Indian black money
In India, Black money refers to funds earned on the black market, on which income and other taxes have not been paid. The total amount of black money deposited in foreign banks by Indians is unknown. Some reports claim a total exceeding US$1.4 trillion are stashed in Switzerland. Other reports, including those reported by Swiss Bankers Association and the Government of Switzerland, claim that these reports are false and fabricated, and the total amount held in all Swiss banks by citizens of India is about US$2 billion.
In February 2012, the director of the Central Bureau of Investigation said that Indians have $500 billion of illegal funds in foreign tax havens, more than any other country. In March 2012, the Government of India clarified in its parliament that the CBI Director's statement on $500 billion of illegal money was an estimate based on a statement made to India's Supreme Court in July 2011.
- 1 Black money in Swiss banks
- 2 SIT on black money
- 3 Hasan Ali case
- 4 Estimates of Indian black money
- 5 Public protests and government's response
- 6 Proposals to prevent Indian black money
- 7 See also
- 8 References
Black money in Swiss banks
In early 2011, several reports Indian media alleged Swiss Bankers Association officials to have said that the largest depositors of illegal foreign money in Switzerland are Indian. These allegations were later denied by Swiss Bankers Association as well as the central bank of Switzerland that tracks total deposits held in Switzerland by Swiss and non-Swiss citizens, and by wealth managers as fudiciaries of non-Swiss citizens.
James Nason of Swiss Bankers Association in an interview about alleged black money from India, suggests "The (black money) figures were rapidly picked up in the Indian media and in Indian opposition circles, and circulated as gospel truth. However, this story was a complete fabrication. The Swiss Bankers Association never said or published such a report. Anyone claiming to have such figures (for India) should be forced to identify their source and explain the methodology used to produce them."
In August 2010, the government revised the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement to provide means for investigations of black money in Swiss banks. This revision, expected to become active by January 2012, will allow the government to make inquiries of Swiss banks in cases where they have specific information about possible black money being stored in Switzerland.
In 2011, the Indian government received the names of 782 Indians who had accounts with HSBC. As of December, 2011, the Finance Ministry has refused to reveal the names, for privacy reasons, though they did confirm that no current Members of Parliament are on the list. In response to demands from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) opposition party for the release of the information, the government announced on 15 December that, while it would not publish the names, it would publish a white paper about the HSBC information.
According to White Paper on Black Money in India report, published in May 2012, Swiss National Bank estimates that the total amount of deposits in all Swiss banks, at the end of 2010, by citizens of India were CHF 1.95 billion (INR 92.95 billion, US$2.1 billion). The Swiss Ministry of External Affairs has confirmed these figures upon request for information by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs. This amount is about 700 fold less than the alleged $1.4 trillion in some media reports.
In February 2012, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director A P Singh speaking at the inauguration of first Interpol global programme on anti-corruption and asset recovery said: "It is estimated that around 500 billion dollars of illegal money belonging to Indians is deposited in tax havens abroad. Largest depositors in Swiss Banks are also reported to be Indians". In a hint at scams involving ministers, Singh said: "I am prompted to recall a famous verse from ancient Indian scriptures, which says – यथा राजा तथा प्रजा. In other words, if the King is immoral so would be his subjects" The CBI Director later clarified in India's parliament that the $500 billion of illegal money was an estimate based on a statement made to India's Supreme Court in July 2011.
After formal inquiries and tallying data provided by banking officials outside India, the Government of India claimed in May 2012 that the deposits of Indians in Swiss banks constitute only 0.13 per cent of the total bank deposits of citizens of all countries. Further, the share of Indians in the total bank deposits of citizens of all countries in Swiss banks has reduced from 0.29 per cent in 2006 to 0.13 per cent in 2010.
The through the Investigation Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes released a White Paper on Black Money giving the Income Tax Department increased powers.
SIT on black money
Noted jurist and former law minister Ram Jethmalani along with many other well known citizens filed a Writ Petition (Civil) No. 176 of 2009 in the Supreme Court of India seeking the court's directions to help bring back black money stashed in tax havens abroad and initiate efforts to strengthen the governance framework to prevent further creation of black money.
In January 2011, the (SC) asked why the names of those who have stashed money in the Liechtenstein Bank have not been disclosed. The court argued that the government should be more forthcoming in releasing all available information on what it called a "mind-boggling" amount of money that is believed to be held illegally in foreign banks.
