User talk:WarthogDemon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:13, 14 July 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 13 days are automatically archived to User talk:WarthogDemon/Archive/Archive 8. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives

Archive Section

More About Illinois

Moccassin is all screwed up now. I don't know what the heck the admins are doing, but they have merged, deleted whatever.--Kranar drogin 13:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [1]. -WarthogDemon 22:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think we got it all straight for now. Mistakes happen, and we just move on from there. Let me know if you run into any other questions concerning Illinois and I will try and answer it for you (or get you one).--Kranar drogin 01:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

...I needed that. It's been a slightly contentious couple of days around here. Hopefully the new month will change all of that. =) -- Gogo Dodo 06:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [2]. -WarthogDemon 01:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Thanks, but I'm okay. I did what I said I would do a long time ago... I walked away from the computer and had a bowl of ice cream. Watched TV a little and played a video game. =) -- Gogo Dodo 20:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Illinois Confusion

Don't worry about it, I didn't help matters any by adding in a redirect. Administrators have the capacity to undo moves by a process called histmerge, but that requires temporary deletion. If you ever need to merge article histories or undo moves, add {{db-g6}} or simply ask an admin for assistance. Anyway, everything seems to be all right now, thanks to Kranar drogin explaining the situation. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 20:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning template you were looking for

Was it {{uw-bv}} or {{uw-vandalism4im}}? Kesac 03:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [3]. -WarthogDemon 04:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Beauty and the Beast (2003 film)

Re your message: It's rather heavy on the plot and nothing else. It makes the article feel a bit fancrufty if you know what I mean. Stating that it's PG-13 and its rather low IMDB score doesn't help any. -- Gogo Dodo 05:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [4]. -WarthogDemon 00:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Linking actors does not make it notable. Unless you're playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. =) Outside reviews would probably help a great deal. WP:NOTFILM -- Gogo Dodo 03:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zamit

"Are you certain all is well with John Żammit. Article seems to be written by the person himself which might be conflict of interest, but I'm not sure. -WarthogDemon 02:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

I'm not the least sure how notable he is, but it isn't a speedy for obvious lack of notability--From Google, he seems to be a local big shot in Malta. This isn't going to be easy to source--what I've just done is put a prod on to give time. It would help if you'd keep track--if someone removes the prod without improving it, p[lease send to AfD. Agreed, its COI, but that is not a reason for speedy. if someone with COI writes a really spammy article, then speedy for G11 spam is often applicable. If they're lazy, then copyvio is worth a look. But this is a sober article of dubious notability. Not everyone agrees with me, but I think speedy is only fair when it is unquestionably non-notable or altogether impossible on other grounds. I apologize for not putting on a prod immediately, but there's a large speedy backlog tonight and not enough admins seem to be around, & I want to help clear out the real trash before the holiday. DGG 02:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [5]. -WarthogDemon 02:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you deleted this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kelly_Nolan please see talk page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gpthurston (talk • contribs). -WarthogDemon 06:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [6]. -WarthogDemon 06:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Dar-Ape has smiled at you and left this dancing hippopotamus on your talk page. Dancing hippopotamuses (or hippopotami) promote WikiLove and other ~~Orwellian sounding~~ goodthink concepts. Spread the love and the polka by sending this message to another user.

Cheers, Dar-Ape 15:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the smile

Haha, I'm having a bit of a gloomy day to, Couldn't have come at a better time. I havn't recieved a smile in a while and thank you for it also.

An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! ^{(talk)(contribs)} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

An Apple a day keeps -The Doctor- Away.. Or does it! ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal report

Hi there; no, actually you didn't do it right. But no matter. When you want to report a username violation, then the place to do it is WP:UAA. But it is a natural mistake to make, because the page has not been up very long. Worry not, all is well.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [7]. -WarthogDemon 20:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes I'm sure. But the page has not existed for very long, and It may be that when you posted the spam username WP:UAA did not exist. It's no big deal ,and I wasn't complaining even slightly. I just thought that you deserved an answer to your question. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [8]. -WarthogDemon 20:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudkip eggs

I placed them in their own article after any mention of them was removed from the Mudkip article several times. If the mudkip eggs clutter up the mudkip article too much, this is understandable objection and they can be moved to separate article, as I have done. User:Zaphraud 01:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: First world problems

Hello WarthogDemon. Regarding your change of my tag of First world problems from spam to nonsense, I would have liked to revert it to spam. This was an article advertising a book, written in the style of an adverstisement. It was coherent English - patent nonsense is something that makes little to no sense at all. As my friend User:Leebo would say:

"A page can be deleted as nonsense when it is simply a meaningless string of characters...

