Talk:Cartoon Wars Part II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speculations[edit]

"It is speculated (but not confirmed) that the creators/writers for Family Guy will either be Scientologists, Catholics, Crab People, Saddam Hussein, the Super Adventure Club, Tom Cruise, Xenu, Darth Chef or another character/group portrayed recently in the series." By whom is it speculated? Bezo 04:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Bezo said. And how is it based on commercials for the show, its website and/or other advance publicity? And if I think Patrick Duffy is behind it all can I add him on the list too? And, finally, what's the point of speculation if you have a list longer then my arm? --Bahati 08:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Part Two[edit]

Twenty bucks says they show a Terrance and Phillip episode.
Yeah, I am half-expecting something completely out of left field, although that one was April 1st. Something having nothing to do with continuing the plotline from the last episode. Doregasm 00:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You guy were half right... Ace ofspade 03:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually convinced for a second that they were really going to pull that "...will not air tonight!" business. Jeff Silvers 03:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You owe me $20

Muhammad image removed by Commedy Central?[edit]

Was the image of Muhammad really removed by Comedy Central?

Yes it was. How disappointing.

How do you know for sure? Couldn't it be just part of the whole free speech joke? Did Comedy Central actually release a statement saying this?

I was sorta wondering the same thing. Jeff Silvers 03:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im guessing it could have gone either way. Either it was part of the joke or comedy central removed it. Someone please update this page when there is a statement or proof of either side. PrettyMuchBryce 03:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that Comedy Central actually does have a policy now where it won't air images of Mohammed, but Parker and Stone knew that beforehand. They had the statement about how CC doesn't air the images immediately followed by the most vulgar cartoon with Jesus in it because of the irony of not being able to show someone handing a football helmet to someone else, but being able to show someone covered in shit. 04:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I personally doubt that Comedy Central censored the image over Matt and Trey's heads. Still, though, I've reworded the section so it states what happened, but doesn't promote a particular viewpoint on why it happened.Raymondluxuryacht 04:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think not showing Muhammad is the point in the joke/idea of these two episodes - everyone expected to see him as if it actually mattered to these episodes' message in any way. Would this whole episode be OK if he was censored, and would it be outrageous if he was not...? On one side you have people disdaining Muhammad's depiction, on the other side you have people slobberig over such pictures. And you have people in the middle that basically don't care that much to start wars for it. --Abdull 14:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Yeah, I agree with the statement above. It was definitly a joke by Matt and Trey, I highly doubt Comedy Central censored it.

I'd like to believe it was Trey and Matt to, but it looks like it was actually Comedy Central's decision. --Mercury1 17:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Can someone say IRONY?Raymondluxuryacht 19:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A torrent file seems to exist with an apparently uncencored version of this episode. ([1]).

The uncensored copy is FAKE FAKE FAKE! 2 things. First, take a close look at this screenshot and you can see the dodgy hack job some amateur has done inserting a SOUTH PARK STYLE (not fake Family Guy style) Mohammed into the scene. Second, if you download this version, you will find that there are no new frames of animation, only the ones before and after the white on black text with Mohammed spliced in badly. Edit: Oh yeah, and did I mention that the Comedy Central ident from the 'censored' original is STILL IN THE CORNER?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060413/ap_on_en_tv/tv_south_park_muhammad Here's the answer guys.

The fake uncensored copy just uses the mohammed from the Super Best Friends episode. Jaderaid 23:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone should put something in the article that mentions the forged 'uncensored' copy. I think it's pretty easy to tell that it is fake because it's already been said that the episode was compiled as is before the airing. PrettyMuchBryce 18:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Designbot

Whether or not Comedy Central Censored it will become 100% clear next week on November 10th when the Canadian release of Cartoon Wars part 2 is put out.

About how Bush was portrayed...[edit]

"This is an unusual depiction of the President, who is often satirized for his supposed simple-mindedness; here, Bush is shown as being clear in his speech and thought with the media being portrayed as anti-free speech and uninformed."

