Jump to content

User talk:71.64.6.46: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
WTF?
Line 66: Line 66:


And how would we know that 'Mitt Romney is dead' rumor is true? SpongeBob could'nt have killed him! It's not even election time yet! Mitt Romney is actually trying to boost the economy with his jobs plan! And he is '''''NOT''''' dead!!! --[[Special:Contributions/71.64.6.46|71.64.6.46]] ([[User talk:71.64.6.46#top|talk]]) 20:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
And how would we know that 'Mitt Romney is dead' rumor is true? SpongeBob could'nt have killed him! It's not even election time yet! Mitt Romney is actually trying to boost the economy with his jobs plan! And he is '''''NOT''''' dead!!! --[[Special:Contributions/71.64.6.46|71.64.6.46]] ([[User talk:71.64.6.46#top|talk]]) 20:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

== A Few Items ==

Emily,
There are a few things I need to discuss with you.

I was going through Luke's notebook this weekend. On almost all of his work, his handwriting is absolutely ridiculous. It is almost unreadable on quite a bit. And most of the stuff that is readable looks like it was written by a first grader. Luke said Ms. Sanzo has talked to him about this, but he still doesn't try any harder. I talked to Luke about this and told him that if I don't see an improvement, he will spend his weekends rewriting every piece of homework in his binder until it is all legible. I need you to help push him on this. I used to have him rewrite all of his homework as he was doing it to force him to write neatly. He hasn't had much homework to do at my house lately, so it's difficult for me to enforce this.

Spongebob HAS to stop. We have talked about this many many times. Ms. Sanzo said he is still getting distracted by stuff in his head, and the majority of the time that is Spongebob. You know that we don't allow it at all in our house. This is the reason. He obsesses about it. He's been obsessing about it for years. The only way to help get him to stop obsessing about it, is to remove ALL access to it. He told me that he watches it on tv and on the computer. This HAS to stop. This is not something that can be negotiated. It is affecting him negatively. He can't even focus through an entire class because of it. A while ago I forwarded you an article from Fox News, of all places, that showed that these types of shows affect children in a bad way. Spongebob was called out directly. It has to stop. He can't watch it on tv. He can't play Spongebob games. He can't watch Spongebob on the computer. It ALL has to be removed. This is the only way to get it to stop. I've done what I can. You have to control it on your end.

This brings me to another issue. Luke says he goes to your mom's every Monday. I'm not sure what the reasoning for this is. I know why HE wants to go. It's so he gets unsupervised computer time so he can play Spongebob. This is completely unacceptable. If your mom is working, there is no reason for Luke to go there. I'm assuming it's not a babysitting thing, since Noah doesn't usually go. Do you know why Noah doesn't like to go? He gets bored. There is nothing there for him to do and Luke spends the whole time on the computer. If it is a babysitting thing, then maybe we need to revisit the visitation schedule. But I don't think either of them need to be going to your mom's to hang out, unsupervised, while she works.

Lastly, I got an email from Ms. Sanzo about another Shakespearre and Autism group. I can't even begin to tell you how shocked and appalled I was by what I saw in the "rehearsal" we went to last year. I don't see how Luke benefits at all from this. If there is some benefit, please explain it to me. I didn't see Luke interacting with any of the other people in the group. All he did was wander around laughing to himself. This is one of the behaviors that we are working to get him away from. My assumption was that it was practice for a play of some sort. And if it was an improv group, it should have had some sort of dialogue. Not just wandering around pretending to be an animal. And I doubt Luke could even tell you what it was about or if he got anything. It was just juvvenile silliness that wouldn't help him improve his interpersonal skills. If you couldn't tell, I don't think he should participate in it this year, either. And I will be sending my thoughts on this to Ms. Sanzo.