The SC on 4 July 2011, ordered the appointment of a Special Investigating Team (SIT) headed by former SC judge BP Jeevan Reddy to act as a watch dog and monitor investigations dealing with the black money. This body would report to the SC directly and no other agency will be involved in this. The two judge bench observed that the failure of the government to control the phenomenon of black money is an indication of weakness and softness of the government.
The issue of unaccounted monies held by nationals, and other legal entities, in foreign banks, is of primordial importance to the welfare of the citizens. The quantum of such monies may be rough indicators of the weakness of the State, in terms of both crime prevention, and also of tax collection. Depending on the volume of such monies, and the number of incidents through which such monies are generated and secreted away, it may very well reveal the degree of "softness of the State."
The government subsequently challenged this order through Interlocutory Application No. 8 of 2011. The bench (consisting of Justice Altamas Kabir in place of Justice B Sudershan Reddy, since Justice Reddy retired) on 23 September 2011 pronounced a split verdict on whether government plea is maintainable. Justice Kabir said that the plea is maintainable while Justice Nijjar said it is not. Due to this split verdict, the matter will be referred to a third judge.
On 27 October 2014, Indian Government submitted name of three people in an affidavit to the Supreme Court who have black money account in foreign countries. But on the very next day, Supreme Court of India orders centre Government to reveal all the names of black money account holders which they had received from various countries like Germany. The honorable bench of the Supreme court also asked the Centre not to indulge in any kind of probe rather just pass the names to them and Supreme court will pass the order for further probe.
Double taxation agreements
Indian Government has repeatedly argued before the Court that it cannot divulge the names. It has further argued that the privacy of individuals would be violated by the revelation of data. These arguments are only designed to stall the revelation of names of some favoured entities.BJP leader Dr.Subramanian Swamy said that DTA was not a valid reason for not revealing names of the accounts of Indians held in foreign banks.
DTAA is about declared (white) incomes of entities so that tax may be levied in one or the other country and not in both. Black income is not revealed in either of the two countries so there is no question of double taxation. Further, this data would not be available to either of the two countries to be exchanged. It is no wonder then that till date, no data has been supplied to India by any of the countries with which this treaty has been signed. In brief, DTAA is about white incomes and not black incomes, so it is disingenuous to say that in future no data would be given to us if names are given to courts. 
Criticism of Government
Different governments have tried to stall SIT. A bank has been revealed to have acted like a hawala operator. Other MNC and private Indian banks also indulge in these activities. Why has the government not initiated action against them and hawala operators? Why is the government not proactive in analysing relevant data from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and Julian Assange? No wonder the perception is that the government is stalling on unearthing Indian black money.
The HSBC Black money whistleblower Herve Falciani, who works with a team of lawyers and experts, told NDTV that there is "1000 times more information" available for investigators and there are a lot of business procedures to be unveiled to them. "It's just up to (the Indian administration). They can contact us," he said. He said India was given only 2 MB of the 200 GB of data. "If India asks tomorrow we will send a proposal tomorrow," he added.
Hasan Ali case
Hasan Ali Khan was arrested by Enforcement Directorate and the Income Tax Department on charges of stashing over 360 billion in foreign banks. ED lawyers said Khan had financed international arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi on several occasions.
However, media sources claimed this case is becoming yet another perfect instance of how investigative agencies like Income Tax Department go soft on high-profile offenders. Ali's premises were raided by ED as far back as 2007. According several news reports, the probe against him has proceeded at an extremely slow pace and seems to have hit a dead end.
India Today claimed that it had verified a letter confirming the US$8 billion in black money was in a Swiss bank UBS account, and the government of India too has verified this with UBS.
The Swiss bank UBS has denied Indian media reports alleging that it maintained a business relationship with or had any assets or accounts for Hasan Ali Khan accused in the US$8 billion black money case. Upon formal request by Indian and Swiss government authorities, the bank announced that the documentation supposedly corroborating such allegations were forged, and numerous media reports claiming US$8 billion in stashed black money were false. India Today, in a later article, wrote, "Hasan Ali Khan stands accused of massive tax evasion and stashing money in secret bank accounts abroad. But the problem is that the law enforcement agencies have precious little evidence to back their claims. For one, UBS Zurich has already denied having any dealings with Khan."
