Talk:Dragonlance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Lost Wars was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 24 February 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Dragonlance. The original page is now a redirect to here. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and find out how to help! |
|
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Top |
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
/Archive 1
[edit] Indonesian
I ran across this rather odd statement:
- Hickman had previously preached as a Mormon missionary in Java for two years, and uses Indonesian in Dragonlance spells.
Naively, one might read this to mean that one must learn Indonesian in order to cast the spells. Is it instead is a reference to the spell names within the rulesbook?—RJH (talk) 23:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
-
- It's a reference to the fact that the words used in the spells incorporate elements of the Indonesian language, I believe. Doniago (talk) 01:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- A look at the original source should clear that up. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 01:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Confusing Section
I have edited the area that was marked as confusing to make it sound better. It is the "Characters" section. Any objections to the way I edited it? If not, I'll remove the "Confusing Paragraph" marker in a few days.Vyselink (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think it makes a lot more sense now, and it's neat to read the full quote! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
