User talk:Mathiassandell

November 2011[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Christina Aguilera; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please see WP:NFCC. Nymf _hideliho! 17:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga deletion[edit]

I see that you've expressed concerns over the Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga page. There is now a discussion about its future at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fame Kills: Starring Kanye West and Lady Gaga (2nd nomination). You may wish to contribute. SplashScreen (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 17:07, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Hair (Lady Gaga song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are moving towards getting blocked nicely buddy. Continue like this and that's exactly what will happen to you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 17:14, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Aguilera images[edit]

I strongly suggest you read Wikipedia's fair use policy which is clear about what is not usable: "Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images." Tabercil (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Christina-aguilera.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Christina-aguilera.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Aguilera in 2002.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Aguilera in 2002.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aguilera in 2002.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Aguilera in 2002.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nymf _hideliho! 15:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Do You Want the Truth or Something Beautiful Tour, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Palomafaith2010.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Palomafaith2010.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/colinwhitephotography/4443515825/. As a copyright violation, File:Palomafaith2010.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Palomafaith2010.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Palomafaith2010.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Palomafaith2010.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Palomafaith2010.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Once (Diana Vickers song), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —Andrew_stalk 06:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Gwen Stefani discography, you may be blocked from editing. What were you trying to do? Why? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 13:35, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you done working on Gwen Stefani discography, or are you still going to fix what you did? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NowThatYouGotIt.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NowThatYouGotIt.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Gwen Stefani discography. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. You didn't answer my earlier question, so I'll ask again here. Following your long series of mystery edits to Gwen Stefani discography, there is still a Canadian reference missing. When are you going to fix that? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 16:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Aguilera discography[edit]

As stated in WP:DISCOGSTYLE when an album receives a standard and Latin certifications: " For an artist who has received both certifications, use whichever one results in the higher shipment number." Mi Reflejo was certified 6× Latin (600,000) which is higher than a standard gold (500,000). Reverting my edit without an explanation does not help your cause. Erick (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Who You Are (Jessie J album), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Paloma Faith; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rain the 1 18:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paloma Faith discography, you may be blocked from editing. Adding non free images and edit warring Rain the 1 18:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paloma Faith discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Telling lies in edit summaries - any editor can clearly see that the image has the incorrect lisence - [1] Rain the 1 19:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absurd edits[edit]

Stop making pointless edits on the article Christina Aguilera discography. The worlwide sales are always above the USA sales. --XtinoFrost (talk) 15:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paloma Faith discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 14:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Curiosity (EP), you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Fame Monster, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

When you do citations and you want one citation for multiple items, you do not copy the entire citation template for that item again. What you do is you change <ref> into <ref name="[whatever]">, and when you want to use that particular citation again you use <ref name="[whatever]"/>. These are the changes I had to make to Fall to Grace.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You haven't provided a single reliable source for the edits you've made in the past few minutes. Please do so in the future. - JuneGloom Talk 18:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Aguilera's seventh studio album[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Christina Aguilera's seventh studio album, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Christina Aguilera. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 17:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Ryulong (竜龙) 19:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers shouldn't be bigger than 300x300.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Paloma Faith 30MLA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history at Christina Aguilera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest reversion includes the following edit summary: "it was uploded in april and hasnt been deleted and still not up for deletion, so stop saying likely because its not up for deletion, stop removin". Your contention that it is not "up for deletion" is false. The image has been nominated for deletion at Commons, which is reflected on the Wikipedia file page. Do not reinsert.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Genie in a Bottle, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. If you have a reliable source calling it a "massive success", please cite it. Otherwise, this is your opinion and does not belong in the article. Thanks. SummerPhD (talk) 23:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Paloma Faith discography, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 20:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bionic (Christina Aguilera album). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bionic (Christina Aguilera album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aligning pictures[edit]

Since you can't seem to understand on the actual article, I'll take time out of my day to explain to you why the pictures should not be touched. They should be aligned from right to left and so forth. Also, the picture of her hometown which is Staten Island is positioned in the section of her life in Pittsburgh, which shouldn't be there. Do me a favor and look at how the article looked prior to that picture. They were all positioned accordingly. Because of this new photo they need to be switched. Please let me know if you need any help comprehending what I said because I'm not sure how clear I can make myself. DeadSend4 (talk) 20:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Every other participant in this struggle has made some effort to discuss the issue. You have simply shouted and reverted.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 06:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for immediately returning to the edit war that you were blocked for previously. Any admin can unblock when editor agrees to stop changing image positions in Christina Aguilera without gaining consensus.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 07:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mathiassandell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wont do it again, i promise, i would like to start over, change my account name, thats a reson why i created another account because i wanted to start fresh...please just give me a chance.

Decline reason:

Getting thumped for it once didn't seem to be enough to get you to alter your behavior. It doesn't seem reasonable to assume getting it twice would. - Vianello (Talk) 18:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Christina Aguilera's seventh studio album for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Aguilera's seventh studio album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Aguilera's seventh studio album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]