Jump to content

Talk:James Foley (journalist): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Worldedixor (talk | contribs)
→‎Crank conspiracy theorists: Rm as per NOTAFORUM. Also, this is not the place to request changing NOTAFORUM
Worldedixor (talk | contribs)
Rm as per NOTAFORUM, BLP and NPOV. It is OK to have reasonable doubts about the video but no need to slander the US Government
Line 43: Line 43:
:Its not affirmed just yet. [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-19/islamic-extremist-video-shows-beheading-of-american.html][http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-08-20/james-foley-s-murder >> What James Foley's Murder Says About Islamic State]. Also the deate doesnt have to be when it was reported by video[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 15:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
:Its not affirmed just yet. [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-19/islamic-extremist-video-shows-beheading-of-american.html][http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-08-20/james-foley-s-murder >> What James Foley's Murder Says About Islamic State]. Also the deate doesnt have to be when it was reported by video[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 15:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
::Based on up to the minute news from NSC, video and beheading have been confirmed. [https://news.yahoo.com/video-u-journalists-authentic-nsc-154740127.html] [[User:Worldedixor|Worldedixor]] ([[User talk:Worldedixor|talk]]) 17:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
::Based on up to the minute news from NSC, video and beheading have been confirmed. [https://news.yahoo.com/video-u-journalists-authentic-nsc-154740127.html] [[User:Worldedixor|Worldedixor]] ([[User talk:Worldedixor|talk]]) 17:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

== Slander/falsehoods about Foley ==

"Convicted and executed as a spy and assassin"? "Pedophile"? Who keeps posting this stuff? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/63.84.193.164|63.84.193.164]] ([[User talk:63.84.193.164|talk]]) 15:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Vandals and trolls. [[WP:BDP]] applies, Biography of Living persons applies to the recently deceased, and those whose deaths may legitimately questioned (as in the bloomberg reference above). [[User talk:Martin451|Martin'''<font style="color:#FB0">4</font><font style="color:#F00">5</font><font style="color:#F60">1</font>''']] 16:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

== Live video of Obama statement on Foley execution ==

[https://news.yahoo.com/video/abc-news-plus-special-report-220000361.html] -- [[User:Green Cardamom|<font color="#006A4E">'''Green'''</font>]][[User_talk:Green Cardamom|<font color="#009933">'''C'''</font>]] 16:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

:Confirmed dead by the President of the United State and the video is accurate as it appears. Please ignore sources saying otherwise. -- [[User:Green Cardamom|<font color="#006A4E">'''Green'''</font>]][[User_talk:Green Cardamom|<font color="#009933">'''C'''</font>]] 16:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

::Yes, only pay attention to authorities that lied to the public to start a war in the first place. That makes so much sense.{{unsignedIP|‎188.220.31.204}}
:::You are free to disbelieve President Obama, but the fact remains that he said it. We deal in [[WP:TRUTH|verifiability not truth]]. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 00:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
::::For your information:[[September Dossier]] {{unsignedIP|‎188.220.31.204}}
:::::I'm not sure what that is supposed to prove. As I stated, you can believe what you wish, but that does not change the fact that the statement was made. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 01:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) I'm not debating the fact that Obama has stated that he can confiem the death of Mr Foley is dead which is both tragic and a shame. Did Obama also state as quoted by Green Cardamom that the "video is as accurate as it appears"?[[Special:Contributions/188.220.31.204|188.220.31.204]] ([[User talk:188.220.31.204|talk]]) 01:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
::::::Green Cardamon was not quoting the President, nor was he saying such a statement should be on this page; he was stating his opinion. Feel free to disagree. Or, if you know of [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that have impugned the credibility or accuracy of the video, please offer them. That said, the National Security Council (answerable to the President) has found the video to be accurate. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 01:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
:::::::Do the CIA or similar intelligence organisations count as reliable sources?[[Special:Contributions/188.220.31.204|188.220.31.204]] ([[User talk:188.220.31.204|talk]]) 01:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
::::::::On the question if the video is real yes they are reliable, since they report to the NSC. Please see [[WP:NOTAFORUM]], this is not a soapbox to attack the credibility of the United States government intelligence community in general. -- [[User:Green Cardamom|<font color="#006A4E">'''Green'''</font>]][[User_talk:Green Cardamom|<font color="#009933">'''C'''</font>]] 01:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


== ISIS or not ISIS? ==
== ISIS or not ISIS? ==

Revision as of 16:23, 21 August 2014

Suggested change of name

I suggest changing the name of this article to "James Foley (photo-journalist)".

