any broadband network architecture that uses optical fiber to replace all or part of the usual metal local loop used for last mile telecommunications. The generic term originated as a generalization of several configurations of fiber deployment (FTTN, FTTC, FTTB, FTTH...), all starting by FTT but differentiated by the last letter, which is substituted by an x in the generalization.
Contents |
[edit] Definition of terms
The telecommunications industry differentiates between several distinct configurations. The terms in most widespread use today are:
- FTTN - Fiber-to-the-node - this is very similar to FTTC, but the street cabinet is further away from the user's premises; it can be up to several kilometers away.
- FTTC - Fiber-to-the-cabinet or fiber-to-the-curb - fiber is terminated in a street cabinet typically closer than 300m of the customer premises, with the final connection being copper.
- FTTB - Fiber-to-the-building or Fiber-to-the-basement - fiber reaches the boundary of the building, such as the basement in an multidwelling unit, with the final connection to the individual living space being made via alterative means.
- FTTH - Fiber-to-the-home - fiber reaches the boundary of the living space, such as a box on the outside wall of a home.
- FTTP - Fiber-to-the premises - this term is used in several contexts: as a blanket term for both FTTH and FTTB, or where the fiber network includes both homes and small businesses.
To promote consistency, especially when comparing FTTH penetration rates between countries, the three FTTH Councils of Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific have agreed upon definitions for FTTH and FTTB [1]. The FTTH Councils do not have formal definitions for FTTC and FTTN.
It is worth pointing out that fiber-to-the-telecommunications enclosure (FTTE) is not considered to be part of the FTTx group of technologies, despite the similarity in name. FTTE is a form of structured cabling typically used in the enterprise local area network, where fiber is used to link the main computer equipment room to an enclosure close to the desk or workstation [2]. Similarly, in fiber-to-the-desk a fiber connection is installed from the main computer room to a terminal at the desk.
[edit] Benefits of fiber in the access network
Fiber-optic cable can deliver much faster broadband speeds to the end-user than is possible over the existing copper access network. The actual speed depends on the equipment hung on each end of the link, but it could be 10 Mbps, 100 Mbps or even 1 Gbit/s using currently available technologies. Consumers are able to download or upload music, movies and data much faster [3].
Fiber configurations that bring fiber right into the building can offer the highest speeds. Fiber configurations that stop at the street cabinet must use electrical wiring to deliver signals over the last few hundred feet using technology such as VDSL, whose maxiumum speed is lower and is affected by the distance from the street cabinet to the home.
Fiber is often said to be 'future proof' because the speed of the broadband connection depends on the equipment, which can be upgraded, while the fiber in the ground need not be replaced.
[edit] FTTx open questions
While fiber as a technology is well defined, there are still many open questions concerning Internet access services that can be provided over optical fiber:
- How much bandwidth (in megabits or gigabits) will be available (maximum and worst case)?
- What particular level of service is guaranteed? See throttling and net neutrality - almost no providers allow gigabit access to the open Internet for ordinary customers.
- What is the guaranteed latency (in milliseconds)? 100 milliseconds is usually considered the slowest that a network can be allowed to get without degradation to voice and other latency-sensitive services (e.g. VoIP, VPN, remote administration and videoconference).
- In a power outage, how long will the communications network be able to function? Does the network prioritize power to telephone / G.729, SMS and other low-bandwidth safety-critical uses, or will battery or backup power run down due to TV watching and file sharing? Typical closets can support up to eight hours of battery backup — 72 hours is normally required for resilient community standards. The PSTN network backs up analog telephone for unlimited periods.
- Will customer devices be paid for directly or billed as part of the service?
- What services can the customer expect to be able to buy from the ISP? From third parties without ISP interference?
[edit] Fiber to the node
Fiber to the Node (FTTN), also called fiber to the neighborhood or fiber to the cabinet (FTTCab),[4] is a telecommunication architecture based on fiber-optic cables run to a cabinet serving a neighborhood. Customers connect to this cabinet using traditional coaxial cable or twisted pair wiring. The area served by the cabinet is usually less than 1,500 m in radius and can contain several hundred customers. (If the cabinet serves an area of less than 300 m in radius then the architecture is typically called fiber to the curb.)[5]
Fiber to the node allows delivery of broadband services such as high speed internet. High speed communications protocols such as broadband cable access (typically DOCSIS) or some form of DSL are used between the cabinet and the customers. The data rates vary according to the exact protocol used and according to how close the customer is to the cabinet.
