Jump to content

World Values Survey: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dancouf (talk | contribs)
I have moved and integrated this section in the above text on results: i.e happiness and the global cultural map.
Dancouf (talk | contribs)
Line 164: Line 164:


-->
-->
* Alesina, A., Giuliano, P. & Nunn, N. (2010) "Gender roles and plough"[http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs/articles/folder_published/publication_590/files/gender-roles-and-plough.pdf]
* {{cite journal | author=[[Ronald Inglehart]] and Wayne Baker | title=Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values | journal=American Sociological Review | year=2000 | volume=65 | issue= 1| pages= 19–51 | url=http://wvs.isr.umich.edu/papers/19-51_in.pdf |format=PDF| doi=10.2307/2657288 | jstor=2657288 | publisher=American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, No. 1 }}
* {{cite journal | author=[[Ronald Inglehart]] and Wayne Baker | title=Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values | journal=American Sociological Review | year=2000 | volume=65 | issue= 1| pages= 19–51 | url=http://wvs.isr.umich.edu/papers/19-51_in.pdf |format=PDF| doi=10.2307/2657288 | jstor=2657288 | publisher=American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, No. 1 }}
* Christian Welzel, Ronald Inglehart & Hans-Dieter Klingemann (2003). "The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis." ''European Journal of Political Research'' 42(3): 341–79 ([http://www.jacobs-university.de/imperia/md/content/groups/schools/shss/cwelzel/papers/12.pdf])
* Christian Welzel, Ronald Inglehart & Hans-Dieter Klingemann (2003). "The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis." ''European Journal of Political Research'' 42(3): 341–79 ([http://www.jacobs-university.de/imperia/md/content/groups/schools/shss/cwelzel/papers/12.pdf])

Revision as of 08:35, 17 May 2011

World Values Survey
Founded1981
TypeNon profit association
Location
Key people
President Ronald Inglehart, Vice President: Christian Welzel, Secretary General: Bi Puranen, Treasurer: Catalina Romero, Members of the Executive Committee: Yilmaz Esmer, Shen Mingming, Permanent advisor: Juan Díez-Nicolás
Websitewww.worldvaluessurvey.org

The World Values Survey is a global research project that explores people’s values and beliefs, how they change over time and what social and political impact they have. It is carried out by a worldwide network of social scientists who, since 1981, have conducted representative national surveys in almost 100 countries. The WVS is the only source of empirical data on attitudes covering a majority of the world’s population (nearly 90%).

The WVS measures, monitors and analyzes: Support for Democracy, Tolerance of foreigners and ethnic minorities, Support for Gender equality, The role of Religion and changing levels of religiosity, The impact of globalization, Attitudes toward the Environment, Work, Family, Politics, National Identity, Culture, Diversity, Insecurity, and Subjective Well-being.

The findings are valuable for policy makers seeking to build civil society and democratic institutions in developing countries. The work is also frequently used by governments around the world, scholars, students, journalists and international organizations and institutions such as the World Bank and the United Nations (UNDP and UN-Habitat). Data from the World Values Survey have for example been used to better understand the motivations behind events such as the 2010-2011 Middle East and North Africa protests, the 2005 French civil unrest, the Rwandan genocide in 1994 and the Yugoslav wars and political upheaval in the 1990s.

Romano Prodi, former Prime Minister of Italy and the tenth President of European Commission has said about the work of WVS: “The growing globalization of the world makes it increasingly important to understand [...] diversity. People with varying beliefs and values can live together and work together productively, but for this to happen it is crucial to understand and appreciate their distinctive worldviews”. [1]

Key Insights

The WVS has over the years demonstrated that people’s beliefs play a key role in economic development, the emergence and flourishing of democratic institutions, the rise of gender equality, and the extent to which societies have effective government. Some of the key findings of the work are described below.

How culture varies

Analysis of WVS data reveals that there are two major dimensions of cross cultural variation in the world: 1) Traditional values versus Secular-rational values and 2) Survival values versus Self expression values. The global cultural map (below) shows how scores of societies are located on these two dimensions. Moving from south to north on this map reflects the shift from Traditional values to Secular-rational and moving from west to east reflects the shift from Survival Values to Self–expression values.

