User:Andries: Difference between revisions
This user opposes an uncritical attitude towards cults and new religious movements. |
trustworthy generally good editors |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|}</div> |
|}</div> |
||
== |
==Trustworthy editors== |
||
I consider the follower contributors good editors whom I trust, though this does not mean that I agree with all their edits. (There are many other good editors at Wikipedia.) |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Homo_floresiensis&diff=8773647&oldid=8772694] |
|||
*[[user:Husnock]] |
|||
*[[User:Pjacobi]] |
|||
*[[user:Willmcw]] |
|||
==I do not use an ip or sockpuppet to push my POV== |
==I do not use an ip or sockpuppet to push my POV== |
Revision as of 22:30, 14 January 2006
My name is Andries Krugers Dagneaux. I am from the Netherlands. Interests are cult/cults, Hinduism, science (esp. physics), electronics (component level), chess. I am an avid but not the most accurate reader and I have to admit that my edits in Wikipedia have unfortunately occasionally reflected my reading habits.
| ||
| ||
|
File:Jim Jones brochure of Peoples Temple.jpg | This user opposes an uncritical attitude towards cults and new religious movements. |
Trustworthy editors
I consider the follower contributors good editors whom I trust, though this does not mean that I agree with all their edits. (There are many other good editors at Wikipedia.)
I do not use an ip or sockpuppet to push my POV
My ip at work is 194.178.102.131 10:27, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC). My ip at home is 62.163.36.36 18:20, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC). Before I got a userid I made a few edits under ip user:62.195.88.154. Andries 13:08, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Is Wikipedia a cult?
Please read this eye-opening new article that dissects Wikipedia's propaganda! User:Andries/Wikipedia:controversy Feel free to expand.
Favorite Quotes
- How could he be certain of anything, after what had happened to him? The Myth of the Totally Enlightened Guru article by John Horgan (I am myself a former follower of Sathya Sai Baba and one of the contact persons of the critical website http://www.exbaba.com)
- There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation. by Herbert Spencer Many people would agree with this quote but for psychological reasons, only pay lip service to it (including me sometimes).
- To explain all nature is too difficult a task for any one man or even for any one age. 'Tis much better to do a little with certainty, and leave the rest for others that come after you, than to explain all things. Isaac Newton
- Quoted in Calculus Gems (1992) G Simmons
- One sign of dependence on ideology over data is lack of notes.
- Whenever there is an absolute truth at stake, the manners become careless. This applies both to the owners as well as their opponents of that truth and to all people involved.
- Dr. Paul Schnabel in his 1982 book Between stigma and charisma: new religious movements and mental health/Tussen stigma en charisma: nieuwe religieuze bewegingen en volksgezondheid ISBN 90-6001-746-3 (Deventer, Van Loghum Slaterus), page 343.
Re-reading sources
In my experience, it takes a lot of effort to write a good article. Sometimes I think I can rely on my memory of books that I read a while ago but later I find out then some inaccuracies have slipped in. So I really have to re-study the subject to write a good article.
Handy Links:
(copied from another user, I forgot from whom)
Boilerplate |
Editing |
Utilities |
FAQ |
Style |
Layout |
Characters |
TeX (math) |
Upload |
Public |
DB |
Maths
Needing attention |
NPOV issues |
Controversies |
Vandalism |
Favorites |
Annoyances
Duplicates |
Most wanted stubs |
Most Wanted Articles |
Stubs |
New |
Long |
Orphaned |
Ancient |
Short |
Short
Boilerplate text
- Listed for deletion: {{subst:vfd}}
- Stub: {{msg:stub}}
- Spoilers: {{msg:spoiler}}
- NPOV: {{msg:NPOV}}
- Factual errors: {{msg:Disputed}}
- Inclusion dispute: {{msg:inclusion}}
- Protected: {{msg:protected}}
- Editing in progress: {{msg:inuse}}
Links
(copied from user explodingboy without asking)
- Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Sandbox
- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:List of controversial issues
- Wikipedia:Database queries
- Wikipedia:Guide to Layout
- Wikipedia:How to edit a page
- NPOV
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Problem_users
- Wikipedia:Special characters
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style
- Special:Upload
- http://wikimedia.org/stats/en.wikipedia.org/
Symbols
Useful information
(Special Character Stash shamelessly "borrowed" from Stan's page)
À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö Ø Ù Ú Û Ü ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ñ ò ó ô õ ö ø ù ú û ü ÿ
Ā ā Ī ī Ū ū Ē ē Ō ō
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
WikiProject / Wikipedia:Wikipedia maintenance / *Ancient pages / Wikipedia:Current polls / Wikipedia:List of common misspellings
Recent Changes / Recent Changes by anon users
16 October, 23:07+2:00
(shamelessly copied from user Patrick)
- • bullet
- … ellipsis
- ′ prime = minutes = feet
- ″ double prime = seconds = inches
- ‾ overline = spacing overscore
- ⁄ fraction slash
- ← leftwards arrow
- ↑ upwards arrow
- → rightwards arrow
- ↓ downwards arrow
- ↔ left right arrow
- ∂ partial differential
- ∏ capital pi
- ∑ capital sigma
- √ square root = radical sign
- ∞ infinity
- ∩ intersection = cap
- ∫ integral
- ≈ almost equal to = asymptotic to
- ≠ not equal to
- ≡ identical to
- ≤ less-than or equal to
- ≥ greater-than or equal to
- ... therefore
A small esay about spelling
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt!
- Talotly aeswome! :) Scott P. 23:04, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
Much obliged for you addition to the List of Adolf Hitler books keep them coming :)
Did I bump into you on the Flakturm article a few months ago ?
Cordially WritersCramp 23:31, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Subpages
- Ill fated satirical article about Wikipedia See also User_talk:Andries/Wikipedia:controversy
- To do list and list of articles that I consider biased or misleading
- Reference materials, still to be plagiarized from another Wikipedian
Multi-licensed into the public domain | ||
I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide. |
Please leave messages on the discussion page. Not here.