Jump to content

User talk:RHaworth/2012 Dec 05: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is an Online Ambassador on the English Wikipedia
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
not allowed
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] and continue to edit. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> {{db|violated rules sub section 2346-a}} {{User talk:RHaworth/Archive index}}
{{db|violated rules sub section 2346-a}} {{User talk:RHaworth/Archive index}}


== Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs ==
== Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs ==
Line 5: Line 5:
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]


==[[J. T. Mahajan College of Engineering]]==
{{delete}} ==[[J. T. Mahajan College of Engineering]]==
Sorry, am I missing some fundamental change in the English language here? The <nowiki>{{unrerenced}}</nowiki> template specifically states "This article does not cite ''any'' references or sources." The template page states "Don't add this template to articles that contain ''even one'' general reference, parenthetical reference, or citation-containing footnote." Since this article now ''does'' cite a source, how is the template appropriate? Yet it has now been readded twice, the second time by you. If you are using the template to mean any source except the college's own webpage then you appear to be using it incorrectly. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 11:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, am I missing some fundamental change in the English language here? The <nowiki>{{unrerenced}}</nowiki> template specifically states "This article does not cite ''any'' references or sources." The template page states "Don't add this template to articles that contain ''even one'' general reference, parenthetical reference, or citation-containing footnote." Since this article now ''does'' cite a source, how is the template appropriate? Yet it has now been readded twice, the second time by you. If you are using the template to mean any source except the college's own webpage then you appear to be using it incorrectly. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 11:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
* Pedant. Instead of moaning at me, it would have be more constructive for you have done [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._T._Mahajan_College_of_Engineering&diff=520576511&oldid=520566103 this edit]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 12:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
* Pedant. Instead of moaning at me, it would have be more constructive for you have done [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._T._Mahajan_College_of_Engineering&diff=520576511&oldid=520566103 this edit]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 12:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Line 11: Line 11:
:* external links and primary sources dnt count as there still no reference techincally that page coul be afd for notabilty. no user is right no user is wrong. it a very fine line to say which is right or wrong in this case i probally say rhawirth is right but you aos have apoint. as i say its being used as external link so doesnt count as reerence. &mdash; [[User:Andrewcrawford|<font color="Light Blue">Andrewcrawford</font>]] ([[User talk:Andrewcrawford|<small>talk</small>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Andrewcrawford|<small>contrib</small>]]) 13:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
:* external links and primary sources dnt count as there still no reference techincally that page coul be afd for notabilty. no user is right no user is wrong. it a very fine line to say which is right or wrong in this case i probally say rhawirth is right but you aos have apoint. as i say its being used as external link so doesnt count as reerence. &mdash; [[User:Andrewcrawford|<font color="Light Blue">Andrewcrawford</font>]] ([[User talk:Andrewcrawford|<small>talk</small>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Andrewcrawford|<small>contrib</small>]]) 13:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


==super speedy==
{{delete}} ==super speedy==


Is the content in a speedy deleted page ([[Style of Eye]]) gone? I could develop it in a user subpage like the msg at the now empty page location says. but I didn't save what I put into the article. can I view the old content somewhere? thanks. [[user:skakkle|skak]][[ying yang|E]][[oingo boingo|L]] 00:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Is the content in a speedy deleted page ([[Style of Eye]]) gone? I could develop it in a user subpage like the msg at the now empty page location says. but I didn't save what I put into the article. can I view the old content somewhere? thanks. [[user:skakkle|skak]][[ying yang|E]][[oingo boingo|L]] 00:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Line 22: Line 22:
* Apologies, foolhardy was the word I should have used rather than foolish. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 01:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
* Apologies, foolhardy was the word I should have used rather than foolish. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 01:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


