Benefits Street: Difference between revisions
ce |
m rm link tracking |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
===James Turner Street=== |
===James Turner Street=== |
||
James Turner Street is a residential street of 137 [[Victorian architecture|Victorian]] [[terraced house]]s in the Winson Green area of Birmingham.<ref name=Chinn>{{cite news|first=Carl |last=Chinn |url=http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/lifestyle/nostalgia/carl-chinn-benefits-street-history-6496189 |title=Carl Chinn on Benefits Street history |publisher=Trinity Mirror |newspaper=Birmingham Mail |date=10 January 2014 |accessdate=24 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=Mirror-2014-01-22>{{cite news|last=Fricker |first=Martin |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/benefits-street-james-turner-street-3051297 |
James Turner Street is a residential street of 137 [[Victorian architecture|Victorian]] [[terraced house]]s in the Winson Green area of Birmingham.<ref name=Chinn>{{cite news|first=Carl |last=Chinn |url=http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/lifestyle/nostalgia/carl-chinn-benefits-street-history-6496189 |title=Carl Chinn on Benefits Street history |publisher=Trinity Mirror |newspaper=Birmingham Mail |date=10 January 2014 |accessdate=24 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=Mirror-2014-01-22>{{cite news|last=Fricker |first=Martin |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/benefits-street-james-turner-street-3051297 |title=Benefits Street: James Turner Street in Birmingham was named after hard-working teacher |newspaper=Daily Mirror |publisher=Trinity Mirror |date=22 January 2014 |accessdate=28 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=BBC-2014-02-10>{{cite web|last=Cavallaro |first=Cassandra |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-25848423 |work=BBC News |title=Benefits Street: 'Living the dream' 100 years ago |publisher=BBC |date=10 February 2014 |accessdate=10 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Jennifer |last=Newton |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2557747/From-Benefits-street-Downing-Street-White-Dee-says-stand-MP-attacks-Government-welfare-encourages-people-scrounge-state.html |title=Benefits Street's White Dee says she will stand as MP |newspaper=Daily Mail |publisher=Daily Mail and General Trust |date=12 February 2014 |accessdate=12 February 2014}}</ref> The street is in the city's Soho Ward, part of the [[Birmingham Ladywood (UK Parliament constituency)|Ladywood constituency]], and has a [[B postcode area#B18|B18 postcode]].<ref name="MLI">{{cite web|url=https://localview.birmingham.gov.uk/My_Local_Information/Sites/MyLocalInformation/|title=My Local Information/|publisher=Birmingham City Council|accessdate=11 February 2014}}</ref> |
||
It is first recorded in local records as Osborne Street in 1877,<ref name="Tyler">{{cite web|url=http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/benefits-street-man-behind-tvs-6535817|title=Benefits Street: The man behind TV's most notorious street|last=Tyler|first=Jane|date=22 January 2014|work=Birmingham Mail|publisher=Trinity Mirror|accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=Express-2014-01-23>{{cite news|url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/455471/BENEFITS-STREET-The-real-James-Turner-a-respected-teacher-would-turn-in-his-grave |title=Benefits Street: The real James Turner – a respected teacher – would 'turn in his grave' |newspaper=Daily Express |publisher=Northern and Shell |date=23 January 2014 |accessdate=24 January 2014}}</ref> and given its present name in 1882.<ref name="Tyler" /> According to school historian Alison Wheatley, the street is possibly named after a James Turner who taught at [[King Edward's School, Birmingham|King Edward's School]] in Birmingham, and the name may have been suggested by a former pupil, who became a [[Urban planner|town planner]], as a way of honouring Turner's legacy.<ref name=Mirror-2014-01-22/><ref name="Tyler" /><ref name=Express-2014-01-23/> However, the Birmingham historian [[Carl Chinn]] believes the street was named for a local businessman and partner in the firm Hammond, Turner & Sons, a manufacturer of buttons.<ref name=Guardian-2014-01-29>{{cite news|first=Jon |last=Henley |url=http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/29/benefits-street-a-spiral-of-decline |title=Benefits Street: the hard-working history that Channel 4 left out |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=29 January 2014 |accessdate=29 January 2014}}</ref> |
It is first recorded in local records as Osborne Street in 1877,<ref name="Tyler">{{cite web|url=http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/benefits-street-man-behind-tvs-6535817|title=Benefits Street: The man behind TV's most notorious street|last=Tyler|first=Jane|date=22 January 2014|work=Birmingham Mail|publisher=Trinity Mirror|accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=Express-2014-01-23>{{cite news|url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/455471/BENEFITS-STREET-The-real-James-Turner-a-respected-teacher-would-turn-in-his-grave |title=Benefits Street: The real James Turner – a respected teacher – would 'turn in his grave' |newspaper=Daily Express |publisher=Northern and Shell |date=23 January 2014 |accessdate=24 January 2014}}</ref> and given its present name in 1882.<ref name="Tyler" /> According to school historian Alison Wheatley, the street is possibly named after a James Turner who taught at [[King Edward's School, Birmingham|King Edward's School]] in Birmingham, and the name may have been suggested by a former pupil, who became a [[Urban planner|town planner]], as a way of honouring Turner's legacy.<ref name=Mirror-2014-01-22/><ref name="Tyler" /><ref name=Express-2014-01-23/> However, the Birmingham historian [[Carl Chinn]] believes the street was named for a local businessman and partner in the firm Hammond, Turner & Sons, a manufacturer of buttons.<ref name=Guardian-2014-01-29>{{cite news|first=Jon |last=Henley |url=http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jan/29/benefits-street-a-spiral-of-decline |title=Benefits Street: the hard-working history that Channel 4 left out |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=29 January 2014 |accessdate=29 January 2014}}</ref> |
||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
The programme has led to some political debate on the issue of welfare. Speaking in the House of Commons on 13 January, [[Iain Duncan Smith]], the Conservative [[Secretary of State for Work and Pensions]], suggested the programme justified the changes being made by his government's [[Welfare Reform Act 2012|Welfare Reform Act]].<ref name=Mirror-2014-01-13/> The following week, Duncan Smith gave a speech to mark the tenth anniversary of his [[Centre for Social Justice]] in which he said that areas of the country were being ghettoised by long term unemployment and had remained largely hidden from the rest of society.<ref>{{cite news|last=Dominiczak |first=Peter |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/10590933/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Ill-stop-Benefits-Street-Britain.html |title=Iain Duncan Smith: I’ll stop Benefits Street Britain |publisher=Telegraph Media Group |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date=22 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=Guardian-2014-01-22>{{cite news|first=Patrick |last=Wintour |url=http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jan/22/duncan-smith-benefits-street-shock |title=Benefits Street reveals 'ghetto' reality, says Iain Duncan Smith |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=22 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25866259 |work=BBC News |title=Benefits Street reaction shows poor 'ghettoised', says Duncan Smith |publisher=BBC |date=23 January 2014 |accessdate=26 January 2014}}</ref> Conservative MP [[Simon Hart]] raised the subject of ''Benefits Street'' at [[Prime Minister's Questions]] on 15 January, saying that a street of the type seen in the series existed "in every constituency in the land".