User talk:Hki007

Reply to your questions on my talk page[edit]

Hello. I decided to omit some information about the boat's interior when I copy-edited the article you had written — I don't think it's necessary to go into such details with a privately-owned pleasure boat — but re-added the tilting mast as it seems to be quite an uncommon feature. As for the "Ericsson spy boat", the main reason why I removed the name of the Swedish cell phone manufacturer from the article is that I could not find it from any of the references and all information in Wikipedia must be verifiable, especially now that I nominated the article for the "Did you know?" section of the main page. I've had the same problem with a number of articles — even if I've known something to be true, I haven't been able to put the information to the article due to lack of reliable sources. However, I found a blog that made a reference to Ericsson and used it. It may not be considered a "reliable source" by some, but it's not a crucial bit of information, so I guess it's okay.

I don't contribute to the Finnish Wikipedia, so I can't say anything about their tools and templates, but some time ago we wrote a usage guide for the infobox in the English WikiProject Ships. There are other guidelines and instructional pages within the project as well. However, that's only for ships — other WikiProjects probably have their own how-to guides and such, in addition to the large number of general guidelines, manuals of style and other help documents for Wikipedia. Generally, we don't expect that everyone reads them all, so don't worry about making a small faux pas here or there. It's just something you learn over time by following others' example, e.g. by using an existing, good article as a kind of template for a new one. Tupsumato (talk) 07:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I began creating new pages by copying existing pages and then editing out the extraneous material. If you have any more specific questions about editing, please feel free to contact me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:43, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Finnish transport vessel Wilhelm Carpelan[edit]

On 1 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Finnish transport vessel Wilhelm Carpelan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Stephen Elop, the CEO of Nokia, was once told that the Wilhelm Carpelan, the small green vessel moored in front of the company's head office in Finland, was a "Motorola spy ship"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Finnish transport vessel Wilhelm Carpelan. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve George Crouch[edit]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Hki007, thanks for creating George Crouch!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To avoid deletion, please return to the article and address the tagged kissues. there are also some notes on its talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hki007 Thanks Kudpung for your valuable comments! I will fix these over the weekend so that the article can be approved. Sorry for the hassle. // hki007

hki007 I've removed the copyright violations. I hope the article is fine now. Thanks! 22:30:04 UTC Wednesday, 17 January 2018

Copyright problem: George Crouch[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as George Crouch, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from

and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:George Crouch and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, George Crouch, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:George Crouch. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:George Crouch with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:George Crouch saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Largoplazo (talk) 01:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hki007Thanks Largoplazo for your valuable comments! I will fix these over the weekend so that the article can be approved. Sorry for the hassle. // hki007

hki007 I've removed the copyright violations. I hope the article is fine now. Thanks! 22:31:04 UTC Wednesday, 17 January 2018

Copyright problem: Baby Bootlegger[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Baby Bootlegger, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://blog.wheels-and-waves.com/2009/05/baby-bootlegger.html http://thunderboats.ning.com/page/baby-bootlegger-the-gold-cup-champion https://boatingnz.co.nz/articles/baby-thunder/ http://www.seqair.com/Other/Bootlegger/Bootlegger.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Baby Bootlegger and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Baby Bootlegger, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Baby Bootlegger. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Baby Bootlegger with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Baby Bootlegger saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DesignOps moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, DesignOps, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, I'll work on the article more! Hki007 (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Russian (November 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good Russian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DesignOps[edit]

Hello, Hki007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DesignOps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DesignOps[edit]

Hello, Hki007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DesignOps".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Good Russian[edit]

Hello, Hki007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Good Russian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]