==Martin Port==
{{delete}} ==Martin Port==
Hi there. I noticed that you have been involved in editing the [[Martin Port]] page before. I have been asked to edit the copy because of inaccuracies, but I have a conflict of interest with one of his former companies, so posted a question on the [[Talk:Martin Port]] page. Having done quite a lot of background research to try and find references to clean it up, it transpires that there's a lot of claims made that are difficult to back up and it's also quite self-promotional. I'm wondering if it should have a speed deletion tag instead? Please advise.[[User:Theredrocket|Theredrocket]] ([[User talk:Theredrocket|talk]]) 14.16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed that you have been involved in editing the [[Martin Port]] page before. I have been asked to edit the copy because of inaccuracies, but I have a conflict of interest with one of his former companies, so posted a question on the [[Talk:Martin Port]] page. Having done quite a lot of background research to try and find references to clean it up, it transpires that there's a lot of claims made that are difficult to back up and it's also quite self-promotional. I'm wondering if it should have a speed deletion tag instead? Please advise.[[User:Theredrocket|Theredrocket]] ([[User talk:Theredrocket|talk]]) 14.16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
* I don't think I have ever been involved but now you my bring it to my attention &hellip; The article has survived nearly two years so, in my view, speedy is inappropriate. But it certainly deserves an hearty {{tl|prod}} or, if you think that might get removed, take it straight to AfD where I will support deletion. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 15:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
* I don't think I have ever been involved but now you my bring it to my attention &hellip; The article has survived nearly two years so, in my view, speedy is inappropriate. But it certainly deserves an hearty {{tl|prod}} or, if you think that might get removed, take it straight to AfD where I will support deletion. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 15:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Line 29: Line 29:
== Phaidra ==
== Phaidra ==
Speedy deletion declined: [[Creating Phaidra (digital repository)]]. Hello RHaworth, could you please give me more details why do you think Phaidra (digital repository) is an article about an eligible subject. In my opinion it has the same relevance as [[Islandora]]. Regards [[User talk:Raman2012|Raman2012]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 14:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Speedy deletion declined: [[Creating Phaidra (digital repository)]]. Hello RHaworth, could you please give me more details why do you think Phaidra (digital repository) is an article about an eligible subject. In my opinion it has the same relevance as [[Islandora]]. Regards [[User talk:Raman2012|Raman2012]] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 14:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* There never has been an article called [[Creating Phaidra (digital repository)]]. If you are talking about [[Phaidra (digital repository)]], then I never declined the speedy. I deleted it because it was an hopelessly short article that scarcely began to describe its subject and never got anywhere near providing evidence of notability. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 15:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
* There never has been an article called [[Creating Phaidra (digital repository)]]. If you are talking about [[Phaidra (digital repository)]], then I never declined the speedy. I deleted it because it wa

== Train Collectors Association ==

Yesterday I updated the Wikipedia page for [[Train Collectors Association]]. I apparently did not provide credit appropriately or was too wordy. Please explain what must be done in order to re-post. Thank you. Carol R. McGinnis, TCA National President, Education Specialist, Wikipedia Contributor <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Carol.McGinnis|Carol.McGinnis]] ([[User talk:Carol.McGinnis|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Carol.McGinnis|contribs]]) 23:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* Interesting phenomenon which I we see occasionally: an article has survived for some time then someone with a [[WP:COI|COI]] comes along, turns it into a piece of spam and it gets deleted. Kindly have the decency to <u>wait</u> until someone with no COI thinks the association is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 01:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

== No purpose ==

Hello sir! Actually what happened was ''At the begining i am an new user in Wikipedia and i don't know that File Talk pages shouldn't be created without a proper reason and if those were created it was only with such as discussing about the Files we have upoladed and Unknownly i have created those all pages with Explicit means unnecessary (or) waste matter''. Being an experienced editor now in Wiki, I felt that those File Talk pages were filled with ''Explicit'' matter. By this reason i have requested for CSD. Hoping that you will delete all. Thanking you in advance sir. Have a nice day sir. [[User:Raghusri|Raghusri]] ([[User talk:Raghusri|talk]]) Raghusri 10:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for all those deletions sir. Have a nice day sir. [[User:Raghusri|Raghusri]] ([[User talk:Raghusri|talk]]) Raghusri 10:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

== Open Food Facts ==
[[Open Food Facts]] speedy deleted: getting a copy?
Following a discussion with Cindy (see [[User_talk:Cindamuse]] for details), she recommended to contact you to get a copy of the Open Food Facts article, which was speed deleted recently.
I will try my best to rewrite the article to meet the Wikipedia's guidelines, working first in my user space to avoid repeating the same mistake.
Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.
Best regards,
[[User:DavidBourguignon|DavidBourguignon]] ([[User talk:DavidBourguignon|talk]]) 14:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
* Text e-mailed. Saw your note to Cindamuse. Some other language wikis do have an approval process for mainspace edits. There seems to be no need for it on the English Wikipedia, probably because this wiki is so ferociously policed. For example [[:fr:Open Food Facts]] has survived for three days. The English version with the same lack of reliable sources was zapped within the hour! &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 19:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Dear Roger, thanks for the quick feedback. I received your email and created a page in my personal space on [[User:DavidBourguignon/Open_Food_Facts]], following [[User:Cindamuse|Cindy]]'s recommandations. My comment about the Wikipedia policy is grounded on psychological & emotional facts rather than organisational concerns. I agree with you: the current process is very effective for "policing" the English version of Wikipedia, but what about the effect on the poor contributor's mind & morale? Seeing its painfully crafted article, achieved without any WYSIWYG help, "speedy deleted" within an hour, is no fun, really. Therefore, I do think that having an explicit "pending procedure" where articles would remain in user space before approval would relieve most of the stress from the Wikipedia community. (This point was on the list of questions in the recent contributor's questionnaire if I remember correctly). What do you think? I would be very glad to know also the opinion of [[User:Cindamuse|Cindy]] and other members of the Wikipedia editorial team on this. In any case, thanks to you all for your help! Best regards, [[User:DavidBourguignon|DavidBourguignon]] ([[User talk:DavidBourguignon|talk]]) 09:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

