Talk:Provo Tabernacle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Past tense[edit]

Twice now the "is" in the first sentence has been changed to "was". I reverted it the first time. The building's still there, and is being restored and remodeled. Why the past tense? Ntsimp (talk) 21:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand the sentiment behind this, even though I'm not sure that I agree with it. The rebuilt structure will not regain the function of a Tabernacle (LDS Church); instead it will be a Temple (LDS Church), and those two types of buildings serve very different purposes in the LDS community. Additionally, while the facade will be retained, the structure is going to go thru a form of facadism, where an entirely new building is to be built within what remains of the old one, essentially keeping the original external shell for historic, aesthetic and decorative purposes. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The building is not a functioning tabernacle. Anyway, having a roofless, part wall of a building there does not really equal "the building is still there". It burned down, it is no more.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

square footage[edit]

Does anyone have any good information on the square footage prior to burning? In the article it mentions that it is being converted much like the vernal tabernacle was and the vernal page lists the square footage of the new temple as well as the lot size. This article lists the Lot size, which is smaller than vernal, and I was curious to see how that translated to square footage of the actual building.--Drewder (talk) 19:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Provo Tabernacle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Not to be confused with..."[edit]

The wording of the template:Distinguish2 template used at the top seems weird. Would anyone object to changing it to something like "For the renovated structure..." or some similar wording using template:For? kcowolf (talk) 19:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and changed it. Ntsimp (talk) 21:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]