Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:30, 22 October 2007

This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style.

It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.

Shortcuts

This page in a nutshell: While flag icons and similar images can be useful in Wikipedia articles in some circumstances, there are also problems associated with their misapplication and overuse. Words are clearer.

The overuse, misuse and abuse of flag icons, larger flag images and similar images in Wikipedia article text, lists and tables presents a number of problems. How to avoid the principal issues is summarized below, followed by more in-depth discussion of each problem.

Note: Terms such as "country" and "nation" as used below should be understood to also apply to other uses of flags, such as U.S. states, the United Nations, etc. Furthermore, the bulk of these recommendations are also applicable to official seals, coats of arms, and other representations which serve similar purposes to flag images.

Summary

Flag images should be useful to the reader, not merely decorative.
Flag icons should not be used in general prose in an article, including in the lead section.
Flag images, especially flag icons in biographical infoboxes, should not be used to indicate birth or death places, as this may imply an incorrect citizenship or nationality.
Flag icons may be appropriate in tables or lists provided that citizenship, nationality or jurisdiction is intimately tied to the topic at hand, such as comparison of global economic data or reporting of international sporting event results. They should always be accompanied by their country names at least once.
Flag images should not be used as stand-ins for images of people or other article topics.
Flag images should have alt text and/or captions for accessibility (the standardized flag icon templates do this automatically).
Flag images should not be used inappropriately, and should explain their applicability in the caption if usage of the flag is limited in some way.
Non-national flags should be used only when directly relevant (e.g., articles on a city may include the city flag).

Avoiding flag problems

Appropriate use

Flag icons may be helpful in certain situations:

They can aid navigation in long lists or tables of countries as many readers can more quickly scan a series of flag icons due to the visual differences between flags. However, since not all readers can do this, the flags should be accompanied with country names (see #Accompany flags with names). Such usage is particularly common at articles on sporting topics, and reflects very widespread offline usage.
Repeated use of a flag in a table or infobox (usually to save space and avoid repeating the country name) should only be done if the flag has been used previously in the table with the country name.
They are useful in articles about international sporting events to show the representative nationality of players, which may differ from their legal nationalities. Example: List of WPA World Nine-ball Champions.

Not for use in general article prose

The flag icons were created for use in lists and tables (especially of sporting and other statistics), and have subsequently found widespread usage in infoboxes (a usage that some editors deprecated, and which can be problematic when done incautiously). They should not be used in the article body, as in, "...and after her third novel was published, Jackson moved to Bristol, England, in April 2004, then...". Such misuse of icons in prose breaks up the continuity of the text, distracting the reader (example). This principle applies equally to other iconic images (for example, in an article about last year's top-40 pop singles, we would not interrupt sentences with icons of CD covers).

Do not emphasize nationality without good reason

Wikipedia is not a place for nationalistic pride. Flags are visually striking, and placing a national flag next to something can make its nationality or location seem to be of greater significance than other things. For example, with an English flag next to him, Paul McCartney looks like an "English singer-songwriter from Liverpool who was in the Beatles"; without the flag next to him, he looks like an "English singer-songwriter from Liverpool who was in the Beatles". Emphasizing the importance of a person's citizenship or nationality above their other qualities risks violating Wikipedia's "Neutral point of view" policy.

Not for use in locations of birth and death

The use of flag icons in the birth and death information in a biographical article's introduction and/or infobox is strongly deprecated, as flags imply citizenship and/or nationality. Many people born abroad due to traveling parents never become citizens of the countries in which they were born and do not claim such a nationality. For example, actor Bruce Willis was born on a U.S. military base in Germany, so putting a German flag in his infobox, for any reason, might lead the casual reader to assume he is or was a German citizen. Similarly, many people die on foreign soil due to war, vacation accidents, etc. without any effect on their actual citizenship or nationality.

Help the reader rather than decorate

Flag and other icons are commonly misused as decoration. Adding a country's flag next to its name does not provide additional encyclopedic information in a general context, and is often simply distracting (example). Wikipedia generally strongly eschews the use of images for decorative purposes, preferring those that provide additional essential information or needed illustration.

Not a substitute for pictures of the subject

A flag (or some other symbolic image) should not be used as an image placeholder, such as in biographical articles. This practice is strongly deprecated, as the use of a flag to represent a person or object is both incorrect and nonsensical. While it may be appropriate to use a flag or seal as the principal image in an infobox for the organizational entity it represents (for example, the FBI), in most cases these uses have been superseded by the introduction of infoboxes that have specific fields for flag and seal images (example).

Using too many flags

Flag icons are often overused. When added excessively, they clutter the page and become redundant, as in this sportsperson's infobox. Here, a single flag icon might be appropriate, e.g. next to the national team the article subject played for. Avoid overuse of other sorts of icons as well.