:::A "pending procedure" of the type you suggest, exists at [[WP:AFC]]. As an additional note, Wikipedia does not have an "editorial team". --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 14:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
* I think the banner on the new article creation page, covers matters adequately. It points people to the new article wizard - which lands up with an AfC option and it gives a warning that inadequately referenced articles may be deleted. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 20:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
** Thanks Demiurge and Roger for the info. But frankly, this is the first time I see the [[WP:AFC]] page and I have been creating/editing Wikipedia articles for more than five years. I think their is room for improvement in this area, in my humble opinion. As I said before, an obvious idea would be to consider that articles are stored in user space unless considered valid by an editor. This would avoid many misunderstandings on the contributor's side. Of course, this would also force people into creating an account before working on articles, but I personally see this as a good thing, because it tests their true motivation. Best regards, [[User:DavidBourguignon|DavidBourguignon]] ([[User talk:DavidBourguignon|talk]]) 11:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

== Jeff Curro1 ==

That [[Jeff_Curro1 |redirect]] didn't seem like an attack - more like a naive move preparatory to expanding [[Jeff Curro]], which is why I gave the reason "improbable typo." Am I missing something? -[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 20:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
* You are right. I could not find Jeff Curro in the target list [[The Howard Stern Show#The Wack Pack]] so I thought it was someone suggesting their friend should be a member of the pack. On further investigation, I realised my mistake. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 20:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
::Ah, that's okay. I fixed it in the list now. --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 06:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

== Sigma Thêta Pi ==

Hello RHaworth,
I was really surprised to see that you deleted the page [[Sigma Thêta Pi]] a few days ago. Can you please explain what motivated you to do so?
Cordially,
[[User:Kheiron STP|Kheiron STP]] ([[User talk:Kheiron STP|talk]]) 00:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

* I too recently noticed that the [[Sigma Thêta Pi]] page was deleted. Please consider restoring this article as Sigma Theta Pi is a legitimate and recognized international francophone fraternity. Thank you. [[User:Drdpw|Drdpw]] ([[User talk:Drdpw|talk]]) 03:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
** Please restore the article [[Sigma Thêta Pi]] and put up for formal AFD. &ndash; [[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 14:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
*** I deleted it for the reason stated in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Thêta Pi|my AfD nomination]]. Interestingly, I was asked recently about my deletion of another Canadian greek sorority - [[Delta Psi Delta (Canada)]]. I note that the [[Delta Psi Delta]] page lists five fraternities but not one of them has its own article. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 18:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

==Regarding the deletion of MGM article==
Why did you delete [[Male Genital Mutilation (MGM)|my article]] so quickly? I didn't even get the chance to express the contest. [[User:Faulknerck2|Faulk]] ([[User talk:Faulknerck2|talk]]) 00:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
* Kindly provide a link when you talk here about any article. Deleted for the reason stated in the deletion log entry. As you have just been told: please discuss your proposed changes in [[talk:genital modification and mutilation]]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 01:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

== Deletion of Tiruparankundram dargah.jpg ==

hi,
What sort of copyright violation this [[:File:Tiruparankundram dargah.jpg]] had? As a contributor, why I was not given a notice before deletion? [[User:Wasifwasif|Wasif]] ([[User talk:Wasifwasif|talk]]) 13:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
* There is no obligation on a deleter to notify the author / uploader. The image appears in a slideshow on [http://www.hoparoundindia.com/tamilnadu/thiruparanakundram-attractions/thiruparankundram-dargah.aspx this page] and as http://www.ervadi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Tiruparankundram_dargah.jpg linked from [http://www.ervadi.com/related-dargahs/thiruparankundram-dargah this page] so there was ample prima facie evidence of copyvio. However it is significant to note that you uploaded the image on 2009-04-09 and the file path of the second use contains "2010/11" so it is possible that what was found on the web are unacknowledged rip-offs from Wikipedia. To convince me, e-mail me (see [http://rhaworth.me my home page] for address) one of the following: the original of this image (the camera on the [[Nokia 6110 Navigator]] has a resolution of 1600&times;1200) or, if you originated the image at 640&times;480, another image taken on the same phone as near to 2008-05-24 10:46:59 as possible. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 14:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
: Another way. You have slightly screwed things up by releasing the image into the public domain but you could [http://www.ervadi.com/contact-us contact ervadi.com] and ask them very sweetly if they are willing to admit that the image came from here and whether they are willing to acknowledge your authorship on the page that uses it. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 15:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

OK will mail ervadi.com and get back. [[User:Wasifwasif|Wasif]] ([[User talk:Wasifwasif|talk]]) 09:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Got reply from ervadi.com saying "No where in our website we have claimed copyright for the images or the contents. It clearly means that nothing is of our own." I checked their site, no where in their site they have given a copyright symbol or message. i am damn sure i took in my camera and uploaded. They have took from WP and legally they havenot claimed any copyright. Kindly revert the file.[[User:Wasifwasif|Wasif]] ([[User talk:Wasifwasif|talk]]) 09:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
: Is it too difficult for you to comply with my request for e-mails? &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 14:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

