User talk:Rationalobserver

Hello, Rationalobserver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Voorts 71 1 3 99 21:06, 8 November 2024 6 days, 1 hour no report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 19:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Peer Review for Bharat Ratna

Hi. I have listed Bharat Ratna for peer review. Its currently a GA and I would like to take it FAC in the near future. I would really appreciate if you could find some time and provide your comments here. Thanks in advance. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Vivvt, I'll make a review over there tomorrow. Okay? RO^(talk) 22:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

That's absolutely fine. - Vivvt (Talk) 06:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration statement Suggestion

Hi Rationalobserver,

Could we ask you to review your second and forth paragraphs of your statement as there are statements that could be considered as personal attacks or aspersions.

For the Arbitration Committee Amortias (T)(C) 17:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

I've copyedited it to soften that aspect, but no. I won't remove them altogether. RO^(talk) 17:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

GD's lament.

I sure do envy EC's supporters, though. I could've used that kinda support, a few years ago ;) GoodDay (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

We could all use that kind of support! Did you get banned or something? RO^(talk) 22:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

I served a full year, followed by another year on probation. But, I survived it all. My experiences inspired me to become a member of WP:RETENTION. -- GoodDay (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

What on earth did you get a one year sentence for? RO^(talk) 22:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Very complicated. You'd have to read my Arb-case :) GoodDay (talk) 22:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Ahh, it's probably better I don't! I'd rather take you at face value and without prejudice. RO^(talk) 22:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

No probs ;) GoodDay (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Vested contributors arbitration case opened

You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 01:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Vested contributors retitled Arbitration enforcement 2

You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. For this case, there will be no Workshop phase. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Peer review

Hai, kindly consider giving a peer review to the film article Drishyam. Already made a request for review. --Charles Turing (talk) 14:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

I left some comments there. RO^(talk) 21:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much.--Charles Turing (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Biblioworm, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Bbb23 (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)