User talk:The Wookieepedian/Archive 3

hiKapowza

Star wars

You say it like it is a good thing. Richardkselby 21:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Afbr.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Afbr.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 07:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for rollback privileges

Actually, this page isn't active yet, so I had to remove your request. But you're more than welcome to help further this proposal when the time comes to do so. Thanks. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 02:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Merge project

Hey there; I have been contemplating a major merge project that will merge galactic information, ground vehicles, et cetera. This will reduce the star wars stubs to nice, neat lists. Plus, it might get noticed by some of the higher ups, because they seem to hate stubs. Deckiller 21:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Right now, I've been working on the star wars galaxy page by merging the Core worlds, etc. I also placed the short trade route article in the Star Wars galaxy article itself. This is really just a temporary fix; perhaps we could create a "List of Star Wars regions" or something. I kept the Outer Rim up for now, since it was fairly lengthy. Deckiller 22:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

-=nods=- Ideally, I would like to have a lot more direct lists, but with so many Star Wars editors, it would take a major discussion. I just finished merging the galactic divisions, trade routes, regions, and other areas. However, some of the regions are also governments, so I don't want to interfere too much with that, y'know? Do you think we should open up a wide discussion? Deckiller 22:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Then again, I'm a guy who is a major mergist ^_^. When I came to Wikipedia, I started 40 articles on different Xenosaga things. Fortunately, it wasn't a popular subject, so it really went unnoticed for a while. Eventually, I was told it was fancruft, so I went ahead and merged it into 5-6 lists. I did the same for Xenogears, and, yesterday, Chrono Cross. Star Wars is a LOOOTTTT bigger and all, so I can understand a detailed article on the Jedi Starfighter. Anyway, I'll think of some ideas. If you want, we can have an IM discussion: I'm on AOL. Deckiller 23:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Hey, while we're on the subject...do you mind taking a look at the Xenosaga (series) page and maybe contributing to the peer review for it? =P Deckiller 23:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

I think I know what the limit is; I won't be merging articles longer than 2-3 sentences without dicussion. You were right. Deckiller 04:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject proposed

Hey, I started a Star Wars wikiproject proposal. Here is the proposal. Deckiller 00:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay, cool. A good example of a Wikiproject is Wikipedia:WikiProject Final Fantasy. We could also create a things to do page (like this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Final Fantasy/things to do). Deckiller 00:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Images on your User Page and Talk Page

Sorry, but any images uploaded onto Wikipedia that qualify under "Fair Use" have to be taken off your User Page and Talk Page. I quote Wikipedia:Fair Use...

"Fair use images should only be used in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages. They should be linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are the topic of discussion. This is because it is the policy of the Wikimedia Foundation to allow an unfree image only if no free alternative exists and only if it significantly improves the article it is included on. All other uses, even if legal under the fair use clauses of copyright law, should be avoided to keep the use of unfree images to a minimum. Exceptions can be made on a case-by-case basis if there is a broad consensus that doing so is necessary to the goal of creating a free encyclopedia (like the templates used as part of the Main Page). "

This means the following images have to be taken off your User Page:

1. Lumpy2 1024x768.jpg
2. Lumpy-HS.JPG

And on your Talk Page:

1. Jedi archives.jpeg

Sorry, but it's the rules. I'll leave you to take them off. It's rather rude of me to do it. Thanks. Deskana (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

*sigh* OK, I removed the images from my user page. But do you think there is any way I can keep that one image (Image:Jedi archives.jpeg) on my talk page, since it illustrates where my archives are? :D The Wookieepedian 02:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Afraid not.

Used outside article space, they are often enough not covered under the fair use doctrine. They should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages. They should be linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are the topic of discussion.

This says that unless it's in the normal namespace (main namespace doesn't include User and User_talk), they might not be covered by fair use and cannot be used. Also, it says they should be linked not placed in talk pages, and that's only if the talk page is about the topic, which your page isn't. Basically, it needs to go. Again, I hate to have to be the one to tell you. I'll leave you to remove it again, since it's rude for me to do it. And try not to shoot the messenger eh? All I suggest is that you try and find an image in the public domain. But being from films, that's unlikely. Thanks. Deskana (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

You've been actively contributing since I left this message, so you can't have missed the big "You have new messages" box, so I deleted the image for you. Happy editing! Deskana (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

A New Hope

You need to let go of this incessant need to change every instance of Star Wars to A New Hope. The title didn't exist until 1981, and there was NEVER any mention of it before then. If it had been INTENDED to be called that, it would have been. It wasn't. The picture refers to 1976, and it should reflect the film as it occured then. What Lucas claims now does not jibe with recorded history and facts. He may own Star Wars, but historical fact should not be changed just because he doesn't like it. And besides, the original "Star Wars" is a perfectly correct notation, whereas calling it A New Hope - in this instance - is not. TheRealFennShysa 19:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Now the edit on the novelization is just ridiculous... the novelization was ALWAYS released as Star Wars : From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker... only very recently has it been changed to "A New Hope" - and even on the inside it still lists the original title... for accuracy, that one's gotta be reverted... And to keep adding in "A New Hope" is not a compromise, you know - the world will still go on if "A New Hope" is not mentioned somewhere. TheRealFennShysa 19:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Also, all your edits on all the Oscar pages is just going to far... the link goes to the proper retitled page, but for historical accuracy, they need to be changed back to just Star Wars, as that is how the film was billed then, how it was nominated, and how it won the awards. The subtitle came years later. TheRealFennShysa 20:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Galaxy versus Expanded Universe

I don't mind your incessant changing of whitespace, and I leave it alone, but I have to draw the line at your removals of Expanded Universe (Star Wars) link and replacing them with Star Wars Galaxy- they are two different things. One is a geographic location in the movie and Expanded Universe in which most but not all events take place, and the other is an entire apparatus of novels and games and RPG guides that constitute an alternate fictional universe, along with a particular canon status. Please stop removing EU links, and keep adding galaxy links when appropriate. --maru (talk) contribs 08:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

