Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive 7.
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader|noarchive=yes|search=no}}
{{shortcut|WT:COMP|WT:COMPUTER|WT:COMPUTING|WT:INFOTECH}}
{{shortcut|WT:COMP}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=Project|importance=NA}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=Project|importance=NA}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{ user:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
| archiveheader = {{atnhead}}
|maxarchivesize = 31K
| maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 8
| counter = 10
| minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(31d)
| algo = old(60d)
|archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive %(counter)d
| archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I|age=31}}
}}{{ user:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
{{archives}}
|indexhere=no
|target=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive index
|mask=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive <#>
}}
{{archives|index=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive index|auto=short|bot=MiszaBot II|age=60|search=yes}}


== Choosing a feature set in software comparison articles ==
== Updated the intro. ==


{{La|Comparison of BitTorrent clients}}<br/>
I was glad to find this article as it helped further clarify subnets and submasks. I had already read some other articles however and had that going in. I noticed a note that the single sentence lead section didn't fit Wiki standards, so I took that opportunity to add an intro paragraph that set the stage with regard to routers, IP adresses, why we care about certain sections of the IP address and what they do. It's written in lay-person's language because I'm a lay person and, as someone newly learning this stuff, I saw the need to outline the basics in common terms so the reader would have a framework for interpreting the more technical details.
There's an edit warring in the referenced article about whether to include a certain feature into the comparison. I advised them to seek consensus but am unsure of how to seek it in this case. The feature is of course covered in [[WP:RS|RS]]'es. And there doesn't appear to be any policies, guidelines or even prior discussions on how to decide whether a feature is "notable" to be comparing on. &mdash; [[User:Ivan Pozdeev|Vano]] 22:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


== Embedded computer emulators ==
I hope it helped! {{unsignedIP|12.217.39.148}}


{{dmf|Talk:ARM architecture #Embedded computer emulators|<span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 11:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC)}}
== eSATA, SATA, ATA, SCIS ==
Can an article called [[Embedded computer emulators]] be made ?
It should include:
* [[Palm OS emulator]]
* [[Aemulor]]
* [[Elbrus Technologies]] x86 emulator (emulator for running x86 programs on ARM)
* ...


[[Special:Contributions/80.200.238.94|80.200.238.94]] ([[User talk:80.200.238.94|talk]]) 10:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a need to keep to one article as there are some profound and some not so profound differences. Integrating the differences in one article allows for continuity in the thought process. Include diagrams as some are visual learners and others are text learners. DJ
:I'm not sure that [[Embedded computer emulators]] (or even [[embedded computer emulator]], per [[WP:SINGULAR]]) would be the best title to include such subjects. Would the two other products listed meet the [[WP:general notability guideline|general notability guideline]]? <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 11:47, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


:it depends on how far you take the article content, if just covering the above it probably just meet notability guidelines but if you extend it to include other emulators it would pass notability but it best to decided what emulators would be included before creating the article, to be hones ti say this might suit better under virtualization, in essence that is what emulators are virtualization of a specif system but doing it within itself rather than in virtual machine[[User:Andrewcrawford|<font color="Light Blue">Andrewcrawford</font>]] ([[User talk:Andrewcrawford|<small>talk</small>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Andrewcrawford|<small>contrib</small>]]) 12:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Article alerts|Article alerts]] ==


::How about starting by improving [[Emulator]] and then split it off to a new article if it becomes necessary? -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 16:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about '''''[[Wikipedia:Article alerts|Article alerts]]''''', a [[WP:BOTS|fully-automated]] subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]], [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment|Requests for comment]], [[Wikipedia:Peer review|Peer review]] and other workflows ([[Wikipedia:Article alerts#Workflows covered|full list]]). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found [[Wikipedia:Article alerts#Samples|here]].


