User talk:KylieTastic
|
If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
WOW!
[edit]You're really quick at reviewing an artilcle! 77.65.108.117 (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- It depends what the submission is, some take a minute, some take an hour. Draft:Lika Leong has lost of unsourced content, unsuitable sources such as linkedin, leaving just 2 sources that do not show the subject is notable. Giving quick feedback for such submission it better than leaving in for months just to be told not even close. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! For an article of some people there's too little sources to even even make an article. 77.65.108.117 (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, not every person has enough sources to show they are notable (see WP:N). Some may never be, for others it's just too soon. Many people do great things that just don't get written about, it does not make them or there work not important, just not Wikipedia notable. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Cheers, Kylie! Have a good day!! 77.65.109.194 (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, not every person has enough sources to show they are notable (see WP:N). Some may never be, for others it's just too soon. Many people do great things that just don't get written about, it does not make them or there work not important, just not Wikipedia notable. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! For an article of some people there's too little sources to even even make an article. 77.65.108.117 (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- It depends what the submission is, some take a minute, some take an hour. Draft:Lika Leong has lost of unsourced content, unsuitable sources such as linkedin, leaving just 2 sources that do not show the subject is notable. Giving quick feedback for such submission it better than leaving in for months just to be told not even close. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Enver Tohti draft article
[edit]Hi, I notice you changed the ":" characters in the "web cite" references in the article I just created on this subject (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Enver_Tohti) to "|" characters, which appears to have rendered the links non-functional. This was my first stab at creating an article from scratch, so I'm not familiar with all the procedures, and am just wondering why you did this. Thank you for explaining. Starchild (talk) 08:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @StarchildSF if you look at your version here the cites where just errors with nothing working. All templates on Wikipedia (things in double curly brackets {{ }} have the parameters split by pipes '|') so you were using template "cite web: Access Date=26 August 2024" rather than just "cite web". I then realised the rest was also wrong but got distracted by an email. I've redone them from scratch to fix fully. See {{cite web}} for all the parameters and Help:Referencing for beginners for more on referencing in general. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 08:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Greater Manchester route 100 article
[edit]Your decision of declining I think isn't right. Instead, I think the article should be published to let others edit. This may easier for me to seek assistance from others on editing. TL9027 (talk) 16:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- @TL9027 the original article was moved to Draft because it showed no sign of notability and I see you have other articles flagged for deletion. Most bus routes are just not notable. Wikipedia does not have articles on everything that exist, only subjects that meet the WP:Notability guidelines. Your first source is a blog which are generally not considered reliable sources however I believe this guy has some reputation in the field so it gives it some worth. The next source does not mention the route as far as I can see, it's about the Bee Network not the route. The other sources are just timetables so nothing to help show any form of notability. It's important to understand the basics of notability (see WP:GNG) otherwise you can end up getting very frustrated and disappointed, and we don;t want to loose motivated editors. Most of us have had subjects we wanted to write an article about but could not find enough coverage in reliable sources, it's just the way Wikipedia works unfortunately. If enough sources do not exist for each route at the moment then you could maybe add sub sections to Bee Network instead. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)