<ref name=BBC-2014-01-15>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25746824 |work=BBC News |title=PMQs: Benefit Street 'in every constituency' says MP |publisher=BBC |date=15 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/10949470.MP_stands_by_his___39_Benefits_Street__39__in_every_constituency__comments/ |title=MP stands by his 'Benefits Street' in every constituency comments |newspaper=Western Telegraph |publisher= |date=20 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> Prime Minister [[David Cameron]] responded that the government should "intervene in people's lives" to get them off benefits and into employment.<ref name=BBC-2014-01-15/> After declining an invitation to visit James Turner Street, Deputy Prime Minister [[Nick Clegg]] said that he believed both left and right arguments on welfare were wrong. "We want a welfare system which is compassionate."<ref name=Guardian-2014-01-22/> Shortly after Clegg's comments, Birmingham councillor Desmond Jaddoo told the ''Birmingham Mail'' that he had compiled letters to Clegg, Cameron and [[Ed Miliband]]{{mdash}}the leaders of the UK's three main political parties{{mdash}}on behalf of some James Turner Street residents inviting them to visit the street and asking for help to find employment.<ref name=Birmingham-Mail-2014-01-23/> |
The programme has led to some political debate on the issue of welfare. Speaking in the House of Commons on 13 January, [[Iain Duncan Smith]], the Conservative [[Secretary of State for Work and Pensions]], suggested the programme justified the changes being made by his government's [[Welfare Reform Act 2012|Welfare Reform Act]].<ref name=Mirror-2014-01-13/> The following week, Duncan Smith gave a speech to mark the tenth anniversary of his [[Centre for Social Justice]] in which he said that areas of the country were being ghettoised by long term unemployment and had remained largely hidden from the rest of society.<ref>{{cite news|last=Dominiczak |first=Peter |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/10590933/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Ill-stop-Benefits-Street-Britain.html |title=Iain Duncan Smith: I’ll stop Benefits Street Britain |publisher=Telegraph Media Group |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date=22 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref name=Guardian-2014-01-22>{{cite news|first=Patrick |last=Wintour |url=http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jan/22/duncan-smith-benefits-street-shock |title=Benefits Street reveals 'ghetto' reality, says Iain Duncan Smith |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=22 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25866259 |work=BBC News |title=Benefits Street reaction shows poor 'ghettoised', says Duncan Smith |publisher=BBC |date=23 January 2014 |accessdate=26 January 2014}}</ref> Conservative MP [[Simon Hart]] raised the subject of ''Benefits Street'' at [[Prime Minister's Questions]] on 15 January, saying that a street of the type seen in the series existed "in every constituency in the land".<ref name=BBC-2014-01-15>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25746824 |work=BBC News |title=PMQs: Benefit Street 'in every constituency' says MP |publisher=BBC |date=15 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.westerntelegraph.co.uk/news/10949470.MP_stands_by_his___39_Benefits_Street__39__in_every_constituency__comments/ |title=MP stands by his 'Benefits Street' in every constituency comments |newspaper=Western Telegraph |publisher= |date=20 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> Prime Minister [[David Cameron]] responded that the government should "intervene in people's lives" to get them off benefits and into employment.<ref name=BBC-2014-01-15/> After declining an invitation to visit James Turner Street, Deputy Prime Minister [[Nick Clegg]] said that he believed both left and right arguments on welfare were wrong. "We want a welfare system which is compassionate."<ref name=Guardian-2014-01-22/> Shortly after Clegg's comments, Birmingham councillor Desmond Jaddoo told the ''Birmingham Mail'' that he had compiled letters to Clegg, Cameron and [[Ed Miliband]]{{mdash}}the leaders of the UK's three main political parties{{mdash}}on behalf of some James Turner Street residents inviting them to visit the street and asking for help to find employment.<ref name=Birmingham-Mail-2014-01-23/> |
||
Writing for the ''[[Gazette and Herald|Wiltshire Gazette and Herald]]'', the Liberal Democrat MP [[Duncan Hames]] argued the programme would contribute little to the subject: "We do need to have a rational, informed debate about how to improve our welfare system, but the editorial line taken by supposedly factual ‘reality TV’ adds very little to that."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/10957620.Duncan_Hames__MP_for_Chippenham______Reality_TV____does_nothing_for_those_wanting_to_work/?ref=var_0 |title=Duncan Hames, MP for Chippenham – ‘Reality TV’ does nothing for those wanting to work |newspaper=The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald |publisher=Newsquest |date=23 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> The programme was condemned by the current Ladywood MP, Labour's [[Shabana Mahmood]]: "I found it shocking that Channel 4 or any other organisation would present poverty as entertainment. It was profoundly wrong."<ref>{{cite news|first=Jonathan |last=Walker |url=http://www.birminghampost.co.uk/news/local-news/channel-4-show-benefits-street-6482174 |title=Channel 4 show Benefits Street exploits the poor, says Birmingham MP |publisher=Trinity Mirror |newspaper=Birmingham Post |date=9 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> In the ''[[Radio Times]]'', Clare Short, who represented the constituency prior to Mahmood said the series was "totally unrepresentative" of the area, and condemned it as "crummy and misleading".<ref name=Guardian-2014-02-04>{{cite news|first=Caroline |title=Davies |url=http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/04/benefits-street-channel-four-clare-short |title=Benefits Street is excuse for viewers to judge and sneer, says Clare Short |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=4 February 2014 |accessdate=4 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Jefferies |first=Mark |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/benefits-street-channel-4-series-3109953 |
Writing for the ''[[Gazette and Herald|Wiltshire Gazette and Herald]]'', the Liberal Democrat MP [[Duncan Hames]] argued the programme would contribute little to the subject: "We do need to have a rational, informed debate about how to improve our welfare system, but the editorial line taken by supposedly factual ‘reality TV’ adds very little to that."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/10957620.Duncan_Hames__MP_for_Chippenham______Reality_TV____does_nothing_for_those_wanting_to_work/?ref=var_0 |title=Duncan Hames, MP for Chippenham – ‘Reality TV’ does nothing for those wanting to work |newspaper=The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald |publisher=Newsquest |date=23 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> The programme was condemned by the current Ladywood MP, Labour's [[Shabana Mahmood]]: "I found it shocking that Channel 4 or any other organisation would present poverty as entertainment. It was profoundly wrong."<ref>{{cite news|first=Jonathan |last=Walker |url=http://www.birminghampost.co.uk/news/local-news/channel-4-show-benefits-street-6482174 |title=Channel 4 show Benefits Street exploits the poor, says Birmingham MP |publisher=Trinity Mirror |newspaper=Birmingham Post |date=9 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> In the ''[[Radio Times]]'', Clare Short, who represented the constituency prior to Mahmood said the series was "totally unrepresentative" of the area, and condemned it as "crummy and misleading".