== Proposed revision: Continuous Controls Monitoring ==
If you are already subscribed to ''Article Alerts'', it is now easier to [[Wikipedia talk:Article alerts/Bugs|report bugs]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Article alerts/Feature requests|request new features]]. We are also in the process of implementing a [[Wikipedia talk:Article alerts/News|"news system"]], which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the <code>display=none</code> parameter, but forget to '''give a link''' to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at [[Wikipedia talk:Article alerts]].<!--Addbot-WP-Message-Article-alerts-01-->


In support of the Wikipedia Improvement by Supported Expert Revision Project - NJIT Workgroup on Information Literacy and Learning (WILL), I am proposing a revision to a stub article on Continuous Controls Monitoring (CCM) in which the current definition needs improvement beyond its rudimentary information, supported by reliable sources.
<small>Message sent by [[User:Addbot]] to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome [[User_talk:Addbot|here]].</small>


Target Article:
Thanks. — [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]]&nbsp;{<sup>[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub>&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 08:59, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
(2012, November 21). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 21, 2012 from [[Continuous_controls_monitoring|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_controls_monitoring]]


Current Definition:
== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Blogging]] ==
“Continuous Controls Monitoring (CCM) is the techniques involved in continuously monitoring and auditing an IT system. Typically CCM solutions will be applied to Enterprise Resource Planning systems such as SAP."


I am proposing a significant re-write by eliminating the use of same word references, expanding upon the lack of explanation of what controls and continuous terms are, and referencing industry expert published content.
We're planning to relaunch [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Blogging]]. Any help would be valued. [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 10:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


In developing my definition, I plan on referring to industry expert reference literature such as:
== AssessorTags ==


1. ISACA (2010, October 1). Monitoring Internal Control Systems and IT. Rolling Meadows, IL. ISACA.
Hello! I thought that I'd bring to your attention a new script which I have created, [[User:Drilnoth/assessortags.js/doc|AssessorTags]], which helps to add WikiProject banners to talk pages. {{#ifeq:yes|yes|The banners for this project and its task forces have|The banner for this project has}} have now been included in the script, so it may be helpful when locating and tagging articles. Documentation for the script can be found [[User:Drilnoth/assessortags.js/doc|here]], and if you have any questions feel free to ask at [[User talk:Drilnoth|my talk page]]. Please not that I will probably not be watching this page, so comments left here will not be responded to. –[[User:Drilnoth|Drilnoth]] ([[User talk:Drilnoth|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drilnoth|C]]) 01:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


2. Senft, Sandra. Gallegos, Frederick. Davis, Aleksandra. (2013, July 18). Information Technology Control and Audit. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press
== Anyone who's interested ==


A proper definition should highlight the importance for organizations to operate and monitor IT system controls, helping readers by improving their understanding of the topic, and potentially give them a good starting point when researching ways to improve their organization's IT governance.
Have a look at [[User:Dank55/Macroview]]. This was an article I speedied, and the creator is asking if it can be saved. Any thoughts? - Dan [[User:Dank55|Dank55]] ([[User talk:Dank55|push to talk]]) 03:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
:Oddly enough, I'm somewhat familiar with it, although it is probably outside the norm for this WikiProject. Can it be improved to meet [[WP:RS]]? It's highly specialized software used for plant/facility management. Similar systems/software are available from companies like [[Siemens]] and [[Johnson Controls]]. Wikipedia's coverage of [[Facility management]] systems is very lacking although there is at least an article for [[BACnet]]. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 03:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
::...and there is an article on [[SCADA]]. This stuff gets into a very niche field. It would be nice if Wikipedia gave it proper coverage but because of how niche market some of these things are it might be difficult. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 04:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
:::...''and'' there's an article on [[Modbus]]. Maybe I should add this to my list of category cleanup tasks and create a navbar for this stuff... I'd probably not have thought to check for this stuff on Wikipedia before. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 04:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


[[User:Christian-NJITWILL|Christian-NJITWILL]] ([[User talk:Christian-NJITWILL|talk]]) 02:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
== Binary code (computing) → Binary code ==


:It is not necessary to ask permission to edit - see [[WP:BOLD]]. Your contribution was definitely an improvement. Thanks. I have made some further minor improvements. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 16:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
[[Binary code (computing)]] → [[Binary code]] has been proposed at [[WP:RM]] [[Special:Contributions/76.66.193.69|76.66.193.69]] ([[User talk:76.66.193.69|talk]]) 01:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