Example given - $₯fe₠./₣- ƒ-j ₭ ₤ ℳ ₥ ₦ ₧ ₰ £ ៛ ₨ ₪ ৳ ₮ ₩ ¥ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦

...or a collection of words that alone may exist in the dictionary, but together comprise an incoherent jumble.

Example given - i butt blattnt plant Template:Butt gunna take iup spiders bagiones preeow oooofa and you prickly dance town monsters"

Thank you for your interest in correctly tagging this article, but I was going to revert it to spam when I found it was already deleted. Since I already had this typed up, I figured I would share my feelings with you any how. If you still disagree, please let me know and we can discuss it further. Have a good one. bwowen ^talk.^contribs 05:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [9]. -WarthogDemon 05:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the info! Glad to have chatted with you. Take care, and happy editing. =] Best, bwowen ^talk.^contribs 05:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deleted Page As I Made An AfD

Re your message: I was very tempted to delete the AfD out from under you, but I held off for a moment. =) It's gone now. The bio was not going to meet the requirements for athlete's notability. I suspect that it's a autobiography, too. -- Gogo Dodo 05:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [10]. -WarthogDemon 05:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I have no idea why. =) Actually, I paused for a moment because I didn't want to cause any undue confusion on your part... it's there, I mangled the AfD, oops, fix it, it's gone, what happened?!? Or something like that. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Littlepaw

Well, the author needs to write more than one sentence, and needs to at least try to explain why this skateboard company is any more notable than any other given one. NawlinWiki 03:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I speedied it again, with a note to the author telling him/her that the article needed to be more than one sentence. NawlinWiki 03:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [11]. -WarthogDemon 04:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Aranjo article

Considering that the article is completely promotional and heavily slanted, along with the fact that the subject of the article is likely to be the same person who wrote it, I think that G11 is in session. Sr 13 21:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [12]. -WarthogDemon 21:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your eyeballs

Thanks for catching the nonsense edits and oddities you caught in the various horse articles today! Montanabw 05:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [13]. -WarthogDemon 00:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On essays

The essay you want to write is certainly appropriate for Wikipedia. As for what style to use, just write and you'll find something. MessedRocker (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Galatian War

Ok, thanks for that. Kyriakos 01:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [14]. -WarthogDemon 01:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question to you

Just asking, but what reason do you have to put Mauiprivateequity (talk · contribs · logs) on the vandals list? -Yancyfry

Replied here: [15]. -WarthogDemon 04:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Just checking. Yancyfry

Replied here: [16]. -WarthogDemon 04:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Na, I didn't see anything in the contribs. I guess I wasn't paying close attention to your report. -Yancyfry

Local Ecumenical Project

I noticed that you PRODded Local Ecumenical Project without citing a reason; it needs more sources, but does have one already. Aha... just looked for Local ecumenical partnership and it exists, so I'll merge & redirect instead.

What was your main reason for the PROD? WP:OR? This might influence how much I merge or delete. Fayenatic london (talk) 07:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [17]. -WarthogDemon 19:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, PROD was certainly better than CSD, but I'd recommend always stating your reasoning for either of them. It showed up at DumbBOT;ProdSummary with bot notice: no reason given. At least that caught my eye, as at least some of the content seemed worth keeping!

