Jump to content

User talk:PBerzinski04: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Your submission at Articles for creation (AFCH)
COI?: new section
Line 111: Line 111:
*You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help live chat help from experienced editors].
*You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help live chat help from experienced editors].
:Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div>
:Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div>

== COI? ==

I'm concerned that the relationship your company (as stated in your own user page bio at [[User:PBerzinski04/Patrick Berzinski]]) has with Innovation Strategies (as stated on the company's client list [http://tranquility49.com/clients/]), run by [[Harold J. Raveché]], and your editing of Raveché's article (for instance, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_J._Ravech%C3%A9&diff=642808453&oldid=641738402 this edit], which materially changes the tone of a critical section of the article) may constitute a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. If your company represents Raveché's company, as it appears it does, it would seem irresponsible of you to make significant changes to the article according to the COI policy I linked above. I don't think your edits are ''necessarily'' harmful; I just don't know if you should be the one making them. Can you clarify your relationship? --[[User:Fru1tbat|Fru1tbat]] ([[User talk:Fru1tbat|talk]]) 02:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:43, 21 January 2015

Hello, PBerzinski04, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 22:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Teahouse

Teahouse logo
Hello! PBerzinski04, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Terry Mulligan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

COI?

I'm concerned that the relationship your company (as stated in your own user page bio at User:PBerzinski04/Patrick Berzinski) has with Innovation Strategies (as stated on the company's client list [1]), run by Harold J. Raveché, and your editing of Raveché's article (for instance, this edit, which materially changes the tone of a critical section of the article) may constitute a conflict of interest. If your company represents Raveché's company, as it appears it does, it would seem irresponsible of you to make significant changes to the article according to the COI policy I linked above. I don't think your edits are necessarily harmful; I just don't know if you should be the one making them. Can you clarify your relationship? --Fru1tbat (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]