== How to Join this Project? ==
== XML lists ==


The title of the page [[List of XML schemas]] is wrong. It's the same thing as [[List of XML markup languages]], only grouped by purpose. Also, the title "List of XML markup languages" is iffy because it can be read as "list of extensible markup language markup languages" which makes little sense. A better title would be e.g. "List of XML-based markup languages", possibly omitting the word markup. I don't have the time to work on these right now (if ever), so feel free to be BOLD should you be inclined so. [[User:Wipe|Wipe]] ([[User talk:Wipe|talk]]) 02:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
How can I join this project?
I would like to contribute to the Homoiconicity discussion page but are unable to do so before I have joined this project. [[User:ClassA42|ClassA42]] ([[User talk:ClassA42|talk]]) 20:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
:Just add your name to the list [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computing/Participants&action=edit here]. And you can copy the userbox to your page if you'd like as well. Then just edit the articles you'd like. — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] ~ <sup><i> [[User talk:Ched Davis|(yes?)]]</i></sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ched Davis|©]]</sub> 20:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


:There are two other Editors who [[Talk:List_of_XML_schemas#Not_a_List_of_XML_Schemas|agree with you]]. I have put up merge banners. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 21:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
== ISO, wrong definition. ==


== FreeDOS 32 ==
In the article that discusses about ISO 9000 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9000) there is a wrong definition:


[[FreeDOS 32]] is up for deleting. Is this notable enough to write a stub for? -- [[Special:Contributions/70.24.247.127|70.24.247.127]] ([[User talk:70.24.247.127|talk]]) 20:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
This article mentions that "ISO" stands for "International Organization for Standardization" however this is not true. "ISO" is a Greek word meaning "EQUAL" which was selected by the International Organization for Standardization to name a set of quality standards.


:Probably not but it [[Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect.3F|doesn't deserve to be deleted]] either. -—[[user talk:Kvng|Kvng]] 21:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Please note that the initials of the International Organization for Standardization are "IOS" not "ISO".


Best regards,


Luis R. Villegas H.
Mexico <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LuisVillegas|LuisVillegas]] ([[User talk:LuisVillegas|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LuisVillegas|contribs]]) 03:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:[[International Organization for Standardization#Name and abbreviation]] explains that. Where does [[ISO 9000]] say different? [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 15:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


== Internet Top Level Country Domains ==
Hi, Mark Hurd.


There is an ongoing debate on the Northern Ireland [[Talk:Northern_Ireland#.ie_is_assigned_to_the_State_named_Ireland|Talk Page]] about what Top Level country domains should be listed. At present the infobox lists .uk, .ie and .eu, but this is disputed. The infobox also has a note saying ".uk is assigned to the United Kingdom of which Northern Ireland is a part, .ie is assigned to Ireland of which Northern Ireland is a part, and .eu is assigned to the European Union of which Northern Ireland is a part. ISO 3166-1 is GB, but .gb is unused"
The problem is that ISO 9000 mentions, "ISO 9000 is maintained by ISO, the International Organization for Standardization". So, it is understood that "ISO" stands for "International Organization for Standardization". However, "ISO" is just part of the organization's logo and is the name of its set of quality standards.


I would like to ask if anyone has any knowledge of matters relating to Internet top level country domains and if they could please add their insights to the ongoing discussion. Myself and a few others believe it is inappropriate to claim that .ie is Northern Irelands internet domain, because .ie was assigned to a different country (the Republic of Ireland), whilst others say it was assigned to the whole island and point to the fact that the organisation that runs the domain, does welcome people from Northern Ireland to purchase domains too.
I think that the ISO 9000 article should say, instead: "ISO 9000 is maintained by the International Organization for Standardization" to avoid any confusion regarding the Greek word "ISO". It is a small but important detail.


