User talk:Xeno: Difference between revisions
→Re: Your RFA: add new section |
Promethean (talk | contribs) RFA |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
==Help!== |
==Help!== |
||
Thanks for the note on my talkpage. Could you please explain (in layman's terms) what is wrong with my status thingy? Congrats on becoming an admin too! = ) --[[User:Cameron|Cameron]] ([[User Talk:Cameron|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cameron|C]]) 09:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the note on my talkpage. Could you please explain (in layman's terms) what is wrong with my status thingy? Congrats on becoming an admin too! = ) --[[User:Cameron|Cameron]] ([[User Talk:Cameron|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cameron|C]]) 09:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
== RFA == |
|||
{{smile|Prom3th3an}} |
|||
Congrats on your RFA, When you find your feet let me know as 2 coaches are better than one and i'd be honoured to have you aboard once more [[User:Prom3th3an|Prom3th3an]] ([[User talk:Prom3th3an|talk]]) 10:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:51, 4 June 2008
userpage | talk | dashboard | misc |
RFA
Standards
![]() | This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. It was last substantively updated 14 August 2008. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. It was last substantively updated 14 August 2008. |
My RFA standards are still being refined, but I rarely base my support on arbitrary cut-offs like number of edits, or length of time editing. More often I will attempt to determine the clue level of a candidate. If high levels of clue are present, they will earn my support, regardless of whether or not they have 5000 non-huggle edits and 6 months of regular activity. This is based on a fairly brief review of their contributions, moreso on their answers to the questions. I have an optional question that I often pose to candidates that helps with this.
Self-noms and the acceptance line
- Neglecting to follow the bolded instruction #6 to delete the acceptance line in the self-nomination instructions will cause me to register a neutral unless a preponderance of clue has already been detected.
- I do this because it is a fairly simple and easy instruction to follow. Not following it is (in my opinion) indicative of a deeper tendency to not thoroughly read and follow instructions generally. Adminship is no big deal, but applying for adminship is. The fact that a candidate hasn't fully versed themselves in the process of RFA prior to jumping in doesn't build confidence that they will accurately follow guidelines and policies in applying administrative actions.
- An example of how this could apply to a real-world admin situation: When blocking for an inappropriate username, it is customary to uncheck the "Prevent account creation" and "Autoblock any IP addresses used" boxes. However, an admin who doesn't thoroughly follow instructions might not do this and as such Wikipedia could lose an otherwise constructive contributor.
- One user has mentioned that leaving this line in could be justified by ignore all rules. Quite frankly, I disagree. There is no good reason to ignore this rule, and following it is painless. Attention to detail is a quality I value in an administrator.
- As I mentioned, leaving this line in isn't always a deal breaker and if the candidate's actions indicate to me that this oversight is an anomaly, I may change to, or otherwise support. Furthermore, if they remove the line using only a herring, I will most certainly lend my support, though I may ask that they first bring me a shrubbery.
