Thanks for uploading Image:Image45.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Image45.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
License tagging for Image:20060830164035842.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:20060830164035842.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding that website into the list of external links, it is not official and does not add any significance to the article itself. In addition, do not add Katergiannakis into noted players' list, he played just a handful of matches with Cagliari and is therefore non-notable (a minimum of 100 matches is required for a player to be included there). Thanks in advance. --Angelo 12:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, please do nor misuse/massive use of flag. Secondly, Serie A is still on going. Please cite a reliable source he signed for Greek club, as there is no announcement by the Greek club yet. Matthew_hktc 18:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add a second entry for a club in the infobox when a player is only loaned to a different club and do not add "at present" (for an example infobox see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players). And be also aware that when you are updating goals and apps for a player the you have to update the "pcupdate" and "ntupdate" parameter, too. --Jaellee (talk) 12:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please read that when you update goals and apps for a player, you only update it with domestic league statistics. Giourkas Seitaridis has not scored a league goal since his last season at PAS Giannina.
Thanks in advance. --Wendroa 15:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunatly Giourkas Seitaridis scored at least one goal in Super League in Greece with Panathinaikos FC. AS YOU CAN SEE IN THIS LINK
Hi. The statistic in the player infobox is for League appearances only. As explained in my edit summaries, Stelios played in only two League games for Hull City; his third game was in the FA Cup. So please could you stop changing this. Cheers, BEVE (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kapsi national team.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:Kapsi national team.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Lakis aek.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:Lakis aek.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Katergiannakis.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:Katergiannakis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Images308.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Thanks for uploading File:Images309.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
File copyright problem with File:Oi xeniteme.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Oi xeniteme.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
Please update the pcupdate parameter when you are updating the goals and apps in a footballer's infobox. --Jaellee (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oi xenitemenoi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ⌘macwhiz (talk) 01:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Oi xeniteme.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Angelos Basinas, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kosm1fentWon't you talk to me? 06:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Giourkas Seitaridis. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Replacement of perfectly well-sourced content with unsourced is a no-no.– Kosm1fent 12:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Leonidas Vokolos. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Neither did PAOK win the 1998 Greek Cup nor did Vokolos play for the team then. Also, decorative use of icons is prohibited pre WP:ICONDECORATION.– Kosm1fent 14:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot insert your personal opinion in any article unless it is verified by a reliable source. Cheers. – Kosm1fent 20:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you cannot present opinions as statement of fact, as you are currently doing (see WP:RSOPINION). – Kosm1fent 13:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kostas Chalkias, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Kosm1fent 07:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iliochori view.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MorganKevinJ(talk) 00:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kostas Chalkias, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Kosm1fent 11:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Giourkas Seitaridis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Also what does "With this Geourgas Seitaridis played 2 European competion, one World Cup and one Confederation Cup with Greece." mean? Please use correct English grammar and syntax when editing Wikipedia articles.– Kosm1fent 20:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've redirected the issue of your inserting greecechampion.com pages as external links on articles of football players to WP:FOOTY. The discussion is located here, your input will be appreciated. Cheers. – Kosm1fent 21:23, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They don't add something unique to the article that is not currently or potentially referenced by a better source (fails point #1).
Greecechampion.com appears to be a fansite, most probably written by yourself (fails point #11, seems a conflict of interest).
This mass addition of those external links on the article of every Greek squad member seems like a try to promote your website by spamming (fails point #2).
If you wish to re-add those external links, please open a discussion on the talkpage of each individual article, explaining how this addition will benefit them. Cheers. – Kosm1fent 08:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeated addition of unreferenced material to BLPs despite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
Hi. Please stop making unsourced edits as you did at 2013–14 UEFA Champions League. The top scorers table will be updated when the source is updated. I see you have been warned previously and hope you stop making unsourced edits or I am afraid that you will be blocked again after some more warnings. Thank you QED237(talk) 21:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |ntupdate= or |nationalteam-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Iliochori. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Iliochori. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Iliochori. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Angelos Basinas, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 06:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Kosm1fent 16:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Georgios Fotakis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GiantSnowman 11:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