I find it implausible how Maru insists on dabbling in Star Wars affairs but can't seem to find the time to assist me with the King of Fighters articles. -_- --Zero^Talk 10:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Han 125x110 animated.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Han 125x110 animated.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 02:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Problem solved. See Image:Han 125x110 animated.gif. It's author at originaltrilogy.com has released it under the public domain. :) The Wookieepedian 02:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Are you 100% sure of that? The absense of a copyright notice does not mean that something is in the public domain, under current law everyting is copyrighted unless it's creator explicitly stated that it can be used for any purpose (wich include commericial use, modification etc). Saying "please use this image to link to us", does not constitute a release of all rights to an image. It also contains what looks like a screenshot from a Star Wars movie, so even if Jay Sylvester have released all rights to his work that would still make it hard to claim that the animation as a whole is in the public domain since Lucasarts have not released any rights to theyr content that has been used in it. --Sherool (talk) 02:54, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:George_lucas03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:George_lucas03.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Holiday_special_ad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Holiday_special_ad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 19:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair

This case has closed. The arbitration committee has banned Copperchair indefinitely from editing Star Wars and War on Terrorism. He may be banned from other articles that he disrupts under the Wikipedia:Probation order in his case. To be enforced by block. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 04:34, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Marquand_Richard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marquand_Richard.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 13:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Up and running!

Belatedly, done and done! I apologise for the delay. Whatyathink? Now, onto other matters ... TY so much for your patience and assistance! :) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 06:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I wonder many things about Wikipedia/ns. :) BTW: feel free to prune the article section, which might be too long (and does reiterate some notions mentioned above). It currently reads fine, however, and thanks for your input.

As well, I'm eager to split our beloved cyborg article in two. I don't think it'll be as challenging as some think: we've already laid out a content plan, and I think the biggest challenge concerns the shear volume of information. I'm hopeful to do the deed in the next week or two: to that end, I hope to prevail upon you to assist. OK? And (even now) I can see some Wikipedians opposing the split, but you can't please everyone all the time. :) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 06:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

BTW, care to weigh in on this issue? Live long and prosper. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 21:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sithera.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sithera.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 10:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

My Page

Glad to bring a smile to your face. I wish I could claim credit for the words in quotes and italics, but of course I can't. I can take credit for the words not in italics or quotes, and for splicing it together :P Lol, anyway, glad to make someone laugh. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelic Wraith (talk • contribs)

subst

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

Thanks! howcheng {chat} 18:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Project

The StarWars WikiProject will be starting soon, here is what I have down so far: User:Deckiller/WikiProject Star Wars. We have 7-9 people interested so far. Deckiller 21:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Bts_bg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bts_bg.jpeg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 07:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject up

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Wars. Thanks! BTW, sexah pic :) Deckiller 17:07, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Srotac

I don't think this character deserves a Wikipedia entry of his own, but I thought you might want to check whether it could be put on Wookieepedia before it is proposed for deletion (or merge it into the appropriate article). Could you have a look at this article? Thank you, Kusma (討論) 20:45, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

This character should be merged with, say, List of minor Star Wars characters. I'll add it to the WikiProject things to do page that I'm trying to get flowing. Deckiller 20:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, once you sign in to the project and whatnot, I was wondering if we could discuss the priorities I mentioned. I think that, if I continue trying to do everything at once, we'll all be confused. Like I said, I think we should focus on stub merging first, then list splitting/creation, then prose improvement/sources. Deckiller 22:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey, if you have any items to add to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Wars/things to do page, or comments, or tasks you feel like doing, that would be awesome :) Deckiller 01:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Template

Good job. If any arguements develope over the template just call me. Jedi6 08:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Heya, not pickign a fight

But we almost had a chat at Template_talk:Firefly, but you missed it when you merged Templates? -b 02:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Snowtroper

I'm going to see about getting this person banned. He's been sneaky vandalizing star wars pages for two weeks. Thanks for helping me revert his vandal edits. Deckiller 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Portal

How do you like the portal? Jedi6 13:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Template:Star Wars

You were asking how to change the color, so I changed it for you. Jedi6 23:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Selected Voting

Make sure to vote for the selected article for next week at Portal:Star Wars/Vote. Jedi6 03:14, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Qui-Gon Image

Hey I waas wondering if you have any good Qui-gon pictures. I'm looking for one with his lightsaber out for a template I'm working on. But I need the pic to be a square or longer top to bottom than left to right. Image:Quigon.jpg is close but the wrong dimensions, any ideas? Jedi6 06:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Templates

Template:JediApprentice, Template:StarWarsVehicles, Template:StarWarsCompanies, Template:StarWarsPlanets, Template:StarWarsGovernments. I believe that's it. Deckiller 20:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

You're due for one

File:Star Wars barnstar.png

Thanks for all your work on Star Wars articles! Deckiller 23:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Congragulations on your barnstar! Jedi6 04:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

It was good of Deckiller to give you that barnstar. He gave me one too the other day. Jedi6 22:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Collaboration of the week

Make sure to vote for the Star Wars Collaboration of the week for next week at Wikipedia:Star Wars Collaboration of the week. Jedi6 03:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Sequel trilogy

Hi, congratulations for all the hard work, I think it's great. Also, I just wanted to ask you whether you are all right with putting some reference about the possible Sequel Trilogy of Star Wars. I think that another set of movies is most than probable and I also just wanted to ask you whether you've seen the actual page.