Estimates of Indian black money
As Schneider estimates, using the dynamic multiple-indicators multiple-causes method and by currency demand method, that the size of India's black money economy is between 23 to 26%, compared to an Asia-wide average of 28 to 30%, to an Africa-wide average to 41 to 44%, and to a Latin America-wide average of 41 to 44% of respective gross domestic products. According to this study, the average size of the shadow economy (as a percent of "official" GDP) in 96 developing countries is 38.7%, with India below average.
Public protests and government's response
In May 2012, the Government of India published a white paper on black money. It disclosed India's effort at addressing black money and guidelines to prevent black money in the future.
India has following institutions already preventing, finding and investigating underground economy and black money.
Swami Ramdev, popular as Baba Ramdev is a Hindu swami and a yoga guru. He is a social activist and has staged protests against corruption in the country. He has been associated with the 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement and also started his Bharat Swabhiman first phase Yatra with the pledge of disease free India and simultaneously to eradicate corruption and bring back black money from the birthplace of Sri Krishna, Dwarika Gujarat on 2 September 2010. This yatra has been through 25 states of India like Rajasthan, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pardesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Orrisa, Assam, West Bengal, Maharashta, Meghalaya and ends at the city of Mahakal Ujjain. On 20 September Swami Ramdev had started second phase of his yatra from the fort of Jhansi. More than 1 lakh people of Jhansi city had taken pledge to fight against corruption. On 30 January 2011, a written representation of people from over 600 districts was sent to the Prime Minister which contained demand of bringing back black money stashed abroad & putting an end to corruption, which was supported by all major social, spiritual groups and organizations of the nation. Ramdev himself sent the signed representation to the President of India through the District Magistrate of Bilaspur. Soon after on 27th Feb, 2011 he, organized a huge rally in Ramlila Maidan, Delhi which was attended by lakhs of people after which a written representation was handed over to the President to bring back black money, on the day which marks the birth anniversary of freedom fighter Shaheed Chandrasekhar Azad.
Central Board of Direct Taxes: is a statutory authority functioning across India under the Central Board of Revenue Act of 1963. The Member(Investigation) of the CBDT,exercises control over the Investigation Division of the Central Board of Direct Taxes.The Member is a high ranking IRS officer of the rank of Special Secretary to the Government of India.The Member controls the:
- Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Central.
- Directorate General of Income Tax Investigation
- Directorate of Income Tax Intelligence and Criminal Investigation.
The Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation) is in charge of taxation issues arising from cross-border transactions and transfer pricing. This organisation has been in operation for nearly 50 years, is primarily responsible for combating the menace of black money, has offices in more than 800 buildings spread over 510 cities and towns across India and has over 55,000 employees and even employees who are deputed from premier police organisations to aid the department.
Enforcement Directorate: was established in 1956. It administers the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973 (FERA), later updated to Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999 (FEMA). It is entrusted with the investigation and prosecution of money-laundering offences, confiscation of the proceeds of such crime, matters related to foreign exchange market and international hawala transactions. This India-wide directorate, with focus on major financial centres in India, has 39 offices and 2000 employees.
Financial Intelligence Unit: has been operating as a separate investigative entity since 2004. This government organisation for receiving, processing, analysing, and disseminating information relating to suspect financial transactions. It shares this information with other ministries, enforcement and financial investigative agencies of state and central government of India. Every month, it routinely examines about 700,000 investigative reports and over 1,000 suspect financial transaction trails to help identify and stop black money and money laundering.
Central Board of Excise and Customs and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence: is the apex intelligence organisation responsible for detecting cases of evasion of central excise and service tax. The Directorate develops intelligence, especially in new areas of tax evasion through its intelligence network across the country and disseminates information across Indian government organisations by issuing Modus Operandi Circulars and Alert Circulars to apprise field formations of the latest trends in tax evasion. It routinely arranges for enforcement operations to research into the evasion of duty and taxes. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence functions under the CBEC. It is entrusted with the responsibility of collection of data and information and its analysis, collation, interpretation and dissemination on matters relating to violations of taxation and customs law. The organisation has thousands of employees and is divided into seven zones all over India. It maintains close liaison with the World Customs Organisation, Brussels, the Regional Intelligence Liaison Office at Tokyo, INTERPOL, and foreign customs administrations.
