Jump to content

Talk:Architecture of Karnataka: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
assess
typo fix re-assess as start
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject India|class=B|importance = mid|karnataka = yes|karnataka-importance = top}}
{{WikiProject India|class=start|importance = low|karnataka = yes|karnataka-importance = top}}
{{WikiProject Architecture|class=B}}
{{WikiProject Architecture|class=start}}
{{User:WildBot/m04|sect={{User:WildBot/m03|1|Indian architecture#Hindu architecture|Dravidian}}|m04}}
{{User:WildBot/m04|sect={{User:WildBot/m03|1|Indian architecture#Hindu architecture|Dravidian}}|m04}}
{{User:WildBot/m01|dabs={{User:WildBot/m03|1|AH}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Bijapur|Vijapur}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Dassera}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|4|Dravidian}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Ganga Dynasty}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Gothic}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Idol}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Indian}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|3|Kadamba}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Mahadeva}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Rishabha|Adinatha}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Tibetan}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|lotus}}|m01}}
{{User:WildBot/m01|dabs={{User:WildBot/m03|1|AH}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Bijapur|Vijapur}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Dassera}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|4|Dravidian}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Ganga Dynasty}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Gothic}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Idol}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Indian}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|3|Kadamba}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Mahadeva}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Rishabha|Adinatha}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|Tibetan}}, {{User:WildBot/m03|1|lotus}}|m01}}

== Nominating at [[WP:GAN]] ==

If you want this article reviewing, then please place a template on the talk page following the instructions at [[WP:GAN]] in the section '''How to nominate an article'''. But, you should get the article copy-edited as at the moment it is very poorly written and likely to quick fail on those grounds alone, there are disambiguation links to be fixed as notified by WildBot, two dead links, one reference link to Wikipedia, which is '''not''' a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], and links to tour companies which are also not reliable sources. I notice that the nominator and article creator has assessed the article at B class, which it clearly is not. I have assessed it against the criteria at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Assessment#Qualityn scale]] as start class. –– [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 17:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:50, 22 April 2010

WikiProject iconIndia: Karnataka Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconArchitecture Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nominating at WP:GAN

If you want this article reviewing, then please place a template on the talk page following the instructions at WP:GAN in the section How to nominate an article. But, you should get the article copy-edited as at the moment it is very poorly written and likely to quick fail on those grounds alone, there are disambiguation links to be fixed as notified by WildBot, two dead links, one reference link to Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source, and links to tour companies which are also not reliable sources. I notice that the nominator and article creator has assessed the article at B class, which it clearly is not. I have assessed it against the criteria at Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Assessment#Qualityn scale as start class. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]