Thanks for your attention Painbearer 16:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars voting

Please make sure you vote for the Star Wars selected article, list and picture by Monday. Jedi6 10:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

GNS article

Nice work in your quotes in NICOLE GAUDIANO's wikipeople article. I'm glad you reformed and became a freaky Star Wars do-gooder rather than running "roughshod over the president’s biography" and changing his name to George Wanking Hitler. BabuBhatt 00:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Appearance on USA Today

Adam Kingrey made an appearance on USA Today. His commentary is found approximately 3/4 of the way down the page. Congratulations, Adam! --Shultz III 19:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

No kidding! I was shell-shocked when I saw that in there on IRC- maybe I could go vandal and get a mention as one of the few bad apple admins? :) Anyway, that's pretty awesome. You should definitely keep a clipping of that. Not many teenagers get mentioned in USA Today! --maru (talk) contribs 20:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, the reporter had called me on the phone twice, and we exchanged several emails. I had no idea where exactly this would be printed. The Wookieepedian 20:35, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Congrats. I guess this means you are our posterboy! Jedi6 00:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Holy shit. Congratulations! — Phil Welch (t) (c) 00:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

WOW, CONGRATS!!!! Deckiller 00:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, guys! :) The Wookieepedian 00:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Kudos! Now, on with editing! :) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 01:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

They spelt your name incorrectly. They also misspelt "editcountitis". Oh well. Well, congratulations again! --M@thwiz2020 03:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair use image problem

Hi. I had to remove Image:StarWarsOpeningLogo.JPG from your userpage as it violates the fair use policy I described above. Sorry, but as I said before, it's policy. Thank you. Deskana (talk) 22:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

TPM and AOTC had multiple lightsaber battles as well

Oh, yes... I apologize for my arrogance... However, you can consider it as the "most number" of duels. Thanks! 203.87.151.226 03:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The Movie Spoiler

How come RV the movie spoiler links on Ep2 and Ep3? They are as valid as any other external link. Scottanon 16:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. They are similiar because they're summaries of the same movies, but it is also a different perspective and voice. And it's one little external link. But, whatever. I'm not getting in a rv war over it. Scottanon 01:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

SW

I just wanted to drop a note to you. I noticed you doing work on some of the SW articles, mostly the DV one since that is where my focus has been lately, but I just wanted to say thanks for the help you've given with the articles. I think the Vader article is finally coming around and hope that we can get it to FA now that it is listed as a good one. I also thought it was cool to find someone else from southcentral KY. -Thebdj 00:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

2001

Check out the text duplications. Ronabop 12:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:BR-soldier10.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BR-soldier10.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 00:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:SWcastphoto.jpg

I need a photo credit or URL link for Image:SWcastphoto.jpg to help Portal:Star Wars get featured. Jedi6-(need help?) 20:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Episode I Trivia

My bad then. Jedi6-(need help?) 05:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Episode III "Notable Firsts"

I hope you don't mind, I'm sending an e-mail to the Wikipedia help desk, reporting Pawnofwhite for starting an edit war without good reason. My claims are that you and I have never heard of these "well known facts" and yet he refuses to cite his source on this. I've done a few searches and come up with nothing. But I hope you don't mind my using your name as support. ;) The Filmaker 21:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars

Hey, I am a big Star Wars fan, but do not know a lot about were George Lucas got the concept. Someone just added that Lucas got the concept of Star Wars from Star Trek. I do not hink this is thrue, but am not 100% sure. (Steve 23:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC))

I have posted a message on User:71.113.134.13's talk page that he/she must support their claim with evidence of some kind. I told him/her to post it on the Star Wars discussion page. My opinion is thta if he/she does not respond with evidence in 24-hours that his/her edits are reverted. What do you think? (Steve 00:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC))

As my brother says: "Cool Beans." I had noticed to chage the page and that is great. If he/she submits evidence then we can discuss the change. (Steve 00:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC))

List of minor characters in Blade Runner

Much thanks for creating that list. Great work! - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 03:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Sourcing new information

I noticed your addition to Serenity (film) of info about upcoming Serenity comics. Could you please include source information when you add stuff like that? So much of this kind of material looks like rumor and fan speculation, especially when it includes "weasel words" (WP's term, not mine) that obscure or completely omit the source, like "It has been recently confirmed" without saying who confirmed it. Since you contribute so much to these articles, it's important to provide a good example for others to follow, particularly when many newer editors feel that anything they hear on a fan discussion forum is suitable material for a Wikipedia article. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Thrawn Template

I see you guys liked the template I made! Need anymore templates made. Jedi6-(need help?) 02:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

You are welcome!! Jedi6-(need help?) 02:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the welcome! M ^o P 03:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, thanks! User:Puppet1

I agree! User:Puppet2

I might. User:Puppet3

Yes, I realized one day that this would probably get people thinking I'm the main vandal; trust me, its only my love of music. Thats my story, and I'm stickin' to it.

Anyway, I was wondering if I could ask your opinion of something; do you think that vibroblades/vibroweapons deserve their own page? I was thinking that they might, but I'm beginning the question my choice, as they're already featured on some pages. I just need some insight from other members. Cheers! M ^o P 04:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Sure, I'll write it up and let you guys see what you think. Thanks and cheers! M ^o P 04:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I just had to;

For being a Wookiee.

M ^o P 05:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Shadows of the Empire

When you get back could you check the trivia of Shadows of the Empire I don't know if it is all true Jedi6-(need help?) 00:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Clone Wars

Why did you move the Clone Wars article? There is nothing else it can be confused with, and "(fictional event)" is not an accepted clarifier; you also broke nigh-upon hundreds of links. --maru (talk) contribs 22:39, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Fair use images

Hi Adam. I notice that you're using fair use images on User:The Wookieepedian/The Star Wars Holiday Special. Please note that such images cannot be used outside mainspace articles - please could you therefore remove them from this and any other of your userpages? Thanks, CLW 14:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi Wookieepedian

How are you doing Wookieepedian? I was wondering if you have been doing anything major lately. If not maybe you could help nominate and vote for the Star Wars Collaboration of the week and Portal:Star Wars/Vote? (Wow you have a lot of templates, especially compared to me) :-O Jedi6-(need help?) 01:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I know, we had the misfortune of everyone but me and Deckiller being on a Wikibreak last week. Things are starting to pick up a little though. Jedi6-(need help?) 01:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

User:The Wookieepedian/The Star Wars Holiday Special

Hi. I see that you've been editing since my message above, but haven't removed the fair use images yet. Please could you now do so? Thnaks, CLW 08:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Third request...