Central Economic Intelligence Bureau: functions under India's Ministry of Finance. It is responsible for coordination, intelligence sharing, and investigations at national as well as regional levels amongst various law enforcement agencies to prevent financial crimes, generation and parking of black money and illegal transfers. This organisation maintains constant interaction with its Customs Overseas Investigation Network (COIN) offices to share intelligence and information on suspected international financial transactions. The COIN offices gather evidence through diplomatic channels from the foreign custom offices and other foreign establishments to establish cases of mis-declaration to help identify and stop tax evasion and money laundering.
In addition to the primary agencies listed above, India has 10 additional separate departments operating under the central government of India - such as National Investigation Agency and National Crimes Record Bureau - to help locate, investigate and prosecute black money cases. Discovery and enforcement is also assisted by India's Central Bureau of Investigation and state police.
In addition to direct efforts, the Indian central government coordinates its efforts with state governments with dedicated departments to monitor and stop corporate frauds, bank frauds, frauds by non-banking financial companies, sales tax frauds and income tax-related frauds.
MC Joshi committee on black money
After a series of ongoing demonstrations and protests across India, the government appointed a high-level committee headed by MC Joshi (the then CBDT Chairman) in June 2011 to study the generation and curbing of black money. The committee finalised its draft report on 30 January 2012. Its key observation and recommendations were:
- The two major national parties (an apparent reference to Indian National Congress, BJP) claim to have incomes of merely 5 billion (US$81 million) and 2 billion (US$32 million). But this isn't "even a fraction" of their expenses. These parties spend between 100 billion (US$1.6 billion) and 150 billion (US$2.4 billion) annually on election expenses alone.
- Change maximum punishment under Prevention of Corruption Act from the present 3, 5 and 7 years to 2, 7 and 10 years rigorous imprisonment and also changes in the years of punishment in the Income Tax Act.
- Taxation is a highly specialised subject. Based on domain knowledge, set up all-India judicial service and a National Tax Tribunal.
- Just as the USA Patriot Act under which global financial transactions above a threshold limit (by or with Americans) get reported to law enforcement agencies, India should insist on entities operating in India to report all global financial transactions above a threshold limit.
- Consider introducing an amnesty scheme with reduced penalties and immunity from prosecution to the people who bring back black money from abroad.
Tax Information Exchange Agreements
To curb black money, India has signed TIEA with 13 countries -Gibraltar, Bahamas, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Isle of Man, the Cayman Islands, Jersey, Liberia, Monaco, Macau, Argentina, Guernsey and Bahrain - where money is believed to have been stashed away. India and Switzerland, claims a report, have agreed to allow India to routinely obtain banking information about Indians in Switzerland from 1 April 2011.
In June 2014, the Finance Minister Arun Jaitely on behalf of the Indian government requested the Swiss Government to hand over all the bank details and names of Indians having unaccounted money in Swiss banks.
Proposals to prevent Indian black money
Even in colonial India, numerous committees and efforts were initiated to identify and stop underground economy and black money with the goal of increasing the tax collection by the British Crown government. For example, in 1936 Ayers Committee investigated black money from the Indian colony. It suggested major amendments to protect and encourage the honest taxpayer and effectively deal with fraudulent evasion.
- Current Proposals
In its white paper on black money, India has made the following proposals to tackle its underground economy and black money.
Reducing disincentives against voluntary compliance
Excessive tax rates increase black money and tax evasion. When tax rates approach 100 per cent, tax revenues approach zero, because higher is the incentive for tax evasion and greater the propensity to generate black money. The report finds that punitive taxes create an economic environment where economic agents are not left with any incentive to produce.
Another cause of black money, the report finds is the high transaction costs associated with compliance with the law. Opaque and complicated regulations are other major disincentive that hinders compliance and pushes people towards underground economy and creation of black money. Compliance burden includes excessive need for compliance time, as well as excessive resources to comply.
Lower taxes and simpler compliance process reduces black money, suggests the white paper.
Banking transaction tax
Baba Ramdev also known as Yoga guru outlined his policy prescription that involves replacement of most direct and indirect levies with a banking transaction tax and de-monetisation of currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 to help prevent Indian black money, ease inflation, improve employment generation and also lower corruption.
The report suggests that non-tariff barriers to economic activity such as permits and licences, long delays in getting approvals from government agencies are an incentive to proceed with underground economy and hide black money. When one can not obtain a licence to undertake a legitimate activity, the transaction costs approach infinity, and create insurmountable incentives for unreported and unaccounted activities that will inevitably generate black money. The successive waves of economic liberalisation in India since the 1990s have encouraged compliance and taxes collected by the government of India have dramatically increased over this period. The process of economic liberalisation must be relentlessly continued to further remove underground economy and black money, suggests the report.
