Jump to content

User talk:Erictheenquirer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tag: contentious topics alert
Line 117: Line 117:
Hello Eric. I saw that you suggested several additions on the talk page, and put them there for comment first. I made a comment on the inappropriateness of some of the material, but it appears that you have added it anyway. Could you review the talk page comments? Also, it appears that you have messed up some code somewhere on the page, as below a certain point it is all offset – could you fix this please? Thanks, [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 21:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Eric. I saw that you suggested several additions on the talk page, and put them there for comment first. I made a comment on the inappropriateness of some of the material, but it appears that you have added it anyway. Could you review the talk page comments? Also, it appears that you have messed up some code somewhere on the page, as below a certain point it is all offset – could you fix this please? Thanks, [[User:Number 57|<font color="orange">Number</font>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<font color="green">5</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<font color="blue">7</font>]] 21:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Number 57}}Regrettably I am unable to find the cause of the formatting wobble. Not sure what to do now. [[User:Erictheenquirer|Erictheenquirer]] ([[User talk:Erictheenquirer#top|talk]]) 08:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Number 57}}Regrettably I am unable to find the cause of the formatting wobble. Not sure what to do now. [[User:Erictheenquirer|Erictheenquirer]] ([[User talk:Erictheenquirer#top|talk]]) 08:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:'''

The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->

Revision as of 02:59, 19 January 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Erictheenquirer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Erictheenquirer, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Erictheenquirer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Arab to Israeli Towns, 1948-67 | publisher=Middle Eastern Studies, | work=Vol. 39 No. 4 | date=(Oct. 2003 | author=Arnon Golan | pages=121–139}}</ref> Kadish and Sela write that, according to the
  • Sela's paper, John W. Pool concluded: ""... on the morning of July 12, 1948, ‘The Palmach forces [in Lyddal came under heavy fire from ‘thousands of weapons from every house, roof and window’

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine article

Hi Eric, I reverted you earlier with the comment "Revert most, in the spirit of WP:BRD. Could we add back in more summary form? Too much text here unbalances the article. More can go in to History of Palestine)", but you then reverted me. BRD means the onus is on you to discuss at the article talk page.

Palestine has a history of many thousands of years - if we had so many paragraphs for every few hundred years as you are suggesting, the whole article will become too long.

That's why we have the History of Palestine article.

Could you please reconsider?

Oncenawhile (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC) OK. Give me a day of three and I will check. Erictheenquirer (talk) 11:00, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erictheenquirer. You have new messages at Oncenawhile's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Israeli Security Agency, http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/EnTerrorData/Reports/Pages/default.aspx]</ref> Following the Israeli threats regarding Fatah-Hamas reconciliation efforts during April 2014<
  • php?id=18987 Israel Hayom | Israel opens alternate airport after wave of flight cancellations <img src="http://www.israelhayom.co.il/site/upload/photos/video_icon/video_icon_24.png" style=...<!--

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Background for 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict

Hi. I have commented on the talk page about the edit you made. Kingsindian (talk) 17:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamas may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Policy"] The Heritage Foundation. June 27, 2007</ref> Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Mexico,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?c=7oJILSPwFfJSG&b=8478237&
  • Palestine Policy |publisher=Jamestown.org |date= |accessdate=2014-08-02}}</ref>, South Africa,<ref>{cite web | url=http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/2007pq/pq1095.htm | title=Status on the Relations between

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 16 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference error

In the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict you added some information and referenced "Shabak2013" without defining it. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Israel%E2%80%93Gaza_conflict&diff=622035617&oldid=622015785 ((If I can be of assistance, let me know))Yaakovaryeh (talk) 03:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 25 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is User:Enquiringeric a previous account of yours? Brad Dyer (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - I lost an email address and then a password and had great difficulty in trying to retrieve it, so I created a new account.Erictheenquirer (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , thanks. Any other previous accounts you'd like to disclose? Brad Dyer (talk) 16:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope - only have the one active account. Any idea how I can get rid of the redundant (inaccessible) Enquiringeric account? I hate having loose ends lying around, and there is always the risk of bad-faith accusations of "sock-puppeteering". Your help would be much appreciated. Erictheenquirer (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you previously edited under any other accounts (whether inactive now, or IP)? Epeefleche (talk) 20:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have only ever had two accounts as I explained to Brad Dyer, with similar names. I had problems (password and/or logging onto G-mail) with one of them, so I abandoned it. I now only use Erictheenquirer. I am sure that it can be verified that there is no overlap between the two in time. I asked Brad if he knew how to get rid of the redundant User:Enquiringeric, but it seems that he did not, so unfortunately this will continue to be the case in the future, and there appears to be nothing that I can do about it. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Epeefleche and Brad Dyer:Since this is the second time that I have received a question on this topic I have initiated greater efforts to try to get the old user-name erased - it appears that there are indeed means to do so. In the process I discovered that the past problem was not with my G-mail account, so I can only presume that I had Wiki password problems. I will keep this page informed of progress. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Have you had any other accounts? Even if their names were not similar? Or they are not active (other than the one disclosed above; Enquiringeric)? Or have you edited otherwise as an IP? Happy new year. Epeefleche (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, to all questions. As stated before, I only remember 2 accounts, and only one of those is in current use. Erictheenquirer (talk) 09:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Epeefleche and Brad Dyer:I have reported the additional account to Admin, and they have duly noted it. It seems that it is not necessary for me to seek cancellation of the earlier account, because the Wiki rule is not to USE more than one account. Simply HAVING more than one is not a violation. Done and dusted. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 20 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eric. I saw that you suggested several additions on the talk page, and put them there for comment first. I made a comment on the inappropriateness of some of the material, but it appears that you have added it anyway. Could you review the talk page comments? Also, it appears that you have messed up some code somewhere on the page, as below a certain point it is all offset – could you fix this please? Thanks, Number 57 21:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57:Regrettably I am unable to find the cause of the formatting wobble. Not sure what to do now. Erictheenquirer (talk) 08:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Template:Z33