Um, but aren't Matt and Trey pro-Bush? So as unusual as it is, it makes sense they wouldn't make fun of him like most people do... (although part of me is surprised that they didn't anyways). Would it be a good idea to add that information to this fact?

They have never really said if they like him or not, but they have made fun of him in the past a fair bit (that's my bush). Maybe it just didn't fit into the plot.Jaderaid 06:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Matt nor Trey has gone on record supporting Bush. Both are often assumed to be conservatives since the show seems to bash liberals so much, but neither publicly identifies himself as such. In fact, Parker is a registered Libertarian. The truth is that South Park's satire is more social in nature than political; making fun of specific political figures has never been their focus.Raymondluxuryacht 06:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I read an interview where they basically said it's not fun to make fun of Bush because everyone does it. Matt Stone said the only punk thing you can do anymore is walk into a party and yell out "Bush effin' rules!" (I don't feel like looking up the source on that right now.) WallyCuddeford 02:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was really surprised when it turned out that Bush knew what the First Amendment was. I doubt he does in real life.

Yes, I'm sure that the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES has no idea what the First Amendment is. You may not support the President, but don't make foolish comments such as the one above.
Indeed. There's a huge difference between not knowing and not caring. WallyCuddeford 02:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you're not Bush I can't see how can you make such a statement with any degree of certainty. On the same note, sign your comments!
In my opinion, and experience, it's not much fun to make fun of someone when everybody else is doing it, and with plenty of material mind you. It would be in bad taste...--Bahati 16:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He probably has at one time or another heard of the Bill of Rights, but obviously doesn't care. Faith-based agenda? Come on. That's just blatant disregard of the First Amendment. Hewn 10:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure South Park has lampooned both sides of the political spectrum on countless occations. People on either side tend to notice more when their side is attacked and gloss over the fact that the other side was, too. --Sean WI 04:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the subject of censorship, someone decided to unilaterally delete the portion dealing with the portrayal of President Bush. I don't know how that differs from any other form of censorship: imposing your views on eveybody else by deleting other people's hard work and comments. If you have a problem with something, bring it up on the discussion page. Free speech isn't about people just deleting stuff they don't like. And if you're going to do it, have the integrity to stand by your actions and put your handle to them. [User:Chesty95|Chesty95]] 04:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