I've politely requested twice that you remove the fair use images from User:The Wookieepedian/The Star Wars Holiday Special, and again you've been editing but have ignored my request. You've not removed the images and you've not replied either here or at my talk page. Please would you now remove these images, otherwise I'll blank the page in question - the onus on going through such a long article to pick out the fair use images is on you, not on other editors, so if you won't take the images out blanking the page is the easiest way to deal with this. Thanks, CLW 17:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Then keep the back-up page, but without the images in it. Please see Wikipedia:Blocking policy where it clearly states:

Fair-use images on user pages are not allowed and may be removed where they are found, which can most often be achieved with a polite talk-page request.

You could add colons after the opening [[ so that there's a clickable link through to the image but no actual image displayed. Thanks, CLW 17:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that, CLW 08:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Cityspeak

You have recently created a page called Cityspeak. Could you please provide citations for the quotes within this page, and where the idea of this language exists in the film Blade Runner to begin with? I'm unconvinced that this is a real topic. ~CS 00:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm probably going to merge this in a few days; if you have any concerns, or want to do it yourself, let me know. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 04:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Take a look

Heya,

You might be interested in my new vandal whacking stick. It's posted on my user page. *grin* Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 18:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

They were laid by a chocolate bunny. Go on, take them! :P _-M ^o P-_ 04:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter! :D _-M ^o P-_ 04:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I special-ordered a 3-ton egg shaped like a Stormtrooper just for you, but they got backed up in traffic at New York. Something about a traffic accident involving an 18-wheeler and giant bunny. _-M ^o P-_ 04:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. I had trouble packing it into a box though, kept shooting at me and calling in a Lambda. Oh well, once this lightsaber scar fades away you'd never know I battled Vader. _-M ^o P-_ 04:56, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

A tiny favour.

Hi there Fluffy, I hope I'm not bothering you too much; I was just wondering, if you have any spare time in your busy schedule, could you look at the Editor review page and try to maybe review me? I'm trying to find out how I can improve and how I'm viewed on Wikipedia. Much thanks! _-M ^o P-_ 04:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I think a review of me at WP:ER would be a novel idea as well, chap. -Zero^Talk 19:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

y

George bush is a hero, y do u hate him

So not cool, man

That was not a good trick to pull. Makgraf 05:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I think you know what I'm talking about. There was a fairly extensive debate, a vote and then another debate about the vote on the R. Tam Sessions issue. It was resolved. Then you unilaterally changed it, without discussing it on the talk page, by an alleged interview you don't directly link to that doesn't even appear to be on the site. If you have a new case to present you should link directly to this interview and argue how it changes your case. If people don't address it then of course feel free to change it. But it's certainly not a settled issue. Makgraf 05:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Just to clarify are you talking about a new interview with Joss Whedon that has just gone up or the one from last year to the Sydney Morning Herald? Makgraf 06:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

ROTS trivia

I know - it's one guy over and over again, and after doing a Google search, I can find only one citation for it on a mailiing list. That's it. No other mentions. That's not verification, as far as I'm concerned. TheRealFennShysa 17:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Station.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Station.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (t • c) 15:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:2001dvd.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2001dvd.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (t • c) 15:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

u do realize?

that star wars is not real and never happened, as long as u no that, im good

by the way i live in Texas, the most southern place in the continental U.S and im a republican

• That doesn't surprise me. The Wookieepedian 23:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

im from canada tho, land to the north, so im more northern than u, ur from kentucky, like the fried chicken, a southern favorite, and if i remeber correctly kentucky was a border state and admitted slavery, a very southern thing or "thang"

A Video You Must See.

Hey,

I ran across this incredible Star Wars Video that you have got to see. Someone clips from Movies 1-3 and Return of the Jedi and combine them into a wonderful video to the tune of "Remember Me This Way." An incredible video. Go to www.youtube.com and search for the title Remember Me This Way. It should be the 9th video down. Tell me what you thik. God Bless (Steve 02:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC))

He has a life

Do you find it ironic that someone who claims he has a life nevertheless seems to log into Wikipedia every few hours to revert Talk:Wookieepedia?  :-) --Doradus 16:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about the misunderstanding around this; I assumed Doradus was talking about you, not another editor, so I reverted. My mistake, its all been cleared up now, and I hope there are no hard feelings. >_< Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{That's hot.} 16:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• im am always on myspace and i drop by wiki to see if some loser has taken out my ramble so i do have a life--Andy 04:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Haninside.JPG)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Haninside.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

edits to template:title

i saw that you made some edits recently to {{template:title}}. In the past this had caused some problems with the way the article title is displayed in some skins. as near as I can tell, things look fine in the monobook skin, but strange at best in others. Of course, I changed a few pages to use this instead of {{template:lowercase}} before noticing this myself. If it bothers people they're free to change it back I guess, but I wondered if you were working on making this be friendlier to other skins? I would look at it myself, but I don't know enough about the syntax of templates to be effective. It would be nice to use this instead of the lowercase template, but I don't think it's ready for primetime yet. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 22:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Why do you keep deleating Science fiction and not the other generes? All the other ones are under Star Wars Films 2.