Participation
- Thingg - nom, support (69/32/4)
- WBOSITG 2 - support (114/10/4)
- Zginder - neutral became moral support in the neutral column and then oppose (8/34/9)
- Ro098 - oppose (0/3/0)
- Jbmurray - support (161/1/2)
- Vivio Testarossa - oppose (8/25/7)
- Bluegoblin7 - neutral (6/13/10)
- Guest9999 - support (48/31/4)
- Paulyb - oppose (0/4/0)
- Strennman - oppose (0/6/0)
- Tyw7 - oppose (with moral support) (0/1/0)
- Tyw7 2 - oppose, switched to strong oppose (3/14/1)
- Xenocidic - candidate (72/13/2)
- InDeBiz1 - moral support (5/15/2)
- Useight (RFB) - support (28/16/6)
- Tinkleheimer - moral support (15/16/8)
- Ironholds - oppose (12/24/10)
- Kevin - neutral, switched to support (54/2/0)
- Pinkville - support (54/0/1)
- Ali'i - weak support (70/55/14)
- Cenarium - support (42/2/2)
- Soxred93 3 - neutral, switched to support (87/7/3)
- Avruch - support (104/35/10)
- Cedarvale1965-08 - oppose (0/2/0)
- Karanacs - support (119/4/3)
- Plyhmrp - oppose (0/4/0)
- SarekOfVulcan - support (76/11/2)
- Golich17 - support (19/36/11)
- Headbomb - support (17/38/11)
- oren0 - support (67/21/13)
- Ryan - support (17/36/2)
- EricV89 - support (13/43/9)
- Frank - support (59/11/4)
- Masterpiece2000 - neutral (10/19/3)
- JeanLatore - neutral (0/12/1)
- JeanLatore 2 - oppose (0/6/0)
- RyanLupin 2 - support (32/28/4)
- Blakegripling ph - support (9/30/9)
- Lomn - support (54/1/1)
- Shoessss 2 - support (23/26/7)
- Tanner-Christopher 2 - support (64/3/4)
- the demonhog 2 - support (100/1/1)
- TomStar 81 3 - support (80/18/2)
- Cailil - support (66/8/5)
- Lady Aleena 2 - neutral, switched to oppose (28/31/10)
- Red Phoenix - support (13/7/2)
- No longer updating, see my RFA participation report
Optional question
Thanks
- Thank you for your support
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e7/Janitor%27s_bucket_with_mop.jpg/140px-Janitor%27s_bucket_with_mop.jpg)
I would like to thank the community for placing their trust in me during my recent request for adminship, which passed 72 13
2
. Rest assured, I have read each comment thoroughly and will be addressing the various concerns raised as I step cautiously into my new role as janitor. In particular, I would like to thank Balloonman for putting so much time into reviewing my contributions and writing such a thoughtful nomination statement after knowing me for only a brief period of time (and for convincing me that I was ready to take up the mop now, rather than go through admin coaching).
To my fellow admins - please let me know right away if I ever take any mis-steps with my new tools. Should I make a mistake, and you reverse the action, I will not consider it to be wheel-warring (but please tell me so I can understand what I did wrong).
To everyone - please feel free to slap me around a bit if I ever lose sight of the core philosophy of Wikipedia as I understand it - the advancement of knowledge through the processes of mutual understanding and respect. As always, feel free to drop by my talk page if I can be of any assistance. =)
Sincerely,
~xenocidic, 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Analysis of my RFA
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This is Xeno's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33Auto-archiving period: 15 days ![]() |
Adoptee subpage update notification section
If you've updated your adoptee subpage, and would like me to respond to it, please sign your name below (~~~~
). When you make a new update, delete your signature, and sign again. xenocidic (talk)
You are now an administrator
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/Admin_T-shirt.svg/250px-Admin_T-shirt.svg.png)
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjBscribe 01:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats! Good luck with the mop! :D Malinaccier (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hearty congratulations on your new tools. Please let me know if I can ever help you in any way. --John (talk) 01:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- And congrats on your approval as well! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- (ec x2)Congratulations!!!!! Hope you enjoy the tools... (like you won't) Thingg⊕⊗ 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you all. Can someone direct me to the "delete main page" button? ;> xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 01:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Right here. Thingg⊕⊗ 01:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats on the admin tools!!! Cheers, Razorflame 01:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Right here. Thingg⊕⊗ 01:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you all. Can someone direct me to the "delete main page" button? ;> xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 01:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- (ec x2)Congratulations!!!!! Hope you enjoy the tools... (like you won't) Thingg⊕⊗ 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Congrats!
