Talk:Sherborne School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Harper House[edit]

Is Harper House named after Hugo Harper, former headmaster and Principal of Jesus College, Oxford? My guess would be yes, but I don't know, so can't add it. If my guess is right, you can add in a wikilink (and also add to his article). BencherliteTalk 10:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.135.76 (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General rhetoric[edit]

This page needs some serious modifications. A huge number of claims are made without citation (too many to change myself), and the entire page reads like a marketing document. I have a suspicion that the page has been majorly edited by the Sherborne School marketing department; this is inappropriate. Claims made that aren't cited need to be removed.

Chaplain section[edit]

I have tagged this. It reads like a prospectus written by the school itself, and was probably copied out of such a prospectus. Viewfinder (talk) 23:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, I have decided to remove the section. This is a neutral encyclopedia, not a school prospectus. Viewfinder (talk) 23:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken out more spam.

Facilities[edit]

This entire section lacks a source (there is data here without evidence), and is arguably unnecessary; Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a marketing resource.

Jimmy Edwards[edit]

Edwards' biographical article indicates he was educated at King's School in Wimbledon, not at Sherborne. I've no idea which is correct. Fairlightseven 07/12/08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.136.191 (talk) 20:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Evelyn Waugh[edit]

Waugh did not attend Sherborne School - I don't know where this came from. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.66.13 (talk) 21:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

His brother Alec Waugh (author of Loom of Youth etc) did however...


John Falconer[edit]

Did John Falconer attend Sherborne? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.30.164 (talk) 12:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Turing[edit]

This entry; 'Alan Turing OBE, FRS, mathematician and instrumental figure at Bletchley Park', is one of the most denigrating entries that you could have possibly made. One could question why his name is not listed in the 'Intelligence' section, for a start. One could ask why his contributions to computing are not identified. Certainly 'Academia' is not where many would place a person so important to modern computing, even though he thought he was writing an academic paper at the time. Think about what you are not achieving. Get real! 11:56, 8 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linmhall (talkcontribs)

Category:Old Shirburnians rename[edit]

At present there is a discussion relating to the renaming of this category. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at this discussion page. Please note that the discussion is not a majority vote so contributions should be based on Wikipedia policies and independent sources. Cjc13 (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cartel[edit]

It seems strange that 50 of the country's top independent schools, have an identical item in their History. Given that these schools have many thousands of years of history between them, to have about half of the section on their history relating to a technical infringement of that occurred some years previously — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doodlerguy (talkcontribs) 22:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The solution to that is easy - not deleting the cartel stuff, which is what I presume you would like to see given your previous unreferenced addition to the article, but to expand the rest of the history. Why not be bold and do that? --Bob Re-born (talk) 22:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

This edit [1] removed the info about the "cartel" issue, replacing it with a copyvio from the school's own history page.[2]. That's going to have to come out, or be rewritten. Because this wasn't a recent edit, I don't want to roll the article back; that would be overkill. But it now needs a rewrite. Also, see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:SherborneArchives_reported for a conflict of interest problem. --John Nagle (talk) 07:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking for other sources. Sherborne is mentioned at length in several biographies of famous people who went there. [3][4]. It appears to have been a miserable experience. --John Nagle (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody did a rewrite, so I took out the material from the school's old history page. The early history is interesting but needs to be rewritten and properly cited if it is to be included. --John Nagle (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Creech[edit]

The Wikipedia entry for the classical scholar Thomas Creech states that 'for two years (1694–6) he was the headmaster of Sherborne School.' But I can't find his name in the list of Headmasters here, nor even in the list of Ushers. Was he in fact Headmaster of Sherborne? If so, his name should be inserted into the list at the appropriate place. If not, the entry on Creech should be emended. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleisthenes2 (talkcontribs) 02:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC) The DNB says Creech was Headmaster from 1694-96, so I've inserted him in the list. (If anyone can show that the DNB is wrong, I'm happy to remove him.) One small problem is that he time overlaps by one year with his successor. Cleisthenes2 (talk) 03:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sherborne.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Music_downloads/Organ_Specifications.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Rusty Springs (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherborne School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

organ specification[edit]

this didn't seem encyclopaedic. i've never seen it on wiki before. it was overly detailed, and thus too dominant in the article, betraying its relevance. I looked it up and there is a niche repository for organ specifications online but feel this is beyond the scope of this project. the deciding tie-breaker for me was westmister abbey's page - i would do as per their article. it wasn't on there and so i removed it from here. Rayman60 (talk) 23:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]