{{title}}

Please don't add {{title}} to articles. It's not ready for use yet and breaks in many cases. Night Gyr 02:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Vlad III Dracula

Did the real person, Vlad III Dracula, really appear in the Young Indy chronicles, or was it the fictional character, Count Dracula? User:Zoe|^(talk) 18:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

How is that possible, since he would have been about 500 years old? User:Zoe|^(talk) 18:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lukepromo2321.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lukepromo2321.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 22:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Voy-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Voy-logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Star wars nomination

Thank you for noticing my comment. I feel like the DVD infomation sounds more of like an advertisment than more of an infomartive encyclopedia. However, once again, I'm a newbie and may not know what I'm talking about. If my view seems wrong, please tell me so I can learn what a wikipedian view should be.-ScotchMB 00:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I changed my vote to support and thank you for helping me learn.-ScotchMB 00:27, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Yea, I forget to sign put my support, blah thanks for reminding me.

Ha thank you for your concern on my editing =) -ScotchMB 00:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Spoiler tags

Hi. Have you been following the discussion on my talkpage concerning these...? I'm curious as to your opinion on the matter. -Zero^Talk 20:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Nothing to add..? I really think your input on the matter would be appreciated. -Zero^Talk 23:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Adam, I am sorry if I offended you in this matter. I'm not requesting your support in the discussion or anything similar to this. I merely wanted to know your opinion on the subject. Please respond. -Randall Brackett 17:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Firefly logo

I'll keep uploading the better picture for Firefly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tec2030 (talk • contribs)

Can we comprimise? Can we use your picure but take the black bars on top..please??? --Tec2030 23:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, well at least it is better than the original picure. Sorry for the conflict. --Tec2030 23:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Episode I > the film

It's the other way you bastard! :P jk The Filmaker 03:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Dude, Why do you keep deleting my link?

How is that spam? Have you even looked at the link?

How is a link to an article that discusses scenes that didn't make the final cut for Revenge of the Sith considered excessive? It's entirely iformational. Quit removing the link.

July Firefly Issue!

The July 2006 issue of the Firefly WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. plange 17:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars ship names

Hey, Wookieepedian (I guess I know where you edit... =) )! I've read your comments on the aformentioned articles. Please explain your thinking more to me, as your definately have more experience than I. If necessary, I'll add a description for every ship: it's condensed history, commander, accomplishments, famous battles it was at, and where it was destroyed.

Thanks,

RelentlessRouge 11:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Jason Palpatine

You asked: "Is your name seriously Jason Palpatine? The Wookieepedian 02:10, 7 July 2006 (UTC)"

No. It's my The username. It is from a character I created originally for the Star Wars role-playing game. You must remember, STAR WARS is deeply rooted in mythology. Originally, he was the Emperor's rouge son who joined the rebelion. Later, with the release of the prequel-trilogy, his nephew.

• Palpatine, because he was supposed to be related to the emperor.
• Jason, from the hero of Greek mythology who led the Argonauts in the search of the Golden Fleece.

-- Jason Palpatine 02:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC) (speak your mind|contributions)

Richard III (1955 film)

Thanks for your re-tooling of said article. It looks a lot better now, actually. Sorry for the late thanks. So... thanks. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 03:20, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Star Wars newsletter

Project updates Greetings, Star Wars editors! Deckiller here. It's the first edition of the WikiProject Star Wars newsletter, and yes, it's a semi-ripoff of the Esperenza newsletter. I think it's important to begin with some good news: Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, and Jabba the Hutt have reached featured article status! Kudos to the editors who helped obtain these achievements! WikiProject Star Wars is also on a mission to improve Star Wars articles using the following ideas: An out of universe perspective versus an in universe perspective (see Wikipedia:Writing about fiction and the future ammendments to our manual of style) Evolving lists into regular articles Moving excess information and specifics to Wookieepedia (and providing links to Wookieepedia per the "see also" and/or "external links" sections) Enhanced communication amongst WikiProject members More to come These should provide the basic steps needed to improve and "encyclopedia-fy" the Star Wars series of articles. Things to do There are plenty of Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Wars/things to do. An update to the page is coming very soon, and it will represent the new and exciting changes that Star Wars pages will be receiving! Out-of-universe versus in-universe perspectives Although details are forthcoming, I would like to take this time to explain the gist of this concept. Wikipedia has generally agreed that fictional articles should write about the topic from a "real world" perspective, focusing on real world issues and topics, with a section or two for plot synopsis and so on. Jabba the Hutt is a solid character example, and Clone Wars (Star Wars) is quickly moving toward an out of universe perspective.

Article evolution As many of you know, lists of minor Star Wars-related themes are very common on Wikipedia; however, since these may be seen as violations of Wikipedia policy (and having seperate articles would breach even more policies), the tentative solution is to create general articles on a list's topic (for example, turning List of Star Wars devices into Technology of Star Wars, which allows us to cover everything from hyperspace to comlinks in a general encyclopedic fashion). This can be very tough for some broad topics, so the key is organization. I encourage all editors to list their ideas on the WikiProject talk page. It will be a very difficult — but tangible — effort. For an example, let me point you to the Final Fantasy WikiProject. Some of us over at that WikiProject decided to turn various components of Final Fantasy X, such as Pyreflies, Yevon, and the backstory — into an article describing the world of Spira. Location descriptions were given a List of locations in Spira article, and the details themselves were placed on the Spira (Final Fantasy X) page. This is a decent template to follow — however, we will need to place priority on out-of-universe, "real life" topics and perspectives in realtion to the article. Sounds confusing, eh? It won't, for examples will be popping up left and right in the near future! Signed... — Deckiller 03:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

How about some usage

re template:Title-shortcut, (I'll show you mine if you show me yours! <g>) ... {{ut}}, {{w2}}, {{w2c}} (note cats). Is this WPP:Books, WPP:Novels, or WPP:series related? Then needs Category:Book templates too.