And you're welcome for the revert; I happened to look at my watchlist at the right moment. - Fayenatic london (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [18]. -WarthogDemon 21:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Going Insane Over A Tag

Re your message: You're looking for {{Fact}}, {{Unreferenced}}, and {{Unreferencedsection}}. [19] -- Gogo Dodo 17:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [20]. -WarthogDemon 19:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Galatian War (2)

It got pretty well expanded. :) Corvus cornix 17:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

69.225.26.14

What the hell? Damn...where did you come across that? Jmlk 1 7 03:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [21]. -WarthogDemon 04:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I removed the comments and declined it, then blocked the user as they were never actually blocked beforehand. Thanks for the heads up though! Also, if you don't already know, reporting things like that at AIV can help, as numerous different admins look there as well! But thanks again! Also, I saw you're an admin hopeful someday. How is that coming along? Jmlk 1 7 04:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And, I noticed/remembered you obviously know what AIV is...sorry :). Jmlk 1 7 04:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, already replied here: [22]. -WarthogDemon 04:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. How's the admin hopeful and adoption going? Jmlk 1 7 04:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [23]. -WarthogDemon 04:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome man...hey, if you're ever considering an admin coach, keep this guy in mind :). Jmlk 1 7 04:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied: [24]. -WarthogDemon 04:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: American Solutions

Hey, would it be ok, if we put the article up for AFD instead, to get opinions on notability from the community? If asking you first isn't the way it's sposed to work, bear with me, I'm still learning here :) I'm also not that great at writing articles yet, but, I'm gonna give it a try... (I'm not the original author, I came across it while trolling Special:Newpages...) --SXT40 05:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [25]. -WarthogDemon 05:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that, thanks! --SXT40 06:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you...

..for the Smile! have we interacted before, or is this just some random WikiLove? VanTucky ^(talk) 06:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied right here: [26]. -WarthogDemon 06:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Thanks for the revert, but I decided to keep that particular comment for posterity and I replied to it, even though it was completely ridiculous. -- Gogo Dodo 06:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain

I have tried to add and start a page about a surrealist garden in Mexico titled LAS POZAS. Since there are many other desciptions and artciles about other such follies, (the Watts Towers for example), I am not sure why you have marked this for omission. Please clarify. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cinelandia (talk • contribs).

Replied as requested here: [27]. -WarthogDemon 17:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Shampoo King

The prior article was a cut-and-paste from the cited news source. This one isn't, so I removed the speedy tags. Thanks for asking me to check. NawlinWiki 19:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [28]. -WarthogDemon 19:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-bigamy

The present article is hopeless as an article--though probably one could be written on the subject--though I do not know what a good title would be-- & there would probably be a decent amount of material to find. Send it, let the others at afd share the amusement. DGG (talk) 23:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [29]. -WarthogDemon 23:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nataliu

Hey you flagged this page and i'm not sure why. My friend and i were trying to present some real facts about a girl that we feel is famous in her own right. Maybe its because she's asian but i'm not sure why you feel the need to discredit her as something special. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sasquatch0303 (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [30]. -WarthogDemon 01:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nataliu (2)

I agree. I cannot comprehend why so many celebrities deserve pages while sincere, honest achievers like her get winnowed. My remarks are not tacit with regards to Asiatic racism, I am merely stating my sincere belief that she is worthy of an article. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Al the Rod (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [31]. -WarthogDemon 01:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are correct sir. I am so rudimentary at this website that I seem to lack the knowledge to reply correctly, but I must not be garrulous. I will work on this issue and then gracefully and humbly re-submit it with proper documentation. I must say that I agree that I have not properly evinced her qualifications. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Al the Rod (talk • contribs).

Wedlock (band)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wedlock (band). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. StacieVan 04:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking Benjamin on the sandbox

What the hell dude you freaking screwed it up, that's for testing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.14.114.27 (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [32]. -WarthogDemon 05:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Luna Halo

First of all, the references in this article were written incorrectly. I fixed this, as well as removing a blacklisted link. As for the article itself, it could use more content, but in my opinion it qualifies for WP:BAND. ~~However, I will list it for AFD to try to get multiple viewpoints.~~ Never mind, I decided that it doesn't need an AFD because of the google news hits and because it has plenty of sources. KJS77 05:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [33]. -WarthogDemon 06:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing!!

