User talk:Prab Toor

November 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zee Music Company, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Prab Toor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Zee TV UK) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Zee TV UK, Prab Toor!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

No sources and no indication of notability; I'm moving this to Draft:Zee TV UK. Feel free to move it back when it has references and content. Moving it now will save it being deleted.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raazi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, re: your recent changes here, I redirected the article back to Student of the Year. Per WP:NFF:

Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun. (Emphasis theirs)

When you can establish that principal photography has begun, the article may be restored, provide it is otherwise notable. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:UTV Movies Unveils New Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UTV Movies Unveils New Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Zee Sarthak

Hello, Prab Toor,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Zee Sarthak should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Sarthak .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zee Cinema International for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zee Cinema International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Cinema International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Egg of Reason | (Talk) 02:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raees (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [2] It's unclear what source you were using when you made this edit, especially when a red chili appears on the theatrical poster of this film. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Zee Magic International (Canada) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! MT Train^Discuss 09:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improper changing of E TV (India)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give E TV (India) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to E TV (India). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to E TV (India). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Dl2000 (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Zee TV Canada, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Star Gold (UK and Ireland)

The article Star Gold (UK and Ireland) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Diffs: [3] The net result of your changes don't look constructive to me, as you've removed a film poster with no explanation, and you've removed a reference from the {{Film date}} template. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Sony Sab, you may be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Zee Magic International (Canada). Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot move a page by copying and pasting the text

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give E TV (India) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Big Magic International (Canada). TL22 (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Zee TV (Canada). Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prab Toor, you have been told previously that copy/paste moves are NOT how we move articles at Wikipedia. You did this yet again when you copied Zee TV Canada and pasted it at Zee TV (Canada), and when you copied Big Magic International (Canada) and pasted it at Zee Magic (Canada) and a number of other articles. Your problematic edits are damaging the encyclopedia, and I'm not confident you understand what the problem is, so ultimately there is little difference between your edits and vandalism, even if you meant to be constructive. To protect the encyclopedia, I have blocked you until you can convince an administrator in your own words that you understand 1) How to properly move an article. 2) Why copy/paste moves are problematic at Wikipedia. See: WP:MOVE#Before moving a page and WP:MOVE#How to move a page for guidance. Being blocked indefinitely does not mean forever, it just means for the foreseeable future. When you have read the instructions and are ready to be unblocked, follow the directions in the template above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Zee Punjabi (Canada)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Zee Punjabi (Canada), Prab Toor!

Wikipedia editor Edaham just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

you need to expand and source this article. It is only barely sufficient to mark as a stub after I　added two sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Edaham's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Edaham (talk) 13:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Edaham: Revolvy is not a sufficient reference, as it is a (crappy) Wikipedia mirror, which in this case is parroting content found at Zee Punjabi. I mention this in case it affects your decision. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zee Punjabi (Canada)

The article Zee Punjabi (Canada) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability. No evidence that it exists at all. The Times of India is simply a TV listing for India which shows that a channel with this name exists in India. No mention of Canada. The whole thing may be a hoax

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb Velella Thanks for the heads up. A good look at this user page would have been a good idea. Edaham (talk) 23:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UTV Movies Unveils New Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UTV Movies Unveils New Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zee TV USA

Hello, Prab Toor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zee TV USA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Colors Telugu" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Colors Telugu. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 4#Colors Telugu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zee Sarthak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zee Sarthak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Sarthak (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 08:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]