User talk:MeltPees

Welcome!

Hello, MeltPees!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NextDNS

Hello, MeltPees,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ToadetteEdit and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, NextDNS, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Toadette^Edit! 07:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Siege of Rawar, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. You have been cautioned not to move the contributions of other editors to mainspace. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Lin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cindy Lin (author). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed your recent edits which mostly consist of new pages of businesses and businesspeople. I wanted to ask you if you are receiving compensation for your edits and, if that's the case, point you to our paid contribution guideline and conflict of interest policy. Broc (talk) 09:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Broc, Thank You but I am not a paid user. MeltPees (talk) 11:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lifeplus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lifeplus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and the page is a copy of Draft:Lifeplus, which was created by User:Erika Mayer who has a disclosed COI. Therefore it needs to go through the Articles for Creation process. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 10:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Broc, again i do not have any COI.. MeltPees (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erika does. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MeltPees you copied the work of an editor who has disclosed a COI. The same rules apply. Broc (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PropertyLimBrothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PropertyLimBrothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PropertyLimBrothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Etf.com moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Etf.com 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gayathri Vivekanandan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gayathri Vivekanandan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Speech Prof

Hello MeltPees, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Speech Prof, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Speech Prof.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JSFarman (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gayathri Vivekanandan (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It requires in-depth covarage from multiple independent secondary sources to establish notability. These sources are interviews and passing mentions, her own words can’t make her notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gayathri Vivekanandan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 04:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MeltPees! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 04:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gayathri Vivekanandan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gayathri Vivekanandan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayathri Vivekanandan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Connors (RJ) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jim Connors (RJ). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and most if not all the sources do not mention Conners. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Giacomo Segre, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Stop moving or copying drafts created by other editors to mainspace. You have not shown the ability to determine notability. S0091 (talk) 14:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Rawar

~~Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.~~ It appears that you tried to give Draft:Siege of Rawar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Siege of Rawar. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also likely sock/meatpuppetry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiteshield and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecteam. MER-C 17:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]