Any additional input on the talk page is most welcome. Thank you [[User:BritishWatcher|BritishWatcher]] ([[User talk:BritishWatcher|talk]]) 11:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Best,
:[http://primaryposition.blogspot.ru/2010/07/domain-names-and-northern-ireland.html SEO Ireland: Domain names and Northern Ireland] - both .uk, .ni, .ie and .eu are used, .uk being the official one (i.e. used by governmental institutions). So they all should be included. &mdash; [[User:Ivan Pozdeev|Vano]] 10:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


== Eighth Generation Consoles ==
Luis R. Villegas H.
Mexico. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/189.245.26.150|189.245.26.150]] ([[User talk:189.245.26.150|talk]]) 05:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I'm looking for additional outside opinions into the inclusion or exclusion of Video Game Consoles into the 8th Generation article. I have started a new section here and am requesting outside comment. [[Talk:History_of_video_game_consoles_(eighth_generation)#.22We_need_hardware_comparisons.22]]. Thank you. -[[User:Kai445|Kai445]] ([[User talk:Kai445|talk]]) 07:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
:From [[International Organization for Standardization#Name and abbreviation]]: "the organization's founders chose ''ISO'' as the universal short form of its name." And seeing as the article is referring to ''ISO'' 9000, a reference to the source of ''ISO'' is needed.


== Commons ENIAC images ==
:(BTW I nearly agreed with you and started to change the sentence as you suggested, but then I realised the ISO reference would need to be explained anyway.)
:[[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 15:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


Happy New Year, all! {{(:}} I've just created a [[commons:Commons:Batch uploading/US Army Research Laboratory Eniac|batch request for a few hi-res US Army images]] relating to [[ENIAC]]. It may come to nothing because there are so few, but I thought those here might have some useful comments to make over at Commons. Cheers. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 12:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
== ZG5 ==


:Say... is there a [[Commons:Commons:WikiProject Computing]] (obviously, if there is, it isn't at that name) ? -- [[Special:Contributions/76.65.128.43|76.65.128.43]] ([[User talk:76.65.128.43|talk]]) 06:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
ZG5 is not an aspire one model, but I do not know exactly what it relates to. this "model number" is found on the sticker that shows the power requirements, I believe it is either the power board model or the adapter pin model.


== WikiProject Sinclair ==
This model number is definately found on other acer models so is not aspire one specific. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.194.210.12|80.194.210.12]] ([[User talk:80.194.210.12|talk]]) 16:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I have started a proposal to group together related articles about the works of [[Sir Clive Sinclair]]. Please take a look at the proposal at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Sinclair]] and see if you support it. --[[User:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F">'''Ritchie333'''</font>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(talk)</sup></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(cont)</sup></font>]] 11:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
== Article Importance scale ==


== HDMI Connection ==
I'm repeating this question from the sub-page Assessment‎, in the assumption that it is never checked.


