User talk:Tony Sidaway

user

talk

watchlist

watched

sandbox

user links

deletion

more links

Template:User Tony Sidaway/User

This is my talk page. Click here to leave a new message.

WP:DAO

On the advice of some of the arbcom, I've created a counterpart to the AMA, linked to above. You may be inclined to join. If so, feel free to declare yourself a senior partner. Snowspinner 05:27, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

Coolcat

I am normaly nice to newbies but the way Fadix does things just challenges ones nerves as I have been constantly accused of a hidden agenda and bias. Now I admit I have views regarding some matters but I believe I can significantly purge my views and stick to neutrality, at least I try. For Fadix case he declares my views are biased and he is neutral, he is trying to provide one sided story to the article, I dont sincerely believe he is intentionaly annoying me. I did overeact as well, thats why I had the surveys sent to several mods I trust.

---

Can you also fix my newbie greet thing? I tried to put something together but seems like its offensive somehow? You are welcome to edit my user page :)

---

Ataturk had ideas that basicaly changed a nation completely. Turkey is a democracy and is very diferent from other middle eastern states.

Ottoman Empier after the initial "powerfull" years, was ruled by religion, The King(shah) was almost obligated to ask religious advisers if the course of action he wants to take conflicts with religion or not. The goverment juggled around religion. Scientists who came up with briliant ideas were often executed here and there. Also Shehs who were "holy" people, basicaly abusing religion like priests before Ronesanse & Reforms in Christianity. So religion was a big commerse, Ataturk attemted to destroy this industry, he didn succeed, he didnt fail either, such groups operate discreately most of the time. Popular groups are known and they operate pretty much above the law discreately, in a way cops cant prove but a way people just KNOW. Members of such organisations/groups hate the man. They use any opertunity to ridicule/propogate the man/their views.
He also prompted things like Equality and Nationalism rather than "Muslim Brothers" of the Ottoman empier the system was now more or less, "long live Turkish people!" and all the good stuff. Also stuff like woman voters were eastablished the year after the decleration of independence. He changed the alphabet from arabic to Latin. There isnt much he didnt touch.
This made a lot of people profiting by abusing other people's beliefs, lack of literacy, etnicity, very unhappy. The ideologies left over at the time still live today to some extent making the Ataturk Article very vanruble to attack. Simmilar to the articles Kurdistan, Kurds, Armenian Genocide, Kurdistan Workers Party. These articles are of significant importance to the Internal politics of Turkey and are a candidate for anti Turkey propoganda. While Neutrality is the most important way of doing things, some people will take it for biased as it does not voice their views "enough", as it should not. You know the kind.

--Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 08:30, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Harmonious Editing Club

Thanks Tony, I'll take a look at it. Thank you very much to you, too, for your vote, though if you read my note to David, you'll see that I intend to do the thanking all at once at the end, which is tomorrow. It's been a long week! I liked your stress-tested comment. ;-) SlimVirgin 16:30, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

Charles Sheeler

Could you help me with the Sheeler article? I just visited the Georgia O'Keefe Museum in Santa Fe, New Mexico and I was interested- though not astonished- by his photography.

My names Matt Cavanaugh, I'm a student at Miami University --

http://netapps.muohio.edu/directory/?searchstring=Matt%20Cavanaugh

Thank you!

Okay, so here is the formal thank you. ;-) Thanks for the support and the congrats, which I appreciate very much. Now I have to learn how to use all the new buttons that have suddenly appeared, and also be careful not to click on them accidentally! Best, SlimVirgin 03:44, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)

Nagorno-Karabakh

Be advised, I'll be working on mediating the people. Since you were involved in the revert war I thought you'd want to know. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 08:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Christmas

You're most welcome. Best wishes to you and yours! --RoyBoy 02:59, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) (PS: Moving answers from my talk, to the proper page... sorry! :'D)

User:Gumba gumba

Hello,

If I'm not mistaken, the procedure should be to:

1. Block Gumba gumba indefinitely (all edits vandalism)
2. Watch Special:Ipblocklist and wait for an "autoblocked because you share an IP with Gumba gumba" to appear
3. Unblock that numbered IP address (eg, #NNNNN).

