User talk:AEMoch

I demand an apology that the editing I made be respectfully acknowledged or else I WILL Seek Serious Legal Council. Just because The Delphine Boel Lawsuit has been resolved... mine is now being addressed and I don't like being called a lier or that I am dullsional regarding my claim and knowledge

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, AEMoch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Stargate Project, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My involvement in the early phase of The Star Gate Project "Is Officially Noted" and I was part of original participants. "The Stargate Collection", was Declassified in 1995, by the US State Department, CIA Archives. Prior to release, There is also a newspaper article published in 1987, where I was interviewed about being involved with Domestic Operations and this news article is part of "The Star Collection" AEMoch (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leopold iii., King of Belgium[edit]

Hello how are you... according to my Biological Association with Leopold III., of belgium. I have added as best as possible additional facts and information. I hope that what I added is not in any conflict with said subject. The added information is based on years of documented research. In 2013... I took a Basic DNA Sampling Test. At the time... all I knew was that I was a Distant Common Cousin to The Belgian Royal House, but in 2019... upon visiting Belgium-Luxembourg, as A VIP-Guest at "The 75th. Anniversary of The Battle of The Bulge Ceremonies" and meeting with a Royal Luxembourg Cousin, my security status suddenly changed. I was informed by my VIP-Guest Escort that my visiting was not an Issue, but The US State Department was alerted and that I should contact them. Upon my return to The United States... I checked State Department Archives. After a series of serendipitous flukes, In April 2020, I decided to request an Extended DNA Report. This DNA Discovery and Documentation, eventually proved that I was a member of The Belgian Royal House and in 2021, I began to communicate to The Belgium Embassy and met with The Consulate General in June 2021. Later, in October 2021, I went to The Belgium Embassy Consulate and submitted some personal documentation, verification of My Association with The Belgian Royal House and based on evidence, most likely My being the Biological Son of Leopold III., and My Adopted Family having direct and Indirect ties to The US State Department. AEMoch (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mabel Normand, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And on US Airways Flight 1549 Meters (talk) 20:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am Distantly related to Mabel Normand and her Husband Lew Cody. Some of Mabel's siblings died of Tuberculosis and she had the Tuberculosis germ that later became acute and she hide her condition. In her later years... when Lew Cody married her... he had prior pre-med school training and discovered her Tuberculosis condition... which is why they lived separately together until she needed to go to a sanatorium. It is recorded that about Two days before her death... her Father, Clodman "Claude" Normand had died.

Regarding US Airways Flight 1549... there is The Bronx River Green way, that many flocking wildlife use as a bird flight pattern. Valid reports of passengers reciting "The Divine Mercy Movement Prayer", during the incident, when the jet was flying over The Fordham Section of The Bronx. Upon research... almost 60years ago below, a so-called religious incident happened, where "The Divine Mercy Movement" was recognized and according to ST. Sr. Sr. Faustina Kowalska of Divine Mercy... it was recommended that "The Divine Mercy Prayer" was to be recited during The 3 O'clock hour. When the passenger recited "The Divine Mercy Prayer", he had No idea and he just started to pray it. I am a historical researcher and I don't post information till I check more than one. Feel free to check for yourself before you remove these additional references.

Thank you. AEMoch (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And how does any of that justify your speculation that Mabel Normand was a cocaine addict? If you keep adding this type of unsourced material you will likely be blocked. Meters (talk) 06:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mabel Normand, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you were to read about Mabel Normand being associated with William Desmond Taylor, under "Scandles", the subject of Cocaine is already mentioned prior to my adding additional information. I did not say she was A Cocaine Addict, but according to Hollywood Gossip Rumors... she might have been, but it may have been possibly exaggerated for Negative Gossip, in which William Randolph Hurst's publications had done to create false controversy. If she was using Cocaine as a medicinal... back in those days, most likely it was usually prescribed for Tuberculosis conditions and it

didn't have the stigma, that it has today?
AEMoch (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 09:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important query about past accounts[edit]