== Deletion of [[Ashford 4XI Hockey]] ==

Can you explain how the article did not explain the significance of the organisation, and how it can be amended in the future to make it viable for wikipedia.org <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.12.223.145|129.12.223.145]] ([[User talk:129.12.223.145|talk]]) 15:27, 6 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* I don't talk to IP addresses. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 19:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

::Ashford Hockey Club might be notable enough by Wikipedia's standards for an article. Read [[WP:42]] carefully and consider whether you can find what it requires. You seem to have been trying to make an article about the 4th XI of that hockey club - which I am quite sure is not notable by Wikipedia's standards, in and of itself. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 22:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

== Keeping the Kibbutz - deletion ==

Earlier today you deleted my [[Keeping the Kibbutz]] article before I had an opportunity to fully respond to the copyright issues raised. Because I am new to Wikipedia and would rather not have to start from scratch all over again, is it possible to restore the deleted article so that I can revise and/or delete the offending material? &mdash; [[User:ColdNorthWind2|ColdNorthWind2]] ([[User talk:ColdNorthWind2|talk]]) 21:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
* Actually I never even noticed that the deletion reason was copyvio. What I noticed was a lack of independent references - blogspot is not generally reckoned a reliable source and in any case your link to it was broken. I have e-mailed you the text. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 21:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

I hope the additions & changes I've made to the article address your earlier concerns about "lack of notability." I've taken the liberty of removing your tag. Your remark about blogspot.com being not "generally reckoned [to be] a reliable source" is noted, except in this instance I think the blogger's remarks are thoughtful and comparative in nature, and therefore worthy of note. - [[User:ColdNorthWind2|ColdNorthWind2]] ([[User talk:ColdNorthWind2|talk]]) 19:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
* Orange Mike has replied for me. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 20:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

==Bullet Raja==

You had deleted a page named [[Bullet Raja (2013 film)]] but now some reliable reference shows the filming begins.Well then, is it ok to recreate it again. &mdash; [[User:zeeyanketu|<font color="bronze">---'''''zeeyanketu'''''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:zeeyanketu|<font color="green">''talk to me'' </font>]]</sup> 09:04, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
* Yes. I assume you will create something more substantial than the single, incomprehensible sentence that {{user|Kaushik9135}} created - twice! &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 09:41, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

== Dillon Francis ==

Hi. You indef protected [[Dillon Francis]] after a series of hoaxes. A new article has been created at [[Dillon Francis (musician)]] and appears to be sourced etc. If you have no objections I'd like to move it to [[Dillon Francis]]. Thanks. [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 16:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
* I would like to see better refs but no objection to the move. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 20:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
**Thanks, moved. [[User:Tassedethe|Tassedethe]] ([[User talk:Tassedethe|talk]]) 20:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

== For All the Tea in China proposed deletion ==

Dear Mr. Haworth,
For All the Tea in China is a work in progress and I have three more groups of undergraduate freshmen working this coming week on improving and expanding the page. Hopefully, their work will be sufficient to address the question of notability, for which the article is proposed for deletion currently. I ask that the page remain in place for the duration of the coming week. In other words, I am asking for a stay of execution in order that by week's end the page may be reassessed for acceptability.

Thank you for your consideration.
Renee Bricker <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rbricker|Rbricker]] ([[User talk:Rbricker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rbricker|contribs]]) 15:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

* So put work in progress in the proper place! I have moved [[For All the Tea in China: How England Stole the World's Favorite Drink and Changed History]] to [[User:Rbricker/sandbox]]. Basic thing to fix: state in the first sentence whether it is a book, movie, or what! We do not duplicate info. on the [[Sepoy Rebellion]], we link to the article about it. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 16:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
* Please announce yourselves at [[Wikipedia:school and university projects]]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 21:55, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
* I have moved [[The Lassa Ward]] to [[User:Rbricker/Lassa]] and [[The Big Necessity]] to [[User:Rbricker/Necessity]]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 12:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

== Deletion??? ==

Hi. May I know why you deleted my talk page? Please respond to this message on my talk page. -- [[User:Stopthecrueltyfast|Stopthecrueltyfast]] ([[User talk:Stopthecrueltyfast|talk]]) 02:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

* The recommendation {{tl|please stop chatting}} applies very strongly to you. Or in this case, not chatting but talking about non-events on Wikipedia instead of actually contributing to Wikipedia. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 11:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

== Malala Yousafzai ==

You deleted [[Conspiracy theories about attack on Malala]]; the log reads: {{cquote|A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, [[Malala Yousafzai#Public reaction]]". CSD:A10 reads and I quote "A10. Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic. ...}}
[[Malala Yousafzai#Public reaction]] is not an article, it is <strike>an</strike> discussed in only one paragraph is an article sub-section, isn't A10 inappropriate? Or have I missed something? [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 02:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