File:Zingiber officinale01.jpg

A ginger rhizome for the warthog :)

Just stopping by to thank you for being the first user to sign my guestbook (I didn't even think people even went to my userpage!). Also, to clarify, rhizomes are one of the warthog's favorite foods, so you should have a great dinner tonight! Arky ^{¡Hablar Conmigo!} 23:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here [34]. -WarthogDemon 00:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Falsely Identified Vandalism

I would like to bring to your attention that my last comment on Gogo Dobo's Usertalk page was accidentally placed in the wrong field and promply identified as vandalism by you, which is now smudging my honorable reputation all over Weekipeda. Apologize! -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by E3992117 (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [35]. -WarthogDemon 00:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Usually the copyvio tag needs the syntax {{db-copyvio|url=XXXX}} for it to work. I say this as i noticed your tag on The Duke (short). Just to let you know. Woodym555 23:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [36]. -WarthogDemon 00:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Loserz

Y Done. However, the instructions were pretty clear on WP:DRV, so I don't know why you asked. However, help has been provided. Oh, and here's a bill for $50 for the deletion review page, $5 for the copy-and-pasting, $9.14 for my wages (the minimum wage in San Francisco, where I live), and $5.86 for "traveling" expenses and potential medical bills caused by carpal tunnel syndrome, bringing a total of $70 flat. What did you think, admins worked for free? :) —Kurykh 03:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here User talk:Kurykh. -WarthogDemon 03:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I kindly refer to Wikipedia:Deletion review#Steps to list a new deletion review if you didn't see it already. —Kurykh 03:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia denied your claim. Sorry. :P —Kurykh 03:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [37]. -WarthogDemon 03:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Yes, I know they were not out of anger. —Kurykh 03:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It Was I

"Who asked him to create a DRV for Loserz. My apologies if that made a bit of a mess. I do agree with what you said on that page, however it just seemed that they were not going to listen to just the reasons of individual editors and that this would be a simpler way to solve it. My apologies if it's the exact opposite. -WarthogDemon 04:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Who knows, it's seems it's just giving him more people to contradict... but I realize people who appear on one's talk page with requests and won't take no for an answer can be rough to deal with though. --W.marsh 04:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [38]. -WarthogDemon 07:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!!!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I loved the new word you made up in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maple Village, remember, no forumcruft! ♫Twinkler4♫ ^{(Talk to me!)} 15:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [39]. -WarthogDemon 18:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My joke

Hahaha you ALMOST fell for it :)Sidious1701_{(talk•email•todo)} 19:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [40]. -WarthogDemon 19:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How'd you find my userpage? Sidious1701_{(talk•email•todo)} 19:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replying here: [41]. -WarthogDemon 19:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles are both useless. g2g btw.Sidious1701_{(talk•email•todo)} 19:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [42]. -WarthogDemon 19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing User talk

Thanks, I followed one of my own links for an unsigned user. Very well spotted and thanks I have tagged User talk for speedy delete. Again thanks. Mike33 00:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [43]. -WarthogDemon 00:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy's Retired Surfer's Bar