Luke is lacking in a lot of basic skills. He still isn't scrubbing his head very well when he showers. He had a lot of dandruff Saturday morning. It is gross. He took a shower Saturday night and actually got his head pretty clean. But I reminded him about 5 times to scrub his head before he took a shower. When he took his shower, he left both sides of the shower curtain wide open. It didn't even occur to him that this may be a problem. And the curtain only got shut because I walked in to see what was taking him so long and shut it. When he picked up the towel I had put down, I told him to take it back up and put it on the wet areas of the floor. He took it up and set it on the dry rug. He still doesn't know how to properly use a fork and knife to cut meat, despite being shown multiple times how to do it. Luke has no idea what to do with himself 95% of the time. If he finds himself alone, he will wander around the house silently looking for Noah (who also has trouble coming up with something to do if one of the girls isn't directing him). He still has issues keeping his shoes tied. A big part of this is lack of practice. I know most of the time his shoes are tied loose enough that he can slip his shoes on and off. We have discussed this before, too. He needs the practice. And he's going to tear up his shoes if he's not taking them off and putting them on properly. He also has a hard time paying enough attention to get himself dressed. We don't pick his clothes out for him. I don't know if you still do. But at 13, he should be able to do it himself. But he will just grab whatever is close, without paying attention to size or whether it's his. This is a simple task he needs to be able to do by himself. If you are picking out his clothes, please stop. Put the responsibility on Luke. You can check to make sure what he's wearing is acceptable, i.e. more than just a t-shirt if it's in the 50s, but the burden should be Luke's. I will say, that the majority of the time, Luke will pick out a perfectly acceptably outfit. But there are moments, like when he went to grab a sweatshirt this weekend, that he grabbed an adult XL and didn't even notice that it was huge on him and wasn't even his. This is not normal.

These things are very important for Luke's well-being. How he acts and what he learns now sets him up for success or failure when he becomes an adult. The expectations need to be raised, otherwise Luke will not have anything to try to reach. He will continue to hover where he's at. Please don't take this as a personal attack or a reason for you to get defensive. I need your help to help get him ready for life.


Dwayne

Revision as of 21:38, 29 November 2012

August 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Acalamari 08:28, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Brickmack. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 9), because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BrickmackTalkContribs 03:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. BrickmackTalkContribs 03:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -— Isarra ༆ 17:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talk • contribs) 12:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z8

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Webclient101 (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Let me just say for the record that there is a perfectly good reason I am making these personal attacks. SpongeBob isn't anywhere NEAR as put together as it used to be, so I'd be surprised if anyone over, let's say 7-9 would even care about the new episodes. They are beyond retarded, and there shouldn't be any excuse for people to even watch them. So if you guys don't like my personal attacks, well then, tough shit, because that just proves right there that you guys are totally unaware of what the show has really become. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seem's that you don't understand what I'm telling you. Yes, I agree Spongebob Squarepants has gone really downhill and the plot of each episode is annoying and stale. But you can't rant about a show on the articles talk page. The talk page for the article is a place to actually improve the article itself, not to discuss about the show itself. If you want to rant about how bad a show is, you should post it on online discussions. A user removed your content because of the reasons I just said above. You undid his edit and used attacks against him, by cursing him out. The next time you make a personal attack against a editor, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you.


Webclient101 (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank YOU for agreeing with me, because I know for a fact that the only people that would watch so much as a minute of any SpongeBob episode released past 2005 are a bunch of braindead toddlers. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talk • contribs) 00:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I hate having to block people, but you've got to tone down the personal attacks (as pointed out to you previously) and cut out talk about "losers". Passion is great, but not particularly useful in building an encyclopaedia. Encylopaedias are not written as vessels of civilization's great passions (or even little passions, like SpongeBob SquarePants). So maybe bring your dispassionate side to Wikipedia to build dry but useful articles on SpongeBob, et al, and then take your passionate side to a better place like a forum or a blog to tell folks how you really feel about the series.
In the meantime, while you're blocked take a few minutes to read this one page: "What Wikipedia is not"
I think you'll better understand where we're coming from. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PS I wouldn't be spending the time to write this if I didn't think you had a lot to offer us, assuming you can work yourself into our way of doing things here.
Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are almost certainly a sock of 71.74.87.105, who is currently blocked for 6 months. You have identical interests, the same Internet provider, and are both in Westerville, Ohio. Meters (talk) 01:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How the hell do you know I live in Westerville? --71.64.6.46 (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at User talk:71.64.6.46. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See also: 71.74.87.105 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:11, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

The End Is Near

It has been scientifically proven that the world will indeed end on December 21, 2012. The economy will collapse, and there will be a World War 3 and Holocaust 2. Barack Obama is once again president because SpongeBob killed Mitt Romney today at 2PM with a gun. Apparently, SpongeBob was a Democrat. --71.64.6.46 (talk) 19:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Template:SpongeBob SquarePants, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Welcoem back from your block. You clearly have no intention of stopping your vandalism. Meters (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe in the end of the world or the Mayan Calendar. How surprising! There was absolutely no editing done to this page for over 2 months and all of the sudden some guy tells us this studff! There will NOT be a Apocalypse!

And how would we know that 'Mitt Romney is dead' rumor is true? SpongeBob could'nt have killed him! It's not even election time yet! Mitt Romney is actually trying to boost the economy with his jobs plan! And he is NOT dead!!! --71.64.6.46 (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.64.6.46&oldid=525598393"