User talk:PBerzinski04: Difference between revisions
Your submission at Articles for creation (AFCH) |
→COI?: new section |
||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
*You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help live chat help from experienced editors]. |
*You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help live chat help from experienced editors]. |
||
:Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div> |
:Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline--></div> |
||
== COI? == |
|||
I'm concerned that the relationship your company (as stated in your own user page bio at [[User:PBerzinski04/Patrick Berzinski]]) has with Innovation Strategies (as stated on the company's client list [http://tranquility49.com/clients/]), run by [[Harold J. Raveché]], and your editing of Raveché's article (for instance, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harold_J._Ravech%C3%A9&diff=642808453&oldid=641738402 this edit], which materially changes the tone of a critical section of the article) may constitute a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]]. If your company represents Raveché's company, as it appears it does, it would seem irresponsible of you to make significant changes to the article according to the COI policy I linked above. I don't think your edits are ''necessarily'' harmful; I just don't know if you should be the one making them. Can you clarify your relationship? --[[User:Fru1tbat|Fru1tbat]] ([[User talk:Fru1tbat|talk]]) 02:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:43, 21 January 2015
|
Teahouse
Hello! PBerzinski04,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Terry Mulligan.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! John F. Lewis (talk) 00:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Berzinski.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
COI?
I'm concerned that the relationship your company (as stated in your own user page bio at User:PBerzinski04/Patrick Berzinski) has with Innovation Strategies (as stated on the company's client list [1]), run by Harold J. Raveché, and your editing of Raveché's article (for instance, this edit, which materially changes the tone of a critical section of the article) may constitute a conflict of interest. If your company represents Raveché's company, as it appears it does, it would seem irresponsible of you to make significant changes to the article according to the COI policy I linked above. I don't think your edits are necessarily harmful; I just don't know if you should be the one making them. Can you clarify your relationship? --Fru1tbat (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)