User talk:Architect 134

Architect 134, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Architect 134! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Architect 134. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Recent edit to Gainesville, Virginia

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Architect 134, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikishovel (talk) 08:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips on editing articles

Hello Architect 134, and again, welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that Cluebot, a computer program that reverts edits that look like vandalism, has been warning you over your edits. It's pretty clear to me that all of those warnings from Cluebot were mistaken, and that your edits so far have all been well meant. You've been adding correct explanations of things, but Wikipedia works in a slightly different way to that.

When we want to clarify what things are in the article, we add a wikilink to an article about them, rather than summarizing them in the article. So, for example, in this edit to 1997–98 Icelandic Hockey League season, you wrote: "This article is about a hockey season in Iceland. Iceland is an island in the North Atlantic Ocean." That's 100% correct, but an even better way to convey that is to give readers who don't know what Iceland is, it to link to the Iceland article. That way, they have the choice to learn about that, if they don't already know it, by clicking on the linked article Iceland. Linking like that keeps the article shorter and easy to read. Just in case readers are in any doubt about what's meant by "hockey" in the title, I've also added a link to the words "ice hockey" in the introduction. Links are a good, concise way to avoid having to repeat ourselves in an article, or having to restate the obvious. I hope that's helpful. Best of luck, and happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 08:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Valea Câinelui River

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amphitorna albipuncta

Hello Architect134. Regarding your reversion of my edit on Amphitorna albipuncta, you'll find that categorizations do not require references. The page currently has a separate citation that links the moth with Ceylon. I'll assume good faith on your part. Please explain your logic. all best --Lockley (talk) 05:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Architect 134 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

N/A (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I don’t understand. I have no idea what any of this is about. I do not want a new username! This block appears to apply to another user and this is the unblock template I was given? Was someone unhappy with one of my recent edits? Whatever is going on here is upsetting and I’d like to be able to contribute. Architect 134 (talk) 03:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; this account is not blocked. Perhaps you are being affected by an autoblock; in that case, please follow the instructions in the block notice. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]