User talk:Vogone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vogone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan653 (talk) 15:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA[edit]

CVU Academy.svg
We see that you need a little more understanding of Counter-Vandalism before you're granted Rollback. The Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy exists to help users, like yourself, understand the way to identify and handle Vandalism through one-on-one instruction. Perhaps you'd like to ask a question of our instructors, or perhaps Enroll in the Academy.

Dan653 (talk) 15:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I believe you made a mistake on a page I edited earlier today. I may be wrong, if so, please explain why (Mrpieface45 (talk) 00:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC))

@Mrpieface45: Since neither you nor me edited any page today besides this one, I believe you are mistaken :-) Vogone (talk) 06:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Accusations[edit]

Please do not accuse me of vandalism as you did here. I suggest that you read the policy carefully. - Sitush (talk) 14:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, this was a mistake. ;-) --Vogone (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Source Code Editor[edit]

It's fairly clear you're using some sort of bot to make sure that whenever certain pages have large amounts of content removed they're automatically reverted, as you managed to make several reverts within seconds of the changes being made.

That's not okay. 203.97.127.101 (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

No, I don't use any Bot reverting other user's edits. I might make mistakes anyway and it's absolutely okay if you mention them. Kind regards, Vogone (talk) 01:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Typical German stuff. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you :) Vogone (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Another beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Careful, have too many of these and you'll need a taxi to get home :-O Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Why did you take the CSD tags off Overwerk? The article creator keeps taking them off....William 17:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Abuse[edit]

Glaisher [talk] 08:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

LGBT rights in x articles[edit]

Why did you revert all my edits in those articles? – Plarem (User talk) 20:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Because I don't tolerate vandals who push their POV on topics they have strong opinions about. Vogone (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Please abstain from using terms like “terrorism” or “propaganda” when writing about LGBT. Thank you, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
How is adding public opinion to articles NPOV? – Plarem (User talk) 20:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
I was talking about “terrorism” or “propaganda” which you added to these articles. These are NNPOV and should not be added. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I understand. I will stop using those phrases, even though they are true. I am talking about these edits,
amongst others. – Plarem (User talk) 20:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Common opinions can be presented in a neutral way, without a valuation. Using terms like terrorism and propaganda however is a cleary unneutral valuation. Besides, I feel ashamed to see a Christian being so intolerant towards people who merely have a different strain. This is certainly in no way Christian. Vogone (talk) 20:32, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Ok, how would you put 'LGBT pride' in the article, without the liberal bias? But that was only 1 edit, which I am not complaining about. – Plarem (User talk) 20:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm not saying it is disallowed to state critical views. It just should not happen with obviously negatively connotated vocabulary and a clear valuation, on both sides. This is why I don't think users with a very strong opinion should edit these articles at all. They will always give it an unneutral touch. Vogone (talk) 20:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
You still haven't explained these edits:
Plarem (User talk) 20:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
An emotional reaction of me being ashamed of a few other edits by your account. Vogone (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Well you shouldn't, because it was all referenced. – Plarem (User talk) 21:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Therefore, I think it will be suitable to give you a warning. This is not meant to be a hostile action, Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings#Introduction says: "The purpose of user warnings is to guide good-faith testers"Plarem (User talk) 21:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, you could also see it as collateral damage. I just made use of the "revert all recent edits by this user" button, in order to remove the vandalism you committed. Adding a ridiculous template hours after an action has been discussed is probably blatant trolling, but morally you seem to be out of place anyway. So I guess I'm done with this. Thanks. Vogone (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Plarem. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!