User talk:Stufroguk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Stufroguk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Energy Savings (October 10)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Sport in England[edit]

I notice all the material you've been adding at England - which is great, but will raise issues of giving too much prominence to details, given that the article is supposed to summarise everything about England. It might be better if you added more details at Sport in England - where there are new sections needed - and then it would be possible to summarise them better in the main England article itself. And don't forget to add reliable sources wherever you can, as well. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem, thanks - though we do need to get the balance right, so that football, say, is treated more prominently than, for example Formula 1 or darts. If you leave messages on user or article talk pages, please remember to sign them with four of these: ~ Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

I still don't think you're going about this the right way. The main article on sport in England is.... Sport in England - but I don't see you making any edits there. It is that article that is the one that needs to be expanded, or at least improved. A summary of the most important aspects should then be at the England article - but, in my view you are doing it the wrong way round. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I take your point. I intend on adding content to the Sport in England. Just because I haven't yet doesn't mean that I'm not going to. Stufroguk (talk) 12:06, 14 November 2013

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at England shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. . PS: You need to discuss this on the article talk page, not try to have a discussion via reversions and edit summaries. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

As I said - please make your comments on the article talk page - not in edit summaries - so that other editors can contribute to the discussion. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

This was all sorted in the end via the power of democratic discussion, education, acceptance, and understanding. The page is much better now and was partially reduced and content moved to where it should be. Still a few errors on there but will edit those as soon as possible. - Stufroguk (talk) 16:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Energy Savings (December 8)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

To be honest can't be bothered with this one; a bit suspicious anyway trying to find credible sources for an energy broker - Stufroguk (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bolton Lads and Girls Club (December 11)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Ping me (By typing @{{u|Ninney}} or {{ping|Ninney}}), once you finish editing. Let me make some minor alterations within a day or 2 (For e.g. History before Activities, References are not cited properly) & then submit it for AFC Submission. - Ninney (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. sorry just responded via your talk page before I saw this message. I managed to draft and add all the edits you requested apart from the logo. I don't quite understand the image tool, it rejects a talk or edit page, only accepts published encyclopaedic entry. thanks. - Stufroguk (talk) 16:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Bolton Lads and Girls Club was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Bolton Lads and Girls Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ninney (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holly Bank Trust (April 15)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

@Gigs Good feedback. The article has been edited to reflect suggestions regarding confusion over subject matter; social media brand mentions have been removed; further sources added; and subjective comment regarding the moderate success of a social media campaign has been removed also. - Stufroguk (talk) 15:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)