User talk:Snoopy5566

Welcome!

Hello, Snoopy5566! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Jess· Δ ♥ 20:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2014[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Creationism, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Creationism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Jess· Δ ♥ 20:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ken Ham. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. See talk page of article. This content is the subject of extensive discussion. This seems one of a series of edits that indicate a pattern. MrBill3 (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe claims are identified as such[edit]

re your edit summary [1]. Per our policy of WP:NPOV we present the situation neutrally. Which in this case WP:UNDUE / WP:FRINGE means we present the overwhelming academic mainstream consensus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	this is for your tireless corrections to the page creationism Kelb2002 (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Snoopy5566 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

74.45.32.145 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Kelby2002". The reason given for Kelby2002's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kelby2002

Blocking administrator: Callanecc (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Obvious sock. Now directly blocked. Elockid ^(Talk) 19:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Me getting blocked[edit]

I didn't do anything! Why am I blocked? The reason Kelby2002 and I have the the same IP addresses is because we use the same computer. We are not the same person! Kelby2002 does have two accounts, Kelb2002 and Kelby2002 but this is my single, personal account. Please let me edit again.

see my BROTHER did it!!! and WP:MEAT-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snoopy5566 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please put a duration of my being blocked. I am not guilty of sock puppetry or anything else! Kelby2002 must just use this same computer (which is in a public building) as I do. I have no idea who he is and I have never met him. This is an unfair blocking.

Decline reason:

And it just so happens you're editing the same articles? In the same way? It just so happens that one account restores edits the other account made? Are you playing musical chairs? It looks like it, since your edits from the same IP on the same computer. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

we are brother and sister we both believe the earth was created in 6 days does that mean that we are the same person NO!! unblock this account nowThe K (talk) 03:47, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]