Reforms in vulnerable sectors of the economy
Certain vulnerable sectors of Indian economy are more prone to underground economy and black money than others. These sectors need systematic reforms. As example, the report offers gold trading, which was one of the major sources of black money generation and even crime prior to the reforms induced in that sector. While gold inflows into India have remained high after reforms, gold smuggling is no longer the menace as it used to be. Similar effective reforms of other vulnerable sectors like real estate, the report suggests can yield a significant dividend in the form of reducing generation of black money in the long term.
The real estate sector in India constitutes about 11 per cent of its GDP. Investment in property is a common means of parking unaccounted money and a large number of transactions in real estate are not reported or are under-reported. This is mainly on account of very high levels of property transaction taxes, commonly in the form of stamp duty. High transaction taxes in property are one of the biggest impediments to the development of an efficient property market. Real estate transactions also involve complicated compliance and high transactions costs in terms of search, advertising, commissions, registration, and contingent costs related to title disputes and litigation. People of India find it easier to deal with real estate transactions and opaque paperwork by paying bribes and through cash payments and under-declaration of value. Unless the real estate transaction process and tax structure is simplified, the report suggests this source of black money will be difficult to prevent. Old and complicated laws such as the Urban Land Ceiling Regulation Act and Rent Control Act need to be repealed, property value limits and high tax rates eliminated, while Property Title Certification system dramatically simplified.
Other sectors of Indian economy needing reform, as identified by the report, include equity trading market, mining permits, bullion and non-profit organisations.
Creating effective credible deterrence
Effective and credible deterrence is necessary in combination with reforms, transparency, simple processes, elimination of bureaucracy and discretionary regulations. Credible deterrence needs to be cost effective, claims the report. Such deterrence to black money can be achieved by information technology (integration of databases), integration of systems and compliance departments of the Indian government, direct tax administration, adding data mining capabilities, and improving prosecution processes.
Along with deterrence, the report suggests public awareness initiatives must be launched. Public support for reforms and compliance are necessary for long term solution to black money. In addition, financial auditors of companies have to be made more accountable for distortions and lapses. The report suggests Whistleblower laws must be strengthened to encourage reporting and tax recovery.
Amnesty programmes have been proposed to encourage voluntary disclosure by tax evaders. These voluntary schemes have been criticized on the grounds that they provide a premium on dishonesty and are unfair to honest taxpayers, as well as for their failure to achieve the objective of unearthing undisclosed money. The report suggests that such amnesty programmes can not be an effective and lasting solution, nor one that is routine.
India has Double Tax Avoidance Agreements with 82 nations, including all popular tax haven countries. Of these, India has expanded agreements with 30 countries which requires mutual effort to collect taxes on behalf of each other, if a citizen attempts to hide black money in the other country. The report suggests that the Agreements be expanded to other countries as well to help with enforcement.
Modified Currency Notes
Government printing of such legal currency notes of highest denomination i.e.; 1000 (US$16) and 500 (US$8.10) which remain in the market for only 2 years. After a 2-year period is expired there should be a one year grace period during which these currency notes should be submitted and accepted only in bank accounts. Following this grace period the currency notes will cease to be accepted as legal tender or destroyed under the instructions of The Reserve Bank of India. As a consequence turning most of the unaccountable money into accountable and taxable money.
- International asset recovery
- Corruption in India
- 2012 Indian anti-corruption movement
- 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement
- United Nations Convention against Corruption
- Nanjappa, Vicky (31 March 2009). "Swiss black money can take India to the top". Rediff.com. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- "White Paper on Black Money". Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 2012.
- "Banking secrecy spices up Indian elections". SWISSINFO - A member of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation. 14 May 2009.
- Black money: Indians have stashed over $500bn in banks abroad, says CBI
- India 'loses $500bn to tax havens'
- "White paper on black money likely to be tabled in Budget Session". The Hindu - Business Line. 13 March 2012.
- Headlines Today Bureau (9 March 2011). "Black money: Tax havens exposed: Europe: India Today". Indiatoday.intoday.in. Retrieved 9 May 2011.