My question is: I connected the HDMI to TV and to computer about a week ago and was able to see computer screen on TV screen, also to connect to Internet and watch Netflix. Since about 2 to 3 days ago it is not connecting...Why? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/139.55.235.99|139.55.235.99]] ([[User talk:139.55.235.99|talk]]) 15:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
How are the importance levels of articles decided? For example, would it be fair to say that complimentary terms would be of equal importance, or does the topic of each and people's opinion take precedence? - [[User:Jimmi Hugh|Jimmi Hugh]] ([[User talk:Jimmi Hugh|talk]]) 22:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
:I find it amusing that this talkpage is rated high-importance. --[[User:Mika1h|Mika1h]] ([[User talk:Mika1h|talk]]) 19:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
:Complements are not necessarily of equal importance, especially in cases where one only exists to distinguish from the other. I wish I could draw a better example, but for now I would say that [[RISC]] as terminology would outweigh [[Complex instruction set computer|CISC]], the latter whose meaning is essentially "not RISC". While RISC itself is a highly notable topic, CISC itself is not, but its constituent topics like [[x86]] are. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] ([[User talk:Ham Pastrami|talk]]) 02:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
:I've re-added the project banner to this page. The template also handles categorizing all sorts of pages, including project pages, see [[:Category:Project-Class Computing articles]]. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 04:08, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
::In any case, it's a fairly subjective score. I agree with HP that RISC is more likely to be important. Why is this talk page high? Well, maybe it shouldn't be. In fact, I'm going to remove the {{tl|WikiProject Computing}} banner, since it is (a) a talk page and (b) a little too recursive. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 02:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
:::Somehow I must have removed my own comment- re-added it and replying. Didn't know the template was important to have on there; I looked on a very active project, it wasn't there, so I assumed it could be removed. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 04:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
::::Project banners always go on talk pages. Often they are present on a WikiProject's main talk page but project banners are not required. Not all projects that use a banner template use the Project class either. A banner can also go on a category talk page, redirect talk page, etc. The importance score isn't really needed for Project class pages and it is often set to NA. This one had always been set to High from what I can remember but generally importance is only used for articles. The documentation for {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} is quite complex but if you need any specific info let me know and I'll see if I can point you in the right direction. The WikiProject computing banner template is one of the more complex examples because of all the extra hooks and taskforces that are linked into it. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 05:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Thanks tothwolf- I'll continue on your talk page if I have any questions about it in the future. Didn't know that's where I needed to look for info. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 05:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::There is also [[Template talk:WPBannerMeta]] which might be a good place to check if something isn't easily found in the documentation. Classes like "Project", "Category", "Template", etc are part of the extended scale enabled with the <code>FULL_QUALITY_SCALE=</code> parameter. Documentation for the various <code>class=</code> and <code>importance=</code> parameters is kinda spread out. The options are mostly mentioned in the {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} documentation. For an actual description of the article assessment ratings one place to start is [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment]] and [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria]]. WikiProjects are intended to have article assessment documentation on their /Assessment subpage but when going though various projects I've found better than 70-80% lack that information. You can see the page I put together for [[WP:WPIRC]] on the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject IRC/Assessment|Assessment subpage]] there. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 05:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


* '''This page is for discussing the project that helps improve computing articles on Wikipedia.''' You probably won't find anyone on Wikipedia who can answer your question. Find a knowledgeable friend or a local dealer. --[[User:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F">'''Ritchie333'''</font>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(talk)</sup></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(cont)</sup></font>]] 17:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
== Amiga 600 Computer ==


== Next Unit of Computing ==
Information I read in the late 90's, Stated that the "Amiga 600" was originally designed and going to be Commodore's first '''Laptop Computer'''. Hence NO NUMERIC KEYPAD and the new PCMCIA Slot!!!
Poor sales of it's predecessor, the Amiga 500+ got Commodore executives worried. There was nothing in the pipe-line to replace the A500+ and it's ailing sales. And Commodore desperateley wanted something to release for Christmas 1992, from what I recall of the article, Christmas was Peak Sale time for most Computer sales.
Apparently it was suggested by someone at commodore to scrap the Laptop Idea, which was stagnating, or running into problems and release the already semi-designed and built A600 mainboard (previously known under another name) as a replacement of the A500+ in Christmas of 1992!
As I said, this is information I read in a Commodore Magazine in the late 90's, I am going from memory, as I unfortunateley do not have the article anymore, and cannot remember the publisher.
I do remember this article, as it influenced me to buy my A600, which I still own to this day!
But this does fit the History, as follows...
1) No Numeric Keypad on the A600, laptops do not have these!
2) The added PCMCIA slot, not on any previous Amiga Computers, but possibly on Laptops of the era?
3) Poor 500+ sales, commiting Commodore to replace it with the A600
4) A600 bugs, as it was rushed onto the market, a market it was not originally intended for
Ihope this assists your site with added info?
Darren Holt, a former Amiga computer repairer.


