Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Hurricane Gloria/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 22: Line 22:
*'''Delist'''. Only 6 edits last year, no one is interested in saving this. [[User:Desertarun|Desertarun]] ([[User talk:Desertarun|talk]]) 15:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delist'''. Only 6 edits last year, no one is interested in saving this. [[User:Desertarun|Desertarun]] ([[User talk:Desertarun|talk]]) 15:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delist''' few edits to address concerns. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delist''' few edits to address concerns. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 21:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:03, 4 February 2023

Hurricane Gloria

Hurricane Gloria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Notified: Hurricane Noah, Fieari, Spangineer, Verrai, Titoxd, Hurricanehink, Dylan620, WikiProject New York City, WikiProject Pennsylvania, WikiProject United States, WikiProject Tropical cyclones, diff for talk page notification (2021-12-01)

Review section

The issues raised initially in the article talk page were inadequate coverage and (in)consistent source formatting. There have been edits since, but it's not yet marked as "satisfactory" in WP:URFA/2020A. Furthermore, I've yet to see edits mostly addressing or resolving the issues. George Ho (talk) 02:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will have a look and see what I can do with Gloria in the next few days, as I play with Hurricane Nora....Jason Rees (talk) 16:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the intent is to work towards a save, a CCI check will be needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been looking at Gloria over the last few days and there is just too much missing for me to try and work it in the limited time I have. As for the CCI check, I believe that most of the sources are taken from NOAA and are thus in the public domain but may need attribution.Jason Rees (talk) 23:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes .. but the CCI check involves also looking for WP:CWW, which is quite time consuming! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]