User talk:Kosta matt

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kosta matt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Confuoco tuition, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 12:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Confuoco tuition[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Confuoco tuition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 12:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:RHaworth, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Favonian (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was a question, not an attack. Im the one who was attacked. Since when was this community so closed? Communism should work in this forum, surely. There does not seem to be any help or answers. Furthermore, the tone used was not conducive to resolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kosta matt (talk • contribs) 15:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Be an egotistical idiot. Conservative" was an attack, not a question. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph Do we as the west have a chance, if that was an attack? it was a statement of fact. Kosta matt (talk) 15:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Kosta matt (talk) 15:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Wikipedia[edit]

Hi: You appear to have got off on the wrong foot; let me see whether I can help explain things.

This is an encyclopaedia project. Therefore, although the number of articles we can include is theoretically unlimited, we do have criteria for inclusion so that we don't become something else - a publicity platform, a directory, etc. The criteria are summed up as notability, which we define - except in obvious cases such as heads of state, Nobel laureates, Olympic medallists, states, populated places, periods of history ... - in terms of coverage elsewhere in reliable sources such as non-self-published books, reliable newspapers, academic journals, and other encyclopaedias. A summary can be found here. Another aspect of being an encyclopaedia is that neutrality is one of our fundamental principles, and it therefore doesn't matter whether an organisation or idea is meritorious; its inclusion in the encyclopaedia is subject to exactly the same notability tests as are applied to other topics. See Wikipedia:Advocacy or more briefly this section of the longer guideline on "tendentious editing". As a corollary, Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit, and is open to people of all backgrounds, opinions, and persuasions. It is therefore emphatically not a place to argue a point of view about "the West" or to promote communism, liberalism, democracy, or any other ideology, self-explanatory though such advocacy may seem in the context of an open project. And to enable very different people to work together here, a modicum of civility is required, and is therefore another of our foundational principles.

If you can find two or three articles or book segments talking at length about the company, or a considerable number of brief mentions, all independent of the company itself (i.e., not press releases or interviews), you can start afresh with an article about the company, citing those sources from the beginning to ward off speedy deletion. An easier way to do it is Articles for Creation, where experienced Wikipedians will evaluate the article and it will not be moved to mainspace until it is reasonably deletion-proof.

I hope these explanations are helpful, even if likely unpalatable. Welcome to Wikipedia, I hope you'll stay around and continue to give us the benefits of your particular knowledge and interests. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]