<ref name=Guardian-2014-02-04>{{cite news|first=Caroline |title=Davies |url=http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/04/benefits-street-channel-four-clare-short |title=Benefits Street is excuse for viewers to judge and sneer, says Clare Short |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=4 February 2014 |accessdate=4 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Jefferies |first=Mark |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/benefits-street-channel-4-series-3109953 |title=Benefits Street: Channel 4 series is "totally unrepresentative" of the area, says former Labour MP Clare Short |newspaper=Daily Mirror |publisher=Trinity Mirror |date=4 February 2014 |accessdate=4 February 2014}}</ref> Others have also criticised ''Benefits Street'', arguing it does not present a balanced view of the subject. Labour MP [[Anne Begg]], chair of the Commons [[Work and Pensions Select Committee]], said that the programme was a "misrepresentation" of people claiming benefits, arguing that it focused on those claiming unemployment benefits which makes up a small proportion of the overall welfare bill.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jan/10/benefits-street-misrepresentation-welfare-mp-begg-channel-4 |title=Benefits Street is a 'misrepresentation' of life on welfare, says MP |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=10 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> Referring to the first episode that featured a shoplifter, [[Chris Williamson (politician)|Chris Williamson]] (also a Labour MP) said it was "irresponsible" to portray him as a typical benefits claimant.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/TV-s-Benefits-Street-blasted-irresponsible-Derby/story-20468612-detail/story.html |title=Channel 4's Benefits Street blasted as 'irresponsible' by Derby Labour MP |publisher= |newspaper=Derby Telegraph |date=14 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> [[Owen Jones (writer)|Owen Jones]], a columnist for ''[[The Independent]]'' described the series as "medieval stocks updated for a modern format".<ref>{{cite news|first= Jessica |last=Elgot |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/01/10/benefits-street-owen-jone_n_4573811.html |title=Owen Jones Tears Into Channel 4's Ralph Lee Over Benefits Street On Newsnight |publisher=The Huffington Post |date=10 January 2014 |accessdate=31 January 2014}}</ref> In an article for the ''Birmingham Mail'', writer and television personality [[Samantha Brick]], a native of Birminggham, said that the series was an "atrociously unbalanced" view of the city.<ref>{{cite news|first=Christina |last=Savvas |url=http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/samantha-brick-defends-birmingham-after-6679179 |title=Samantha Brick defends Birmingham after Benefits Street - "We're not all on the take and Channel 4 twisted show' |publisher=Trinity Mirror |newspaper=Birmingham Mail |date=6 February 2014 |accessdate=6 February 2014}}</ref> |
||
[[Fraser Nelson]], editor of ''[[The Spectator]]'', suggested the programme had highlighted a section of society who have been forgotten by the politicians: "These people are people who otherwise don’t have a voice. They don’t vote, so for many years they have just not mattered".<ref>{{cite news|first=Fraser |last=Nelson |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10579987/Benefits-Street-the-real-scandal.html |title=Benefits Street: the real scandal |publisher=Telegraph Media Group |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date=17 January 2014 |accessdate=19 January 2014}}</ref> Nelson's comments were echoed by [[Dominic Sandbrook]] in the ''Daily Mail'', who felt the programme portrayed its participants sympathetically: "The real scandal of Benefits Street, in fact, is what it tells us about a welfare system that abandons thousands of people – through no fault of their own – to a life without hope or ambition, effectively turning them into an underclass, dependent on the charity of the State."<ref name=Mail-2014-01-18>{{cite news|first=Dominic |last=Sandbrook |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541568/No-Benefits-Street-does-NOT-demonise-poor-But-shows-immoral-let-welfare-pay-working.html |title=No, Benefits Street does NOT demonise the poor. But it shows how immoral it is to let welfare pay more than working |newspaper=Daily Mail |publisher=Daily Mail and General Trust |date=18 January 2014 |accessdate=21 January 2014}}</ref> [[Charlie Brooker]] also felt the programme had been "broadly sympathetic" to those it portrays.<ref>{{cite news|last=Brooker |first=Charlie |url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/12/benefits-street-poverty-porn-british-fury |title=Benefits Street – poverty porn, or just the latest target for pent-up British fury? |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=12 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> In the ''[[Daily Mirror]]'', entrepreneur [[John Bird (entrepreneur)|John Bird]], founder of ''[[The Big Issue]]'' wrote that although ''Benefits Street'' did not fully represent the spectrum of people who claim benefits, it did show what could happen to those forgotten by the system "who get caught in a kind of social suicide".<ref>{{cite news|first=John |last=Bird |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/big-issue-founder-john-bird-3116153 |title=Big Issue founder John Bird says Benefits Street demonstrates the cycle of poverty and self-destruction which the current welfare system actually encourages |newspaper=Daily Mirror |publisher=Trinity Mirror |date=6 February 2014 |accessdate=6 February 2014}}</ref> |
[[Fraser Nelson]], editor of ''[[The Spectator]]'', suggested the programme had highlighted a section of society who have been forgotten by the politicians: "These people are people who otherwise don’t have a voice. They don’t vote, so for many years they have just not mattered".<ref>{{cite news|first=Fraser |last=Nelson |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10579987/Benefits-Street-the-real-scandal.html |title=Benefits Street: the real scandal |publisher=Telegraph Media Group |newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date=17 January 2014 |accessdate=19 January 2014}}</ref> Nelson's comments were echoed by [[Dominic Sandbrook]] in the ''Daily Mail'', who felt the programme portrayed its participants sympathetically: "The real scandal of Benefits Street, in fact, is what it tells us about a welfare system that abandons thousands of people – through no fault of their own – to a life without hope or ambition, effectively turning them into an underclass, dependent on the charity of the State."<ref name=Mail-2014-01-18>{{cite news|first=Dominic |last=Sandbrook |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541568/No-Benefits-Street-does-NOT-demonise-poor-But-shows-immoral-let-welfare-pay-working.html |title=No, Benefits Street does NOT demonise the poor. But it shows how immoral it is to let welfare pay more than working |newspaper=Daily Mail |publisher=Daily Mail and General Trust |date=18 January 2014 |accessdate=21 January 2014}}</ref> [[Charlie Brooker]] also felt the programme had been "broadly sympathetic" to those it portrays.<ref>{{cite news|last=Brooker |first=Charlie |url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/12/benefits-street-poverty-porn-british-fury |title=Benefits Street – poverty porn, or just the latest target for pent-up British fury? |publisher=Guardian Media Group |newspaper=The Guardian |date=12 January 2014 |accessdate=23 January 2014}}</ref> In the ''[[Daily Mirror]]'', entrepreneur [[John Bird (entrepreneur)|John Bird]], founder of ''[[The Big Issue]]'' wrote that although ''Benefits Street'' did not fully represent the spectrum of people who claim benefits, it did show what could happen to those forgotten by the system "who get caught in a kind of social suicide".<ref>{{cite news|first=John |last=Bird |url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/big-issue-founder-john-bird-3116153 |title=Big Issue founder John Bird says Benefits Street demonstrates the cycle of poverty and self-destruction which the current welfare system actually encourages |newspaper=Daily Mirror |publisher=Trinity Mirror |date=6 February 2014 |accessdate=6 February 2014}}</ref> |