That way Gumba gumba stays blocked, but the IP can still be used.

At least, that's the way I believe it works. -- Curps 21:42, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'm as mystified as you are as to why it's been necessary to re-unblock the #NNNNN IP address so many times. It's only supposed to be necessary once. Something to do with the extreme slowness of Wikipedia at the moment? -- Curps 22:12, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

OK, what can we do but lift the block. I posted a request at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard for someone to look into this. I'd really like to know why it isn't possible to just block a username without blocking the IP, without all this nonsense. In many ways, the Mediawiki software is a load of crap (don't get me started about duplicated sections of articles). I have to step away from the computer now, talk to you later. -- Curps 22:36, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Elastigirl section of The Incredibles

Thanks for trimming down the Elastigirl stuff - I have no problem with a small mention like what you created. DenisMoskowitz 22:12, 2005 Mar 24 (UTC)

Confession

Father, I have sinned, for I have had evil thoughts about a fellow Wikipedia user. When you added the office of "Witchsmeller Poursuivant", I immediately thought of exactly whom I would nominate for that position. But I shall not say the name, lest it be deemed a personal attack - I just wanted to come and confess my sinful thoughts to you. Prescribe what penance you will, and I will seek absolution. And by the way, I wanted to say what a fine (and persuasive) signature you have. --Michael Snow 23:37, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No, I'm not going to say, that would just gratify confessional voyeurism. (More precisely, I fear the person involved might misunderstand the joke.) --Michael Snow 23:47, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Read the rules

I've read the wikirules and agree to abide by them. J. Parker Stone 04:28, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. Welcome back. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:31, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Viscount of Santarem's world atlas

Hi! You created a redirect from Viscount of Santarem's world atlas to Atlas do Visconde de Santarém, which currently does not exist. Try as I may, I couldn't find any related article on Google, and nobody's pointing to the redirect. This looks like RfD material, but I wanted to ask your opinion first. Fbriere 06:48, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

VFD for RDFA/Snowspinner

I have edited your most recent comment on this to read RFC rather than RFD - I presume you weren't talking about converting the VfD debate into a Redirects for Deletion debate. Feel free to revert if I'm wrong. Thryduulf 15:14, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ranking

You git it all wrong. Ranking is how likely someone will change my mind. I thought you were an admin... I did not want to offend you in any way. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 06:24, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Idea was to promote contribution by merit, like Barnstars. With improvement may be usefull. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 06:29, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Nagorno-Karabakh

The reason I aproached the artile like this is because the discussion itself was vandalised, I just wanted to make sure nothing was lost during the intese reverting... --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 07:13, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Vote for deletion on Artike Bongsha

Hello Tony, Seeing as you don't know the bongsha I explain to you. Bongsha is an trend around various areas in germany and its getting quite popular. as this is my first post on Wikipedia I am quite confused.

Holocaust

What prompted you to move "Holocaust" to "The Holocaust"? To me, it looks like that title is against naming policy. Besides a lot of links into the article would be redirected unnecessarily, because I believe most people would link to the word "Holocaust" itself without "The" in front of it. Please let me know on my talk page. Happy editing, - Mgm|^(talk) 16:51, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide

I am having difficulty talking to anyone in the discussion, All I get is "Genocide is real, go away" (paraphrasing). My spelling corrections are reverted, declared vandalism. Fadix declared ownership to the article and wikipedia on any Armenian - Genocide related article. He is completely ignoring the NPOV logic, he is interpreting meands from NPOV article which are far fetched to say the least. Not to mention the level of Personal attacks from Fadix. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 01:40, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I clearly understand what you are saying, but the problem is he convinced himself that he is right and I am ignorable. I dont know how but he should be shown that his behavior is not plesant as far as admins are concerned. (personal attacks + constant reverting + I know best go away) thing. He first needs to start talking properly and stop the "Academia uniformly says this you all are biased" attitude. I am not sure how to deal with him. I know this is being an extra strain to your valuable time but given how you introduced me to wikipedia, you have a talent in dealing with people who star of as me :) --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:02, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh and by the way, you may want to archive a bit ;) --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:03, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hmm... How would you start? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:18, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yes but he revers spell fixes. He declared he will ignore me and he is waiting for "administration" to ban me or something, I am not sure. he doenst realise that there is no "administration" but a few adins. He will not back down on anything nor discuss it properly, also can you support my color tag in the article discussion as people are ignoring it due to their perosnal hate towards me. I know you like it, I know I like it. They may like it... --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:24, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