Last night this page was deleted. The person that wrote the original page contacted the administrator that deleted it. I re-wrote the page using the guidelines specified by WIKIpedia. Please explain why it has been listed as spam. It was a descriptive page. Nothing more. The Dunkin Donuts page lists every kind of coffee they sell. If that is okay, I don't see the problem with this page since it was only a brief history and a map link. Nothing was promoted here. Please explain. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Foreveryours4444 (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [44]. -WarthogDemon 00:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There have been 8 Lucy's Retired Surfer's Bars across the country. 4 are still in existance. It is a franchise, just like McDonald's. You may have never heard of it but companies like "Pita Pit" have a page and they are a small franchise also. The discription of Lucy's was not merely about the one in Syracuse but about all of them. The pictures happened to be from Syracuse. But when you see a picture of "Pita Pit" it was obviously taken locally somewhere. And companies such as Dunkin' Donuts blatently advertises their stores by listing every type of coffee they sell. And I don't mind but is that really necessary? I doubt that I'd find that information in the "Encyclopedia Britannica." You also shortened the Marshall Street page. I see your point that you don't think it's necessary to list the stores, but there are many pages like that that exist on WIKIpedia, that list all the stores in the area that the page is about. I'm not trying to get you to delete them. I just want you to be fair, that's all. Listing the stores was not to make the page into a tour-guide. I know it may seem that way. But their are a lot of Syracuse University students and Alumni as wellas visitors that would find that information useful. Have't you ever said,"Hey, what was the name of that place we used to go to when we were in college?" Wouldn't you want to be able to look it up? I know this doesn't matter but I worked pretty hard on these pages. The Marshall Street page has listed stores from 2004 until now. So if it's wrong, then why did it go unnoticed for 3 years? All I did was correct information that was wrong, corrected spelling and punctuation, organized and alphabetized things and updated it. Truthfully, the page is much shorter than it was before. I deleted a lot of unimportant information, including bars and restuarant specials, incidents that occurred at various bars, and all the former retail stores. I understand if there's nothing you can do, but I hope you consider what I've stated. Thanks for your time. -Foreveryours4444 01:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged the article for deletion, so you are likely familiar with the content. I agree with the tag and the deletion (by another admin, not me), and don't see any reason to go to DRV. A speedy deletion for spam in no way prevents the article from being recreated, but any new version should include references to places where these bars have been covered in reliable sources (not cameos in movies) and should document the notability of the chain. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [45]. -WarthogDemon 01:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did I (and why would I) tag my own article for deletion? What does DRV mean? I can only refer you to articles on the internet, web pages and web-found franchising information. Lucy's was in Co-Ed mMagazine (for instance) but they rated it "Best Bar in Syracuse" but I can't write that because it would be "promoting." Show me one reference on the "Pit Pit" page where they have been covered by reliable sources that document the notability of THEIR chain. On top of that they to have 2 links to their websight - obviously promoting, and descriptions of the types of pita sandwiches you can buy. Not exactly encyclopidia information. They don't have one reference to prove their notability. Just a lot of hear-say claims. I'm just using Pita Pit is just an example by the way. I've looked at quite a few WIKIpedia sights for franchises and NONE of them reference anything to prove their notibilty. You administrators seem to be bias, so I'm giving up. Thanks and have a great day. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.71.67.218 (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [46]. -WarthogDemon 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You say you wantes to see if "I" had grounds for my article to removed? Why on earth would I want my own article removed? If I tagged it for removal, it was an accident, I assure you. I don't know how to tag articles or what that even means exactly. You also didn't explain why you allow other pages to do things your telling me I can't do. As I said before, not only are they promoting themselves by explaining detailed discriptions on the products they sell, but adding links to their personal websights. Both of which, I was told I can't do and was what got my article deleted the first time. And I haven't seen one page that uses references to back up their claims. Go to the "Studio 54" page for instance. Then read the long list of celebrities who supposedly were seen there. Try and find one reference to back up these "notable" claims. I realize that Lucy's is not Studio 54, but I'm just trying to make a point here and this is not an isolated thing. It's pretty much everyone.

I also still disagree that you shortened the Marshall Street page. It was up and running for 3 years and all I did was make some corrections. In fact, I actually shortened it myself. You're going to get everyone that you deleted angry with me. As I stated earlier, the businesses that were listed directly reflect to the area's personna and history and listing them was informative to many people. Taking them out deprives people of important information. And anyway, WIKIpedia allows this "unnecessary store listing" on many other pages that refer to a given city's specific area.

This time please address all my questions and concerns instead of just answering one. You ask me not to get angry and I'm not, but please understand that I spent about a week reasearching and writing these articles. Then they were deleted. So I spent hours rewriting them using one of YOUR ADMINISTRATOR"S strict guidelines and you again deleted them as I was still in the process of editing one. I've gone by your rules but WIKIpedia doesn't seem to even follow their own rules. And everytime I've written you and explained my concerns you pick out the one question that's easy to answer and fail to address the rest. (For example, out of all my questions and comments I wrote last time, all you anwered was what DRV stands for, which clarified absolutely nothing for me)

When I said have a great day I meant it. I know you're not out to personally get me. I would just like all of my questions answered so don't have to keep asking because I've wasted enough time this week on all this already and it's not angering me, it's just very frustrating.