Revision as of 10:19, 13 February 2014
Benefits Street | |
---|---|
Genre | Documentary |
Narrated by | Tony Hirst |
Composer | Matthew Cracknell |
Country of origin | United Kingdom |
Original language | English |
No. of series | 1 |
No. of episodes | 5 |
Production | |
Production locations | Winson Green, Birmingham, England 52°29′44″N 1°56′38″W / 52.4955°N 1.9438°W |
Running time | 60 mins (inc. adverts) |
Production company | Love Productions |
Original release | |
Network | Channel 4 |
Release | 6 January 10 February 2014 | –
Benefits Street is a British documentary series broadcast on Channel 4. It was first aired on 6 January 2014, and ran for five episodes. The show was filmed by documenting the lives of several residents of James Turner Street, Winson Green, Birmingham, England, where newspapers including the Daily Mail and The Guardian reported that 90% of the residents claim benefits.[1][2] It shows benefits claimants committing crimes, including a demonstration of how to shoplift,[3] and portrays a situation in which people are dependent on welfare payments and lack the motivation to seek employment.[4]
The show has been controversial, with the police, Channel 4 and Ofcom receiving hundreds of complaints.[5] There have been Twitter death threats made against the residents of the street.[6] Channel 4 has been accused of making poverty porn.'[7] Many of those taking part have claimed that they were misled by the documentary makers.[8] However, the producers of Benefits Street have defended the series, arguing that the reaction to it demonstrates the importance of making such a documentary. The series was mentioned in the House of Commons, and prompted some political debate on the topic of welfare. Benefits Street has given Channel 4 their highest viewing figures for any show since 2012.[9]
Background
In 2012, Love Productions approached the BBC with the idea for a programme that would feature a prominent member of the business community working with unemployed people, but the show did not come to fruition after the unnamed individual had to withdraw from it because of other commitments. The format for the series that would later become Benefits Street was then suggested, but the BBC declined to commission the series because it was producing a number of other programmes concerning similar issues, such as People Like Us and Nick and Margaret: We All Pay Your Benefits. Love Productions then suggested the format to Channel 4, which agreed to commission it.[10]
Writing for The Observer in January 2014, Nick Mirsky, head of documentaries at Channel 4 said that Love Productions intentionally selected an area where a high proportion of the residents were in receipt of welfare payments "to show the effect of benefit cuts on a community for whom they were the principal source of income".[11] The filming and production process took eighteen months.[7] Both Mirsky, and Ralph Lee, Channel 4's head of factual programming, said the residents of James Turner Street were consulted about the series before filming began.[11][12] Cameras observed them over the course of a twelve month period.[11] The decision to call the series Benefits Street was taken two weeks before the programme aired.[12] The comedian Frank Skinner, who is from the West Midlands, was approached to narrate the documentary but turned it down because he had concerns about how people from Birmingham would be portrayed, and did not wish to criticise the city.[13]
The first episode of Benefits Street was aired at 9.00pm on Monday 6 January 2014,[14] and ran for five episodes.[7][15] A live one-hour debate was then scheduled to be broadcast by Channel 4 following the final episode. Channel 4 announced on 16 January that this would be chaired by presenter Richard Bacon and feature a panel of guests who "represent the views across the political spectrum – and crucially those who claim benefits".[16] Mentorn Media, producers of programmes such as BBC One's Question Time was commissioned to produce the show.[17][18] Originally scheduled for 10 February, the programme, titled Benefits Britain: The Debate, was subsequently moved back a week to 17 February after rival broadcaster Channel 5 announced plans for a two hour debate about immigration for the same evening. Channel 4 said Benefits Britain: The Debate would be immediately preceded by a follow up documentary, Benefits Street: The Last Word. The change was announced after many listings magazines had gone to press, a practice generally discouraged in the media industry.[19]
During the week following the broadcasting of the third episode of Benefits Street, West Midlands Police charged several James Turner Street residents with drugs related offences in connection with a raid their officers had carried out in June 2013.[20][21] Those facing charges included some people seen in episodes of the series.[22] Channel 4 said they had no plans to alter any footage from the episodes yet to be transmitted.[23]
On 23 January, the Birmingham Mail reported that some Benefits Street branded merchandise, such as mugs and T-shirts were being produced for sale over the internet by individuals wishing to cash in on the programme.[24] As the series came to a close on 10 February, Love Productions confirmed to the Birmingham Mail that it was investigating potential locations for a second series, but that this would not be filmed in Birmingham.[25] Channel 5 confirmed to Broadcast magazine that it was in the process of filming a similar documentary, provisionally titled Living on the Social, in which individuals and families would discuss their lives on welfare.[26][27]
James Turner Street
James Turner Street is a residential street of 137 Victorian terraced houses in the Winson Green area of Birmingham.[28][29][30][31] The street is in the city's Soho Ward, part of the Ladywood constituency, and has a B18 postcode.[32]
It is first recorded in local records as Osborne Street in 1877,[33][34] and given its present name in 1882.[33] According to school historian Alison Wheatley, the street is possibly named after a James Turner who taught at King Edward's School in Birmingham, and the name may have been suggested by a former pupil, who became a town planner, as a way of honouring Turner's legacy.[29][33][34] However, the Birmingham historian Carl Chinn believes the street was named for a local businessman and partner in the firm Hammond, Turner & Sons, a manufacturer of buttons.[2]
Of Winson Green, Chinn writes that it was originally developed as a "better-off working class district", but that by the latter part of the 20th century, many of the properties in the area were falling into decay.[28] Dr Chris Upton, reader in public history at the city's Newman University has described the street as part of a "ribbon development" of suburban districts built as Birmingham expanded during the latter part of the 19th century.[30] While many of the street's original residents were locals who moved from the inner city back-to-back houses, some had moved from as far away as London and Cornwall to work in Birmingham.[30][35] Upton describes them as "the respectable working class"—skilled workers who earned around 30 shillings (£1.50) per week, and who in many cases could even afford to employ a maid.[30] Those who grew prosperous moved to wealthier areas, and were replaced by immigrants from Asia and the West Indies, who came to the UK during the years after World War II.[35] A high proportion of those who lived in the area were employed by Birmingham's industrial economy, which enjoyed prosperity until the collapse of the city's manufacturing industry during the early 1980s, resulting in mass unemployment.[2] Professor Steven McCabe of Birmingham City Business School has noted that Birmingham lost 200,000 manufacturing jobs between 1971 and 1981, and that the city's GDP per capita, which in 1976 was the highest for a UK city outside the south east region, had fallen to become the lowest in England seven years later.[35]
