This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Reverting Ahollypak
I was about to revert its removals of archive.is links, but I searched for "archive.is" in WP-space and came up with this: Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC
It appears that removal of links to archive.is is approved, but Ahollypak was doing it with no edit summaries and marking the edits as minor. Ahollypak may also be part of the events discussed here at ANI. Jeh (talk) 09:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the links.:) (talk) 11:44, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Looks like Ahollypak was blocked. Jeh (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your vandalism-fighting efforts on 6 July 2014 (although I feel there is more to it than I realize). Codename Lisa (talk) 10:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the appreciation.:) (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey Bro what was wrong with the alomar? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaddyLicious13 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Please provide citation to verifiable sources for the edits. Please see the link [1]:) (talk) 04:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi Rijinatwiki/Archive 2. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 13:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your time in looking at the request and granting the rollback right. Rijin (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Thanks a lot! :) Rijin (talk) 04:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki!
Hello, Rijinatwiki, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:16, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Mark Dodson
Hi Rijinatwiki,
You recently wrote - Hello, I'm Rijinatwiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mark Dodson because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rijin (talk)
The reason for my contribution/edit was as follows:
1. The copy on the page was of a low standard IMO.
2. It is openly promoting something called Allmusic
3. Mark produced albums right up until 2001, the original article states that he stopped producing in 1992 - incorrect!
I thought wiki was all about facts and this is why I believe my updated article is justified
Please use talk page of the article for discussing the removal of factual errors if any before mass removal. Also provide citation to verifiable sources for the contents added. Please see the welcome note in your user talk page.Rijin (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Radu Postavaru references
Hello! Thanks for your time reviewing my article. I have added relevant references, so please take another look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StheEyE (talk • contribs) 08:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Aabasoft
Hi
Aabasoft is one of the growing IT/ITES company from Infopark www.infopark.in . This page is to create awareness of existence of the company and not for any promotions. Please give me a couple of days to create an article about the company and stop your action against the company page for deletion. ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomaszac (talk • contribs) 13:11, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for your time reviewing my article Nodar Kharatishvili. I have added relevant references, so please take another look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MDLM (talk • contribs) 12:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
ScottyCZE
Hello Rijin,
thank you for taking look on my text about project Reading helps. I wanted to share information about interesting Czech project and I believe that it could be valuable for others to have information about it from another source than project website. Are there any recommendations from your side what can I do with the article to be more in favour? Should I add more sections or something like that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottyCZE (talk • contribs) 07:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Every facts written in the article should be verifiable from a reliable sources. Please see the follwing links.
Hello. I have found some sources. Is it possible to use them and change the deletion of that page? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Reading_helps for more information about sources I found.. Thanks. ScottyCZE (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, it seems you want to promote something. Please take a look at 'what Wikipedia is not'. Still you feel the article is suitable for Wikipedia entry then I would suggest to crate it in 'articles for creation' so that it is peer reviewed. Thanks. Happy editing!RijinTalk 12:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
digigram
hey you Rijinatwiki, how dare you to delete my article "digigram"... that page is just about the company , it is not at all a promotion
Please let me know the reason to mark my page for deletion.
Please let me know the reason to mark my page for deletion. I will follow all rules. please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dausaanoop (talk • contribs) 11:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rijinatwiki.Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers.--Pratyya(Hello!) 14:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Interesting one, that. Most of the spambots seem to stick to user pages - this one had a user page and an article. Peridon (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
New Page Patrolling
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I changed the speedy deletion criterion on Pillars of entrepreneurship, because the article is devoid of context (A1) rather than consisting only of vandalism (G3). Please read WP:CSD (specifically criterion G3) and the field guide to proper speedy deletion to learn about what is vandalism and what is not. Thanks, Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Contested deletion - ZA
Hi Rijinat,
The page is not unambiguously promotional because that is an introduction page of ZoeyAnne, similar to Zalora - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalora. Instead of flagging this for deletion, I would appreciate if you could, in your capacity as Wikipedia's Editor, advise me on how I can better phrase this page.
Hello Rijinatwiki. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at MATLTA. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Your A1 tag here was inappropriate. It's also very bad practice to place such tags on articles while they're still being worked on immediately after creation, absent serious violations like copyvios and attack pages. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm SmileBlueJay97. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, AMORPHOUS pharmaceutical systems, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SmileBlueJay97talk 12:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry
Rijinatwiki, I've received your notification about my deletion of Biographies of Living Persons PROD. I was not supposed to delete that content. Since I'm new to wikipedia, I was learning how to edit a content. By mistakenly it got deleted. I knew about the deletion, when you left me that notification. It was mistakenly happened. Very sorry about that. Don't delete the page I've created named "Adihyan Vk". Music Info Music Buzz (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rijinatwiki, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of AOMEI Backupper, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 08:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joni Ernst. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ronn Torossian. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kevin Sorbo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alex Titomirov. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because...
i have not used any promotional material on the page
i have not invited any one to take their services
I have not used any affilate links
i have only written about the company and their management and their services
Making people know about an organistaion is not against voilation i believe
i have gone through hostgator , dreamhost and other hosting portals and i have written in same way and i was thinking to include some more reputed companies like bigrock , reseller club , znet live and etc
let me know where i am wrong
i understand and i really wikipedia , i am not a spammer here .. i am writing about companies with out any marketing material
calling it a WP:G3 due to the blatant falseness of content. if it were actually true, then it would be notable. ⁓ Hello71 11:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Tom Paulin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Go to animal jam and have fun!!!!!Italic text— Preceding unsigned comment added by Flamehulk541 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Animaljam.com
go to animaljam.com and have some fun. WHOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flamehulk541 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleting my work on Sarah Kemble Knight
While I can understand why you deleted the Humor section as it was not complete (although if you looked at the edit page I was interrupted while working on it and planned to come back to finish ASAP) I have no idea why you deleted external links which went to a map of her journey and the text of her journal. Please do not delete without asking about it on the talk page first. Thank youAmanda50973 (talk) 17:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Rijinatwiki. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Rijinatwiki. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Re Revert at Terrorism in Australia
Hi Rijinatwiki,
I noticed your recent revert here at the Terrorism in Australia page. I think you were totally correct in reverting as the incident was not sourced, and whether it was 'Terrorism' is debatable. However, the an incident as described did occur. See Battle of Broken Hill. it took me a while to find it actually! Just FYI. --220ofBorg 05:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
--Pratyya (Hello!) 14:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rijinatwiki. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at MATLTA. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