THE WAY Bush is portrayed is satirical because, you would think that due to the controversy surrounding the Patriot Act, that they would depict Bush as being ignorant about the First Ammendment. Bush is often portrayed as an idiot and Trey and Matt like to go against the comedy grain, so to speak, so instead of going with the common way of making fun of him, they go 180 degrees in the opposite direction to depict him as the only intelligent person in the room. The joke is that it is ironic.Wanda5088 20:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They probably didn't put in any "Bush is dumb" jokes because they were trying to be funny, and those jokes got old and gay 4 years ago. --Sean Gray 23:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that hasn't stopped them from making fun of Al Gore. Hewn 10:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just looked at that scene, and really I think its just an example of how Matt and Trey make fun of the larger issue as a whole. Look at Bush- he's cowering, worried, and constantly glancing from left to right, which is often how he appears in reality. The press, on the other hand, is portrayed as chewing into Bush rabidly, which they do. (And, being a liberal, I think they SHOULD.) This is an example of Matt and Trey showing how both sides of the argument create a stalemate. Bush is hardly portrayed as being strong and compitent in this situation, rather he's wormy and cowardly. I don't think Matt and Trey's portrayal of Bush has ever been positive: look at That's My Bush where he's a well meaning, incompotent doof or look at Mystery of the Urinal Duce where he's masterminding the transmission of subversive information to control the people who are revolting against him. Those are hardly favorable examples. Having gone through the South Park catalogue many times, I've found a great many examples of Matt and Trey being very liberal in their slant. Far more than I could mention here.  ;)
    • That's My Bush! was before everyone really made fun of him. The Mystery of the Urinal Deuce made fun of him to make fun of conspiracy theorists. Trey and Matt weren't saying that Bush is conniving or evil, but making fun of the fact that conspiracy theorists and liberals say he is. Even the I'm a Little Bit Country episode made fun of the anti-war people more than pro-war people, and when it did make fun of the pro-war side it was in a mocking fashion of the way liberals view them. The way they satirized the anti-war people seemed to be an honest attack. Even the episode where the Bush Administration thought (accurately, ironically) that Saddam had WMD's in Heaven saw Bush's advisors as the satirized ignorant ones, not the President himself. Personally, I believe Trey and Matt, like most sane libertarians and moderates, dislike the war and some of Bush's decisions, but aren't at his throat like liberals and crazy libertarians are. And as stated, they don't satirize the President directly because everyone else is, it's easy, and they don't want to be labeled as just another anti-everything-Bush-does show. Mac OS X 08:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's funny. Because as a liberal, anti-war fan of South Park, I interpreted these episodes in exactly the opposite sense that you did: look at those crazy rightwingers and their insane nonsensical destructive beliefs, but we can also see that there are idiots on both sides so there sure are people on the left who get into dumb positions too...--Drojem (talk) 06:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of section: I believe Trey and Matt believe whatever I believe about Bush because that's what reasonable people believe, clearly. Their humor is so godlike and original that it transcends and incorporates whatever take anyone else has had upon the matter and vastly improves upon it. This enables them to see all sides of all arguments and to simultaneously see the absurdities inherent in every facet of every situation. But obviously when they make fun of people I disagree with it is because they are satirizing those crazy views. While when they make fun of things I agree with it is merely self-deprecating good humor (or even satirizing the crazy way crazy opponents of my beliefs foolishly make fun me). I will now proceed to cherry-pick from episodes and interpret them according to how I found them funny to prove my point. (Now, could someone please explain to me what the hell any of this rambling South-Park-fanboy-forum-chit-chat has to do with an NPOV Wikipedia article on the "Cartoon Wars II" episode?)--Drojem (talk) 06:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not hard to see the irony in this post. Rodiggidy (talk) 22:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Rodiggidy[reply]

Missing cultural reference[edit]

The leadup to the Kyle and Cartman fight reminded me alot of the Matrix and Matrix Revolutions fight between Neo and Agent Smith.--The dez 07:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Julie, the woman in the network control center, resembles Glenn Close in Air Force One, doesn't she? --Bahati 11:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I came to this page to say just that. I don't know about Star Trek, but what I got from that entire scene was a parody of Air Force One. I think it should be in the article. Mac OS X 08:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The manatees resemble the dolphin in Johnny Mnemonic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.171.93 (talk) 16:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All of this is WP:POV/OR, and cannot go into the article unless it is supported by reliable, verifiable sources that are cited in the article. Nightscream (talk) 19:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

News story links[edit]

All the news sources in the External Links section link to the same story- the Associated Press story- just reprinted on different sites and given different headlines. Do we really need three links to the same story?Raymondluxuryacht 00:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had put the 3 story links in. Noticed today that the AP story link that was put in instead (linked to www.newsvine.com) was dead and replaced it with the CNN link instead, that's likely to be more stable --Vivek 14:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
CNN link is now dead. Can we get that article anywhere else? Hewn 10:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The old newsvine version works, so I'll put that one back. --KGF0 ( T | C ) 10:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name Tags on Reporters[edit]

In the scene where Bush is describing the so-called First Amendment with the reporters, two reporters are noticeably wearing name tags while the others aren't. One says "TCO" and the other is "LSX". What is this a reference to?Cory Kohn 03:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Searching on the internet provides no real clues. TCO could stand for a lot of things, the most common search result being "Total Cost of Ownership." LSX only returns as a media-file type. I'm assuming they may just be initials of people the show creators know. Orichalcon 15:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pull the Episode parody[edit]