Repurposing flags beyond their legitimate scope

Flags represent a specific entity and should not be repurposed to represent something else, e.g. because an actually appropriate flag is not available. For example, do not abuse the flag of the United Nations to represent the entire world, as this is not an accurate application of the official flag of that international organization. See also the "#Inventing new flags and using non-flag stand-ins" section below.

Direct relevance of subnational flags

Subnational flags (regions, cities, etc.) should generally be used only when directly relevant to the article. Such flags are rarely recognizable by the general public, detracting from any shorthand utility they might have, and are rarely closely related to the subject of the article. Flags may be developed for any purpose: organizations, subnational governments such as cities, provinces, states (in the U.S. sense), counties, social or ethnic identities, and so on. Such flags are directly relevant to articles about those subjects. For instance, the flag of Tampa, Florida, is appropriately used on the Tampa article. However, the Tampa flag should generally not be used on articles about residents of Tampa: it would not be informative, and it would be unnecessarily visually distracting.

A common example of use of subnational flags is in tables or lists of sporting information with regard to subnational teams; in such contexts, the appropriate flag is of course not the national one, in multiple entries in such listing would end up with the same flag. Another applicable situation would be that of a list concerned with subdivisions of a specific country.

See also #Use of flags for non-sovereign states and nations.

Readability, usability and accessibility

Poor use of flags and flag icons can present a variety of usability problems for different users.

Accompany flags with country names

When a flag icon is used for the first time in a list or table, it needs to appear adjacent to its respective country (or province, etc.) name. Use of flag templates without country names is also an accessibility issue, as it can render information difficult for color blind readers to understand.

Not all flags are easily distinguishable:

The flag of the United States is almost universally recognized;
but few readers – even those who recognize the country's name – would immediately identify this as the flag of Liechtenstein.

This is especially the case when a flag is reduced to icon size:

Country can sometimes be omitted when flag re-used

The country name may be omitted if a flag appears with its country name earlier in a list or table. When a flag icon is needed more than once, the flag-and-name template, for example {{flag|Japan}}, or its shorter variant {{flag|JPN}} should be used first, but may be reduced to {{flagicon|JPN}} in subsequent uses. However, some editors feel that some tables such as those containing sports statistics (example) are easier to read if {{flag}} is used throughout.

In this infobox, flags of participating countries are first given with their names. Following this, the flag alone is used to identify the nationality of military commanders.

Accessibility for the visually impaired

Failure to provide alt text, which is text describing the content of the image, will make the information meaningless or confusing to those using screen readers or text-only browsers. This is mainly a problem when including flags directly as images, as the standardized flag icon templates provide alt text. To provide alt text, simply add the description to the end of the image markup: [[Image:PictureName.jpg|300px|right|Description of the image]].

Historical considerations

Flags change, and sometimes the geographical or political area(s) to which a flag applies may also change.

Do not rewrite history

Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure, event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better to not use a flag at all, and where one is genuinely needed, use the historically accurate flag.

For example, writer James Joyce, a native of Ireland while that island was entirely administered by the United Kingdom, should have neither an Irish flag (especially not the modern one, which did not exist in his era) nor a British flag, as both will confuse readers (as to his legal citizenship or his country of residence, respectively).

Use historical flags in contexts where the difference matters

When use of a historical flag and associated country name has at least a semi-officially applicable rationale, use them. For example, in lists of Olympic medalists, the USSR flag and country name should be used for reporting stats predating 1992, not those of either the Russian Federation or the CIS

In some military history contexts

It may in some narrow military history circumstances be appropriate to use flags, as they were used at the time being written about, including naval ensigns, provided that the flags are (as usual) accompanied at first occurrence by their country (or more narrow) names — our readers are not expected to be military historians. An example might be an in-depth exploration of a famous battle involving numerous forces with known flags; such flags might be used in summary tables to make it clearer which force was being referred to for a particular detail.

Entities without flags until after a certain point in time

Some subnational entities have not had flags until recently (e.g. the Welsh flag has only been official since 1959). While this flag can still represent Wales generally, it should not be used to represent the country when the context is specifically about a time period predating the flag. Some countries are also new, formed from parts of, or entirely subsuming, one or more other countries. It may need to be decided by consensus on a case-by-case basis what flag to use, when a topic crosses two periods and a conflict arises as to what country the topic pertains to in what contexts.

Political issues

Beware political pitfalls, and listen to issues raised by other editors with concerns. Some flags are (sometimes or always) political statements and can associate a person with their political significance, sometimes misleadingly. In other cases, a flag may have limited and highly specific official uses, and an application outside that context can have political (e.g. nationalist or anti-nationalist) implications.

Use of flags for non-sovereign states and nations

The exact definition of a "state", "nation" or "country" is often politically divisive and can result in debates over the choice of flag. For example, England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are referred to by the British government as "countries" within the United Kingdom [1]; the Canadian government recently recognised the Québécois as "a nation within a united Canada.";[2] and the United States recognizes many Native American tribal groupings as semi-independent "nations". Some people may feel stronger identification with such entities than with the wider state of which they are a citizen, and editors sometimes choose, for example, to use an English flag rather than a British one. Such choices can cause debates, or can sometimes mislead if the editor's own political bias is the motivation for the choice, and does not represent the views of the article subject.

