User talk:Andrew11908

Welcome

Hello Andrew11908 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Talk:Uranus, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Mlpearc (open channel) 18:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John W. Davis— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John W. Davis. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John W. Davis was changed by Andrew11908 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866842 on 2015-04-21T16:43:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plessy v. Ferguson, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Plessy v. Ferguson was changed by Andrew11908 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975334 on 2015-04-21T16:47:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Adams. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 13:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Area 51 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Area 51. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Area 51 was changed by Andrew11908 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966322 on 2015-05-13T16:17:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Area 51. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)