User talk:Kmvhmv

August 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to United States, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Airbus A380. Your edits appeared to be unhelpful or vandalism and were reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:14, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at All of Me (John Legend song), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 02:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Honda CR-V. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Renault Trafic. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toyota RAV4. OSX (talk • contributions) 01:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mitsubishi Freeca. OSX (talk • contributions) 23:30, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Toyota RAV4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Liberty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing and persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal ^talk 00:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hyundai Getz, you may be blocked from editing. Areaseven (talk) 08:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Perhaps it would help if I explain why your edits keep being reverted as vandalism. We're trying to build the world's biggest and most accurate encyclopaedia, and the way to make sure our articles are accurate is to make sure they are fully referenced. That means, if you add new information to a page, please add an appropriate reference as well. Repeatedly adding unreferenced information is the reason you're finding yourself in trouble.

For information on how to add references, please see WP:CITE.

If you do not stop adding unsourced information we may have to block your account indefinitely (please see WP:DONTGETIT for reasons why), until such a time that you can demonstrate that you understand and will abide by the requirement to reference information.

Best wishes, Waggers TALK 08:37, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The unreferenced material is 100% fake. This is a vandalism-only account. OSX (talk • contributions) 08:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced content despite numerous warnings. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kmvhmv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not trying to make disruptive editing that much because i tried to get onto other different pages for editing articles just for fun so please unblock me Kmvhmv (talk) 16:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I fail to see a productive edit out of this account. Your long term nonsense and vandalism only stopped now when you are blocked. only (talk) 21:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kmvhmv, why have you waited until now to talk? We have been trying to converse with you. Do you understand why you were blocked? — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to support the administrator's decision to decline the unblock. This editor has made no constructive edits at all and the information added has always been hoax material with absolutely no factual basis whatsoever (e.g. adding hoax locations In automotive articles for manufacturing facilities). OSX (talk • contributions) 22:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually prefer that he gets a site ban because he has been vandalizing the articles and then he is not really a valuable contributor. Nim - 60.224.249.55 (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MusikAnimal, I would like to ask if I can permanently delete my wikipedia account because I knew that I am permanently blocked from editing articles and i am creating a new account right now and afterwards I will not try disruptive edits means that I will read the message carefully on my new UserTalk page

Any more of that nonsense and your account will be extended to a site ban because you cannot make a useful edit - Nim 60.224.249.55 (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]