During the 1980s, unemployment in Birmingham reached 20%, and McCabe says that in many areas, including James Turner Street, this figure has not been reduced since that decade.[35] Clare Short, who grew up in the area and represented Winson Green as Member of Parliament for Ladywood for 27 years has said that along with high unemployment came a "new culture of drugs, crime and mental health problems."[36] On their website, Channel 4 have described James Turner Street as "one of Britain's most benefits-dependent streets".[37] Sources such as the Daily Mail and The Guardian reported in January 2014 that 90% of the street's residents are benefits claimants.[1][2]
Synopsis
Narrated by Tony Hirst, the series is presented in a fly on the wall documentary format that follows a year in the lives of the residents of James Turner Street, a road in the Winson Green area of Birmingham which Channel 4 describes as "one of Britain's most benefit-dependent streets". The programme portrays a situation in which people are dependent on welfare payments, and often lack the motivation to find employment. Some residents are seen committing crimes such as shoplifting, and attempting to raise money to support themselves and their families. Others are shown to have more ambition, such as a young mother who wants to become a model. The series also aims to show the street's sense of community spirit, with residents helping each other in times of difficulty.
Episode list
No. | Title | Air date | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | "Episode 1" | 6 January 2014 | |
Viewers are introduced to the residents of James Turner Street in Birmingham, where there is a high proportion of benefit claimants. Residents are seen committing crimes, such as benefit fraud, cannabis cultivation and shoplifting, with the programme including a demonstration of how to steal designer clothes and remove the security tags. A shoplifter is returned to prison after breaching an anti-social behaviour order that excluded him from the city centre, while another resident takes free magazines from a hotel lobby and sells them on the streets for £2.50. A reformed ex-convict sells 50p sachets of sugar and washing powder to raise money for himself. The street's sense of community is highlighted too, as one of the residents attempts to help a friend to overcome his drug habit.[1][38][39] | |||
2 | "Episode 2" | 13 January 2014 | |
The second episode of Benefits Street focuses on immigration. A group of Romanians arrive in the street and start a metal collecting business, but this leads to tension with other residents when the newcomers search through their household rubbish looking for recyclable material. The group is forced to move on when their electricity supply is cut off, but another group from Romania soon arrives. Promised work on a farm, they quickly discover their gangmaster has not told them the truth about their working conditions.[39] | |||
3 | "Episode 3" | 20 January 2014 | |
Episode three focuses on the children of the families on James Turner Street. The episode deals with a woman whose son has been taken away from her because of her addiction to heroin. The programme also features a young couple struggling to raise their two young children. Children are seen swearing and misbehaving, while a mother reprimands her son for losing his bicycle.[40][41] | |||
4 | "Episode 4" | 27 January 2014 | |
The fourth episode deals with ambition. The 15-year-old daughter of a resident, who wishes to follow a career as a gym instructor undertakes work experience at a leisure centre. An aspiring model who left her abusive partner has her children schooled at home, and finds work in a local takeaway. A drug addict whose electricity has been cut off, and who has no contact with his children, experiences personal disappointment when a planned meeting with his son is cancelled by the boy's adoptive parents.[42][43] | |||
5 | "Episode 5" | 10 February 2014 | |
The final episode of the series sees a woman leaving her Zimbabwean partner after he loses his benefits because he failed to renew his visa, descends into depression as a result and begins drinking excessively. She is rehoused by the local authority, while he is left without an income because of his lapsed immigration status. Another resident goes for hospital tests after discovering a lump on his chest. He is relieved to learn it is not cancerous, but is told it is being aggravated by his lifestyle of drink and drugs. An information technology worker takes part in a cleanup initiative as the street prepares to enter a Britain in Bloom contest.[44][45][46][47] |
Reception
Political and media response
The programme has led to some political debate on the issue of welfare. Speaking in the House of Commons on 13 January, Iain Duncan Smith, the Conservative Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, suggested the programme justified the changes being made by his government's Welfare Reform Act.[48] The following week, Duncan Smith gave a speech to mark the tenth anniversary of his Centre for Social Justice in which he said that areas of the country were being ghettoised by long term unemployment and had remained largely hidden from the rest of society.[49][50][51] Conservative MP Simon Hart raised the subject of Benefits Street at Prime Minister's Questions on 15 January, saying that a street of the type seen in the series existed "in every constituency in the land".[52][53] Prime Minister David Cameron responded that the government should "intervene in people's lives" to get them off benefits and into employment.[52] After declining an invitation to visit James Turner Street, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said that he believed both left and right arguments on welfare were wrong. "We want a welfare system which is compassionate."[50] Shortly after Clegg's comments, Birmingham councillor Desmond Jaddoo told the Birmingham Mail that he had compiled letters to Clegg, Cameron and Ed Miliband—the leaders of the UK's three main political parties—on behalf of some James Turner Street residents inviting them to visit the street and asking for help to find employment.[24]
Writing for the Wiltshire Gazette and Herald, the Liberal Democrat MP Duncan Hames argued the programme would contribute little to the subject: "We do need to have a rational, informed debate about how to improve our welfare system, but the editorial line taken by supposedly factual ‘reality TV’ adds very little to that."[54] The programme was condemned by the current Ladywood MP, Labour's Shabana Mahmood: "I found it shocking that Channel 4 or any other organisation would present poverty as entertainment. It was profoundly wrong."[55] In the Radio Times, Clare Short, who represented the constituency prior to Mahmood said the series was "totally unrepresentative" of the area, and condemned it as "crummy and misleading".[36][56] Others have also criticised Benefits Street, arguing it does not present a balanced view of the subject. Labour MP Anne Begg, chair of the Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee, said that the programme was a "misrepresentation" of people claiming benefits, arguing that it focused on those claiming unemployment benefits which makes up a small proportion of the overall welfare bill.[57] Referring to the first episode that featured a shoplifter, Chris Williamson (also a Labour MP) said it was "irresponsible" to portray him as a typical benefits claimant.[58] Owen Jones, a columnist for The Independent described the series as "medieval stocks updated for a modern format".[59] In an article for the Birmingham Mail, writer and television personality Samantha Brick, a native of Birminggham, said that the series was an "atrociously unbalanced" view of the city.[60]
