User talk:Yjenith: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:46, 7 December 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Yjenith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gitanjali Selvaraghavan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vrenator ^talk 12:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gitanjali Selvaraghavan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gitanjali Selvaraghavan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vrenator ^talk 12:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What do you need help in?--Hallows AG (talk) 08:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have created one page. But it is rejected due to biography, how to make it working with the Wiki compliance --Jenith Michael Raj talk 09:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can submit your article to WP:AFC as it wouldn't be deleted in that namespace.--Hallows AG (talk) 11:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. --Jenith Michael Raj talk 13:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anushka in Kochadaiyaan

Can you please take a look at how other film articles in Wikipedia are formatted for an idea of how a film article should be like? Anushka has not yet been confirmed as a cast member in Kochadaiyaan. Also, you've added an image of Anushka from Arundati, which has nothing to do with Kochadaiyaan. Only place images of cast members if their photos were taken while on the sets of the film in question. Do not misinterpret WP:MOSFILM. If you need help understanding how certain things should be, please ask before doing. Thanks. EelamStyleZ (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was intended to place the image in casting section which describes the casting and staffing decisions made, not in the actual cast. Arundati also shares the same genre historical drama, so user can interpret the film. Anyway Thanks for your valuable comments. --Jenith Michael Raj talk 13:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Rajinikanth

A Regional Television channel placing a Graffiti wall for birthday celebrations is not a big thing to be mentioned here. Adding Stuff like this will be like giving undue weight and henceforth is not encyclopedic. —Commander _{(Ping me)} 12:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rajinikanth edit

I used a tool to do the revert. The comment said Reverted to revision 464159657 by Yjenith: It was Arunkumarkat that was reverted, not you. That comment style has fooled me a few times too. BollyJeff || talk 14:13, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Learn to edit

You're continuously adding unencyclopedic information to Rajinikanth. Read WP:NOT to get an understanding of what kind of information can be put in Wikipedia articles. The grafitti wall is a highly unnotable event that is happening only for Rajinikanth's birthday this year. Celebrations of this type happens to Rajinikanth every year and happens to every actor. Wikipedia is not a place to document every single detail about someone, doing so would turn it into a tabloid affair. Learn how to write encyclopedia articles in an academic manner before contributing. EelamStyleZ (talk) 15:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, never refer to Rajinikanth as 'Rajini' in an article. That is his nickname. Always go by his true entire name Rajinikanth. EelamStyleZ (talk) 15:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't understood my point. You don't seem to understand what kind of information should be kept in an encyclopedia article. This is not a place to describe "special qualities" about someone. You may believe Rajinikanth is a humble and kind person, but that is not a fact, it is an opinion. The section you wrote on Rajinikanth cherishing friendship is something common to many people and isn't significant just to Rajinikanth. Again, I strongly urge you to read WP:N, WP:NPOV and WP:NOT. Any disruptive edits as such will be reverted because they go against consensus. EelamStyleZ (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Behindwoods news template

My first Wikipedia template created for all Wikipedians who contribute contents about Films to cite behindwoods news in their Wiki... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Behindwoods

Just so you know, I have been told by several editors that Behindwoods is not trustworthy, so I tend to avoid using them unless I have to. It has been hard to get articles to GA status with Behindwoods citations in there. BollyJeff || talk 19:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the purpose of this template anyway? If any website, including Behindwoods, needs to be used as a source then use {{cite web}} template surrounded by <ref> and </ref> just like all articles cite web sources. Do not create templates that end up going against consensus. EelamStyleZ (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind dude, I just saw your message on User talk:DVdm. You made that template in order to link Behindwoods articles under 'External links' sections? First read WP:EL to know what kinds of links are appropriate for 'External links' sections. I'm afraid you're really, really confused about Wikipedia. EelamStyleZ (talk) 04:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy, I read that policy already. I created that template just when the appropriate place is needed about to make the content writers job easy. the external links are when you have any external references you needed apart from the internal links/ref/cite. I am not telling that you should use. You may use when it is needed for you. You read about template policy. Not only External links wherever the link is required the template will help. Please dont think you are the only expert on understanding Wikipedia all others are crap. It is bad approach buddy for you. --Jenith Michael Raj (talk) 04:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down with your words. I never said I was an expert in policies. I'm only letting you know before you end up doing things that go against the interest of other editors. Anyway, I really can't think of an appropriate situation to use such a template. Don't take offense to my warnings, it's just for your heads up. Cheers. EelamStyleZ (talk) 04:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You never said. But you acted like this. It is your situation, other editors may find it and use, so No worries buddy Cool! For your more help WP:TEMPLATE--Jenith Michael Raj (talk) 04:54, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign messages on talk pages

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:DVdm, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the Twitter status message Template.It will be really helpful.WikiMan88 (talk) 07:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yjenith. You have new messages at Filing Flunky's talk page.
Message added 08:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Filing Flunky (talk) 08:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change other users' talk page messages

Please do not modify or delete other users' comments on discussion pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (Referring to this edit on my talk page) - DVdm (talk) 09:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He probably edited an older version of the page or something :) --Errant ^(chat!) 09:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is possible indeed. Hadn't thought of that. I have removed the red signs. - DVdm (talk) 15:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Hi Yjenith, thanks for your note. I guess you "found" me by looking at the contributors to the Twitter article. Anyway, some advice...

We probably don't want millions of templates for all sorts of external links. The idea behind external links is that they give some extra detail or experience that we cannot otherwise draw into the Wiki article. I suppose a Twitter link actually works in that respect. However, having too many templates is not necessarily a good thing - so I'd suggest not making too many of them :)
I understand why you are sending out messages to people about the new templates. However, as is being explained on other talk pages, the etiquette here generally discourages doing such things. For example - I don't recall ever adding a Twitter link to an article :) even though I did work on the Twitter article once or twice, so your selection methods for these notifications aren't necessarily the best. You will find that quite a lot of people don't appreciate such messages (you may see them referred to as spam).

Anyway; hopefully this has been helpful :) --Errant ^(chat!) 09:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind and helpful reply. --Jenith Michael Raj (talk) 10:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your template notifications

Please stop notifying random people with messages about the templates you have created, as you did with this edit. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 == Do not change other users' talk page messages ==
-[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|24px|left|alt=|link=]]
 Please do not modify or delete other users' comments on [[Help:Talk page|discussion pages]]. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. (Referring to {{diff||464539704|464528518|this edit}} on my talk page) - [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 09:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 :He probably edited an older version of the page or something :) --'''[[user:ErrantX|Errant]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:ErrantX|chat!]])</sup> 09:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
+::Yes, that is possible indeed. Hadn't thought of that. I have removed the red signs. - [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 15:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 ==Templates==
 Hi Yjenith, thanks for your note. I guess you "found" me by looking at the contributors to the Twitter article. Anyway, some advice...
@@ Line 94: / Line 93: @@
 == Your template notifications ==
+Please stop notifying random people with messages about the templates you have created, as you did with {{diff||464528518|464517332|this edit}}. Thank you. - [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 09:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
-[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|24px|left|alt=|link=]]
-Please '''stop''' notifying random people with messages about the templates you have created, as you did with {{diff||464528518|464517332|this edit}}. Thank you. - [[User:DVdm|DVdm]] ([[User talk:DVdm|talk]]) 09:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)