Question

No, I'm not. I checked out, and Copperchair is blocked. How could I be him/her if when a user is blocked his/her IP address gets blocked? By the way, nice handling of our difference about the image. Esaborio 15:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Esaborio 18:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Having looked over Esaborio's records, I have found three things: his user page begins exactly the same as Copperchair's, his first edit is just three days after Copperchair's blocking, and his edits (Star Wars and The War on Terrorism) are on the same topics as Copperchair's. I have no definite proof he's Copperchair, though, and I'll wait and see what he says in response to my query on his talk page. PBP 16:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Yep, it's Copperchair. He replied saying he didn't care if I believe him or not and asked a question about Star Wars. Hope the edit wars don't begin again. PBP 17:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:StarWarsOpeningLogo.JPG)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:StarWarsOpeningLogo.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Copyedit for Episode I

I'm getting ready to submit Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace for FAC and completing the prequel trilogy FAs! :) I was wondering if you would perform a quick copyedit through the article before I do so. The Filmaker 18:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Episode I FAC

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace is now up for featured article candidates! The Filmaker 00:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Hey, I'm leaving for a family vacation to Oahu, Hawaii on August 2nd, and won't be back till August 10th. So I was wondering if you wouldn't mind keeping an eye on the FAC while I'm gone, fixing the article should more objections come bye. Thanks. :) The Filmaker 17:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Leia mac 1280x1024.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leia mac 1280x1024.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --85.160.8.42 10:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

your RfA

appears to have a problem-- none of the questions with answers appear.  :) Dlohcierekim 21:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Please answer the questions fresh, use the old ones as a guide if you must, but they must be out of date. If you want to pass, do a good job on presentation here. Read this when you get a chance, but first answer the questions and sign again on the acceptance line. NoSeptember 21:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

It's not too late to expand on your answers and your nomination statement, which currently leaves much to be desired. These days you really have to sell yourself if you want any chance to succeed :). If you need examples, look at the answers on the RfAs in the green zone listed on this page. NoSeptember 21:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on my page. NoSeptember 21:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, The Wookieepedian! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. - Glen 22:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

August 2006 Firefly Newsletter

The August 2006 issue of the Firefly WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. plange 01:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

McCallum quote

You probably can't recall since you made this edit last November, but I was wondering where you got this Rick McCallum quote: "Leia's recollection as described in Return of the Jedi have no inherent flaws and are valid given the greater context of the saga. But I suspect those looking for contradictions always find them." You added it to the article Alleged inconsistencies in Star Wars on November 11, 2005. I would like to have more reliable source for this quote in the Padmé article than Answers.com. I have removed the quote for now, since this has come up at the article's FAC. Thanks. Dmoon1 20:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Firefly Templates

As I mentioned on User:Plange's talk page, the category is only redundant coming down the category tree FROM Fox, but not going back up. Or is the intention for categories always to go downward? That's why I felt it was not repetitive, the article itself has no other reference to the Fox category. You would have to first go into the Firefly category to find it. - BalthCat 23:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Serenity reverts

The stuff I removed did contain a reference, but the reference used was for a translation of the name Miranda, and did not support the conclusion that the name was chosen because of the translation. Further, the translation was challenged on the talk page and it also seems to contradict a later statement that it was chosen for the character Miranda from The Tempest. This was previously discussed on the talk page here: Talk:Serenity (film)#Miranda_2 --Lethargy 00:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Invitation

You have been invited to join the Wikipedian Star Wars edits Organization by John Fry. To join just add Category:Wikipedian Star Wars edits Organization to your userpage. John Fry 18:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Lost (TV series)

You recently made an edit to Lost (TV series) that you summarised as a "clean up" that involved moving around many sections of the article that had just been altered; User:Wikipedical had just restructured the article based on some suggestions I derived from the wikiproject television guidelines. Perhaps you might be interested in contributing to the discussion about the structure of the article here.--Opark 77 01:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing

I know you're a Star Wars fan, but you have to realize that, god forbid, there's something else out there with the title "Episode One / Two / Three". I'm reverting your removal. Scumbag 21:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Sally_Forth.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Sally_Forth.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Palpatine FAC

I'm not sure what you're talking about. The FAC nomination instructions say "If you are resubmitting an article, use the Move button to archive the previous discussion. For example, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Television → Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Television/archive1"

I thought Palpatine was nominated just once before. Dmoon1 21:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Would you mind commenting at the FAC sometime soon? Dmoon1 21:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyedit

Hey, I've finished up the Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope article and was asking you and a few other users to copyedit it while it's up for GA nominee and before I submit it for FA candidacy. Thanks. :) The Filmaker 23:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

So, dude, you never gave me a direct answer (you did answer the peer review), but would you mind copyediting it for me? Or should I find someone else? I figured a man with Star Wars in his name would like a shot at copyediting the article for the film that started it all. :) The Filmaker 03:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I just put the article up for FAC, if you'd like to do a copyedit while it's up, please be my guest. :) The Filmaker 12:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Jim Raynor

Please reconsider your revert on the Star Wars canon article. I'd much rather trust an editor who has politely presented his opnions over and over again, as opposed to someone who has descended to personal attacks and the like. I've done a little reading on this Raynor character, and he's consistently shown the same pattern of abusive behavior to get his way. I don't believe he is proven his case by any means. TheRealFennShysa 00:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Who should you trust more? The guy who actually provides evidence albeit not always in the most polite way, or the guy who has made NO EFFORT whatsoever to back up his claims? RealFennShysa, you should read up on ad hominem fallacies. It is both ridiculous and offensive that you would make such a big deal about my impoliteness, while YOU continue to commit ad hominems, dodge the questions, and make THREATS of ban. You're no saint, so don't try to pretend that you're taking the high road. JimRaynor55 01:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Apparently you have the same trouble understanding me as you have with MikeWazowski. I made my points back in July, and I don't feel the need to state them again, just so you can ignore them again. However, this is not the place to have this argument, unless TheWookieepedian wants to continue this here. TheRealFennShysa 05:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

See the talk page in the "Star Wars canon" article. I've gone over your so-called "points." But as you say, we'll continue this elsewhere. Just remember that you started it, by going to OTHER people's talk pages to try to ad hominem me. JimRaynor55 14:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

To nitpick, going to someone else to prejudice him is not so much ad hominem as poisoning the well. Rogue 9 12:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Firefly logo

Hi

The consensus on the Firefly talk page seems to be in favor of the DVD cover. Please don't revert any more. Thanks!

