User talk:Geometry guy: Difference between revisions
Ottawahitech (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Geometry guy (talk | contribs) →Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians: Belated reply: rumors of my disappearance have been greatly exaggerated. |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
You have been mentioned at [[Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians]]. X[[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 14:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC) |
You have been mentioned at [[Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians]]. X[[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 14:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
: Many thanks for the notification. Rumors of my disappearance have been greatly exaggerated. ''[[User talk:Geometry guy|Geometry guy]]'' 23:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:46, 31 October 2013
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/Chandra-crab.jpg/200px-Chandra-crab.jpg)
Welcome to my (rather minimalist) user and user talk page: please leave comments, questions, complaints, or just general chat below. Please provide direct links to issues you raise. I am contributing rather sporadically at present and can't promise to reply, but if I do I will reply here: if I take a while and it is important, I will drop a note on your talk page.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
YGM
You've gots an email. :) — Ched : ? 20:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Belatedly replied. Sorry for the 5 month delay! Geometry guy 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Precious again
treatment of editors as human beings
Thank you for voicing the right of every editor to be treated as a human being, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (21 April 2009)!
(About) a year ago, you were the 44th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, - did you know that I framed your words on my user and remind everybody and myself in my edit notice? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I did - how could I forget? Thank you again for your kind words. Geometry guy 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't know about the edit notice, because I installed that much later. The reminder is still needed, see another thread in WP:Great Dismal Swamp that could be short and easy if only ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Would you comment on Map Projections?
Hi, we have an ongoing disagreement on the Map Projections page and I was hoping you'd weigh in given your mathematical bent. Here's the current dispute: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Map_projection_discussion. Appreciate any thoughts! Thanks.184.186.8.148 (talk) 23:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Alas I was unavailable for this - I hope you sorted it out. Geometry guy 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Rumours of my inactivity have been somewhat exaggerated. I wish you the best in your future endeavors also, MadmanBot, and hope that electromagnetic fields continue to bend to your will. Geometry guy 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
![]() So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC) |
- Good luck with this initiative. Ironically, I never did sign up to WGA. Echoes of Marx, I guess (Groucho, not Karl). Geometry guy 14:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the notification. Rumors of my disappearance have been greatly exaggerated. Geometry guy 23:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)