Jump to content

User talk:Stevertigo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 68: Line 68:
== Historical template ==
== Historical template ==
Hi there, you're invited to join the discussion at [[Template_talk:Historical#New_icon]]. thanks, [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 01:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, you're invited to join the discussion at [[Template_talk:Historical#New_icon]]. thanks, [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">&oelig;</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>&trade;</sup>]] 01:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Stevertigo:<br />
Regarding the above, I see that you're still routinely labeling your major edits (including controversial ones) "[[Help:Minor edit|minor]]," usually without bothering to include an edit summary. This is disruptive and needs to cease. Please do so immediately. Thank you. —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 15:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:52, 3 September 2010

Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

nice work. Decora (talk) 21:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expression (language)

Hello, Stevertigo. Thank you for creating Expression (language). You did not cite any source for your definition of "expression," and (as I note at Talk:Sentence (linguistics)) I'm not aware of any technical definition of the term within linguistics. Might you be thinking of Utterance? The relationship between utterances (as acts of language performance) and sentences (as somewhat idealized linguistic forms) is much discussed. Cnilep (talk) 15:56, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move: Manners of articulation to Manner of articulation

I have requested that Manners of articulation be moved back to Manner of articulation. Your comments are welcome at Talk:Manners of articulation#Requested move. Cnilep (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit default

Hi. Gentle nudge. Please be more careful to turn off your "all edits minor" setting, when you're adding or changing significantfuzzy! amounts of content, eg [1] and [2]. Thanks! (Also, edit summaries are still handy for other editors, even when your edits are minor. Just a short "c/e" or "clarify" is often all that's needed! :) -- Quiddity (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a) Why? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

b) Different and only vaguely related topic:

  • I've noticed the use of this template quite a bit recently.
  • I've also noticed that the template users don't seem to either explain or justify their suggestions.
  • I've also noticed that in most cases NO-ONE, (not even the proposer), have contributed ANYTHING to ANY discussion.
  • I'm afraid I don't see the point. Can you enlighten me?

Thanks in advance, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have nominated List of popes (graphical), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of popes (graphical). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sandman888 (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Human

Hello, Stevertigo. You have new messages at Cybercobra's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Stevertigo. You have new messages at Pfhorrest's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Move of floor to Floor (surface)

Please discuss moves like this before doing them. What was so all important that you had to change the name to something a silly as Floor (surface) which is simply wrong. Flooring is surfacing a floor and there is an article about it and it is different from a floor. Floor was perfectly okay as a main article rather than going direct to the disambiguation page but now there's all sorts of fixing and changing to get it back to a reasonable state. Dmcq (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Historical template

Hi there, you're invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Historical#New_icon. thanks, œ 01:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stevertigo:
Regarding the above, I see that you're still routinely labeling your major edits (including controversial ones) "minor," usually without bothering to include an edit summary. This is disruptive and needs to cease. Please do so immediately. Thank you. —David Levy 15:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]