There are two references that people made that this scenen is a parody of:

"The "Pull the episode" scene is also reminiscent of the FOX drama 24, and, particularly, the fifth season. Early on in the season, as in this scene, characters would constantly argue over critical decisions that were ultimately up to the President's call, and both Rupert Murdoch and President Charles Logan (early on in the season) were characterized as being highly indecisive figures that couldn't pull the trigger on anything that could have a major impact."

and

"The scene that shows the Fox president deciding whether or not to pull episode is a parody of a scene from Air Force One with Harrison Ford."

Although there are similarities, I don't think it's a parody of "Air Force One", I think it's just a parody of 24 and maybe an amalgamation of scenes like it. Any thoughts?

Maybe it had nothing to do with 24, but was just the original thinking the makes pride themselves in in this very episode. 84.139.4.74 13:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, if that "Pull one episode, kill whole series"-part was a parody of anything, then it is about the removal of South Park's own episode "Trapped in the Closet" from syndication. 84.139.4.74 13:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: William Donahue[edit]

It is worth noting that, over the holidays, when asked if a future Jewish President should be expected to send Christmas cards (as opposed to the "Happy Holidays" cards that President Bush sent this year), Mr. Donahue said "absolutely".

Just wanted to share that. Chesty95 03:33, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South Park and the Simpsons[edit]

Just something I'm curious about. Trey and Matt have both mentioned on several occasions that they are big fans of the Simpsons. Does anyone know if Matt Groening has ever publicly expressed any opinions on South Park?Raymondluxuryacht 03:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of Matt Groening making any public comment, but a somewhat loving parody of the show appeared in one episode. Check this out: [2]. It's entirely possible it was done in response to the equally loving Simpsons Already Did It episode. Personallly, it's one of my favourite Simpsons moments, both for Bart mocking Simpsons fans by wondering "how do they keep (South Park) so fresh after 52 episodes?" and one of my all-time favourite lines, "Cartoon violence! Cartoon violence!". --L T Dangerous 14:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]



hi i'm too lazy to fix it but this is the FOURTH two-parter in south park, the missing one in the TRIVIA section being the professor chaos/simpsons already did it

That wasn't a two-parter. Those episodes were just linked together through a similar theme. The same could be said about the whole butters/tweak episodes in Season 6 as the boys' new friends. Orichalcon 08:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it's that clear-cut. There WAS a cliffhanger ending to the Professor Chaos episode, and one of the two story lines of "Simpsons Already Did It" was a continuation from "Professor Chaos." I think it's as much of a two-parter as any of the others. Hewn 10:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The cliffhanger in Professor Chaos was inmediately resolved, if you remember. It was a pun on cliffhangers in general. - Redmess (talk) 20:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

Near the beginning of the "Fox Refrences" sections i found this sentence:

"He, like Cartman, hates Family Guy, a reference to both the fact that The Simpsons creator Matt Groening shares Trey and Matt's dislike of Family Guy, as well as the fact that Family Guy is often accused of being a Simpsons ripoff."

This appears to be unfounded and not accurate at all. I read that Groening is on good terms with the Family Guy staff, but it is true that Stone and Parker have publicly stated they're dislike of Family Guy. --Willers 23:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another possible vandalism under Real life Controversy: "Ironically, due to the pulling of "Trapped in the Closet," Mission: Impossible III may not have performed as well at the box office due to angry South Park fans boycotting it.". Need a source or some type of proof that would suggest that MI:3 did bad at the box office because of a soutpark fan boycott. -User:pallfy 21:37, 10 July 2006
Vandalism seems like a pretty strong accusation when people are probably just repeating rumors. Hewn 10:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this suppossed to be here?[edit]