:{{tps}} The speed-ied article duplicated a '''topic''', ie: the section in [[Malala Yousafzai]]. {{u|OrangesRyellow}} is on a mission here, as has already been noted at [[WP:ANI]]. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 02:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
:* It does not matter whether it duplicates an entire article or an article section. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 11:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Isn't it common to have sections being expanded to a full article. Secondly there is just one paragraph about "conspiracy theory" in the article section. This clearly isn't a case of A10. [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 16:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
:* But this was not a section expansion. It was a very short article which could easily have been added directly to [[Malala Yousafzai]]. Text e-mailed. Judge for yourself. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 17:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
I saw it and was going to remove the speedy deletion tag as I thought that A10 was inappropriate. The deletion happened faster than I could act. Mighty oaks from little arcons grow. The length of the article when it is born isn't reason for its deletion as far as I understand. They are called stubs then. Would it be all right if I paste the former article on its creater's page and then request him to put it in his sand box, so that it could be developed, a review done and then the article recreated? [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 02:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
:* Why two stages? Paste it straight to [[User:OrangesRyellow/Malala]]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 02:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
:**First thank you for the email. Another thanks for the suggestion, I didn't know that an editor could create a sandbox in the name of another editor. [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 02:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

== Nikon f mount ==

Hi, I saw that you removed my speedy delete request for [[Nikon f mount]], stating that it was heavily used. Are you sure about this? I mean, we still have [[Nikon F mount]] (and many others), and they should stay, of course. Assuming [[Nikon f mount]] would be deleted, typing "Nikon f mount" in the search box would be catched by [[Nikon F mount]] instead, which I find more desirable since the redirect message would read "Redirected from Nikon F mount" rather than "Redirected from Nikon f mount" then. Cheers, --[[User:Matthiaspaul|Matthiaspaul]] ([[User talk:Matthiaspaul|talk]]) 20:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
* [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Nikon_f_mount Viewed 853 times in the last 30 days] - says "keep" to me. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
<nowiki>;</nowiki>-) Yes, this number is astonishingly high. However, the question remains, if these hits are actually down to external sites referring to the article under "<code>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon&nbsp;f&nbsp;mount</code>" or just people typing in "Nikon f mount" in the search box. In the first case, this would strongly indicate that the redirect should not be deleted, in the second case, the remaining redirect [[Nikon F mount]] would catch all these requests once [[Nikon f mount]] is gone, so nothing would be broken by deleting it. Can you retrieve a search box statistic as well? Thanks and greetings, --[[User:Matthiaspaul|Matthiaspaul]] ([[User talk:Matthiaspaul|talk]]) 22:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
* Sorry, I have no idea how to find search box statistics. But if you find them, please let me know. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 23:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
I have no idea, either, but in the unlikely event that I stumble upon them, I'll let you know. --[[User:Matthiaspaul|Matthiaspaul]] ([[User talk:Matthiaspaul|talk]]) 23:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Legobot|Blocked|ts=00:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)}}
I have asked if the bot can be unblocked for now since it has other tasks to do. The task that you blocked it for has been disabled until a solution is reached. [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 00:40, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
:Left another message. [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 23:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

== EPOS ==

Saw you PRODded [[Embedded Parallel Operating System]]; since then, I've endorsed the PROD, the creator's contested it, and I've nominated it for AfD. Point is, the page notes that this software or whatever it is was developed by a company called LISHA, and the creator's name is [[User:Manager lisha|Manager lisha]]. And in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Midhart90&diff=prev&oldid=521713643 this comment] (re a previous article [successfully] tagged for speedy deletion), they seemed to acknowledge involvement with the company. I know administrators tend to be pretty harsh on COI usernames, so I thought you might want to take a look.''' — <u><font color="#000000">[[User:Francophonie&#38;Androphilie|Francophonie&#38;Androphilie]]</font></u> ''(<u><font color="#000000">[[User talk:Francophonie&#38;Androphilie|Je vous invite à me parler]]</font></u>)''''' 14:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

== Maybe you know how to handle this ==

I come to you as an admin who has had past dealings with this issue. {{user|Rbricker}} appears to be teaching a class of university freshmen in how to use (or, from my experience of their edits - abuse) Wikipedia. Specifically, he has his class furiously working away on [[Coffee: A Dark History]], [[The Big Necessity]] and [[Edwin Chadwick]]. Their edits generally break the page syntax leaving large red warnings on the page, and add generally poorly cited "facts" to the articles. I have found myself spending the better part of my day chasing them all with a mop and bucket. If it were just a couple of users, I might try a more direct approach with them, but there appear to be several dozen editors involved in this process. Is there any way to put a temporary hold on these activities until the instructor can bring his class in line? <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 19:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
* Revert all their edits and tell them to create user:Rbricker/foo. As you can see above , I specifically created [[user:Rbricker/Necessity]] but they have declined to work on it. It is rather depressing when a tutor seems to know no more about Wikipedia than her students. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:48, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