- "Banking secrecy spices up Indian elections". SWISSINFO - A member of Swiss Broadcasting Corporation. 14 May 2009.
- "Banks in Switzerland 2011". Swiss National Bank. 11 June 2012.
- "No 'black money' statistics exist: Swiss banks". The Times of India. 13 September 2009.
- Ashok Dasgupta (8 April 2011). "News / National: India will have to wait till year-end for Swiss information". The Hindu (Chennai, India). Retrieved 9 May 2011.
- "Black money debate: Govt agrees to bring white paper". Times of India. 15 December 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
- "CBI chief’s wisdom: If king immoral, so will be subjects". 14 February 2012. Retrieved 14 February 2012.
- Black Money, May 2012, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NEW DELHI http://pib.nic.in/archieve/others/2012/may/d2012052101.pdf
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR. "SC ordering formation of SIT - 4 July 2011". New Delhi: Supreme Court of India. Archived from the original on 29 July 2012. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
- "SC pulls up govt on black money issue – Times Of India". Articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com. 19 January 2011. Retrieved 9 May 2011.
- "SC raps govt on black money in foreign banks – Economy and Politics". livemint.com. 19 January 2011. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- "Black Money Probe: Supreme Court Appoints SIT". 4 July 2011. Retrieved 2 May 2012.
- Justice ALTAMAS KABIR; Justice SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR. "SC order on IA 8 of 2011". New Delhi: Supreme Court of India. Archived from the original on 29 July 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
- "Black Money: SC Bench Split on Centre's Plea On SIT". 23 September 2011. Retrieved 2 May 2012.
- "Govt discloses names of 26 Liechtenstein Bank Account Holders". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Retrieved 29 April 2014.
- "Dabur's Pradip Burman among 3 named for holding black money accounts abroad". The Times of India. Retrieved 27 October 2014.
- "Black money: Supreme Court orders Centre to reveal all names by tomorrow". The Times of India. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
- "Black money case: List of 627 foreign account holders given to SC". rediff.com. Retrieved 29 October 2014.
- "Act tough on black money: Kerala CM tells PM, IBN Live News". Ibnlive.in.com. 3 February 2010. Retrieved 9 May 2011.
- "HC questions Hasan Ali's source of wealth". The Times of India. 29 July 2011. Archived from the original on 30 July 2011. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- "Black money: Enforcement Directorate helped Hasan Ali Khan cover tracks". 16 January 2012. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- "Hasan Ali probe hits dead end". 30 November 2011. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- "Black money: Enforcement Directorate going soft on Hasan Ali Khan is a comment on our system". 17 January 2012. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- "ED HELPED HASAN ALI COVERTRACKS". Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- Bali Pavan (31 January 2011). "Billions, gone with the hawa(la)!". Deccan Chronicle. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- "ED officer suspended for slow pace of Hasan Ali probe". India Today. 6 May 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- "SC pulls up Centre on Hasan Ali case". Times of India. 3 March 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- "ED official in the dock for ‘helping’ Hasan Ali, aides". The Indian Express. 7 May 2011. Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- R Vaidyanathan – Prof of finance and control, IIM Baglore (1 December 2011). "Shame them! Black money held abroad is not just a tax issue". Retrieved 4 March 2012.
- "Who is Hasan Ali Khan?". India Today. 3 March 2011.
- "Swiss bank UBS denies any dealings with Hasan Ali Khan". Deccan Herald. 16 February 2011.
- M Padmakshan (17 February 2011). "Documents in Hasan Ali money-laundering case forged: Swiss Bank". The Economic Times.
- "ED lacks evidence on Hasan Ali Khan". India Today. 8 March 2011.
- Friedrich Schneider (September 2006). "Shadow Economies and Corruption All Over the World: What Do We Really Know?". Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA Bonn).
- Owen Lippert, Michael Walker (December 1997). The Underground Economy: Global Evidence of Its Size and Impact. ISBN 978-0889751699.
- Frey and Schneider (2000). "Informal and Underground Economy".
- "M C Joshi takes over as CBDT new Chairman". Jagran Post. 2 August 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2012.
- "Panel calls for amnesty to get back black money". 10 February 2012. Retrieved 9 February 2012.
- "Bank deposits outside India will be a taxable asset". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 10 February 2011.
- Ayers, Chambers and Vachha (1936). Income tax enquiry report, 1936, submitted to the Government of India as a result of the investigation of the Indian income-tax system.