Hi, AEMoch. My name's Tamzin. One of the things I do on Wikipedia is look into cases where people are using multiple accounts, or where they've changed accounts in a manner not allowed by policy. I've left two very impotant questions for you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aedwardmoch. If you could please answer those questions before continuing to edit other parts of Wikipedia, I would appreciate it. Your answer can go in the "Comments by other users" section. Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tamzin... I thought that adding content to a preexisting article is supposed to be an improvement? What I have added was to give more accurate information and documentation detail. If my editing is not appropriate, then let's discuss this that is agreeing to Wikipedia and it's standard to be as accurate as possible? The additions are noted from other reliable sources outside myself and should not be considered a conflict of interest... Thank you. AEMoch (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My concern right now is solely about our policy about illegimate usage of multiple accounts, not anything else. As such, I'm going to have to ask that you answer these two questions:

Did you previously edit as Aedwardmoch (talk · contribs)? The person behind that account claimed the same biographical details you claim on your userpage.
If you did previously edit under that username, do you stand by the legal threat you made at User talk:Aedwardmoch § Stargate Project? I ask "Wiki" to cease and decest under the scope of posting courtesy... if refused again, to post... will be forced to present such information and documents to legal council, pending possible action

Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 09:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be more clear, if you continue to edit without answering these questions, your account will be blocked for block evasion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 19:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Legal Statement: My reputation speaks for itself and I respectfully post as needed information to correct and/or post updated information within my scope of research and evidence. In 2009, an argument began regarding my involvement with "The Stargate Project". Being accused of posting erroneous information about my involvement is not a boast and documents pertaining to me is noted and is part of "The Stargate Collection"(ie: Psychic fits together pieces of criminal puzzles, by Nancy Love, Aug.15, 1987 Foothill Leader Newspaper Article) In spite the fact that this news article is part of "The Stargate Collection"... I was still being called a liar, which is why I gave possible threat of seeking legal counsel. Since the recent Extended DNA Report and finding out that I am A Member of The Belgian Royal House and most likely The Biological Son of King Leopold III., of The Belgian's... You Have Defamed Me, which is why, I Demand an Apology and I am giving serious threat of seeking Legal Counsel and Action. Is this what you really want... not my idea, and I have documented evidence that's been sent to those that know. Please refer to FOI DOJ File 190-LA-140356, May 12, 1992, FOI CIA File #P-1999-02364

I also have photos and a Video meeting The Son of Grand Duke Henri of Luxembourg and with other Diplomatic VIP Guests at Belgium-Luxembourg in December 2019 and went to various International Media, etc.

With Good Intentions;

~Rev./Dr. A. Edward Moch (aka: Ld.Dk. Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch

AEMoch (talk) 00:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... Most of my adding addional updating content comes from Other Reliable Sources and my being supportive of updating the present Wikipedia Post mostly from these various sources. I feel that I am not in a conflict of interest, but my being involved is particularly put in my direction and the noted articles and facts that need to be reviewed and posted in accordance to Wikipedia's welcome to soundly provide corrections and updates as needed.

 AEMoch (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're writing (allegedly) about yourself and close family members, then you have a conflict of interest by definition. Largoplazo (talk) 22:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Leopold III of Belgium. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Stop doing this. We do not add non-notable relatives to the infobox, and their relationship is unsourced. Meters (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have reliable sources you must add them to the articles. You cannot simply list them in the edit summary. And "Public Search Engine Information" is not a citation. Meters (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Leopold III of Belgium. Your own profile, written by you, and user-generated material, especially when you're one of the users generating it, on a genealogical website are not reliable sources. Largoplazo (talk) 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion regarding you at WP:ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page access has been revoked. Cullen328 (talk) 00:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch[edit]

Draft:Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Alfred Edward "Michael" Cota-Moch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ravenswing 00:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]