OK. Can you also point out to Fadix that he cant just ignore me and revert my edits without reading?? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:37, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Done, however I do need your support in the article, not that in anyway am I sugeesting you to side with me, but tell them that they need to discuss it instead of ignoring me. They are waiting for my ban or something. They may listen to you. Just tell them to dicsuss and talk. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:45, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Also can you lock my mediation template? At least for now? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:52, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

What is RfC ? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 03:04, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Btw template is Template:User:Coolcat/mediat. I am not concerned about vandalism, but accidentaly comments being posted into the template. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 03:08, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

See also: Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:User:Coolcat/mediat. — Davenbelle 06:34, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

Tony Sidaway is anti-House Hippo

What's up with that?

There are articles about articles on WikiPedia.

a true "Vanity" article would be me making an article called "snafumedia.com"

Or lipstick

Armenian Genocide

I am not suggesting the Turkish view should be in the article. I am suggestiong Armenian/Pro genocide view be filtered out and article discusses matter 50/50. Not dening The genocide nor supporting. However Fadix suggests this is a POV. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 07:53, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

50/50 when it is not presented 50/50 in the Academic world IS POV. Neutrality is NOT presenting two poaitions as equal, it is not deleting one positions arguments because they are stronger. This is what you want. Fadix 15:49, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ranks and Insignia of NATO

Aside from the time consuming contraversial articles I developed this. What do you think? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 07:53, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

A note for people who want to discuss Armenian Genocide, etc

Please do not put anything that might possibly be construed as a personal attack on anyone here. This page is intended for me to communicate with other people and lately it's beginning to look like a pub brawl. I've removed some of the worst material. Please don't contribute any more, that was enough. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 17:39, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Personal Attack

Read your post after posting. My bad. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 20:30, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Alien parasites

Hi Tony. The Alien Parasites vandalism has resumed on its VFD page. Cheers. TigerShark 23:54, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I don't think the page should be protected. How can people establish notability? r3m0t ^talk 00:25, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC) (PS reply here or at Talk:The Alien Parasites)

Da dispute

As you requested complaints regarding users are comented out, they will not stop reverting my edits as I asked them not to revert but comment out. I cannot reason with them as they claim biased on any article I put up a comment. I was atempting to mediate a discussion on several articles and they overwhelmingly were against it, they never posted anything on those articles. I never posed as a mediator in Armenian genocide, I clearly sateted that my default template be used to discuss the matter and that I will not be mediating, Instead they just harrased me. It is clearly established that Armenian Genocide is a dispute and should be presented as one. Fadix on various articles created an aurora of "Murderous Turks" which is not necesarily true. I made points in the Armenian Genocide article disputing their claims, claiming that the "majority of academia" is just not how we should be baseing things. One thing their request for a one sided article or a pro-genocide article proves that the genocide isnt as powerfull of a case they claim it is, if that were the case a 50/50 page would be more than saticfactory. Also if the article is not 50/50 some misguided Nationalist will vandalise it. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 00:42, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You are such a liar, at least when I accuse you of something, there is a backup. Where did I created an aurora of "murderous Turks"? I have enough of you, look dude, I had 2 hard days of work, and I have to read yet again your stupid "trollian" posts to get articles involving turkey hijacked. Find other articles to hijack, because the Armenian Genocide article won't be one of them. Fadix 00:26, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I was going to experiment with my mediatopn skills. I could never paractice that ability yet. I can be unbiased as long as the other party does not insist that his bias is neutral and that I am biased for suggesting that his facts may not be facts. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 01:02, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia wide edit

As soon as I am done with my NATO article Ill seek out anything related to Armenian Genocide troughout wikipedia, I will re write it in a tone that does not dispute the thesis nor does it acknowlege it but instead guides user to Armenian Genocide Article. What would you suggest I do to achieve this? If I do this alone people with Misguided Energy like Fadix will revert it without reading it. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 01:52, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You've got mail!