Hello. I created the article "[[Next Unit of Computing]]". Please expand the article as appropriate. Thank you. [[User:Axl|<font color="#808000">'''Axl'''</font>]] <font color="#3CB371">¤</font> <small>[[User talk:Axl|<font color="#808000">[Talk]</font>]]</small> 10:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
== Recent Death ==


== "T-carrier" ==
Not sure if this guy meets your notability criteria. If he does, I couldn't find a page on him. I thought one of you may want to write a brief page if interested: [http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=194392&Itemid=95]. [[Special:Contributions/69.68.238.142|69.68.238.142]] ([[User talk:69.68.238.142|talk]]) 17:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


FYI, a reorangization of the data communications articles is being discussed at [[Talk:T-carrier]] (and [[User talk:TCBallister]]/[[User talk:John F. Lewis]]) you may be interested in participating -- [[Special:Contributions/76.65.128.43|76.65.128.43]] ([[User talk:76.65.128.43|talk]]) 02:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
== Unnecessary tag? ==


== "DNA computing (2013)" ==
I think somebody might have tagged [[Open Source Beer Project]] with this project's tag by mistake. It has nothing to do with open source software, if that's where the initial thought was. It's about beer whose recipe is open source. Just a thought. ~ '''<font size="2">[[User:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkred">ωαdεstεr</span><span style="color:darkblue">16</span>]]'''</font><sub>[[User talk:Wadester16|<span style="color:black">«talk</span>]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Wadester16|<span style="color:black">stalk»</span>]]</sup> 09:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
:Looks like the banner was put in place by a bot. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Open_Source_Beer_Project&diff=221822397&oldid=209923884] Most likely the bot placed a project banner on all articles listed in [[:Category:Open content projects]]. [[User:Tothwolf|Tothwolf]] ([[User talk:Tothwolf|talk]]) 09:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
::I removed it. Feel free to re-add it if I made a mistake. ~ '''<font size="2">[[User:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkred">ωαdεstεr</span><span style="color:darkblue">16</span>]]'''</font><sub>[[User talk:Wadester16|<span style="color:black">«talk</span>]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Wadester16|<span style="color:black">stalk»</span>]]</sup> 04:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


FYI, there's a note at [[WT:MED]] about the title for [[DNA computing (2013)]] -- [[Special:Contributions/76.65.128.43|76.65.128.43]] ([[User talk:76.65.128.43|talk]]) 09:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
== Source code written by editors ==


== Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/to do ==
Please take a look and comment: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computer_science#Source_code_written_by_editors]]. This seems to be a huge problem in Wikipedia. [[User:Offliner|Offliner]] ([[User talk:Offliner|talk]]) 22:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


This doesn't exist. Background: I was looking to enhance and include [[Wikipedia:WikiProject RISC OS/to do]] (thanks, [[User:Mabdul|Mabdul]]) within {{tl|WikiProject Computing}}, but thought [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/to do]] would be the logical place to start before moving onto the task force.
== [[BeaTunes]] ==
#Is a project-wide to do list perhaps located elsewhere?
#:(All I found was [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive 2#To-Do]])
#[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force/to do]] is present, although apparently not included within {{tl|WikiProject Computing}} - could it be used for tagged task force articles?
#{{tl|WikiProject Companies}} seems to work well (although no task forces are included)
#[[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/todolist]] seems to contain the appropriate information
#If/when the main project to do list is included, can we also include task force lists such as [[Wikipedia:WikiProject RISC OS/to do]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force/to do]]?
#:(The latter is noted as a talk page and should maybe be moved to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force/to do]].)
<span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 11:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


== Advertising check ==
I declined the db-spam deletion on this one because it looks like potentially notable software, and not too promotional. Please let me know if I was wrong. - Dan [[User:Dank55|Dank55]] ([[User talk:Dank55|push to talk]]) 00:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


Someone put a {{tl|Advert}} tag on [[Cray XK7]], an article I wrote. I won't remove it since I was the one who created the article, could someone please take a look and provide a second opinion or suggestions of what sounds like advertising? Thanks, <font color="#454545">[[User:James086|James086]]</font><sup>[[User talk:James086|<font color="#006400">Talk</font>]]</sup> 16:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
== New Child WikiProject ==
:Didn't exactly look like an advert to me! Removed. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 18:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

