User talk:Skäpperöd: Difference between revisions
→DYK for Treaty of Königsberg (1656): new section |
→DYK for Treaty of Labiau: new section |
||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] |
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] |
||
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#February 21 2010|February 21, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Treaty of Königsberg (1656)]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201002/Treaty_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg_(1656) quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#February 21 2010|February 21, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Treaty of Königsberg (1656)]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201002/Treaty_of_K%C3%B6nigsberg_(1656) quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
||
|} [[User talk:Ucucha|Ucucha]] 18:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== DYK for Treaty of Labiau == |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]] |
|||
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#February 21 2010|February 21, 2010]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Treaty of Labiau]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201002/Treaty_of_Labiau quick check] )</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|||
|} [[User talk:Ucucha|Ucucha]] 18:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC) |
|} [[User talk:Ucucha|Ucucha]] 18:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:11, 21 February 2010
Contents |
---|
DYK for Swedish Wars on Bremen
Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Gustavia, Rügen
⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Vorpommern
Mea culpa. Lfh (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Could you check the stress at Saarbrücken too? It was placed on two syllables, so I removed the second, but maybe I should have removed the first. Lfh (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Expulsion of Germans after World War II
I have soft-protected Expulsion of Germans after World War II to allow for more discussion on the talk page before further large changes are made to the article. This allows for established users to edit the page, but not anonymous IPs, so that this does not become an edit war. Cheers --BaronLarf 19:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Relax
I did not call anybody a Neo-Nazi. You have no cause for complaint.--Woogie10w (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, why keep him there? The mention of the IHR stinks like a dead fish in the sun.--Woogie10w (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note well my earlier comments The current article is poorly written and sorely needs a lot of cleanup work. Over the years this article has become a hodgepodge of edits by editors who acted in good faith but unfortunately lack historical expertise. Overall my POV is sympathetic to the plight of the German civilian population who became the victims of the expulsions. The historical facts need to be narrated in a credible scholarly article rather than the current disjointed, poorly written mess that exists at this time--Woogie10w (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article is your baby, let me read the The New Cambridge Medieval History[1]--Woogie10w (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Happy Skäpperöd's Day!
User:Skäpperöd has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Humph! He completely misled me with his photos of unblemished hollyhocks. Shameful. Novickas (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! You made my snowed-in day! Skäpperöd (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Brotbackautomat.
Wir haben frisches Brot, Schnee oder kein Schnee. Wir Haben ein Brotbackautomat. [2]--Woogie10w (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Ecktes Brot
Weizenmehl-2 tassen(US)
Vollkornweizenmehl-1/4 tasse (US)
Roggenmehl-1/4 tasse (US)
Milchpulver- 1 tablespoon (15 milliliters)
Olivenöl 1 tablespoon (15 milliliters)
Salz-1 teaspoon (5 milliliters)
brauner Zucker-2 tablespoons (30 milliliters)
Wasser-1 tasse (US)
Backhefe-1 teaspoon 5 (milliliters)
backen vier Stunden--Woogie10w (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Tylman AfD
Your editorial comments are unhelpful, unnecessary, and serve no purpose other than to create a hostile atmosphere. If User:Paweł5586 should not have commented, let the blocking admin remove his comment. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 07:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop trying to turn this AfD into a battleground. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 07:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
(response)
DYK for Peace of Travendal
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
History of Poland
There are missing references because I haven't finished this big "Decline of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" section yet. I get most of the development from the "Historia Polski 1505-1764" book by Gierowski, it's listed there, an old Jagiellonian University text. Then I check some other sources, add information, do references. This process is basically complete as far as I'm concerned up to the "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" portion, so any corrections, additions, additional references would be best to put into this "finished" part. This current "Decline" part it is probably best to leave till I'm done with it. Other that that I appreciate contributions and involvement. For example I rarely add internet references, which I suppose should become increasingly available as the network encompasses more and more things. Thank for your interest and constructive input. Orczar (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Tylman AfD