SW Collabaration....

Hello just dropping in to let you know that I'm organizing a huge Star Wars collabaration, if you want just go to this discussion page..... Cheers, --Sadow (talk | contr.) 19:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

yo wookiedawg

when did you get diagnosed with aspergers, i'm just curious 64.251.142.74 00:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Category:Indiana Jones characters

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Category:Indiana Jones characters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at [[Talk:Category:Indiana Jones characters]]. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. johnpseudo 02:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Buffy nomination restarted

Since you have were involved with discussion before at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Buffy the Vampire Slayer, you might appreciate knowing that the nomination for the Buffy articles has been restared at the same wiki page. I am letting everyone know who might not be aware (whether they were for or against the article becoming featured). Cheers -- Buffyverse 22:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Smart as a Wookiee.

Lucas ignore things you count as canon. He wrote 3 films that negate them as canon. Yet you think the marketing arm of Lucasfilms has the last say?

Riiiight.

Duggy 1138 08:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

He has repeatedly said he wishes all copies of the Holiday Special destoryed. He either had his name taken off it during production, or had nothing to do with it. Splinter was written by Foster as part of a deal in exchange for ghosting the Star Wars novel. Total different kettle.

Duggy 1138 11:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Please be civil, and not use phrases like: "OK, how in the hell am I going to get this through your head?"

"Lucas Licensing, THE ONES WHO DETERMINE CANON," Yeah. Right. Lucas determines canon. Lucas chose which part of the EU to ignore when writing the films. Lucas Licensing calls everything canon so they can sell more to suckers.

If you'd ever watched the Holiday Special and watched Revenge how could you say the Wookie section "still fits."

"Excutive Producer" means made by LucasFilms, not necessarily anything else.

He didn't "mistake and contradicted the events of the DROIDS series" he ignored it.

"HOWEVER, Lucas Licensing created a retcon for the Droids series explaining that R2 and 3PO..." yadda, yadda, yadda, buy our product.

Ewoks was contradicted by the Ewok films, and by a degree by Jedi.

"In addition to the fact that Lucas personally WROTE the Ewok films, they were never contradicted either." So?

"The Clone Wars series was never contradicted" Of course it wasn't. It was designed to be part of canon and leads right up to Revenge. Have you watched it?

The EU isn't Canon. Lucas basically ignored it when creating the prequels, because he could, as he created the canon. He lets others play with his toys. He lets marketing pretend that stuff is canon to make him more money, but frankly, it ain't canon. And unless you're Rich, you ain't the

biggest fan.

Duggy 1138 12:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Wookieepedian. Consider this a friendly warning: I've worked well with you in the past, but the current revert war is unacceptable. Technically, I believe that both you and Duggy 1138 are in violation of the three-revert rule. Remember, it takes two to edit war. Both of you, talk this out at Talk:Lengths of science fiction film and television series. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

The 3RR refers to three edits within a 24-hour period. These four edits are within a 24-hour period: [1], [2], [3], [4]. I'm not going to block you now, but don't do it again. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Copyvio on Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure

Hey, Wookieepedian. I was looking at Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure in connection with the discussion at Lengths of science fiction film and television series, and I noticed that the section you added here appears to be copied pretty much directly from here. That's a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. I've removed it, but I wanted to let you know. If there are other pieces of prose you've copied from the Star Wars website, you should remove and/or reword them as well. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek episode naming

Hiya, since I have seen you involved with the Star Trek articles, I would like to invite you to participate in a discussion that is ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:Naming conventions (television). The specific question being discussed is whether or not episode articles should include a standardized suffix, or whether the suffix should only be used on articles that specifically require them for disambiguation purposes. Since the result of this discussion will probably directly impact the Star Trek categories, if you could please pop in to offer your opinion on this matter, it would be greatly appreciated.  :) --Elonka 07:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Firefly FAC

I've now expanded the Music section per your request. Let me know if it meets your criteria for acceptance, thanks! --plange 17:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Han shot first

Damn right he did. — Loadmaster 04:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Did you know?

Congratulations, The Wookieepedian (talk • contribs • count)! It may not come as a surprise to your that you are Star Wars's biggest contributor! s d 3 1 4 1 5 final exams! 14:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rwookrrorro.jpeg

Hello, concerning your contribution, Image:Rwookrrorro.jpeg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from Lucasarts Entertainment. As a copyright violation, Image:Rwookrrorro.jpeg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Rwookrrorro.jpeg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk::Image:Rwookrrorro.jpeg]]. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Rwookrrorro.jpeg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. AlistairMcMillan 05:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

happy holidays!

File:Julekort.jpg

Wishing you a Happy Holidays
from s d 3 1 4 1 5 Happy Holidays!! 14:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Tannhauser Gate

Hi Adam- In the Roy quote from the end of Bladerunner, I suspect the word might be 'sea beams', not 'C-beams'. I haven't seen the script for the film, though, so I didn't change the article. 'Sea beam' is a (not very) common name for a fish in the dorado family. -Eric ^(talk) 04:04, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

shut up

your gay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.17.221.74 (talk) 05:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC).