For your exeptional "mediative" handling of my, fadix's, and all other parties', I hereby award you the cool as cucomber award, congradulations. I know we have been a noocience. (I also know I cant spell). --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 06:03, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! I popped it onto my user page. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:44, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Get it straight

Moved to Talk:2003 invasion of Iraq

hey sorry bout that

hey sorry dude. just was messsing around on the site for the first time and figured out how to start a new page dude. sorry brah, wasnt heady at all. oh yeah check out phish. best live music ever.

Martin Heidegger quotes

Hi, the reason givenfor deleting all your quotes from this article was that most of them were unreferenced. Could you provide the source of each quote, that is, the work of Heidegger in which it appears, please? And if possible the edition and page number. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:23, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I only contributed one of the quotations. It was referenced, and I have restored it. But some of the other quotations did give the essay that they were from, if not the page number. --Goethean 16:32, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide

Can you tell me what you think? Is this proper way to discuss things on wikipedia, I tried being fair to them all I always get is insults from all 3 - 5 of them. You must interfere the way they are trying to discuss this, on their own. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 22:28, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Well if there are three-to-five of them, clearly they're not on their own. In your position I would walk away from this one, your edits are far more appreciated on other articles. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:02, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I understad, but I should not let POV passed ariund just because 5 (maybe clones) want to push it. Can you lock the article for a while? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 23:06, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The discussion curently is why I am bad or why I am biased anyways, Ill just stick around the discussion untill they start reasoning. They are 5 newbies, I think I can make 5 veterans out if them, THough meanwhile I dont want the article to be comprammised. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 23:10, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

So we're clones right? That claiming you're a Turk, for participating in every enteries regarding Tueky is an unfounded accusation, but to accuse people just because they support what most academics support as being clones makes just sense right? Look, there are many other articles beside those regarding Turkey which you can participate in. You don't even know what neutral is, and as an engeneer, one would believe that you had the intellectual capacity to distinguish between neutrality and the presentation of two different but equaly valid theses. That you still persist, further support my "bad fate" claim against you. Fadix 00:32, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I cant convince them to discuss... --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 23:53, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

How does one suggests a WP:RFC?

Go to WP:RPF and, in the "Article Content disputes", make an entry very briefly describing the problem. eg:

• Armenian Genocide - <summarise how the problem in as neutral language as possible here>.

Fill in the bit in angle brackets with your own words. About thirty words or so is about right. The shorter the better. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 06:26, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Both done, after 5 secs passed I placed it Fadix posted stuff almost instantly. Is there a policy regarding "hunting users down based on what they think regarding one article" ? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 02:08, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Show me where Mr. Coolcat, the owner of the server can check the logs to display my presence. I have nothing to do with it. On the other hand, you have just registered another member. The next time you use another alias, be careful to not make the same kind of grammer mistakes, and edit the article with expressions you were known to use. With that, you are killing the Wikipedia spirit. You have claimed yesterday that you could use proxies if you wanted to, and no one would know. You should have thought twice before placing your plan into execution. You've did a serious mistake Oghlum. Fadix 16:24, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Why do you think there's a 'user contributions' link on your page? Would you like to know how to disable it? — Davenbelle 05:00, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

User:82.124.54.4 and 82.124.140.225

I assume that these two people are the same, given that they have "both" inserted the same tirade at Terri Schiavo. Seems to be vandalism to me (even if it may be well-meaning). Could also consider it 4 reverts in 24 hrs, assuming you can consider the person to be the same. Not quite sure what (if anything) one should do about this. Thanks. Guettarda 16:47, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I didn't really understand your comment about Irismeister on the TS talk page. Guettarda 16:58, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Bahá'u'lláh