I'm relieved to hear you didn't take offense. Looking back, I realized that I made my comment right after you, and I used the word "you". Thanks. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715)
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Siege of Tönning
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Poznań
Hi Skapperod, I would appreciate if you would stop POV pushing on Polish cities. Thank you. Dr. Loosmark 22:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- ?Skäpperöd (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- You know very well what I mean. I request you give us a quote of the relevant text from the source on the article's talk page. Dr. Loosmark 00:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
[3] Skäpperöd (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- How does "Also in Poland and Bohemia were the burghers in the towns initially primarily of German origin" support your claim that the "German settlers constituted the majority in Polish towns of that time"!? Please remove your nonsensical claim. Dr. Loosmark 12:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Maybe my translation is slightly ambiguous (though I don't think so), but I had also quoted the original. "Überwiegend", which I translated as "primarily", means primarily in the sense of constituting a majority, but "primarily of German origin" and "German majority" are imho redundant anyways. Please also avoid aggressive terms like "POV pushing" and "nonsensical claim" when talking to me. Skäpperöd (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Initially (soon after the Mongol invasion - at a single point in time) primarily of German origin is quite different from "constituted a majority of Polish towns at that time". Please stop pushing your POV. Dr. Loosmark 18:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
No, "initially" refers to the Ostsiedlung = founding period of these towns, I wonder why you associate the Mongols with that quote? Sure that was the same time period, and there was a feedback-loop on Ostsiedlung, but that was primarily in Lesser Poland and Silesia. Anyhow, the paragraph from which the quote is derived does not mention the Mongols, it deals exclusively with the founding of towns during the Ostsiedlung. I am sorry to see that you won't tone down your aggressive language. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Two things 1) These towns = which towns? 2) What exactly is meant by "founding period"? I hope you are not claiming that these towns had a German majority at the time where they were founded. PS please don't make bogus accusations of aggressive language. Dr. Loosmark 10:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- The Cambridge History of Poland Vol 1 supports Skäpperöd's POV--Woogie10w (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Arbeiterbewegung in Pommern
Maybe you are interested in this [4] [5]. Viele Grüße HerkusMonte (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, I just skimmed through it and will look at it more closely as time permits. Skäpperöd (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Thx
Thanks for improving my articles. My writting english is not good but I am trying my best (Meost (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC))
Wikiout
First Annual Wikiout. In order to give our vandalism, new page and spam patrollers a well deserved day off, it is suggested that all edit patrollers take a 1 day vacation from editing Wikipedia, on Thursday, April 1, 2010. (No, this is NOT an April Fools Joke) Go out, enjoy the spring weather, and give your wrist a break from using that mouse! Please pass this message along to other patrollers by adding {{subst:User:Wuhwuzdat/Wikiout}} ~~~~ to their talk pages |
WuhWuzDat 17:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Skäpperöd. I see you noticed my decline of your speedy tagging on RSOE EDIS - I would have notified you but you got there first. After looking over the article a bit in the process of trying to find sources I decided it qualifies as unambiguous promotion and deleted it anyway. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Lorenz Schwietz
The DYK project (nominate) 18:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of German-Japanese relations
Hi there. Over the past weeks I majorly expanded the article on German-Japanese relations and really need people to go scan my contributions. I want to set a high quality standard since I'd love to have it featured some day. I'd really appreciate your participation on its nomination for a Good Article at Talk:German–Japanese relations. Thanks in advance! --Gliese876 (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've dealt with every missing citation ;) --Gliese876 (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Europa regina
The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have never seen, heard of, or imagined this before. Thanks very much for bringing this article to Wikipedia! --Griseum (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Allegories of Europe are not well covered on wikipedia yet, except for the Greek myth (but not its Early Modern adaptations, as far as I am aware). If you are interested, take a look at this map, where Europa regina actually left the map and becomes pure allegory, as an Europa triumphans. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Hoop crown
The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Capitulation of Estonia and Livonia
Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Treaty of Königsberg (1656)
Ucucha 18:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)