User talk:Amanojyaku

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

Hello![edit]

I just want to be the second person to give you a warm welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy your stay! VincentGross 06:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I appreciate your eagerness to contribute to our encyclopedia, but I would like to encourage you to check out Wikipedia:How to write a great article. Currently, you are placing a lot of links on new pages that give only a sentence or two of information about the subject. The key to writing a good article is content. Use the sources you cite to write your own article telling everyone about those subjects. (Just don't copy and paste it from other sources because we have to respect the copyright status of those sources.) If you have any questions or comments, feel free to me a message. --Zsinj^Talk 05:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Madonal-CBS-60Minutes.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Madonal-CBS-60Minutes.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 21:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland[edit]

please note that animals of Iceland is a deprecated category for bird species, subsumed into category:birds of Europe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimfbleak (talk • contribs) 16:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Unterlanders Heimweh[edit]

I have nominated Unterlanders Heimweh, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unterlanders Heimweh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Lea (talk) 11:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Astral dreadnought[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Astral dreadnought, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astral dreadnought. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PROD nomination of Chance[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chance (muskox), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NN Not sufficiently notable. All references come from a single Canadian news source - was this even picked up by US news stations?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Elen of the Roads (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barghest (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Barghest (Dungeons & Dragons), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

not enough coverage in sources independent of D&D

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 17:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chance (muskox)[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chance (muskox). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance (muskox). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saving Iceland[edit]

Hi, I hate to bother you, but do you have any references to prove this radical organization is notable? Is it also possible to tone it down? This article has many serious issues. Bearian (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added some more sources about Saving Iceland to the article. I think this should be sufficient to establish notability. I don't have a lot of time to edit Wikipedia nowadays, so if you'd like to help out by improving the wording and tone of the article, feel free. --Amanojyaku (talk) 20:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Icelandic Elf School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 15:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Icelandic Elf School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 15:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism. Please see my comments on your talk page. --Amanojyaku (talk) 15:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dire rat for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dire rat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dire rat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Not a very active user (talk) 08:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]