User talk:209.115.232.65

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This IP address resolved to fw-center15.pason.com as of 18 June 2008, 08:06 (UTC)


December 2005[edit]

The link you added was not relevant at all. Please note also that Wikipedia is not a list of external links. Note that disruption of Wikipedia constitutes vandalism and may get you blocked. Honest, useful edits however are most welcome. Shinobu 16:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. -- GraemeL (talk) 12:58, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

February 2006[edit]

Stop spamming, please. You will achieve nothing. The wiki is stronger than you. --Ashenai 20:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Directional drilling, you will be blocked from editing. Oneiros 01:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please keep being awesome, and you will be rewarded for editing. Pete Tillman (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Now this guy is vandalizing his own page. Get a life, fellow. Pete Tillman (talk) 04:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of geologists, you will be blocked from editing. cf38 talk 15:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2008[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Coaldale, Alberta on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Jd027chat 19:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of geologists, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geologyguy (talk) 22:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nokomis, Saskatchewan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Skyezx (talk) 02:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template: Canadian Rockies[edit]

Hiya. The formatting changes to the template are being implemented across all (or almost all) Canadian templates, per discussions at WT:CANADA. Please provide your input there if you disagree with the changes. Thanks! Prince of Canada t | c 14:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalise articles as you did at Amen. DJ Clayworth (talk) 03:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of geologists, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mikenorton (talk) 19:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Oil depletion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 20:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Oil depletion, you will be blocked from editing. NJGW (talk) 03:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of National Football League Championship, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of National Football League Championship was changed by 209.115.232.65 (u) (t) deleting 10854 characters on 2009-02-02T13:46:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Talk:Hail Mary pass. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Pianoplonkers(talk) 07:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I would just like to remind you in a friendly way not to remove the information header at the Wikipedia sandbox, and other sandboxes, or make any other inappropriate edits, such as adding libelous, offensive, or copyrighted material. You are free to test your editing skills there, but please follow the instructions stated on the page. Good luck with your editing and thank you for your co-operation. Binksternet (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spectacular, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Spectacular was changed by 209.115.232.65 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-29T01:46:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Spectacular. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:47, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

Please stop. Your latest vandalism has been corrected. The vandalized page is on the watchlist. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Oakbranch (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Measurement while drilling, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 14:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and some issues were found because of which it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Academy des Beau Arts de Ville de Paris. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 14:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and some issues were found because of which it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Academy des Beau Arts de Ville de Paris. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Joseph RoeTkCb, 18:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Public holidays in the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Race card. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 22:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Hobe Sound Bible College. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- Luke (Talk) 01:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hobe Sound Bible College. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Thparkth (talk) 02:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Penn View Bible Institute. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Thparkth (talk) 02:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Conservative holiness movement with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Academy des Beau Arts de Ville de Paris, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 209.115.232.65. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Academy des Beau Arts de Ville de Paris.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Academy des Beau Arts de Ville de Paris}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Lightning Bolt (Pearl Jam album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. STATic message me! 21:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Lightning Bolt (Pearl Jam album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 22:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:209.115.232.65 reported by User:STATicVapor (Result: ). Thank you. STATic message me! 22:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Skr15081997. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Religious views of Adolf Hitler because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Skr15081997 (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:World Resources Institute are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Wikipedia articles are not necessarily monitored by the organizations mentioned therein, and are not an avenue of communication with those organizations. Thank you. Ibadibam (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.