Traditional values emphasize the importance of religion, parent-child ties, deference to authority and traditional family values. People who embrace these values also reject divorce, abortion, euthanasia and suicide. These societies have high levels of national pride and a nationalistic outlook.

Secular-rational values have the opposite preferences to the traditional values. These societies place less emphasis on religion, authority, traditional family values and authority. Divorce, abortion, euthanasia and suicide are seen as relatively acceptable.

Industrialization tends to bring a shift from traditional values to secular-rational ones. With the rise of the knowledge society, cultural change moves in a new direction. The transition from industrial society to knowledge society is linked to a shift from Survival values to Self-expression values. In knowledge societies, an increasing share of the population has grown up taking survival for granted.

Survival values place emphasis on economic and physical security. It is linked with a relatively ethnocentric outlook and low levels of trust and tolerance.

Self-expression values give high priority to environmental protection, growing tolerance of foreigners, gays and lesbians and gender equality, and rising demands for participation in decision-making in economic and political life.

Examples:

A recreation of the Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map of the World, created by political scientists Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel based on the World Values Survey.
  • Societies that have high scores in Traditional and Survival values: Zimbabwe, Morocco,Jordan, Bangladesh.
  • Societies with high scores in Traditional and Self expression values: the U.S., most of Latin America, Ireland
  • Societies with high scores in Secular-rational and Survival values: Russia, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Estonia
  • Societies with high scores in Secular-rational and Self expression values: Sweden, Norway, Japan, the Netherlands.


Aspirations for Democracy

The desire for free choice and autonomy is a universal human aspiration, but it is not top priority when people grow up feeling that survival is uncertain. As long as physical survival remains uncertain, the desire for physical and economic security tends to take higher priority than democracy. When basic physiological and safety needs are fulfilled there is a growing emphasis on self-expression values. Findings from the WVS demonstrate that mass self-expression values are extremely important in the emergence and flourishing of democratic institutions in a society. With industrialization and the rise of postindustrial society, generational replacement makes self expression values become more wide spread and countries with authoritarian regimes come under growing mass pressure for political liberalization. This process contributed to the dramatic Third Wave Democracy in the late 1980s and early 1990s and is one of the factors contributing to more recent processes of democratization.


Empowerment of citizens

WVS researchers have identified how the empowerment of ordinary citizens can lead to democracy. This process of human development enables and motivates people to demand democracy, leading to regime changes that entitle people to govern their lives. Growing action resources (such as education), and the spread of self expression values leads to the emergence of democratic institutions, that enable people to gain growing freedom of choice in how to live their own lives, and to choose their political regime.


Globalization and converging values

During the past 30 years, the world has witnessed profound changes in political, economic and social spheres and increasingly rapid technological advances. This is often attributed to the phenomenon of globalization. Capital markets are today integrated around the globe and movies and books circle the world in seconds. Hundreds of millions of people visit the same websites, watch the same TV channels and laugh at the same jokes. These examples have contributed to the belief that globalization brings converging values, or a McDonaldization of the world. In fact, analysis of data from the World Values Survey demonstrate that mass values have not been converging over the past three decades. Norms concerning marriage, family, gender and sexual orientation show dramatic changes but virtually all advanced industrial societies have been moving in the same direction, at roughly similar speeds. This has brought a parallel movement, without convergence. Moreover, while economically advanced societies have been changing rather rapidly, countries that remained economically stagnant showed little value change. As a result, there has been a growing divergence between the values prevailing values in low-income countries and high-income countries.


Gender values

Findings from the WVS indicate that support for gender equality is not just a consequence of democratization. It is part of a broader cultural change that is transforming industrialized societies with mass demands for increasingly democratic institutions. Although a majority of the world’s population still believes that men make better political leaders than women, this view is fading in advanced industrialized societies, and also among young people in less prosperous countries. [2]


Religion

The data from the World Values Survey cover several important aspects of people’s religious orientation. One of them tracks how involved people are in religious services and how much importance they attach to their religious beliefs. In the data from 2000, 98% of the public in Indonesia said that religion was very important in their lives while in China only three percent considered religion very important. [3] Another aspect concerns people’s attitudes towards the relation between religion and politics and whether they approve of religious spokesmen who try to influence government decisions and people’s voting preferences.