In general, if a flag is felt to be necessary, it should be that of the sovereign state (e.g. the United States of America or Canada) not of a subnational entity, even if that entity is sometimes considered a "nation" or "country" in its own right. This is partly for the sake of consistency across Wikipedia, but also because a person's legal citizenship is verifiable, whereas "nationality" within a country can be porous, indeterminate and shifting; an English person's passport describes them as "British", for example, not "English", and being English is a matter of self-identification, not verifiable legality in most cases. Many editors, however, feel that the UK's subnations in particular are an exception, most especially in sporting contexts, and disputes are likely to arise if this sovereign state maxim is enforced in articles on subnational British topics.

See also #Direct relevance of non-national flags.

Overbroad use of flags with politicized connotations

Some flags are politically contentious – take care to avoid using them in inappropriate contexts. Some examples are:

Use of the flags of the Confederate States of America to represent all or part of the Southern United States prior to 1861 or after 1865.
Use of the flag of the Republic of China in contexts where the flag of Chinese Taipei is preferable.

Biographical use

Flags make simple, blunt statements about nationality, while words can express the facts with more complexity.

For example, the actress Naomi Watts could be said, depending upon context and point of view, to be any or all of: British, English, Welsh, or Australian. She was born a British citizen in England, lived in Wales for a long time, then moved to Australia and became an Australian citizen. There is no single flag for that, and using all four flags will not be helpful.

Special care should be taken with the biographical use of flag templates in the following situations:

Never use a flag for birth or death place, since doing so may imply an incorrect citizenship or nationality.
Do not use the flag and name of the former country in a case of reliably-sourced renunciation of citizenship of that country.
Do not use the flag and name of the former (or later) country where is is unknown whether legal citizenship applied (or applies); in particular, a recent immigrant from one country to another should not be automatically given the nationality (much less flag) of the second country. For example, Alex Pagulayan, a Filipino-Canadian who recently emigrated permanently to the Philippines, will sometimes be listed with the Canada flag templates and sometimes with those of the Philippines in tournament charts, depending upon the time period, but should have his nationality or citizenship (with or without a flag) as "Canadian" in his infobox as he is not yet a Philippine citizen.
If someone's citizenship has legally changed because of shifting political borders, use the historically correct country designation, not a later one, and perhaps mention in the article prose the new country name, e.g. "Belgrade, Yugoslavia (today in Serbia)"; it may also be best to avoid using any flag at all.
Use the flag and name of the country (be it a state or a nation) that the person (or team of people) officially represented, regardless of true citizenship, when the flag templates are used for sports statistics and the like. If a French player is awarded a medal for playing in a German team, the German flag would be used in a table of awards. The Scottish flag would be used with regard to the FIFA World Cup, but that of the UK for the Olympics. Caution should be used in extending this convention to non-sporting contexts, as it may produce confusing results. And a countervailing example would be an article about a sports team that officially represents a particular country but is composed of members who are citizens of several countries; a table of players at such an article might list them by their country of actual citizenship or professed nationality.
Avoid flag usage, especially to present a point of view, that is likely to raise editorial controversy over political or other factual matters about a biography subject.

See also "Historical considerations" for other relevant recommendations.

Inventing new flags and using non-flag stand-ins

The practice of inventing a new flag to fill a perceived need for one is not simply deprecated but expressly forbidden by policy, as it constitutes original research; additionally it will most often advance a personal viewpoint which may have political or other contentious undertones, and it constitutes the neologistic invention of something that is unlikely to be recognizable or meaningful to anyone else (i.e. it is patent nonsense). One example of such an invention is a bogus "North American flag".

In some cases, workarounds have been instituted in the form of non-flag alternatives to flag images for use in flag icon templates, such as the one for the entire world or for "international" in general that WikiProject Flag Template has provided, {{flag|Earth}}, which can be customized, e.g. {{flag|Earth|name=worldwide}} (Template:Country data Earth); but, due to its flag-like shape, some editors might object to it as a bogus flag invention. Map or political border outline images are occasionally used in this way, to represent places with no official flag, but at icon-level size are difficult to distinguish from random blobs. Other than as already observed here, this guideline offers no opinion on the appropriateness or utility of these stand-ins, which require further community consensus-building as to their future and whether more of them should be created as needs are perceived.

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 # Use of the [[flags of the Confederate States of America]] to represent all or part of the [[Southern United States]] prior to 1861 or after 1865.
 # Use of the [[flag of the Republic of China]] in contexts where the flag of [[Chinese Taipei]] is preferable.
-# Use of the [[Ulster Banner]] to represent [[Northern Ireland]] in inappropriate contexts; see [[Northern Ireland flags issue]] for details.
 ===Biographical use===