Talk:Killer application

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

BitCoin as KillerApp[edit]

BitCoin digging programs are KillerApps for AMD 7970, x290X graphics cards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daroooo (talk • contribs) 16:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UNIX a killer app for DEC computers[edit]

Hi, i wrote the 3rd paragraph about UNIX being a 'killer app' for digital computers. I recognize that it is a less-strong but still, very relevant example. Many universities would buy PDP-11's and VAXen *only* to run UNIX, never intending to run the DEC operating systems at all. Digital almost "monpolized" the academic market for small computers and operating systems from the mid 1970's through the early 1990's because of a piece of software that they had no hand in writing (their own flavor of UNIX, Ultrix, was a failure at most schools.) I worked with UNIX #1 at UIUC and was an undergrad in CS from 1980-84 and CS grad student 1986-1993. SystemBuilder (talk) 01:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Section[edit]

Having individual words in the sentence linking to different games apparently randomly seems odd. I've never seen unrelated words link to a page. It reads awkwardly and doesn't promote clear navigation. CanningIO (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with Video Game mentions: Needs Proper Citations[edit]

I first looked at "Another was Eastern Front (1941), released in 1981.[1]" The citation is actually only a review. It in no way documents the game's status as "killer app"

I then checked the second: Star Raiders, released in 1979, may have been a system-seller for the Atari 400/800 computers.[2] The article doesn't mention how well (or poorly) Atari systems sold, just that the game existed. Both citations give a review and have no evidence of it's status as a "Killer App". The poster of these games seems to think it just needs citation to show it was popular. The next mention, for "Wizardry" quotes the article "sent AD&D fans scrambling to buy Apple IIs". THAT is evidence the game is a "killer app" and not just a popular game. I'm not even sure it is entirely true, it might be an exaggeration! The point is that it is documented, published evidence that the game could be considered a killer app. Citations that the game is very popular aren't going to cut it. I was alerted by the fact that Atari Computers aren't even best-selling for their time, certainly not in comparison to Visicalc with the Apple II family. I'm beginning to think many of these mentions don't pass "the smell test". 75.71.166.197 (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Greenlaw, Stanley (November–December 1981). "Eastern Front". Computer Gaming World (review). pp. 29–30. Retrieved 31 October 2013.
  2. ^ Williams, Gregg (May 1981). "Star Raiders". BYTE. p. 106. Retrieved 18 October 2013.

Sourcing on list of claimed "killer apps"[edit]

The current list has some rather dubiously sourced claims about what constitutes a "killer app". I think a minimum standard of two-or-three independent reliable sources should be required here. Some of these are almost certainly uncontroversial (Lotus 123 for MS-DOS, Sonic the Hedgehog for the Mega Drive, etc.) but that should only make it easier for a knowledgeable person to source them properly. I don't really follow technology or gaming publications, so I wouldn't know where to start (motorsport is usually my area in that regard), but I'd much prefer this article was more focused on giving a history of strong examples like the paragraph on Visi Calc rather than being padded by an extended list with unclear inclusion criteria. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for video game topics are listed at WP:GAMESOURCES. I haven't scrutinized this page's reflist quite yet, but that should be a good starting point for determining their overall reliability. Joyce-stick (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Dreamcast examples are dubious but I left two of them since they had retrospective sources (one of which I am confident can be called reliable, the other I am not sure of) calling the given titles "killer apps" and thus I feel it would be inappropriate to remove them without discussion. Ultimately I question the inclusion of any Dreamcast examples here though given the console was a well-known commercial failure. Perhaps with suitable sourcing it would be possible to say that even a "killer app" like Sonic Adventure may not save a platform from commercial failure, but contemporary sources predicting that "this will be one of the console's biggest sellers" or that "this will sell consoles" is not helpful for this sort of list. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Dreamcast didn't quite fail, it's more accurate to say it underperformed. The console's Wikipedia page notes that it experienced success in the US but that sales overall "did not meet Sega's expectations." Further, Sonic Adventure is well known as being the best-selling game for the Dreamcast and almost certainly is the main reason that many people bought the console, so I think it's indisputable that it was the Dreamcast's killer app. However, your overall point raises an interesting question, and that is: Is this article about either
A) Software that hardware manufacturers push in marketing, hoping that it will sell hardware, or
B) Software that actually does sell hardware, or that reliable sources widely note was the reason for which hardware was often purchased
So, I don't know, and the historical definition does seem inconsistent and it doesn't seem there's one that the page has decided on for its purposes? Also, should this page be moved to List of killer apps? Or List of notable software known as killer apps? It does seem like that's more what it is, rather than a detailed and full coverage of the term's history and common usage... Joyce-stick (talk) 13:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even if such a move isn't warranted, perhaps splitting the article might be in order... But then again, it isn't particularly large, so maybe not. Joyce-stick (talk) 13:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what an objective criteria for inclusion would be, but I agree the list needs to be trimmed significantly. If it includes every game that's ever been described as a "killer app" by anyone, then it just becomes a list of well-received games.
Demon's Souls (PS5), for example, was inevitably called a "killer app" because it was the only exclusive AAA game at launch. There's nothing to indicate that it was a system seller, though. In the first year after release, Demon's Souls sold about 1 million copies, PS5 sold about 15 million consoles. Surachit (talk) 15:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would take Demon's Souls and Soul Calibur off. The former for what you said, and the latter because the citation is questionable and it doesn't prove that the game sold DC's to the general app. VF3 I'd keep because TheGuardian is an acceptable source.80.192.165.53 (talk) 16:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the best way to go about it is to c
I'm paraphrasing, but a killer app iwhenogood that people.
compare the sales of the app and the (X) at the time th. It should help see if people bought the (X) just because of the app or not. out, and then compare it to the sale numbers of the (X) when it came out to see if the Yeah (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resident Evil and NFL GameDay[edit]

The source doesn't say it was a killer app or it sold system, but rather it was the best selling game for the system - which seems like a grey area. Rayman was the best selling PS1 game in the UK, but I doubt people would call it a system seller. I've decided to put it in here as I can see merit on keeping it on, but at the moment, consdering taking it off.80.192.165.53 (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Visicalc considered to be the first killer app, when it was preceded by Wordstar?[edit]

In June 1979, WordStar was released for CP/M systems. In October 1979, VisiCalc was released for the Apple II. At that time, Wordstar was also released for the TRS-80, which outsold the Apple II by about 3 to 1 in 1979 and 1980.[1]. While Visicalc was a spreadsheet, Wordstar was the first WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) document editor, often replacing typewriters and batch document programs like RunOff. Wordstar was also used as a text editor by programmers. The Apple II was never that popular, outsold by one or more computers from competitors every year that the Apple II was made. Other references cite WordStar as being the first killer app.[2]. Rcgldr (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://arstechnica.com/features/2005/12/total-share/3
  2. ^ https://lynceans.org/all-posts/35-years-since-the-introduction-of-personal-computers-with-word-processing-and-spreadsheet-apps
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Killer_application&oldid=1204956336"