[edit] Why the node is usually where fiber stops
Unlike the competing fiber to the building (FTTB) technology, fiber to the node can use the existing coaxial or twisted pair infrastructure — see G.hn — to provide last mile service. For this reason, fiber to the node costs less to deploy, and if BPL technology is used, networking of AC devices can save energy to pay for the fiber deployment itself. While it also has somewhat lower maximum bandwidth potential than fiber into the building, it is radically less expensive and disruptive, and in practice no fiber to the home provider anywhere in the world can provide more than one gigabit worth of backhaul to individual home subscribers. Thus the case for power-integrated networking is usually made on the grounds of a hundreds-of-dollars-per-site deployment that pays for itself over time with energy savings, versus several thousands for fiber to the building that cannot justify itself with power savings or advanced "smart grid" services to enhance safety/security/resilience.
[edit] Fiber to the curb
Fiber to the curb (FTTC) is a telecommunications system based on fiber-optic cables run to a platform that serves several customers. Each of these customers has a connection to this platform via coaxial cable or twisted pair.
Fiber to the curb allows delivery of broadband services such as high speed internet. High speed communications protocols such as broadband cable access (typically DOCSIS) or some form of DSL are used between the cabinet and the customers. The data rates vary according to the exact protocol used and according to how close the customer is to the cabinet.
FTTC is subtly distinct from FTTN or FTTP (all are versions of Fiber in the Loop). The chief difference is the placement of the cabinet. FTTC will be placed near the "curb" which differs from FTTN which is placed far from the customer and FTTP which is placed right at the serving location.
Unlike the competing fiber to the premises (FTTP) technology, fiber to the curb can use the existing coaxial or twisted pair infrastructure to provide last mile service. For this reason, fiber to the curb costs less to deploy. However, it also has lower bandwidth potential than fiber to the premises.
In the United States of America and Canada, the largest deployment of FTTC was carried out by BellSouth Telecommunications. With the acquisition of BellSouth by AT&T, deployment of FTTC will end. Future deployments will be based on either FTTN or FTTP. Existing FTTC plant may be removed and replaced with FTTP.[6]
[edit] FTTP network architectures
FTTP is an ambiguous acronym used to refer both to fiber-optic communication delivery in which an optical fiber is run directly onto the customers' premises, and those that stop at the "pole" and are thus more properly FTTN.
All of fiber to the node (FTTN), fiber to the curb (FTTC), or hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) depend upon more traditional methods such as copper wires or coaxial cable for "last mile" delivery. Increasingly these rely on G.hn which is a flexible IP-based networking standard that also supports broadband over powerline. Advantages of exploiting these existing wires is usually so compelling that fiber optic is almost never deployed beyond the power meter or existing wiring tap(s). Advantages of "home grid" or home automation technology are also compelling insofar as energy savings can almost always pay for any equipment needed in a home.
FTTB (fiber to the building) is a form of fiber optic communication delivery in which the optical signal reaches the private property enclosing the home or business of the subscriber or set of subscribers, but where the optical fiber terminates before reaching the home living space or business office space, with the path extended from that point up to the user's space over a physical medium other than optical fiber (for example copper loops or power lines).
FTTH (fiber to the home) is a form of fiber optic communication delivery in which the optical signal reaches the end user's living or office space with outlets that require specific fiber optic wiring.
[edit] Direct fiber
The simplest optical distribution network can be called direct fiber. In this architecture, each fiber leaving the central office goes to exactly one customer. Such networks can provide excellent bandwidth since each customer gets their own dedicated fiber extending all the way to the central office. However, this approach is about 10% more costly due to the amount of fiber and central office machinery required.[7] The approach is generally favored by new entrants and competitive operators. A benefit of this approach is that it doesn't exclude any layer 2 networking technologies, be they Passive optical network, Active Optical Network, etc. From a regulatory point of view it leads to least implications as any form of regulatory remedy is still possible using this topology. [8].
[edit]
More commonly each fiber leaving the central office is actually shared by many customers. It is not until such a fiber gets relatively close to the customers that it is split into individual customer-specific fibers. There are two competing optical distribution network architectures which achieve this split: active optical networks (AONs) and passive optical networks (PONs).
[edit] Active optical network
Active optical networks rely on some sort of electrically powered equipment to distribute the signal, such as a switch, router, or multiplexer. Each signal leaving the central office is directed only to the customer for which it is intended. Incoming signals from the customers avoid colliding at the intersection because the powered equipment there provides buffering.
As of 2007, the most common type of active optical networks are called active Ethernet, a type of Ethernet in the first mile (EFM). Active Ethernet uses optical Ethernet switches to distribute the signal, thus incorporating the customers' premises and the central office into one giant switched Ethernet network. Such networks are identical to the Ethernet computer networks used in businesses and academic institutions, except that their purpose is to connect homes and buildings to a central office rather than to connect computers and printers within a campus. Each switching cabinet can handle up to 1,000 customers, although 400-500 is more typical. This neighborhood equipment performs layer 2/layer 3 switching and routing, offloading full layer 3 routing to the carrier's central office. The IEEE 802.3ah standard enables service providers to deliver up to 100 Mbit/s full-duplex over one single-mode optical fiber to the premises depending on the provider. Speeds of 1Gbit/s are becoming commercially available.