'There may also be a relationship between the terrorists and actor and Celebrity-Scientologist Tom Cruise. Existing rumors point towards Cruise threatening Paramount Studios, the producing company behind Cruise's summer vehicle, Mission: Impossible III, with not doing any publicity for the film if the episode Trapped in the Closet were to air again. Paramount put pressure on Viacom which in turn owns Comedy Central to not air the episode. Thus, it can also be read that the comments about terrorism being fear based are inclusive of Cruise, using Paramount's fear of revenue loss if he were not to publicize the film, to get the episode pulled from airing rotation. Ironically, due to the pulling of "Trapped in the Closet," Mission: Impossible III may not have performed as well at the box office due to angry South Park fans boycotting it.'

Despite the fact that all of this is merely speculation... Why is it here?... it should be, maybe in the Tom Cruise article or the "Trapped in the closet" episode article. Only because this episode is about censorship, doesn't mean this article is about "South Park censored" or something like that. I am not moving or deleting anything, but I think this part doesn't belong here. Also I think the language in that pharagraph is way too rude (by stating that Tom Cruise may be linked to terrorists), at least, for wikipedia standards, so, it should be edited. Dhekranh 01:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations[edit]

Why do these quotations keep appearing in this article? There's clearly a wikiquote box right next to the section where people are supposed to add quotes. I'm tired of removing these quotes from the main article. What will it take to get people to stop adding them and LOOK at the wikiquote box? Orichalcon 16:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Next Emmy?[edit]

I predict that, a year from now, we will be hearing about this episode being nominated for an Emmy as well.

Tom Cruise a terrorist?[edit]

I've removed this line. Even though Tom Cruise may be somewhat crazy, but he certainly isn't a terrorist since he hasn't ever used violence against Paramount. Also, the line fails both WP:OR and WP:V. --TBCTaLk?!? 00:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goofs[edit]

I fail to see how Osama Bin Laden dying and coming back to life is a goof. It happens regularly with characters like Kenny and Saddam Hussein. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.20.124.228 (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Duplicate picture[edit]

the picture at the bottom of the plot page (the comedy central one) is already at the top of the page. can someone replace the plot on with a different picture or maybe remove it altogether.

Cultural References and OR[edit]

Cite the following;