== Yo! ==

Hey dude. I'm not trying to be rude or anything, but can't a user have rules for his own talk page? Why'd ya' delete the regulations? Then again, I don't know whether it was YOU, or Mediran. But if it was YOU, please answer. Thanks. [[User:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000|Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000]] ([[User talk:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000|talk]]) 00:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

* This person should get a Barn Star for bullying people who are just trying to do their job! I feel like this person has been stalking my user page! I have reported them on many levels. [[User:Jason West Jones|Jason West Jones]] ([[User talk:Jason West Jones|talk]]) 00:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
** RHaworth deleted your page (upon Mediran's nomination) because you posted it in the mainspace instead of your userspace. If you would like to post a page in your userspace, you have to do it as a subpage of [[User:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000]] or, in some cases, your talk page ([[User talk:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000]]). For instructions on creating a subpage, please see [[Help:Subpages]]. ''More importantly'', as a general [[rule of thumb]] on Wikipedia, if you have to start by saying "I'm not trying to be rude," you just shouldn't say it. Your comments are rude and [[WP:CIV|uncivil]], and while RHaworth has, in his own words, "a well-justified reputation for blunt speaking on talk pages," and may therefore cut you a bit more slack than most editors or administrators (though I shan't speak for him), talking like that repeatedly can land you with a [[WP:BLOCK|block]]. (Also, if you want a faster reply to a question you've asked at your own talk page, you can just post [[Template:tb|this template]] at theirs.)''' — <u><font color="#000000">[[User:Francophonie&#38;Androphilie|Francophonie&#38;Androphilie]]</font></u> ''(<u><font color="#000000">[[User talk:Francophonie&#38;Androphilie|Je vous invite à me parler]]</font></u>)''''' 03:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC) ''<small>'''Updated''' to reflect the following correction: I idiotically just looked an inch up on the screen to see what name to use for the "your user page"/"your talk page" links, and used [[User:Jason West Jones]]'s since he's the most recent contributor.... sorry Jason! — 04:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)</small>''
*** "I don't know whether it was YOU, or Mediran" - learn to read the deletion log. Your personal user space is all pages with titles starting <code>user:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000/</code> or <code>user talk:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000/</code>. You have far more freedom as to what you put in such pages but remember that you still do not [[WP:OWN|OWN]] them. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 11:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

:Got it! Thanks! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000|Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000]] ([[User talk:Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bacon-Cheddar Man 5000|contribs]]) 14:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== [[User:Geosworld2011]] ==

Don't often get a chance to use [[Special:Nuke]]. I have blocked him and said if he wants to be unblocked he will have to convince an admin that he understands WP:V. His approach to Wikipedia is shown by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legoktm&diff=prev&oldid=523436832 this]. I have also blocked {{user|Greecity2011}} which is certainly the same child. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 15:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

== The Hard Worker's Barnstar ==

As you can see, conversations on this page are usually quite short. Jason, if you wish to continue haranguing me, please do so at [[user talk:RHaworth/JWJ]]. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:29, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

== Some policies ==
See [[user talk:RHaworth/JWJ#Some policies]]

== Protect ==
Sorry folks, to encourage JWJ to use the page I have prepared for him, I have protected this page. Anything you have to say will keep - I shall be asleep anyway. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

* I am leaving Wikiedia, Roger!!!!!!!!!!!! You can get on with annoying a new person now!!!! [[User:Jason West Jones|Jason West Jones]] ([[User talk:Jason West Jones|talk]]) 01:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

== Boxwars ==

You speedied [[Boxwars]] a few minutes ago but it is back again. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 00:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

== Reverted move on article [[Israfel]] ==

Hi, [[User:RHaworth]] I have seen your reverted move on article [[Israfil (Archangel in Islam)]] to [[Israfel]] as the proper spelling is Israfil according to sources like [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/296909/Israfil britannica] and the books linkes Angels A to Z etc. So i believe the name of the article would be with the spelling as it was created with the spelling and later moved to Israfel.
Secondly, the redirect link is not used in a useful fashion as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israfil_(archangel)&oldid=70753413 here] i myself has corrected the link and feels that there is no need for this redirect.
Please justify you reason to revert the move back to its namespace. Wating to hear from you. -- [[User:Ibrahim ebi|Ibrahim ebi]] ([[User talk:Ibrahim ebi|talk]]) 08:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
* You are mis-using the word namespace. A "namespace" is all pages with a specific prefix, eg. Wikipedia: or user_talk: . A crude Google search suggests that Israfil is the more common spelling however [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Israfel]] indicates an overwhelming preference in Wikipedia for the spelling Israfel. If you really feel the page should be moved, start by changing the incoming links. Changing a few templates such as {{tl|eschatology}} may have a significant effect. I assume you are happy with a title of either [[Israfil]] or [[Israfel]]. I see absolutely no justification for anything else such as "(archangel)" in the title. But of course [[Israfil (archangel)]] and all the other redirects can remain in place. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 13:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Actually the thing is that i am working on the category [[:Category:Angels in Islam]] and in the near future i want the names of the archangles in islam with the same suffex such as (Archangle in Islam) because the namespace are already been occupied such as [[Gabriel]], [[Azrael]], [[Michael (archangel)]] depecting the views of the angels in Islam. Meanwhile you are right that i should first work with the incoming links and once they are set can take your help in moving the page.