Fraser Nelson, editor of The Spectator, suggested the programme had highlighted a section of society who have been forgotten by the politicians: "These people are people who otherwise don’t have a voice. They don’t vote, so for many years they have just not mattered".[61] Nelson's comments were echoed by Dominic Sandbrook in the Daily Mail, who felt the programme portrayed its participants sympathetically: "The real scandal of Benefits Street, in fact, is what it tells us about a welfare system that abandons thousands of people – through no fault of their own – to a life without hope or ambition, effectively turning them into an underclass, dependent on the charity of the State."[4] Charlie Brooker also felt the programme had been "broadly sympathetic" to those it portrays.[62] In the Daily Mirror, entrepreneur John Bird, founder of The Big Issue wrote that although Benefits Street did not fully represent the spectrum of people who claim benefits, it did show what could happen to those forgotten by the system "who get caught in a kind of social suicide".[63]
The Birmingham Mail reported on 10 February that figures released to the newspaper by Birmingham City Council's fraud investigation service indicated instances of benefit fraud in the city were lower than had been suggested by the documentary, with 851 prosecutions in the five years preceding 2014, an average of 0.5% of total benefit claimants. Furthermore, of the 152,000 housing benefit claimants in Birmingham, 178 were prosecuted for fraudulent claims in 2013.[64]
The Big Benefits Row: Live
Channel 5 aired The Big Benefits Row: Live, their own unconnected debate about the welfare state on Monday 3 February. Presented by Matthew Wright, the show featured a panel of guests made up of Conservative MP Edwina Currie, reality television star Katie Hopkins, former London Mayor Ken Livingstone, broadcaster Terry Christian, former model Annabel Giles, and two people associated with James Turner Street – charity campaigner Rev. Steve Chalke and Dierdre Kelly, who has appeared in Benefits Street.[65][66] The programme was watched by 2.1 million viewers.[67] The Daily Express described it as a "heated debate" in which Hopkins was heavily critical of Kelly for claiming welfare, and of Giles's modelling career.[68] The Independent's Jess Denham felt that Hopkins's "larger-than-life personality" had dominated proceedings, while "fact-based arguments were lost to the non-stop barrage of immature tempers".[69] The Daily Mirror described it as "a mess of a programme and a joke of a discussion".[70]
Public reception
The first episode of the series attracted several hundred complaints both to Channel 4 and the media regulator Ofcom from viewers over a variety of issues. According to The Guardian, complaints were received about alleged criminal activities, foul language and misleading portrayals of welfare claimants.[71] By 8 January 2014, two days after the series debuted, Benefits Street had attracted 300 complaints to Ofcom and 400 to Channel 4.[71] Three weeks later that figure had collectively increased to 1,700.[22] Ofcom said that it would assess the viewer feedback before deciding whether to launch an investigation.[72] Additionally, an online petition calling for Channel 4 to cancel the remaining episodes was launched, attracting 3,000 signatures by 8 January.[71] 60,000 people had signed it by the time the series ended on 10 February.[73] The trade union Unite organised a protest at the offices of Love Productions on the afternoon of 13 January. A group of 30 people attended.[74]
Following the first episode, West Midlands Police said they had received a number of complaints from members of the public about alleged criminal activities that had been filmed, which they were considering whether to investigate.[7] Alleged death threats by Twitter users against the residents were also being probed.[6][75] Channel 4 said they would not provide investigators with any unbroadcast material from Benefits Street unless issued with a court order to do so.[6]
The Birmingham Mail reported on 9 January that the programme had attracted an influx of tourists to the street, who wished to have their picture taken by the James Turner Street road sign.[76] Police advised visitors to stay away.[77] Steve Chalke, founder of the Oasis Academy Foundry, a charity that runs a primary school in James Turner Street subsequently said that visitors had disrupted activity at the school and that he was preparing a complaint for Ofcom.[78][79]
Critical reception
Several James Turner Street residents have claimed they were tricked into appearing in the series by Love Productions, who they say told them it would be about community spirit. One resident told the Birmingham Mail, "They told me it was about living as a community and how we all got along. But the actual programme doesn't show any of that. If they had said it was about benefits and making the street look bad I would not have taken part. They tricked us."[37] Responding to allegations the residents were duped, Nick Mirsky said that Love Productions had spent much time consulting the residents before filming began, and that process continued afterwards: "Key contributors have been offered viewings of the programmes during the editing period and were given the opportunity to comment on them. Both Love and Channel 4 listened to any concerns raised, and in some cases made changes to the programme to accommodate them."[11]
Sources including The Independent and Broadcast reported that several commentators had accused Channel 4 of making "poverty porn".[7][80] In response, Ralph Lee refuted those accusations during a debate on the 9 January edition of BBC Two's Newsnight programme: "It’s inaccurate and it’s patronising towards the people that take part in these programmes and open up their lives, and it’s quite offensive to the people who make them."[80] Mirsky claimed the reaction to Benefits Street demonstrated how it had "touched a nerve" and subsequently proved it was "essential" the series was made.[81] The boss of Love Productions, Richard McKerrow, also defended the series, saying it was not about "demonising the poor...It’s a very honest and true portrayal of life in Britain and people are frightened of it."[48] Writing as the series concluded, The Daily Telegraph's Neil Midgley felt that Benefits Street had not exploited its participants, and was "definitely the kind of series that Channel 4 should be making: easy to grasp and innovative, and yet a blinding revelation of some ills that are at the heart of modern Britain."[46]
Emma Johnson, the head teacher at the street's primary school, organised a public meeting on the evening of 15 January to discuss issues raised by the programme.[82] The event was attended by around 100 residents from the area. BBC journalist David Lumb said some residents became irritated and felt that the meeting was being used as an opportunity to "preach a political agenda".[83] Those present were told that an employed couple who were filmed for the series were dropped from the final version. Love Productions said this was because the show was about people on benefits, and one of the unnamed pair was a benefits officer.[83]
After the third episode was televised on 20 January, the Daily Mail reported that community leaders and residents had accused Channel 4 of exploiting children, claiming it had led to the children featured in the documentary becoming targets for bullying. In response, a Channel 4 spokeswoman said that consent from parents and guardians, and the children themselves was obtained before filming began "in accordance with the relevant sections of the Ofcom broadcasting code. Any children without consent have been blurred in programmes."[40][84]
Viewership
