User talk:Ethdhelwen

Hello, this is a page for user talk with Ethdhelwen, me! :)

At the moment, I am putting in a lot of work on the page for the 'Dominion War', to remove its warning boxes. Help with references very welcome!

Article history[edit]

The {{ArticleHistory}} template keeps all previous article milestones, such as failed or passed nominations; the point is to have them in a list that may be collapsed, so the head of the talk page isn't overpopulated of banners. Check here, the edit I made, and click on "show". As you can see, the links to GA1 and the failed AFD are still there to be checked when needed. MBelgrano (talk) 20:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Belgrano, sorry! I didn't realise that was what was happening to the banner. I have undone my undo! Ethdhelwen (talk) 20:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I could help, but I had only seen the series on TV. I have read that the problem with the article is a lack of out-of-universe perspective, and I don't have much to offer in that sense. I have never buy any magazine detailing the making of the series, so I don't have sources to provide or work from. Even more, I know the characters around, but I'm afraid I didn't even learn who were the actors doing them; in part because I hardly care about actors as "celebrities", when they aren't working, so I don't have either magazines with interviews. MBelgrano (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ethdhelwen! I am Alpha Quadrant and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Alpha Quadrant (talk) 21:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Star Trek[edit]

Hello Ethdhelwen I noticed that you have added the WikiProject Star Trek userbox, but you have not added your name to the list of active members. To do so, add your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Star Trek/Participants. I hope to see you around. If you have any questions, just ask me. --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alpha, thanks for inviting me! I have added my name to the list. Ethdhelwen (talk) 08:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination[edit]

Hello Ethdhelwen, I have nominated Dominion War for good article status. I think it is ready for this status. --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me find references for some of these articles on the merge list List of Star Trek: Enterprise episodes? Several editors intend to merge several episode articles due to lack of sources and in universe style. Thank you --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this nomination, the review is finished and the article placed on hold for one week. Vast improvements have been made since the first GA review in April, but (as explained at the review page), I feel that some changes still need to be made before the article can be granted the status of Good Article. Super Mario Man 20:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry i haven't made a start on the ideas in your review, i've been so busy with work, and now on holiday without ds9 companion book. I will get back to adding the missing refs and quotes when i get back, and resubmit for you to GA review. Thanks for doing such a thorough review! Ethdhelwen (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it's been an interesting read, and it has (I think) a lot of potential to reach GA. Super Mario Man 12:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Goodnight–Loving Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Longhorn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean Gilpin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Barton and Equity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Battle of the Marne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Namur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ethdhelwen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ethdhelwen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ostrich guitar[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Ostrich guitar. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 11:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC) The comment randomly accused me of deleting a comment in the Talk page. It was libellous, so I deleted it. Why don't you take it up with them!Ethdhelwen (talk) 20:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ethdhelwen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Star Trek: Short Treks. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martok[edit]

Thank you on behalf of Wikipedia and Star Trek fans for being a part of the Star Trek project. In case you did not see the article alert, Martok was put up for AFD today here. Lets try to avoid a repeat of Weyoun, which was deleted with one vote! Starspotter (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]