User talk:Roy Nave

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Roy Nave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ni-Ni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Whispe ring 18:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ni-Ni[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ni-Ni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Whispe ring 18:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ni-Ni[edit]

The article Ni-Ni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable singer lacking non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ni-Ni. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Please stop adding copyrighted images to Wikipedia. It is a violation of editing guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bowie High School (Austin, Texas)[edit]

Your recent restoration of content that I had removed from the above article shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what Wikipedia or any encyclopedia is. By definition, an encyclopedia is a tertiary source. That means that every single thing in it must be sourcable to reliable independent sources. Nothing whatsoever in an encyclopedia can come from the editor's personal knowledge. Further, Wikipedia is not a collection of random facts. It is instead intended to be an overview of what has been written about the subject. Specifically, it is not intended to serve people associated with the subject of the article.

Frankly, that article was a mess. Apparently, no one had been watching it and over the years it became an extension of the school's social media pages. Wikipedia is not social media. Are there other pages that are just as bad? Yup. Does that matter in regard to this specific page? No. There are well over 5 million articles on Wikipedia and to put it bluntly, crap happens. This one is going to be cleaned up.

That being said, if there is any content of general, not local, interest that was removed that can be supported with reliable independent sources and falls within Wikipedia policies and guidelines, feel free to start a discussion on the article's talk page and try to gain a concensus for its inclusion. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 16:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eternal Atake. StaticVapor message me! 17:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]