User talk:Youreallycan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:10, 22 January 2013

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome to Youreallycan's talkpage. If you are unable to post here follow this link to post at my unprotected talkpage.

This user previously edited as Off2riorob.

This editor is a
**Senior Editor**
and is entitled to display this Rhodium
Editor Star.

Welcome

If you start a discussion here on my talkpage I will likely respond on this page as I like to keep discussion complete in one location. If you post an imo attacking comment here I will just delete it and you will no longer be welcome on my talkpage untill I remove the restriction.If I feel the discussion is confrontational or attacking I also reserve the right to request you to host it on your own talkpage. If I move the discussion to your talkpage please do not replace it here, I will delete it. Please do not edit war here, this is my talkpage, if I delete or revert your edit don't replace it or escalate disruption on my talkpage, instead please raise your report to an administrator or a relevant noticeboard, thanks

PRSA GA review

Hey YRC, I was looking at another matter on the Public Relations Society of America article and noticed the GA review. While you did fail it at the time and it is now clearly a candidate for a quickfail, you never took the technical steps to mark it as failed. You should leave a subsequent comment on the GA review and follow the necessary steps to have it noted as failing.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 01:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - thanks Devil's Advocate, I will do that in the near future - best regards and wishes - Youreallycan 07:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you had still not formally failed the GA review so I took the liberty of doing so myself. You might like to make some final comments on why you do not feel it met the GA criteria. For future reference, please look over the review process as outlined at WP:GAN.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 20:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About Zhou Jun and other things

Hi YRC. Zhou Jun is now referenced, including one added by me. That said, I'm one of the no doubt many other users that admire your WP:BLP vigilance.
My apologies for not responding to your kind message back in October 2012. I share your concerns about the use of Wikipedia for purely commercial ends. A case on point is Aimer, which was cleverly written to avoid G11s and G12s and.. oops, it's been deleted. I'll have to get back to you about that!
--Shirt58 (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, cool, thanks User:Shirt58 - I appreciate the comment, no worries - regards - Youreallycan 14:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your comments were removed because

I removed an entire section begun by a community banned editor here, mostly in the interests of WP:BLP. Your entirely sensible and correct comments were removed at the same time. Unavoidable, but apologies for this! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the note Demi - really appreciate that. I have come to feel that everything I contribute here and however I try to help improve this place, is reverted or removed because it can be , and its at least nice to get a explanation. Thank you - Youreallycan 23:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you helpme , ok, you spend your valuable free time helping and bang - some wiki speak revert and thats it - you just waste your time here - Youreallycan 23:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anent nothing above - you might read WP:Tiptibism someday. Collect (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)

Why did you request PP? The article is again locked out on the crappiest version any article on wiki which could ever be. I had removed the BLP vio's again. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:34, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring of BLP concerned content - its locked at the version you supported and were objecting to - Please make your case on talk or at WP:RFPP for lowering the protection. Regards - Youreallycan

(talk page stalker)I actually think that's the best thing for the article until the facts can be straightened out. It stops the cycle of add, revert and repeat Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(ec)Sadly no, it is still on the sucky version. Can you look the article over to ensure i have not missed any more vio's? I think I got all the ones sourced to blogs but an extra pair of eyes is usually handy. Hell in a Bucket, the best thing for that article is what I had done, go compare and let me know what you think. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In every dispute someone has that opinion, you've raised concerns of endless reverts from another editor. This in turn makes you revert them, whether right or wrong and I'm not going into that part, what it ends up being is a disruption, therefore this will force a discourse on the issue. If you wish to make edits there is a process for that even with fully protected pages, and you have the option of going back to the page protection board and asking for it to be unprotected if you feel strongly. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, full support for that position HIAB - Youreallycan 10:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Social/structural change in Wikipedia

If you can add anything to this list it would be appreciated. I think we need to talk about a central repository for this splintered discussion. Perhaps a notice in Signpost? --Anthonyhcole (talk) 14:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anthony - logging off now - tomorrow, or later today I will look at adding something - thanks - Youreallycan 07:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Youreallycan. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help_desk.
Message added by Theopolisme at 22:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

like a star

twinkle twinkle little star - Youreallycan 17:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moar

See: Marc Walder. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks quite promotional - if its a translation of a German article I am pretty sure it needs some it needs some attribution to say so on the talkpage ... citations are a bit self publised/promotional - some content is , or at least appears to be uncited - such as, live in Zurich with ... I would likely trim it in half - as a tennis player - http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Wa/M/Marc-Walder.aspx doesn't look notable Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Tennis - doesn't seem notable as a journalist either Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals - CEO , not really notable imo -most is promotional - WP:GNG might get a few keep votes - Youreallycan 19:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bbb23 deleting my comment

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bbb23&diff=prev&oldid=533617455#deleting_my_comment

Hi regarding this deletion of my comment - diff - the correct thing for you to have done was move it to the talkpage. Please do such in future if a similar situation occurs - and also - if you delete one of my posts in any administrative/policy compliance action, please do me the decency of letting me know on my talkpage - thanks - Youreallycan 19:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You posted a message where you shouldn't have and I removed it with an explanation. I vaguely recall someone else moved it to the talk page, but if they hadn't, you could certainly have done so. The other editor had no obligation to do so, and neither did I. I don't like to presume what other people want, and for all I know, you might have phrased it differently if you'd posted it onto the talk page instead of to the crat page. Frankly, when one posts to such a page, particularly an experienced editor, one would expect that the page would be on their watchlist. I didn't remove your post in my administrative capacity. As for correctness and decency, you should be mildly annoyed (your error wasn't a big deal) with yourself for not following instructions instead of lashing out at others for fixing your mistake. I suspect you'll take offense at this response, but I'm mildly annoyed by your comments.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry matey - please be aware I care less about what you think I do - I am not even mildly upset - I have pointed out what you should have done and requested you not to do it/to improve your actions next time - carry on regardless if you want - its only a good faith attempt to improve the situation should it occur again - you don't agree - ok - do it again and I will report you. - Youreallycan 01:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Discussion was then deleted by user Bbb23 diff with the edit summary - removing entire section including threat - don't post here again on this issue

Asgardian_appeal

Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#BASC:_Asgardian_appeal. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 00:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks - Youreallycan 17:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#BASC:_Asgardian_appeal]]. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting. '''[[User:SilkTork|<span style="color:purple; font-family: Segoe Script">SilkTork</span>]]''' '''[[User talk:SilkTork|<font color="#347C2C"><sup>✔Tea time</sup></font>]]''' 00:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 :Yes, thanks - <font color="purple">[[User:Youreallycan|You]]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">[[User talk:Youreallycan|can]]</font> 17:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
-==You should be embarrassed of yourself==
-Your double standards are extreme. You style yourself as the BLP knight in shining armor, defending BLP articles with editwarring and personal attacks... except when the living persons are Muslims. You speculate that other people are just defending the Pakistani's right not to be painted as a nation of rapists because they are themselves pakistanis. And when you're called out you complain that people are attacking you. That is despicable behavior that frankly you should be punished for. I am sorry that I ended up not recommending a community ban in your rfc/u. I hope a new one is coming up soon so we can finally get wikipedia rid of your bigoted disruption.[[User:Maunus|·ʍaunus]]·[[User talk:Maunus|snunɐw·]] 22:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)