Happiness and life satisfaction

The WVS has shown that from 1981 to 2007 happiness rose in 45 of the 52 countries for which long-term data are available. [4] Since 1981, economic development, democratization, and rising social tolerance have increased the extent to which people perceive that they have free choice, which in turn has led to higher levels of happiness around the world. The popular statistics website Nationmaster publishes a simplified world happiness scale derived from the WVS data. The WVS website provides access to the WVS data, allowing users to carry out more complex analyses, such as comparing happiness levels over time or across socio-economic groups. One of the most striking shifts measured by the WVS was the sharp decline in happiness experienced in Russian and many other ex-communist countries during the 1990s.


History

The World Values Surveys were designed to test the hypothesis that economic and technological changes are transforming the basic values and motivations of the publics of industrialized societies. The surveys build on the European Values Study (EVS)[5] first carried out in 1981. The EVS was conducted under the aegis of Jan Kerkhofs and Ruud de Moor and continues to be based in the Netherlands at the Tilburg University. The 1981 study was largely limited to developed societies, but interest in this project spread so widely that surveys were carried out in more than twenty countries, located on all six inhabited continents. Ronald Inglehart of the University of Michigan played a leading role in extending these surveys to be carried out in countries around the world. Today the network includes hundreds of social scientist from more than 100 countries.

Findings from the first wave of surveys pointed to the conclusion that intergenerational changes were taking place in basic values relating to politics, economic life, religion, gender roles, family norms and sexual norms. The values of younger generations differed consistently from those prevailing among older generations, particularly in societies that had experienced rapid economic growth. To examine whether changes were actually taking place in these values and to analyze the underlying causes, a second wave of WVS surveys was carried out in 1990-1991. Because these changes seem to be linked with economic and technological development, it was important to include societies across the entire range of development, from low income societies to rich societies.

A third wave of surveys was carried out in 1995 – 1997, this time in 55 societies and with increased attention being given to analysing the cultural conditions for democracy. A fourth wave of surveys was carried out in 1999-2001 in 65 societies. A key goal was to obtain better coverage of African and Islamic societies, which had been under-represented in previous surveys. A fifth wave was carried out in 2005-2007 and a sixth wave is being carried out during 2011 – 2012.

Due to the European origin of the project, the early waves of the WVS were eurocentric in emphasis, with little representation in Africa and South-East Asia. To expand, the WVS adopted a decentralised structure. in which social scientists from countries throughout the world participated in the design, execution and analysis of the data, and in publication of findings. In return for providing the data from a survey in their own society, each group obtained immediate access to the data from all participating societies enabling them to analyse social change in a broader perspective. [6]

The WVS network has produced over 1,000 publications in 20 languages and secondary users have produced several thousand additional publications. The database of the WVS has been published on the internet with free access. [7]

The official archive of the World Values Survey is located in [ASEP/JDS] Madrid, Spain.

Methodology

The World Values Survey uses the sample survey as its mode of data collection, a systematic and standardized approach to collect information through interviewing representative national samples of individuals.The basic stages of a sample survey are Questionnaire design; Sampling; Data collection and Analysis.

Questionnaire design For each wave, suggestions for questions are solicited by social scientists from all over the world and a final master questionnaire is developed in English. Since the start in 1981 each successive wave has covered a broader range of societies than the previous one. Analysis of the data from each wave has indicated that certain questions tapped interesting and important concepts while others were of little value. This has led to the more useful questions or themes being replicated in future waves while the less useful ones have been dropped making room for new questions. [1]

The questionnaire is translated into the various national languages and in many cases independently translated back to English to check the accuracy of the translation. In most countries, the translated questionnaire is pre-tested to help identify questions for which the translation is problematic. In some cases certain problematic questions are omitted from the national questionnaire.


Sampling Samples are drawn from the entire population of 18 years and older. The minimum sample is 1000. In most countries, no upper age limit is imposed and some form of stratified random sampling is used to obtain representative national samples. In the first stages, a random selection of sampling points is made based on the given society statistical regions, districts, census units, election sections, electoral registers or voting stations and central population registers. In most countries the population size and/or degree of urbanization of these Primary Sampling Units are taken into account. In some countries, individuals are drawn from national registers. [1]


Data collection (Field work) Following the sampling, each country is left with a representative national sample of its public. These persons are then interviewed during a limited time frame decided by the Executive Committee of the World Values Survey using the uniformly structured questionnaires. The survey is carried out by professional organizations using face-to-face interviews or phone interviews for remote areas. Each country has a Principle Investigator (social scientists working in academic institutions) who is responsible for conducting the survey in accordance with the fixed rules and procedures. During the field work, the agency has to report in writing according to a specific check-list. Internal consistency checks are made between the sampling design and the outcome and rigorous data cleaning procedures are followed at the WVS data archive. No country is included in a wave before full documentation has been delivered. This means a data set with the completed methodological questionnaire.[3] and a report of country-specific information (for example important political events during the fieldwork, problems particular to the country). Once all the surveys are completed, the Principle Investigator has access to all surveys and data.


