Jump to content

Supplier evaluation: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 September 2024

  • curprev 15:2315:23, 5 September 2024BobKilcoyne talk contribs 9,854 bytes −340 Decarolis et al's auction study is a very specific example of how supplier evaluation avoids exclusive reliance on price in supplier selection, not a suitable focus for the lead in this article. Correction to Baily et al citation, page number needed undo

22 July 2024

20 October 2023

6 August 2023

5 July 2023

1 February 2023

29 January 2023

23 January 2023

28 August 2022

26 August 2022

12 February 2022

4 October 2021

29 September 2021

10 September 2021

23 June 2021

18 March 2021

4 March 2021

24 February 2020

21 January 2020

13 January 2020

5 January 2019

9 December 2018

5 December 2018

26 November 2018

28 August 2018

28 May 2018

10 May 2018

18 September 2017

27 July 2017

16 March 2017

13 March 2017

4 November 2016

20 October 2016

26 August 2016

28 July 2016

9 July 2016

7 July 2016

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)