  • Cartman's "Let this be our final battle" line to Kyle at the beginning of their fight is a reference to the live action Masters of the Universe film, in which Skeletor utters the same line to He-Man as they begin their battle during the film's climax. This line was also spoken by one of the "psychic detectives" in "Cartman's Incredible Gift".
  • When about to pull the second Muhammad-including episode of Family Guy, the network president begins to enter his presidential approval code of "Zero, zero, destruct...", which was also the self-destruct sequence to the U.S.S. Enterprise on Star Trek, as used in the episode "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield" and the motion picture Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
  • The Fox president's calling a woman named July to cancel the episode is a reference to a similar scene in the movie Air Force One, in which the President (Harrison Ford) calls the Vice President (Glenn Close) with instructions to liberate a Russian prisoner. July is clearly a reference to Glenn Close's character in that movie.
  • This episode is filled with many references to the Fox Network:
  • A South Park version of Bart Simpson (voiced by Mona Marshall) appears in this episode donning a red shirt, blue shorts and spiked hair, and carrying a green skateboard. The character occasionally uses old Bart catchphrases such as "Eat my shorts", and writes, "I hate Family Guy" repeatedly on a wall outside Fox Studios, a reference to his chalkboard gags. The character is never mentioned by name; Cartman and Kyle only refer to him as "kid" or "that kid". One minor difference between the two Barts is that the South Park version of Bart writes on the wall with his right hand. The Simpsons version of Bart writes with his left hand.
  • Bart is depicted differently in this episode to the way that South Park depicted him in "Simpsons Already Did It": he looks much more like other South Park child characters, whereas before his design was much closer to how he appears on The Simpsons. This, however, is probably because "Simpsons Already Did It" showed Bart in his "cartoon" version, whereas this is a "real-life" one.
  • When Cartman and Bart are arguing about who is "badder", Bart refers to The Simpsons' episode "The Telltale Head" and Cartman to the South Park episode "Scott Tenorman Must Die" to win the argument. This scene is similar to a scene in The Simpsons episode "Take My Wife, Sleaze", in which Bart makes fun of child star Jay North for the tameness of his character Dennis the Menace. Similarly, an exchange between Bart and Cartman — when the latter states that he plans to use fear to convince the Fox executives to pull Family Guy, Bart asks, "Isn't that like terrorism?", and Cartman responds, "It's not like terrorism; it is terrorism" — mirrors a conversation from "The Telltale Head" in which Jimbo, Dolph and Kearney convince Bart to sneak into a movie theater to see a movie for free. Bart asks, "Isn't that practically stealing?", to which the bullies, laughing, reply, "Practically? It is stealing!"
  • As Cartman enters the Fox TV studio parking lot, a billboard for Family Guy shows the airdate for Family Guy episodes as "Mondays on FOX". In this episode, however, the new Family Guy installment airs on a Friday. Both of these are in contrast to the real Family Guy, which airs on Sunday.
  • During Cartman and Kyle's fight, they pass a sign for Cold Age: The Smackdown, a parody of FOX's Ice Age: The Meltdown, which was the number-one movie at the box office at the time. Fox had also taken to placing static advertisements for the movie into their shows.
  • When Kyle and Cartman are trying to convince the network president to see their respective point of view, Kiefer Sutherland's real face can be seen on a wall poster for 26, a parody of 24.
  • When Cartman and Kyle fight, they crash through the window of the King of the Hill animation studios. On the wall is a poster which reads "11th season!", a reference to the show's recent unexpected renewal for an eleventh season by FOX. The King of the Hill office is also quiet and calm, perhaps a reference to the show's style and pacing. Trey Parker and Matt Stone have a friendship with King of the Hill creator Mike Judge, who provided the voice for the unmuffled Kenny in South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut.
  • Bart has his classic green 'seventiesesque skateboard, as seen in The Simpsons's long opening sequences and many episodes.

And we can return it to the main article.Alastairward (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad image[edit]

Is it possible to obtain a real image of Muhammad as portrayed in this episode? I've seen the face on the Internet, but transplanted into totally unrelated pictures. Note that it is possible to make an image hidden at start. Tezero (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammed didn't appear in the episode. Nightscream (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, he did, but the image was censored by Comedy Central, not the show itself. Tezero (talk) 15:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the image you saw was transplanted into a totally unrelated picture, are you sure it came from this episode, and not "Super Best Friends"? Nightscream (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The image was "censored" in the UK too, it was a joke best I can see. When I read the above, I thought of Super Best Friends too, where Muhammed is entirely uncensored. Alastairward (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Yes, he did, but the image was censored by Comedy Central, not the show itself." Same thing. If he didn't appear in the episode as broadcast, then how could we obtain an image of him? The episode at southparkstudios.com is also censored, and I'm guessing the DVD is as well, since they're put out by Comedy Central/Paramount. The only place to get a South Park image of him is from "Super Best Friends" or the opening title sequence. Nightscream (talk) 01:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Aervanath (talk) 22:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Plot[edit]

last paragraph of the plot

Despite President Bush's observation that the use of Muhammad was not inflammatory, terrorist leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, reminding America that it was warned not to show Muhammad, initiates Al-Qaeda's retaliation - a crudely animated video depicting President Bush, Carson Kressley, Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes and Jesus Christ defecating on each other and the American flag. At the end of the video, al-Zawahiri declares victory over the United States, asserting that the video was "way funnier than Family Guy."

i don't see tom cruise or katie holmes in this scene. ≈Sensorsweep (talk) 03:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cartoon Wars Part II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cartoon_Wars_Part_II&oldid=1204866660"