Perhaps we could also move the "James Foley" to "James Foley (film director)".

Then we could set the "James Foley" page to be the disambiguation page.
Aberdeen01 (talk) 03:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I started it at this title because I initially saw reports about him using his full name and thought using that would be better than a career disambiguation, but I have no problem with using one if that's what users want. I don't know enough about the director Foley to know if that page should be moved. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Others at Category:American photojournalists use this format. The director is hatnoted. — Wyliepedia 18:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Authenticity

I think there should be a section of the article dealing with the authenticity. In particular focusing on the authenticity of:

  • whether the man speaking is indeed James Foley
  • whether the captives are indeed ISIS ( aka IS)
  • whether the man is indeed killed

Aberdeen01 (talk) 03:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Death confirmed

It is inapproprite to list "cause of death" as beheading. It can be listed as a means of execution or murder but the graphic nature and the description beheading is not a standard way of listing cause of death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.102.58 (talk) 04:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foley's family has confirmed his death. The family is the first to be notified. It would be a shame if this article became a monument to conspiracy theory and "what ifs" by the press and pundits. -- GreenC 05:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did the video show a still picture of the aftermath without showing the actual beheading? This is the first IS video that does not show the actual beheading which raises a reasonable doubt. Also, the alleged murderer in black spoke with a British accent which is not the norm for IS. The White House could not confirm and many news media are saying that there is a little chance that the video was fake.Worldedixor (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you have the sick need to actually view the beheading itself? (Read WP:NPA). Considering that the video was released by IS through their "official" channels, we can conclude it is authentic. Additionally, the family members of Foley have confirmed his death. IS has beheaded more than just a couple of people, it appears to be their M.O. as of late. There is no reasonable doubt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.183.232.24 (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly Wikipedia is not the place where people should publish there own theories, but when there is a debate we can report the debate. Are there some good reliable sources that can answer the following three questions:
* Was the American who spoke in the video James Foley?
* Was he killed?
* Was he killed by ISIS ( aka IS)?
Aberdeen01 (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Its not affirmed just yet. [1]>> What James Foley's Murder Says About Islamic State. Also the deate doesnt have to be when it was reported by videoLihaas (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Based on up to the minute news from NSC, video and beheading have been confirmed. [2] Worldedixor (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ISIS or not ISIS?

Intro:

"he was abducted and later killed by a fundamentalist militia in northwestern Syria...Foley is the first American killed by ISIS militia"

I understand that - at least earlier today, fill me in - it was unsure whether it was ISIS who did it. If it was, then the intro should say:

"he was abducted and later killed by an ISIS militia in northwestern Syria...Foley is the first American killed by ISIS militia"

And if we still don't know, then all references to ISIS in the lead should be removed unless they have a "reported" or "alleged" before them. '''tAD''' (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He was killed by ISIS this is verified by the highest level sources per the article (see footnotes). Who abducted him in 2012 is open for discussion. -- GreenC 23:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Cameron

British Prime Minister David Cameron cut short a holiday to hold meetings after the murder, due to a strong likelihood that the murderer was British. Can this go in the article, or is that making it more an article on the incident (execution) rather than a biography? http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/20/isis-fighter-beheaded-us-journalist-james-foley-appears-british-hammond '''tAD''' (talk) 23:21, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The murderer in question was described as having a British-sounding accent or apparently sounding British. That can and should be included if properly sourced. If it turns out that he is a British citizen, then by all means, no censorship. But I don't think it has been established yet for encyclopedic standards. Quis separabit? 01:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Religion RC Church

Wasn't he Roman Catholic as some site said he prayed the rosary in detention? See [3] and [4] 62.205.66.50 (talk) 02:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add it as I find several newspapers mention it too.--T. Anthony (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]