I don't know you, but congrats on your new adminship! --Justpassin (talk) 01:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- As the first to support your RFA, I'm the first to congratulate you on passing. Wait, no. Not even close. Useight (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
help
can you help me with something?Wikieditor 222 01:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, what's up? xenocidic (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can you help me with my personal status thing. I made a board of status faces but they don't work.Wikieditor 222 01:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what you're trying to accomplish but if you want to add your own custom statuses you'll need two pages - one to hold the statuses and one to hold the switch. User:Wikieditor222/StatusTemplate now holds the template and User:Wikieditor222/Status now holds the switch. Your custom status "stupid" should work properly now - though I don't know why you'd want to say that! Let me know if you need further assistance. xenocidic (talk) 01:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can you help me with my personal status thing. I made a board of status faces but they don't work.Wikieditor 222 01:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Your In-depth analysis
You've got a slight typing error in this section, where you have "Wisdom89 was an early was an early strong supporter". Useight (talk) 02:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out! xenocidic (talk) 02:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Between the possibly divisive connotations of xenocidic vs. Xeno, I think I'd go with your current name. Just my opinion though. Congrats btw. dorftrottel (talk) 04:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Heh
Lol at your summary: "While Naerii was initially unconvinced, they later deleted the entire oppose discussion and switched to support, citing a popular Eminem song in the edit summary as the justification for this change." - it makes me sound so crazy when written formally like that! I just realised that my concerns were kind of petty, and seeing as I supported Evula in her recent RFB even after seeing her mention somewhere that she hasn't written much in the articlespace I figured it would be hypocritical not to support you for admin. It's nice that you're taking opposes into account rather than taking a stance of "well I've passed now, I can forget all that crap", though. My exams are over soon (in 6 hours as a matter of fact :o) so if you need any help writing articles over the summer I'd be glad to assist (personally I'm going to be writing some boring history stuffs). Improving an article to GA or FA can be pretty daunting on your own, so I'd be happy to help out if you like :)
And the edit summary was just me pissing about I guess; I rarely if ever use edit summaries and when I do remember I can never think of anything to say, so sometimes I just quote whatever I happen to be listening to at the time (how embarassing to admit that I listen to Eminem :(). Congrats on passing your RfA. naerii - talk 04:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not embarrassing at all - Eminem rocks! or raps... or something... Sorry, I didn't meant to make you out to seem crazy, I wrote it that way for comedic effect. =) (I can change it if you want) I must admit I did have a chuckle when I read it. at first I was like... wtf? until I realized where it was from. Still, I was rather confused - thanks for clearing that up for me. and I might take you up on that offer, though, my area of expertise... well,... it's been getting some scorn from the GA/FA review projects recently. as for addressing the opposes, I feel that they are the most important part of the RFA, they really need to be taken into account and you need to look at how you can improve for the betterment of the encyclopedia as a whole. anyways, thanks again. xenocidic (talk) 04:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Lmao it's fine, it cracked me up :P I've seen some grumbling about the video game wikiproject in FAC recently but I wouldn't take it to heart if I were you; most of the articles I write are about albums and that area is looked down on just as much as video games are and to be honest I give about this <-> much of a shit ;) So yeah just let me know if you want any assistance with anything (wikis are all about collaboration after all) - I'm not the world's best writer but I enjoy expanding articles (people will just have to deal with my amateur prose - you know it's really ironic since I got 94% in my English Literature A Level). naerii - talk 04:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: Your RFA
Hey Xenocidic, I hope you weren't offended/put off by my switch (seemingly at the last minute) to a weak oppose. Nothing personal of course. I do think you're a strong contributor/editor, but after revisiting the discussion, the CSD tagging took me somewhat aback. I swayed back and forth about it for a while before changing my !vote. I think you'll make a good admin though, just as long as you don't bite the newbies by tagging an A7 as an attack page : ) Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Offended - not at all - I've come to respect your contributions to the RFA process and I know you wouldn't have done that without deep deliberation. No hard feelings whatsoever. Truthfully, I didn't expect to be at RFA so soon, I really did want some coaching on the CSD stuff - but no matter. I'll have to learn on the job =) xenocidic (talk) 04:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Help!
Thanks for the note on my talkpage. Could you please explain (in layman's terms) what is wrong with my status thingy? Congrats on becoming an admin too! = ) --Cameron (T|C) 09:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
RFA
This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions
Congrats on your RFA, When you find your feet let me know as 2 coaches are better than one and i'd be honoured to have you aboard once more Prom3th3an (talk) 10:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)