I just protected because somebody requested it, and from looking at the history the reason for the request was obviously valid. While I know what the dispute is fundamentally about, I haven't followed it enough to know if some or all of these IPs are the same person. But if it's Martin2000 choosing not to log in, then he has used the talk page before. I'm always leery of range blocks because of the potential to affect other editors besides the one causing problems, but for IPs that can be confirmed as open proxies it sounds fine to me. --Michael Snow 17:05, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Weight training

Tony, the protect was requested is to give the participants a chance to work out their differences in Talk. This has worked for some much more contentious articles. I will revisit this soon to see if there is progress. If so, the participants can request unprotect. If there is no progress, I will unprotect it myself. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 17:02, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Tony, you are right. I looked at the history before I protected it but it didn't click in my brain that the date of the last edit was a week ago, so I've unprotected. Maybe Taxman meant to point me to a similar article. Thanks, Cecropia | explains it all ® 17:26, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Tony, I've protected the actual article where the dispute is taking place. Mediation is a good suggestion but I'm trying one step below that to see if the users can "mediate in place" on the subject article. I'm also setting up a "Draft" article for the participants to kick around. This has been done successfully in the past and will give all concerned an opportunity to work and also gauge the intentions of all to work productively. Cheers, Cecropia | explains it all ® 17:52, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

CP

My favorite one is this one image:Grillon1.jpg. My husband took it, it is my shoulder and a sweetie I found in the house. I took about 50 pictures of it. It stayed a while on angela talk page; She was scared of it, and thought it would scared trolls away.

What do you think of my logos ? http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Anthere/logos

On the cp issue, the fact is that I thought we reserved the designation "under copyright" to precisely those pictures which were copyrighted but which we could not freely use due to restriction (such as "ask me before using it" or "only for non profit use"). This is what is done on most other wikis. In fr, the qualifier "under copyright" is mandatorily accompanied by the tag "fair use" for this reason. Anthere

David Yost

Thanks for the help with the article. Hopefully the vandals will get bored before the protection expires. Tbjablin 18:38, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

nitro sockpuppets

yeah, but he just keeps incrementing.

Now that they've closed off open proxies, what can we do to stop his nitro00xx series? Rick Boatright 20:21, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

well, I can't rever nitro006 back on the Baha'u'llah page or I am against 3rr...... So, I where do I post a request for a revert and page block? and who do I submit an arbitration formal request to? I'm really really tired of being called worse names here than I have been called in my 20 years as a usenet moderator (and not, that there is an ENTIRE WEB SITE devoted to how horrible the soc.religion.bahai moderators are, and Martin is STILL more offensive than those folks ever were.) Rick Boatright 20:27, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Coolcat again

Tony, please see my note re Coolcat at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Coolcat running roughshod over Talk:Armenian Genocide. Thanks, Davenbelle 22:41, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

check your email, Davenbelle 23:58, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

Why locked on his edits

That's outragious, why has the edits being reverted to the vandalised version and locked on it? The article as is was suggested to be presented for peer review, while who I suspect being Coolcat, has sabotated the article. While one version was the result of discussions, the other was a simple hijacking of the article. I must admit being disgusted of what you did, it was nothing more than taking position. Fadix 22:59, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You have been engaging in aggressive reverting. Where a sysop protects a page because of edit warring, he is permitted to select the version favored by the less aggressive party. This doesn't imply that I endorse the version I protected on, but I judged that protecting the article on the version favored by you would not encourage you to take a cooperative attitude. Please engage in discussion over the article, and stop conducting personal attacks on other editors. See also m:The wrong version. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Actualy, I think that is so outragious that you have abused of your administrator privilages Tony, and I think I will have to report you. Pay closer attention to what you have done. Fadix 23:07, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I've put a note on WP:AN asking other sysops to review what I have done. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 00:41, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Tony, see my answer to Carbonite at the talk page. Your decision was obviously the wrong decision. How can you lock the article on edits made by a new alias just registering yesterday? Read the absurd changes, this is beyond POV, while my article was much neutralised. Besides, how can you lock on a new edit like this, when the article being asked to be commented on, was the previous version? While my edits were all justified on the talk page. Fadix 00:58, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