Overnight figures indicated the show's first episode attracted 4.3 million viewers and a 17.7% share of viewing, more than any Channel 4 show in the whole of 2013.[85] The second instalment, aired on 13 January, saw an increase of almost a million viewers to 5.1 million, a 20.8% share of the audience and beating ITV's The Bletchley Circle and an edition of Panorama on BBC One and its own former show Celebrity Big Brother (now on Channel 5) which aired in the same time slot.[74] The third episode drew 5.2 million viewers giving it a 21.2% share of the audience, making it the most popular programme in the 9pm time slot for the second week in a row, and giving Channel 4 their highest ratings since their coverage of the closing ceremony of the 2012 Summer Paralympics in September 2012.[9][86] The fourth episode attracted less viewers, however, with an average of 4.1 million, and was behind the first part of Jeremy Paxman's World War I documentary series, Britain's Great War, which aired on BBC One and had an average viewership of 4.23 million.[87] The final episode drew 4.5 million viewers, an 18.6% audience share, but was beaten by ITV's DCI Banks which was watched by an average 6 million viewers.[88]
Episode no. | Date | Total viewers (including +1)[89] (in millions) |
Share | Channel 4 weekly ranking[89] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 January 2014 | 5.42 | 14.4% | 1 |
2 | 13 January 2014 | 6.45 | 17.5% | 1 |
3 | 20 January 2014 | 6.48 | 18.4% | 1 |
4 | 27 January 2014 | 5.87 | 16.9% | 1 |
5 | 10 February 2014 | 4.5 | 16.0% | 1 |
References
- ^ a b c Wright, Stephen; Dolan, Andy; Infante, Francesca (7 January 2014). "Backlash over TV lessons in how to shoplift: Flood of complaints triggers police probe into Channel 4 documentary". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
- ^ a b c d Henley, Jon (29 January 2014). "Benefits Street: the hard-working history that Channel 4 left out". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 29 January 2014.
- ^ Philipson, Alice (8 January 2014). "Channel 4 documentary Benefits Street faces police investigation". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
- ^ a b Sandbrook, Dominic (18 January 2014). "No, Benefits Street does NOT demonise the poor. But it shows how immoral it is to let welfare pay more than working". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
- ^ Hanley, Lynsey (8 January 2014). "Channel 4 has betrayed the residents of Benefits Street". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
- ^ a b c "'Demonised' or 'humane'? Row breaks out on Benefits Street". Channel 4. 7 January 2014. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
- ^ a b c d e Burrell, Ian (7 January 2014). "'Benefits Street': Channel 4 documentary sparks anger and threats of violence". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ "Benefits Street: Birmingham documentary 'encouraged crime'". BBC. 7 January 2014. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
- ^ a b Pleasance, Chris (21 January 2014). "Benefits Street gives Channel 4 its highest ratings since 2012". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ Doward, Jamie; Conlan, Tara (18 January 2014). "BBC rejected early version of Benefits Street two years ago". The Observer. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ a b c d Mirsky, Nick (10 January 2014). "Benefits Street struck a nerve – exposing how vital a documentary it is". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ a b Wyatt, Daisy (10 January 2014). "Benefits Street: Channel 4 boss denies show's residents were duped". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ Laws, Roz (13 January 2014). "Frank Skinner turned down Benefits Street job over fears about how Brummies would be portrayed". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- ^ Collier, Hatty (7 January 2014). "Channel 4's Benefits Street claims 4.3 million viewers". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ "Benefits Street: White Dee Invites Nick Clegg". Sky News. British Sky Broadcasting. 22 January 2014. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ "Channel 4 commissions Benefits Street live debate". Channel 4. 16 January 2014. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ White, Peter (16 January 2014). "C4 plans Benefits Street live debate". Broadcast. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ Plunkett, John (16 January 2014). "Benefits Street: residents to get the right of reply in live TV debate". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ Deans, Jason (6 February 2014). "Benefits Street: Channel 4 moves live debate show back a week". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
- ^ "Benefits Street: Seven charged with drug offences". BBC News. BBC. 25 January 2014. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
- ^ Withnall, Adam (26 January 2014). "Benefits Street residents charged with drug offences". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
- ^ a b Glennie, Alasdair (27 January 2014). "Channel 4's Benefits Street receives 1,700 complaints". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
- ^ Hall, John; Hastings, Chris (26 January 2014). "Tory Paul Nischal 'pockets thousands' by renting out Benefits Street house". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
- ^ a b Suart, Paul (23 January 2014). "Ebay sellers cashing in on Benefits Street". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- ^ Suart, Paul (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street makers planning second series". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 10 February 2014.
- ^ "Channel 5 developing Benefits Street-style series - TV News". Digital Spy. 12 February 2014. Retrieved 12 February 2014.
- ^ Greenwood, Carl (12 February 2014). "Benefits Street: Channel 5 announces it is developing own Benefits Street style series called Living on the Social - Mirror Online". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 12 February 2014.
- ^ a b Chinn, Carl (10 January 2014). "Carl Chinn on Benefits Street history". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 24 January 2014.
- ^ a b Fricker, Martin (22 January 2014). "Benefits Street: James Turner Street in Birmingham was named after hard-working teacher". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- ^ a b c d Cavallaro, Cassandra (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street: 'Living the dream' 100 years ago". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 10 February 2014.
- ^ Newton, Jennifer (12 February 2014). "Benefits Street's White Dee says she will stand as MP". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 12 February 2014.
- ^ "My Local Information/". Birmingham City Council. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ a b c Tyler, Jane (22 January 2014). "Benefits Street: The man behind TV's most notorious street". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ a b "Benefits Street: The real James Turner – a respected teacher – would 'turn in his grave'". Daily Express. Northern and Shell. 23 January 2014. Retrieved 24 January 2014.
- ^ a b c d McCabe, Steven (6 February 2014). "Benefits Street - and a warning from history". Birmingham Post. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
- ^ a b "Benefits Street is excuse for viewers to judge and sneer, says Clare Short". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. 4 February 2014. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
{{cite news}}
:|first=
missing|last=
(help) - ^ a b Suart, Paul (6 January 2014). "Benefits Street TV show lied to us, say Winson Green residents". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Young, Graham (7 January 2014). "Review: Benefits Street – Graham Young's verdict on Birmingham TV show". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ a b Rahim, Sameer (13 January 2014). "Benefits Street, episode 2, Channel 4, review". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ a b Cooper, Rob (21 January 2014). "Benefits Street child exploitation row". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
- ^ Davies, Serena (20 January 2014). "Benefits Street, episode 3, Channel 4, review". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 22 January 2014.