And as far as the speedy deletion of the redirect is concerned i personelly dont like them as they increase the watchlist and it gets difficult to mentain an eye on pages.I believe the search engines is strong and can give suggestion therefore the redirect should be deleted.

As said its ok for now but in the near future i would definately need your help in moving the page. Thanks for helping me out. -- [[User:Ibrahim ebi|Ibrahim ebi]] ([[User talk:Ibrahim ebi|talk]]) 14:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

On Similar note if the namespace is changed back to Israfil (Archangle in Islam) it would be easirer for me to work with the incoming link. -- [[User:Ibrahim ebi|Ibrahim ebi]] ([[User talk:Ibrahim ebi|talk]]) 14:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
* Did you actually read my message above? You are mis-using the word [[namespace]]. I think when you say namespace, you actually simply mean "title". Are you trying to tell me that you propose to create separate articles for these angels as they are seen by Islam? That is fine. But that is absolutely no reason for putting ''(archangel in Islam)'' in the title. (And certainly not for placing a capital A on archangel or a spelling of "archangle"!) For example, I would place the Muslim version of Gabriel on the title of [[Jibril]]. How on earth could a title of [[Israfil (archangel in Islam)]] be easier to work with than a simple [[Israfel]]. I repeat [[Israfel]] is the obvious preferred title at the moment. It you swing the weight of incoming links, I would be willing to move the article to [[Israfil]]. If you want any title with a totally unnecessary suffix in it, then I would want to see consensus in [[talk:Israfel]] before doing a move. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 15:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, i am working to create separate articles for these angels as they are seen by Islam, and is happy that you have pointed a way out to me. The weight has been transfered to Israfil as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Israfel here] so i would be glad if you move the article Israfel to Israfil. Thanks in advance and hope to see the article in the new namespace with the correct and most common spelling.-- [[User:Ibrahim ebi|Ibrahim ebi]] ([[User talk:Ibrahim ebi|talk]]) 19:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
* How many times do I have to tell you that you are misusing the word "namespace"? If you confirm that you understand the meaning of the word "namespace" and repeat your request without using that word, then I will do it instantly. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 19:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Ooh now i got it actually i am new to wikipedia that's why there might be a light misunderstanding regarding the techanical terms. But now i got it."Would you move the title Israfel to Israfil"? and thanks once again for correcting me. -- [[User:Ibrahim ebi|Ibrahim ebi]] ([[User talk:Ibrahim ebi|talk]]) 07:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
* Now moved. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 11:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

== Request for text of deleted article ==

Hi,
I would like to have a copy of the following deleted article: [[Weave:Web-based Analysis and Visualization Environment]].
The page is supposed to be about a piece of software. I am part of the team that created that software, and we would like to see the text of the page to understand why it was deleted. Thank you. [[User:Adufilie|Adufilie]] ([[User talk:Adufilie|talk]]) 15:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
* You have effectively answered your own question. You were blatantly advertising your own product. Please tell your team to kindly have the decency to <u>wait</u> until someone with no [[WP:COI|COI]] thinks the product is notable and writes about it here. E-mails sent. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 18:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

== Woongarrah ==

Your deletion of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Woongarrah Wildcats Football Club]]. I marked this Article for Creation for deletion because of a copyright violation, but you deleted it because of unambiguous advertising or promotion (G11). Is there a reason why you did this? Do you think I marked it incorrectly as a copyvio? (that is really what I am curious about) [[User:The Anonymouse|The Anonymouse]] ([[User talk:The Anonymouse|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/The Anonymouse|contribs]]) 21:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
* No special reason. I was looking at an earlier version, so I was not offered an automatic deletion reason. It was written in such nauseatingly spammy language, I went for that. (In any case it was probably posted by the copyright holders so they could have given permission - not that it would have served any purpose!) &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
The user name suggests it could have been someone that owned the copyright, but we don't know for sure.