::FWIW, I don't think that reads like an ad, though the person who put that notice there probably balked at all the "This company has this configuration" sections. To my eye, the article is awfully technical and your average reader would have a hard time understanding it. But I don't think it looks like an ad. &mdash; '''[[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]]''' ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) &mdash; 19:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Is this the correct place to request a child WikiProject? [[User:Geek2003|Geek2003]] ([[User talk:Geek2003|talk]]) 16:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
::: Thanks guys, I'll try to make it a little less technical. Much appreciated. <font color="#454545">[[User:James086|James086]]</font><sup>[[User talk:James086|<font color="#006400">Talk</font>]]</sup> 07:21, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:56, 27 January 2013

WikiProject iconComputing Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Choosing a feature set in software comparison articles

Comparison of BitTorrent clients (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
There's an edit warring in the referenced article about whether to include a certain feature into the comparison. I advised them to seek consensus but am unsure of how to seek it in this case. The feature is of course covered in RS'es. And there doesn't appear to be any policies, guidelines or even prior discussions on how to decide whether a feature is "notable" to be comparing on. — Vano 22:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded computer emulators

Can an article called Embedded computer emulators be made ? It should include:

80.200.238.94 (talk) 10:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that Embedded computer emulators (or even embedded computer emulator, per WP:SINGULAR) would be the best title to include such subjects. Would the two other products listed meet the general notability guideline? -- Trevj (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
it depends on how far you take the article content, if just covering the above it probably just meet notability guidelines but if you extend it to include other emulators it would pass notability but it best to decided what emulators would be included before creating the article, to be hones ti say this might suit better under virtualization, in essence that is what emulators are virtualization of a specif system but doing it within itself rather than in virtual machineAndrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 12:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How about starting by improving Emulator and then split it off to a new article if it becomes necessary? -—Kvng 16:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed revision: Continuous Controls Monitoring

In support of the Wikipedia Improvement by Supported Expert Revision Project - NJIT Workgroup on Information Literacy and Learning (WILL), I am proposing a revision to a stub article on Continuous Controls Monitoring (CCM) in which the current definition needs improvement beyond its rudimentary information, supported by reliable sources.

Target Article: (2012, November 21). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 21, 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_controls_monitoring

Current Definition: “Continuous Controls Monitoring (CCM) is the techniques involved in continuously monitoring and auditing an IT system. Typically CCM solutions will be applied to Enterprise Resource Planning systems such as SAP."

I am proposing a significant re-write by eliminating the use of same word references, expanding upon the lack of explanation of what controls and continuous terms are, and referencing industry expert published content.

In developing my definition, I plan on referring to industry expert reference literature such as:

1. ISACA (2010, October 1). Monitoring Internal Control Systems and IT. Rolling Meadows, IL. ISACA.

2. Senft, Sandra. Gallegos, Frederick. Davis, Aleksandra. (2013, July 18). Information Technology Control and Audit. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press

A proper definition should highlight the importance for organizations to operate and monitor IT system controls, helping readers by improving their understanding of the topic, and potentially give them a good starting point when researching ways to improve their organization's IT governance.

Christian-NJITWILL (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessary to ask permission to edit - see WP:BOLD. Your contribution was definitely an improvement. Thanks. I have made some further minor improvements. -—Kvng 16:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

XML lists

The title of the page List of XML schemas is wrong. It's the same thing as List of XML markup languages, only grouped by purpose. Also, the title "List of XML markup languages" is iffy because it can be read as "list of extensible markup language markup languages" which makes little sense. A better title would be e.g. "List of XML-based markup languages", possibly omitting the word markup. I don't have the time to work on these right now (if ever), so feel free to be BOLD should you be inclined so. Wipe (talk) 02:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are two other Editors who agree with you. I have put up merge banners. -—Kvng 21:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FreeDOS 32

FreeDOS 32 is up for deleting. Is this notable enough to write a stub for? -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not but it doesn't deserve to be deleted either. -—Kvng 21:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Internet Top Level Country Domains