Cheers -Foreveryours4444 14:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brainbox

Yes I'd say it is a non-required redirect. I have deleted as a test page not required. Thank you for your prompt. Best wishes. --VS ^talk 00:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [47]. -WarthogDemon 00:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong number

I'm not the one who put that there. Maybe you should talk to the person who did. Savie Kumara 04:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [48]. -WarthogDemon 04:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion welcome at deletion review for Plot of Les Mis

After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plot of Les Misérables closed as a deletion, I'm challenging the way the closing administrator acted as in violation of Wikipedia rules. Your participation is welcome at that discussion, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 14. Please keep in mind that only arguments related to either new information or to how Wikipedia rules were violated or not violated in closing the discussion will be considered. It isn't a replay of the original AfD. I'm familiar with WP:CANVASSING and I am alerting everyone who participated in that discussion to the deletion review. I won't contact anyone again on this topic, and I apologize if you consider this note distracting. Noroton 04:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologize

Sorry about that article, I will be more careful next time. Thank you. Matpimenta 16:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [49]. -WarthogDemon 18:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning An Attack Page

I'm mad at that guy. He just annoyed me and I couldn't help but to write about it on Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mr. johnathan (talk • contribs).

Can you take back that stupid report you threatened on my talk page about being reported? -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mr. johnathan (talk • contribs).

Replied here: [50]. -WarthogDemon 19:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Can You Delete Two Talk Page Edits From My Page?

"A user created an attack page and has apologized thrice (long story, you can check history) and while I want to keep the apology, I think it might be best that the retard edits: [51] and [52] be removed. Is that possible? -WarthogDemon 19:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you think it's not that bad. I just want to make sure all extreme/serious attacks on people can not be traced through my talk page. -WarthogDemon 19:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Hmmm, that's slightly awkward because the edits exist in the edit history of the page. I think that to do this would mean recreating your page and merging in order to preserve the edit history. It is a fiddly thing, though. Is it really necessary? (aeropagitica) 20:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [53]. -WarthogDemon 20:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Myachi pages

Feel free to explain why you think said pages are advertisements, because they are anything but. They're simply sources of information for anyone who wants to know more about Myachi, and there is no reason to delete them.

I've already dealt with this plenty of times, and every time, I did what was asked. I removed everything that didn't sound "encyclopedic," I made it so it wasn't like an advertisement, I added references. But now you've got a problem with it? -BrownsFanForLife 21:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [54]. -WarthogDemon 21:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing my best to source the information, but you've got to understand, there aren't many sources. Most of what is said on the article is just that: said. There are no books on Myachi, and just one video. The only real sources are the Myachi website and forum, and that's all I really can source. Most everything else was said, at one point or another, by the creators of Myachi themselves. -BrownsFanForLife 21:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here: [55]. -WarthogDemon 21:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I added one more reference, the Myachi video I mentioned. I haven't watched it all, but it demonstrats and explains a lot about Myachi, some of the info on the article should also be on the video.

BrownsFanForLife 21:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wondering If My Prodding Was Legit

To be honest I am currently looking at the pages, trying to figure out how to get rid of them ;). Personally I wouldn't have tagged them as {{db-spam}}, and the problem with prod is that obviously this person won't agree with you. I think we'll have to go through AfD. I let you do the honours :) (nominate both articles as the same discussion). -- lucasbfr ^talk 21:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 327: / Line 327: @@
 [[User:BrownsFanForLife|BrownsFanForLife]] 21:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
+== Re: Wondering If My Prodding Was Legit ==
+To be honest I am currently looking at the pages, trying to figure out how to get rid of them ;). Personally I wouldn't have tagged them as {{tl|db-spam}}, and the problem with prod is that obviously this person won't agree with you. I think we'll have to go through AfD. I let you do the honours :) (nominate both articles as the same discussion). -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 21:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)