The only problem is that, unlike the article namespace, advertising-like content is permitted in AfC under the condition that it is changed before being moved into the article namespace. I normally would ask if you could restore it, but I am worried about it being a copyvio. What do you recommend? [[User:The Anonymouse|The Anonymouse]] ([[User talk:The Anonymouse|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/The Anonymouse|contribs]]) 22:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
* For goodnes sake! Let it stay deleted. Even if they fixed the copyvio, it would be rejected as nn-amateur club - even though they field a massive 42 teams. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 22:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
That's true, but keep in mind that AfC allows (but doesn't accept, of course) quite a bit of content that you wouldn't see in the article namespace (advertising, non-notable stuff, essays, etc.). Anyway, I agree that this one should stay deleted. Happy editing! {{Smiley}} [[User:The Anonymouse|The Anonymouse]] ([[User talk:The Anonymouse|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/The Anonymouse|contribs]]) 22:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

== TotalBiscuit ==

Hello, I noticed you deleted the [[TotalBiscuit]] article in the past.
Could you please recreate it and redirect it to [[John Bain (game commentator)]]? He's the only person using the TotalBiscuit alias and he's mainly known by it, so if someone were to search for him, they'd usually type "TotalBiscuit". While it's not necessary since John Bain's article is the top suggestion after typing "TotalBiscuit", it would be more comfortable for a person looking for more information on him. &mdash; [[User:Changyu27|Changyu27]] ([[User talk:Changyu27|talk]]) 10:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
* Your user page does not suggest a serious attitude. I am dubious about John Bain's notability but you may have the redirect. &mdash; [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 11:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

This account was created for a University project which required us (a group of people) to make a legitimate Wikipedia article about a notable subject. Yes, the user page redirect was an inside joke of the group, but the article is serious and we're trying to expand it as much as we can. Thank you for the redirect. &mdash; [[User:Changyu27|Changyu27]] ([[User talk:Changyu27|talk]]) 11:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
*{{Talk page stalker}} Are you still [[WP:NOSHARE|sharing the account]] with the rest of your group?'''&nbsp;—&nbsp;<u><font color="#000000">[[User:Francophonie&#38;Androphilie|Francophonie&#38;Androphilie]]</font></u> ''(<u><font color="#000000">[[User talk:Francophonie&#38;Androphilie|Je vous invite à me parler]]</font></u>)''''' 11:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Everyone contributes in a shared Google Document. One person with all the details submits the work of all the people and fixes any mistakes which become apparent when submitting the article. So no, the account itself is not shared. &mdash; [[User:Changyu27|Changyu27]] ([[User talk:Changyu27|talk]]) 11:35, 20 November 2012

== Delete Abiah Jones ==
Can you please delete the page Abiah Jones today. ([[User talk:Starship9000|talk]]), 1:10, 21 November 2012

Revision as of 20:36, 21 November 2012

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Archives

Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

==J. T. Mahajan College of Engineering==

Sorry, am I missing some fundamental change in the English language here? The {{unrerenced}} template specifically states "This article does not cite any references or sources." The template page states "Don't add this template to articles that contain even one general reference, parenthetical reference, or citation-containing footnote." Since this article now does cite a source, how is the template appropriate? Yet it has now been readded twice, the second time by you. If you are using the template to mean any source except the college's own webpage then you appear to be using it incorrectly. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

No, it would actually have been more constructive for you to have done it instead of ignoring my edit summary and simply reinstating an inappropriate tag. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

  • external links and primary sources dnt count as there still no reference techincally that page coul be afd for notabilty. no user is right no user is wrong. it a very fine line to say which is right or wrong in this case i probally say rhawirth is right but you aos have apoint. as i say its being used as external link so doesnt count as reerence. — Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 13:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

==super speedy==

Is the content in a speedy deleted page (Style of Eye) gone? I could develop it in a user subpage like the msg at the now empty page location says. but I didn't save what I put into the article. can I view the old content somewhere? thanks. skakEL 00:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

digo Style Of Eye, sorry. I guess I never had time to create that redirect. skakEL 15:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

More like foolhardy. I feel that the article is legit. if my creating it preceded the finding of the references by whomever, then I should not be surprised by the deletion, I guess, right? he almost seems cooler & more underground if he doesn't have an article on en:. anyway, content, like "life" in Jurassic Park, I think, finds a way.

Thanks for dropping the old content off in my sandbox. skakEL 15:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

==Martin Port==

Hi there. I noticed that you have been involved in editing the Martin Port page before. I have been asked to edit the copy because of inaccuracies, but I have a conflict of interest with one of his former companies, so posted a question on the Talk:Martin Port page. Having done quite a lot of background research to try and find references to clean it up, it transpires that there's a lot of claims made that are difficult to back up and it's also quite self-promotional. I'm wondering if it should have a speed deletion tag instead? Please advise.Theredrocket (talk) 14.16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

  • I don't think I have ever been involved but now you my bring it to my attention … The article has survived nearly two years so, in my view, speedy is inappropriate. But it certainly deserves an hearty {{prod}} or, if you think that might get removed, take it straight to AfD where I will support deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, I appreciate it. I wasn't aware of {{prod}} - forgive me, I'm far from being a Wikipedia expert - so will look at your suggestions and go for one of those. Theredrocket (talk) 11.20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Phaidra

Speedy deletion declined: Creating Phaidra (digital repository). Hello RHaworth, could you please give me more details why do you think Phaidra (digital repository) is an article about an eligible subject. In my opinion it has the same relevance as Islandora. Regards Raman2012 —Preceding undated comment added 14:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RHaworth/2012_Dec_05&oldid=524245066"