From even the most cursory perusal of the Armenian Genocide page's history, it's perfectly obvious to me that this Fadix character is behaving like a Holocaust Denier himself, and should be banned from WikiPedia altogether. Tony, you've done the right thing, and I'm sure your fellow sysops will concur. Nevertheless, the Armenian Holocaust is a fact, not an opinion. - Unsigned 67.161.42.199

I personaly think the "Holocausts" factuality is open for debate, sys ops will not interfere with the process, they never do. They may remove the block if they think Tonys action was in aproporate, but they will not declare genocide as a fact. Thats for us to debate, you are welcome to join. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 11:26, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Greco-Turkish relations

"ghastly colors" are back at Talk:Greco-Turkish relations — this after user:Adam Carr asked Coolcat to not attempt to mediate there. — Davenbelle 01:47, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

Adam Carr a PhD in history? It is persons like him that are needed in the Armenian genocide entry. Fadix 02:32, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This is not your talk this is Tonys talk, keep your own talk in your own user talk page. Thanks --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 03:21, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Armenia and other pages

• Article Discussion Edit this page + History Move Watch

I just noticed the top items have been replaced with new terms, is this wikipedia wide wandalims or not? Or is it a twisted April fools joke that I do not appriciate.

• Article Groupthink Censor + History Teleport Stalk

--Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 04:50, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

2003 Invasion of Iraq

Hi, since you are active in the article, I believe we can work together for a second time to merge lost of articles cluttering wikipedia. Us working together is very productive in my opinion. Since I know the wiki way I dont think we will have the "newbie friction". --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 11:16, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Kurdistan Workers Party, Abdullah Ocalan

Curps is claiming my templates are inaproporate, what do you think? Material is not removed in any way from the article. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:04, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

What bothers me is my work been reverted quietly. Where should I post for such concensius? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:20, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Can you make sure my templates are not deleted as the discussion commences?

:-)

I appreciate your attempts to get this dispute between Cool Cat, Davenbelle, Fadix and Stereotek sorted. It seems I still have a lot to learn with regard to performing dispute resolution. Mgm|^(talk) 12:23, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)

Users: Davenbelle, Stereotek are still reverting my edits wikiepdia wide, declaring it vandalist Pov. I am sory spelling corrections etc is not POV. And I want auto sig. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:31, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I welcome you to vote in: Wikipedia:Requested moves for soulthern kurdistan article. Davenbelle of course opposes it. He opposes everything I say because I am a "denialist" heh.

Seriously Davenbelle and Stereotek's disruption of my edits by constanly reverting almost any edit I make should be dealt with I ask for help. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:59, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do something. :P Put a block if you like, check their contribs. both of theirs. You will se a very disturbing pattern. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 14:03, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I am sorry, I am too irritated by Davenbelle, lack of progress of removing his conduct towards me is rather too slow. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 16:39, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

There are too many OP IQ 2003 articles. I was trying to move people. Apperantly it is imposible to do anything in grand scale... I mentioned articles that are identical just oposing views. Views of the american gov should be incorporated into the article. After a clean up most articles can be condensed. I am sorry I cant contrubute much Davenbelle,Stereotek have effectively removed me from wikipedia, I may return back someday. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 16:47, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I dont want you to block them make sure they dont try to destroy my credibility and not declare anything I add POV. This is not a serries of sidputes, user are "hunting" me down because of what I am trying to do in "Armenian Genocide", check their contibutions, how fat back their reverts go? What else have they done? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 22:11, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

They think you're doing harm to Wikipedia. I happen to disagree with them. But still you should try to listen to them. Try to find out why they think that. The flip side of being bold is that you have to learn how to carry it off. Not everybody can do that. But I can assure you that it's worth trying, if only because the interpersonal skills you learn will carry into your everyday life. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:17, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)