There is an ongoing debate on the Northern Ireland Talk Page about what Top Level country domains should be listed. At present the infobox lists .uk, .ie and .eu, but this is disputed. The infobox also has a note saying ".uk is assigned to the United Kingdom of which Northern Ireland is a part, .ie is assigned to Ireland of which Northern Ireland is a part, and .eu is assigned to the European Union of which Northern Ireland is a part. ISO 3166-1 is GB, but .gb is unused"

I would like to ask if anyone has any knowledge of matters relating to Internet top level country domains and if they could please add their insights to the ongoing discussion. Myself and a few others believe it is inappropriate to claim that .ie is Northern Irelands internet domain, because .ie was assigned to a different country (the Republic of Ireland), whilst others say it was assigned to the whole island and point to the fact that the organisation that runs the domain, does welcome people from Northern Ireland to purchase domains too.

Any additional input on the talk page is most welcome. Thank you BritishWatcher (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SEO Ireland: Domain names and Northern Ireland - both .uk, .ni, .ie and .eu are used, .uk being the official one (i.e. used by governmental institutions). So they all should be included. — Vano 10:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eighth Generation Consoles

I'm looking for additional outside opinions into the inclusion or exclusion of Video Game Consoles into the 8th Generation article. I have started a new section here and am requesting outside comment. Talk:History_of_video_game_consoles_(eighth_generation)#.22We_need_hardware_comparisons.22. Thank you. -Kai445 (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons ENIAC images

Happy New Year, all! I've just created a batch request for a few hi-res US Army images relating to ENIAC. It may come to nothing because there are so few, but I thought those here might have some useful comments to make over at Commons. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 12:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Say... is there a Commons:Commons:WikiProject Computing (obviously, if there is, it isn't at that name) ? -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sinclair

I have started a proposal to group together related articles about the works of Sir Clive Sinclair. Please take a look at the proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Sinclair and see if you support it. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HDMI Connection

My question is: I connected the HDMI to TV and to computer about a week ago and was able to see computer screen on TV screen, also to connect to Internet and watch Netflix. Since about 2 to 3 days ago it is not connecting...Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.55.235.99 (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • This page is for discussing the project that helps improve computing articles on Wikipedia. You probably won't find anyone on Wikipedia who can answer your question. Find a knowledgeable friend or a local dealer. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Next Unit of Computing

Hello. I created the article "Next Unit of Computing". Please expand the article as appropriate. Thank you. Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"T-carrier"

FYI, a reorangization of the data communications articles is being discussed at Talk:T-carrier (and User talk:TCBallister/User talk:John F. Lewis) you may be interested in participating -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 02:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"DNA computing (2013)"

FYI, there's a note at WT:MED about the title for DNA computing (2013) -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/to do

This doesn't exist. Background: I was looking to enhance and include Wikipedia:WikiProject RISC OS/to do (thanks, Mabdul) within {{WikiProject Computing}}, but thought Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/to do would be the logical place to start before moving onto the task force.

  1. Is a project-wide to do list perhaps located elsewhere?
    (All I found was Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Archive 2#To-Do)
  2. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force/to do is present, although apparently not included within {{WikiProject Computing}} - could it be used for tagged task force articles?
  3. {{WikiProject Companies}} seems to work well (although no task forces are included)
  4. Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/todolist seems to contain the appropriate information
  5. If/when the main project to do list is included, can we also include task force lists such as Wikipedia:WikiProject RISC OS/to do and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force/to do?
    (The latter is noted as a talk page and should maybe be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force/to do.)

-- Trevj (talk) 11:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising check

Someone put a {{Advert}} tag on Cray XK7, an article I wrote. I won't remove it since I was the one who created the article, could someone please take a look and provide a second opinion or suggestions of what sounds like advertising? Thanks, James086Talk 16:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't exactly look like an advert to me! Removed. -- Trevj (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I don't think that reads like an ad, though the person who put that notice there probably balked at all the "This company has this configuration" sections. To my eye, the article is awfully technical and your average reader would have a hard time understanding it. But I don't think it looks like an ad. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 19:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks guys, I'll try to make it a little less technical. Much appreciated. James086Talk 07:21, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]