Analysis The World Values Survey group works with leading social scientists, recruited from each society studied. They represent a wide range of cultures and perspectives which makes it possible to draw on the insights of well-informed insiders in interpreting the findings. It also helps disseminate social science techniques to new countries.

Each research team, that has contributed to the survey, analyses the findings according to its hypotheses. Because all researchers obtain data from all of the participating societies, they are also able to compare the values and beliefs of the people of their own society with those from scores of other societies and to test alternative hypotheses. In addition, the participants are invited to international meetings at which they can compare findings and interpretations with other members of the WVS network. The findings are then disseminated through international conferences and joint publications.[4]


Usage The World Values Survey data has been downloaded by over 100,000 researchers, journalists, policy-makers and others. The data is available on the WVS website which contains tools developed for online analysis.[5]

Governance and Funding

The World Values Survey is organised as a network of social scientists coordinated by a central body - the World Values Survey Association. It is established as a non-profit organization seated in Stockholm, Sweden, with a constitution[6] and mission statement[7]. The project is guided by an Executive Committee representing all regions of the world. The Committee is also supported by a Scientific Advisory Committee, a Secretariat and an Archive. The WVS Executive Committee provides leadership and strategic planning for the association. It is responsible for the recruitment of new members, the organization of meetings and workshops, data processing and distribution, capacity building and the promotion of publications and dissemination of results. The WVS Executive Committee also raises funds for central functions and assists member groups in their fundraising.

Each national team is responsible for its own expenses and most surveys are financed by local sources. However, central funding has been obtained in cases where local funding is not possible. Presently, the activities of the WVS Secretariat and WVS Executive Committee are funded by the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. Other funding has been obtained from the U.S. National Science Foundation, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Volkswagen Foundation and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Media

The World Values Survey data has been used in thousands of scholarly publications and the findings have been reported in media such as Time, Newsweek, The New York Times, The Guardian, Discover Magazine, China dialogue, CNN, The Economist, the World Development Report and the Human Development Report of the United Nations.

In 2011, the WVS results on democracy helped many reporters understand the cultural motivations behind the revolts around the Arab world.[8]

World Values Paper Series: World Values Research

World Values Research (WVR), is the official online paper series[9] of the World Values Survey Association. The series is edited by the Executive Committee of the Association. The research papers are based on evidence from World Values Surveys data and should follow good academic practice, abide to ethical norms in line with the mission of the World Values Survey Association[10] and the guidelines for authors[11].


See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c Ronald Inglehart, Miguel Basanez, Jaime Diez-Medrano, Loek Halmanand Ruud Luijkx (2004) « Human Beliefs and Values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999 – 2002 values surveys » p. xiii. Cite error: The named reference "Inglehart" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  2. ^ Alesina, A., Giuliano, P. & Nunn, N. (2010) The Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough.
  3. ^ Ronald Inglehart, Miguel Basanez, Jaime Diez-Medrano, Loek Halmanand Ruud Luijkx (2004) « Human Beliefs and Values : A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999 – 2002 values surveys  » p. 2.
  4. ^ World Values Survey
  5. ^ European Values Study
  6. ^ [1]
  7. ^ [2]

Further reading

  • Alesina, A., Giuliano, P. & Nunn, N. (2010) "Gender roles and plough"[12]
  • Ronald Inglehart and Wayne Baker (2000). "Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values" (PDF). American Sociological Review. 65 (1). American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, No. 1: 19–51. doi:10.2307/2657288. JSTOR 2657288.
  • Christian Welzel, Ronald Inglehart & Hans-Dieter Klingemann (2003). "The Theory of Human Development: A Cross-Cultural Analysis." European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 341–79 ([13])