[edit] Passive optical network
Passive optical network (PON) is a point-to-multipoint, fiber to the premises network architecture in which unpowered optical splitters are used to enable a single optical fiber to serve multiple premises, typically 32-128. A PON configuration reduces the amount of fiber and central office equipment required compared with point to point architectures.
Downstream signal coming from the central office is broadcast to each customer premises sharing a fiber. Encryption is used to prevent eavesdropping.
Upstream signals are combined using a multiple access protocol, invariably time division multiple access (TDMA). The OLTs "range" the ONUs in order to provide time slot assignments for upstream communication.
[edit] Electrical portion
Once on private property, the signal typically travels the final distance to the end user's equipment using an electrical format.
A device called an optical network terminal (ONT), also called an optical network unit (ONU), converts the optical signal into an electrical signal. (ONT is an ITU-T term, whereas ONU is an IEEE term, but the two terms mean exactly the same thing.) Optical network terminals require electrical power for their operation, so some providers connect them to back-up batteries in case of power outages. Optical network units use thin film filter technology to convert between optical and electrical signals.
For fiber to the home and for some forms of fiber to the building, it is common for the building's existing phone systems, local area networks, and cable TV systems to connect directly to the ONT.
If all three systems cannot directly reach the ONT, it is possible to combine signals and transport them over a common medium. Once closer to the end-user, equipment such as a router, modem, and/or network interface module can separate the signals and convert them into the appropriate protocol. For example, one solution for apartment buildings uses VDSL to combine data (and / or video) with voice. With this approach, the combined signal travels through the building over the existing telephone wiring until it reaches the end-user's living space. Once there, a VDSL modem copies the data and video signals and converts them into Ethernet protocol. These are then sent over the end user's category 5 cable. A network interface module can then separate out the video signal and convert it into an RF signal that is sent over the end-user's coaxial cable. The voice signal continues to travel over the phone wiring and is sent through DSL filters to remove the video and data signals. An alternative strategy allows data and / or voice to be transmitted over coaxial cable. In yet another strategy, some office buildings dispense with the telephone wiring altogether, instead using voice over Internet Protocol phones that can plug directly into the local area network.
[edit] See also
- Broadband Internet access
- Fiber-optic communication
- Fiber to the premises by country
- Hybrid fiber-coaxial
[edit] Notes and references
- ^ FTTH Council, Definition of Terms, Jan 2009 , Retrieved on 2009-08-25.
- ^ All multimode fiber is not created equal
- ^ FibreSpeed Tool at the FTTH Council Europe website, retrieved 2009-28-08.
- ^ da Silva, Henrique (March, 2005), Optical Access Networks, Instituto de Telecomunicações, p. 10. Retrieved on 2007-03-25.
- ^ McCullough, Don (August, 2005), "Flexibility is key to successful fiber to the premises deployments", Lightwave 22 (8). Retrieved on 2007-03-25.
- ^ Analyst: AT&T may replace some FTTC with FTTP
- ^ The Economics of Next Generation Access
- ^ Developments In Fibre Technologies And Investment
[edit] External links
- Fiber to the Home Council: Asia & The Pacific
- Fiber to the Home Council: Europe
- Fiber to the Home Council: Northern America
- Fiber Optics LAN Section of the Telecommunications Industry Association
- Telephony Magazine — FTTH One-Stop news, metrics, technology, regulatory information and industry commentary
- Kingfisher International Application Notes Fiber Optic Testing information about FTTH backbone Terminology.
- Can You Say FTTN? Annie Lindstrom, Telephony Online, January 22, 2001
- SBC clarifies FTTN, FTTP plans Ed Gubbins, Telephony Online, November 12, 2004
- Network intelligence — optical networks of new generation August 2008
- Hybrid PON and Active Ethernet solutions, June 2008
- FTTx Primer, July 2008
- Developments in Fibre Technologies and Investment, [OECD], 2008
- Richardson, TX FTTP Conversion Notes Details of conversion to FTTP in Dallas, TX (USA) suburb of Richardson.
- San Francisco Draft Fiber Study
- UOC University article
| Internet access | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network type | Wired | Wireless | ||||||
| Optical | Coaxial cable | Twisted pair | Phone line | Power line | Unlicensed terrestrial bands | Licensed terrestrial bands | Satellite | |
| LAN | Ethernet | G.hn | Ethernet | HomePNA · G.hn | G.hn | Wi-Fi · Bluetooth · DECT · Wireless USB | ||
| WAN | PON · Ethernet | DOCSIS | Ethernet | Dial-up · ISDN · DSL | BPL | Muni Wi-Fi | GPRS · iBurst · WiBro/WiMAX · UMTS-TDD, HSPA · EVDO · LTE | Satellite |