Humanism UBX

This user is Humanist

Found you in the humanist category. {{User:Whytecypress/UserboxHumanist}} Live Long and prosper.--Whytecypress 18:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Hannibal Lecter films

Template:Hannibal Lecter films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --CyberGhostface 21:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Fettbodyshot.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fettbodyshot.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Fettholidayspecial.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fettholidayspecial.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Fso dystopiannovel7.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fso dystopiannovel7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Indiana Jones - aged 93

Your contribution to the Indiana Jones page is much appreciated - just a quick point : -

The article never stated that older Indy had been kicked out of canon - only that his 'canonicity is now unclear' - which is quite correct. It has not yet been specifically contradicted, which I daresay is your point, and in fairness no-one has yet actually removed his mention on the official biography [5]. This said, it is now impossible to source any materials that refer to him (i.e. he is removed from all commercially available prints of Young Indy), and Lucas's intention seems clear (although our interpretation of his intentions shouldn't have any bearing on the article). It's also likely to be contradicted by Indy IV (although again, we can't let expectations of what a future film is going to contain sway the article).

The bottom line is that Lucas has removed all mention of him from the show. An analog would be the Star Wars holiday special - which is firmly non-canon, despite being produced with his input, because he has later changed his mind (as he often does).

Therefore, I suggest that we leave in his mention in the biography, but we make a clear italicized note stating that whether or not these events are canon is currently unclear - and I will then alter the following section about his daughter to suit. Thoughts?

Regards, Mikejstevenson 19:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Csubi3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Csubi3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jedi archives.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jedi archives.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yuriy Lapitskiy 07:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Hi, Wookieepedian. You deserve another barnstar. Axl 18:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		The Wookieepedian, for ongoing contributions to film-related articles. Axl 18:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 22:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Clonewars3GF.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clonewars3GF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Natalie Portman

Please do not add unreferenced controversial biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Natalie Portman. Wikipedia is a legitimate encyclopedia, not a tabloid or outlet for the rumor mill. Ward3001 02:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:2010dvd.jpeg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2010dvd.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 23:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:BR-soldier5.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BR-soldier5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cindel towani2.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cindel towani2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Crossingendordesert.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Crossingendordesert.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:George lucas03.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:George lucas03.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Jeremitt.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeremitt.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:ObiwanESB.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ObiwanESB.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Star101davis1.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Star101davis1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SWcastphoto.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SWcastphoto.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 10:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ObiwanESB.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:ObiwanESB.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Session 416 first title large.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Session 416 first title large.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. --Nehrams2020 09:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

American films

Please please!!! help fill in List of American films. Even if it is just a few details it all helps -any contribution you can make will be more than appreciated!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 17:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:WillowDVDcover.jpeg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WillowDVDcover.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Indiana.jpeg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Indiana.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 19:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Origin of Image:Newjediorder1024.jpg

Hiya. The copyright tag on Image:Newjediorder1024.jpg says it's a screenshot, but it most definitely isn't -- it's a collage. I'm pretty ignorant about the image side of Wikipedia; could you please find a more appropriate tag for the image? --EEMeltonIV 20:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:ESBOpeningCrawl.JPG

I have tagged Image:ESBOpeningCrawl.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:YoungIndyJones V1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:YoungIndyJones V1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 13:53, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Holiday_special_ad.jpg

I have tagged Image:Holiday_special_ad.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast 16:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Request for participation in Asperger FARC :

As a member of Wiki Aspergians, I hope you'll comment on the Asperger's FARC. I am voting to de-list, as I believe the article has taken a drastic POV shift toward pure pathology and away from the dual nature - talent+disability - articulated by the leading RS's of the field. I hope you'll vote whether you agree or not with my assessment :

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#FARC_commentary_10  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CeilingCrash (talk • contribs) 19:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 

Indy 4 titles

Can I suggest incorporating previous title rumors based on what was mentioned here? There's no mention about the speculation in the article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Moblog_402483abedfac.jpg

I have tagged Image:Moblog_402483abedfac.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 06:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Jeremitt.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeremitt.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 18:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KOTCScc.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KOTCScc.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 05:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Firefly CfD

There is a call for deletion on most of the Firefly character articles. -- Shsilver (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Characters of Firefly

Recently you contibuted to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrial Book. There is now an ongoing discussion stemming from that AfD here if you wish to contribute. [[Guest9999 15:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)]]

Image:Raiders_of_the_lost_ark_poster_A.jpg

I have tagged Image:Raiders_of_the_lost_ark_poster_A.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Citation templates

Just curious, why do you capitalise the 'c' in "Cite news"? It doesn't quite matter and it's an interesting quirk. Alientraveller (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Revengeofthebrick.jpg

I have tagged Image:Revengeofthebrick.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BR-soldier10.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BR-soldier10.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vaderandbast.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vaderandbast.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Princess Leia Organa Peer Review

I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite my adding of a lot of references, it lacks reliable source citations. Although I've already requested another peer review for another article, as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Any helpful comments are appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other Star Wars-centric articles (particularly bios like that of Luke Skywalker and Han Solo, also in dire need of certain expansion). Thanks. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 03:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:B0009A40F2.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:B0009A40F2.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blackfleet3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackfleet3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ec 1 b.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ec 1 b.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mo 37.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mo 37.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lumpy-HS.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Lumpy-HS.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lukeworkingonxwing.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lukeworkingonxwing.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 18:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wookieeceremony.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wookieeceremony.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 18:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Star Wars events

I have nominated Category:Star Wars events (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RevengeOfTheSithNovel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RevengeOfTheSithNovel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, The Wookieepedian! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be. Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany | finger on pulse Wikipedia:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board | finger on pulse

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 16:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

User Page

Your user page is entirely too long and too detailed. Wikipedia is not Myspace or your personal web page. Please see this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_page) and this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#MYSPACE) to see how to make your user page more apporpriate. 134.68.227.179 (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Who are you to tell him that his user page is inappropriate? He can make his user page whatever he damn well pleases, so long as his "Myspace" qualities don't make it into actual articles. - Jimbo Wales

Fair use rationale for Image:Vectorprime.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vectorprime.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CloneWarsPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CloneWarsPoster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 10:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:HeirtotheEmpire.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HeirtotheEmpire.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2010-poster01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2010-poster01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)