- ^ Lawrence, Ban (28 January 2014). "Benefits Street, episode four, review". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- ^ Laws, Roz (28 January 2014). "REVIEW: Benefits Street, Episode Four". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- ^ Shelley, Jim (11 February 2014). "Benefits Street saved its most controversial moment to the end". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ Young, Graham (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street has engaged and enraged the nation in equal measure". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ a b Midgley, Neil (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street, final episode, Channel 4, review". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ "TV review: Benefits Street final episode". Express & Star. Midland News Association. 11 February 2014. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ a b McTague, Tom (13 January 2014). "Benefits Street: Iain Duncan Smith uses poverty porn show to justify savage Tory welfare cuts". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- ^ Dominiczak, Peter (22 January 2014). "Iain Duncan Smith: I'll stop Benefits Street Britain". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ a b Wintour, Patrick (22 January 2014). "Benefits Street reveals 'ghetto' reality, says Iain Duncan Smith". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ "Benefits Street reaction shows poor 'ghettoised', says Duncan Smith". BBC News. BBC. 23 January 2014. Retrieved 26 January 2014.
- ^ a b "PMQs: Benefit Street 'in every constituency' says MP". BBC News. BBC. 15 January 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ "MP stands by his 'Benefits Street' in every constituency comments". Western Telegraph. 20 January 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ "Duncan Hames, MP for Chippenham – 'Reality TV' does nothing for those wanting to work". The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald. Newsquest. 23 January 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Walker, Jonathan (9 January 2014). "Channel 4 show Benefits Street exploits the poor, says Birmingham MP". Birmingham Post. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Jefferies, Mark (4 February 2014). "Benefits Street: Channel 4 series is "totally unrepresentative" of the area, says former Labour MP Clare Short". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ "Benefits Street is a 'misrepresentation' of life on welfare, says MP". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. 10 January 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ "Channel 4's Benefits Street blasted as 'irresponsible' by Derby Labour MP". Derby Telegraph. 14 January 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Elgot, Jessica (10 January 2014). "Owen Jones Tears Into Channel 4's Ralph Lee Over Benefits Street On Newsnight". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 31 January 2014.
- ^ Savvas, Christina (6 February 2014). "Samantha Brick defends Birmingham after Benefits Street - "We're not all on the take and Channel 4 twisted show'". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
- ^ Nelson, Fraser (17 January 2014). "Benefits Street: the real scandal". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 19 January 2014.
- ^ Brooker, Charlie (12 January 2014). "Benefits Street – poverty porn, or just the latest target for pent-up British fury?". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Bird, John (6 February 2014). "Big Issue founder John Bird says Benefits Street demonstrates the cycle of poverty and self-destruction which the current welfare system actually encourages". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
- ^ McCarthy, Nick (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street: The truth about benefit fraud in Birmingham". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 12 February 2014.
- ^ Henderson, Eugene; Davis, Matthew (2 February 2014). "Beyond Benefits Street: Ghettos with 70% unemployment and no future". Sunday Express. Northern and Shell. Retrieved 2 February 2014.
- ^ Wyatt, Daisy (3 February 2014). "Benefits Street's White Dee to join Katie Hopkins in live televised benefits debate". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 3 February 2014.
- ^ Plunkett, John (4 February 2014). "Channel 5 reaps reward of the Benefits Street bandwagon". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Dassanayake, Dion (3 February 2014). "The Big Benefits Row: Katie Hopkins and White Dee go head to head in welfare debate". Daily Express. Northern and Shell. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Denham, Jess (4 February 2014). "The Big Benefits Row, TV review: 'Live debate became one big Katie Hopkins Show'". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ Leigh, Rob (4 February 2014). "The Big Benefits Row Live: Channel 5 'Benefits Street' debate with Katie Hopkins and White Dee, as it happened". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
- ^ a b c Collier, Hatty (8 January 2014). "Benefits Street backlash continues as petition calls for series to be axed". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 14 January 2014.
- ^ Suart, Paul (15 January 2014). "Huge viewer backlash over Benefits Street". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- ^ Suart, Paul (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street set for second series - but camera crews will not be returning to James Turner Street". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 10 February 2014.
- ^ a b Plunkett, John (14 January 2014). "Benefits Street adds nearly 1 million viewers for second episode". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- ^ Denham, Jess (8 January 2014). "Benefits Street Twitter reactions: The angry, the idiotic and the defensive". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Capelo, Esh (9 January 2014). "Benefits Street becomes tourist attraction with people taking 'selfies' by road sign". Birmingham Mail. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 1 February 2014.
- ^ Lawton, Jerry (11 January 2014). "Police urge the public to stay away from James Turner Street". Daily Star. Northern and Shell. Retrieved 1 February 2014.
- ^ Spence, Alex (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street pupils 'afraid to go to school'" (subscription required). The Times. News International. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ Arkell, Harriet (10 February 2014). "Benefits Street now a tourist attraction as the show prepares for its final episode". Daily Mail. Daily Mail and General Trust. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ a b Kanter, Jake (10 January 2014). "C4 rejects Benefits Street's 'poverty porn' tag". Broadcast. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
- ^ Missim, Mayer (13 January 2014). "Benefits Street protest takes place at Love Productions London offices". Digital Spy. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- ^ Elkes, Neil (13 January 2014). "Benefits Street school leads fightback for community 'demonised' by controversial Channel 4 show". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
- ^ a b "Benefits Street: Working couple 'cut' from Channel 4 show". BBC News. BBC. 16 January 2014. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
- ^ Edgar, James (22 January 2014). "Channel 4 accused of exploiting children for Benefits Street". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
- ^ Suart, Paul (6 January 2013). "Benefits Street: Channel 4 documentary stars hit out at portrayal of life in James Turner Street, Birmingham". Daily Mirror. Trinity Mirror. Retrieved 9 January 2014.
- ^ McConnell, Fred (21 January 2014). "Benefits Street draws more than 5m for a second week". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
- ^ Eames, Tom (28 January 2014). "Benefits Street dips to 4.1 million on Channel 4". Digital Spy. Retrieved 28 January 2014.
- ^ Deans, Jason (11 February 2014). "Benefits Street ending pulls in 4.5 million". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 11 February 2014.
- ^ a b "Weekly Top 30 Programmes". Broadcasters' Audience Research Board. Retrieved 12 February 2014.